Written Review. When a review of an Employee’s performance is documented in writing, the Employee concerned shall be given an opportunity to discuss the review and make written comments on the review. The Employee shall be entitled to up to two (2) working days to consider the review document before making written comments. The Employee and the College shall jointly sign the review document confirming that the information has been reviewed and discussed. The Employee shall receive a signed copy of the document and the College shall place a copy of that review on the Employee’s Official Employment File.
Written Review. After the conclusion of the discussion, the Chair of a Department (Xxxx in the case of a non-departmentalized Faculty) shall prepare a written annual review with regard to each non-tenured Faculty Member with eligibility for tenure that addresses each of the standards for achieving tenure.
Written Review. If the facility requests a review by written briefing, the Review Committee will forward the allegations, the record of the investigation, the determination of a violation, the recommendation regarding sanction(s), and the response of the facility to the Hearing Committee. Written briefing may be submitted within thirty (30) days following receipt of the written review request by the Hearing Committee. The Hearing Committee will render a decision based on the record below and written briefs (if any) without an oral hearing.
Written Review. If the facility requests a review by written briefing, the Review Committee will forward the allegations, the record of the investigation, the determination of a violation, the recommendation regarding sanction(s), and the response of the facility to the Hearing Committee. Written briefing may be submitted within thirty (30) days following receipt of the written review request by the Hearing Committee. The Hearing Committee will render a decision based on the record below and written briefs (if any) without an oral hearing. Oral Hearing. If the facility requests a hearing: The Review Committee will: forward the allegations, the record of the investigation, the determination of a violation, the recommendation regarding sanction(s), and the response of the facility to the Hearing Committee; and designate one of its members to present the allegations and any substantiating evidence, examine and cross-examine witnesses and otherwise present the matter during the hearing. The Hearing Committee will: schedule a hearing after the request is received, allowing for an adequate period of time for preparation; and send by traceable delivery service, signature required, a Notice of Hearing to the facility. The Notice of Hearing will include a statement of the time and place selected by the Hearing Committee. The facility may request modification of the time and place for good cause. Failure to respond to the Notice of Hearing will be deemed to be the facility’s consent for the Review Committee to administer any sanction which it considers appropriate. The Hearing Committee will maintain a verbatim oral or written transcript. ABRET and the facility may consult with and be represented by counsel, make opening statements, present documents and testimony, examine and cross-examine witnesses under oath, make closing statements and present written briefs as scheduled by the Hearing Committee. The Hearing Committee shall determine all matters relating to the hearing. Formal rules of evidence do not apply. Relevant evidence may be admitted. Disputed questions will be determined by the Hearing Committee. The right to the hearing may be forfeited if the facility fails to appear without good cause. In all written reviews and oral hearings: The Hearing Committee may accept, reject, or modify the recommendation of the Review Committee, either with respect to the determination of a violation or the recommended sanction. Proof is by preponderance of the evidence. The Hearing Committ...
