Who Will be Evaluated Sample Clauses

The "Who Will be Evaluated" clause defines which individuals, teams, or entities are subject to assessment under the terms of an agreement or policy. Typically, this clause specifies whether the evaluation applies to employees, contractors, departments, or other relevant parties, and may outline criteria or roles that determine inclusion. Its core function is to clearly identify the scope of evaluation, ensuring all parties understand who will be reviewed and thereby preventing misunderstandings or disputes about the evaluation process.
Who Will be Evaluated. A. All teachers shall be formally evaluated in accordance with the standards-based statewide teacher evaluation 50/50 framework as outlined in the Ohio Revised Code (“ORC”), consisting of 50% Teacher Performance and 50% Student Growth Measures (Value-Added, SLO, Vendor). B. The following teachers will be evaluated using evaluation instruments mutually agreed by the Association and the District that comply with the law: 1. school counselor; 2. speech; 3. psychologist; 4. librarian; 5. licensed/certified staff member assigned to work with students less than fifty percent (50%) of the time. C. All other licensed/certified staff members assigned to work with students at least fifty percent (50%) of the time will be evaluated using the Teacher Performance Evaluation Rubric and the Student Growth Measures as prescribed in ORC. D. These procedures shall not apply to co-curricular or other supplemental contracts.
Who Will be Evaluated. 1. The evaluation system covered in Article 12 shall apply to any person employed under a teacher’s license or a professional or permanent teacher’s certificate in accordance with law, or a permit issued under O.R.C. 3319.301. ▇. ▇▇▇▇ of Students, speech and language pathologists, school psychologists, school nurses, technology coordinator shall have their evaluation instruments developed through the Waterloo Evaluation System Committee (WESC); b. Licensed/certified staff members assigned to work with students less than fifty percent (50%) of the employee’s time will be evaluated based only upon the Teacher Performance Evaluation Rubric. c. Licensed/certified staff members who spend at least fifty percent (50%) of his/her time providing content-related student instruction will be evaluated using the Teacher Performance Evaluation Rubric and the Student Growth Measures. d. School Counselors shall be evaluated by utilizing the Ohio School Counselor Evaluation System (“OSCES”).
Who Will be Evaluated. 1. The evaluation system covered in Article 12 shall apply to any person employed under a teacher’s license or a professional or permanent teacher’s certificate in accordance with law, or a permit issued under O.R.C. 3319.301. ▇. ▇▇▇▇ of Students, speech and language pathologists, school psychologists, school nurses, technology coordinator shall have their evaluation instruments developed through the Waterloo Evaluation System Committee (WESC). b. Licensed/certified staff members who spend at least fifty (50%) percent of the time employed not providing content-related student instruction will have their evaluation instruments developed through the Waterloo Evaluation System Committee (WESC). c. Licensed/certified staff members who spend at least fifty (50%) percent of the time employed providing content-related student instruction will be evaluated using the Teacher Performance Evaluation Rubric. d. School Counselors shall be evaluated by utilizing the Ohio School Counselor Evaluation System (“OSCES”).
Who Will be Evaluated. 1. All teachers shall be formally evaluated annually using the Barberton Evaluation System as outlined in ORC. 2. The following teachers will be evaluated using ONLY the Teacher Performance Evaluation Rubric in their area of licensure or area of specialty and will NOT include student growth measures: a. school counselors, school speech and language pathologists, school psychologists, school nurses; b. licensed/certified staff members assigned to work with students less than fifty percent (50%) of the time. 3. All other licensed/certified staff members assigned to work with students at least fifty percent (50%) of the time will be evaluated using the Teacher Performance Evaluation Rubric and the Student Growth Measures as prescribed in Ohio Revised Code (ORC).
Who Will be Evaluated. 1. All educators shall be formally evaluated annually using the Sylvania Evaluation System as outlined in ORC. 2. Bargaining unit members not required to be evaluated using the OTES Model, shall be evaluated pursuant to Article XVIII, EVALUATIONS, NON-OTES EDUCATORS, OF THIS Collective Bargaining Agreement. A Joint Committee shall be established to recommend changes to the evaluation process for Non-Otes Educators. Should changes be recommended, they will be implemented if approved by the District and the Association.
Who Will be Evaluated. All coaches/advisors will be evaluated annually in accordance with the procedures herein.
Who Will be Evaluated. 1. All licensed/certificated teachers and school counselors shall be formally evaluated annually as outlined in the ORC and the Ohio State Board of Education approved OTES 2.0 framework. 2. The following licensed/certificated staff members will be evaluated using a local evaluation tool approved by the Green Evaluation Committee (“GEC”). a. Related service providers, library media specialists and instructional coaches; b. licensed/certificated staff members assigned to teach students less than fifty percent (50%) of the time. 3. All other licensed/certificated staff members will be evaluated using the Performance Evaluation Rubric as prescribed in the ORC. a. No video/audio recording will be used as evidence in OTES evaluations.

Related to Who Will be Evaluated

  • PROGRESS EVALUATION Engineer shall, from time to time during the progress of the Engineering Services, confer with County at County’s election. Engineer shall prepare and present such information as may be pertinent and necessary, or as may be reasonably requested by County, in order for County to evaluate features of the Engineering Services. At the request of County or Engineer, conferences shall be provided at Engineer's office, the offices of County, or at other locations designated by County. When requested by County, such conferences shall also include evaluation of the Engineering Services. County may, from time to time, require Engineer to appear and provide information to the Williamson County Commissioners Court. Should County determine that the progress in Engineering Services does not satisfy an applicable Work Authorization or any Supplemental Work Authorization related thereto, then County shall review same with Engineer to determine corrective action required. Engineer shall promptly advise County in writing of events which have or may have a significant impact upon the progress of the Engineering Services, including but not limited to the following: A. Problems, delays, adverse conditions which may materially affect the ability to meet the objectives of an applicable Work Authorization or any Supplemental Work Authorization related thereto, or preclude the attainment of Project Engineering Services units by established time periods; and such disclosure shall be accompanied by statement of actions taken or contemplated, and County assistance needed to resolve the situation, if any; and B. Favorable developments or events which enable meeting goals sooner than anticipated in relation to an applicable Work Authorization’s or any Supplemental Work Authorization related thereto.

  • Other Methods of Procurement of Goods and Works. The following table specifies the methods of procurement, other than International Competitive Bidding, which may be used for goods and works. The Procurement Plan shall specify the circumstances under which such methods may be used: (a) National Competitive Bidding (b) Shopping (c) Direct Contracting

  • Program Evaluation The School District and the College will develop a plan for the evaluation of the Dual Credit program to be completed each year. The evaluation will include, but is not limited to, disaggregated attendance and retention rates, GPA of high-school-credit-only courses and college courses, satisfactory progress in college courses, state assessment results, SAT/ACT, as applicable, TSIA readiness by grade level, and adequate progress toward the college-readiness of the students in the program. The School District commits to collecting longitudinal data as specified by the College, and making data and performance outcomes available to the College upon request. HB 1638 and SACSCOC require the collection of data points to be longitudinally captured by the School District, in collaboration with the College, will include, at minimum: student enrollment, GPA, retention, persistence, completion, transfer and scholarships. School District will provide parent contact and demographic information to the College upon request for targeted marketing of degree completion or workforce development information to parents of Students. School District agrees to obtain valid FERPA releases drafted to support the supply of such data if deemed required by counsel to either School District or the College. The College conducts and reports regular and ongoing evaluations of the Dual Credit program effectiveness and uses the results for continuous improvement.

  • Self-Evaluation Each regular faculty member shall provide a self-evaluation. It shall address, among other items, the faculty member's fulfillment of professional responsibilities as referenced in Section 18.2.3 and an assessment of his or her own performance. The faculty member will share the self-evaluation with the Faculty Evaluation Committee and the first-level manager or designee. The self-evaluation will become part of the evaluation report.

  • Methodology 1. The price at which the Assuming Institution sells or disposes of Qualified Financial Contracts will be deemed to be the fair market value of such contracts, if such sale or disposition occurs at prevailing market rates within a predefined timetable as agreed upon by the Assuming Institution and the Receiver. 2. In valuing all other Qualified Financial Contracts, the following principles will apply: