5CPA Program Combined Review by PricewaterhouseCoopers Sample Clauses

5CPA Program Combined Review by PricewaterhouseCoopers. 2015‌ The DAA program was evaluated as part of the Review of the PPI Program performed by PwC in 2015. The overall aim of the Review was to better inform how the 5CPA Medication Management programs and services (including PPI Program and Medication Management Program) contribute to improving consumer health outcomes, in order to better inform future investment by the Australian Government in pharmacy programs and services. PwC evaluated the three priority areas in the PPI Program: CIs, DAAs and SS. The Review methodology involved an analysis of full program data in order to assess the uptake and volume of services delivered over the duration of the 5CPA (between 2011 and 2014), stakeholder consultations, consumer focus groups, practitioner focus groups, a practitioner survey and a consumer survey. Table 4.7 summarises the main findings of the evaluation in relation to the DAA initiative. A total of 767 primary health care practitioners, with the majority being pharmacists (94%), responded to the practitioner survey. More than half (57%) were involved in the DAA program. Results of consumer surveys are not discussed as only 2% (10/502) of responders participated in the DAA program7, and thus results from the consumer surveys do not reflect consumers’ satisfaction with the DAA service. Table 4.7 Main findings of the 2015 5CPA combined review, 2011-2014 Measure/domain Key findings Program results PPI participating pharmacies Overall, a total of 6,216 pharmacies (with unique registration numbers) submitted claims for PPI services DAA participating pharmacies and patients 5,909 pharmacies submitted claims for DAAs delivered to 22,571,080 patientsa. Total expenditure on PPI $126,507,909 Total expenditure on DAA initiative $71,225,306 (56% of total funds allocated) Total expenditure on SS initiative $11,231,152 (9% of total funds allocated) Total expenditure on CI initiative $44,051,451 (35% of total funds allocated) Practitioner focus group themes raised Addressing consumer need DAAs were seen as an essential part of medication management in RACFs by all participants involved in RMMRs. All participants commented that DAAs address medication adherence needs in the community and reduce medication misadventure. Eligibility criteria and targeting There were no specific marketing strategies or recruitment activities directed at those most in need of the 5CPA programs. Program implementation A multidisciplinary, collaborative approach to programs/services would aid in...
AutoNDA by SimpleDocs

Related to 5CPA Program Combined Review by PricewaterhouseCoopers

  • Financial Statement Audit If, during its fiscal year, Grantee expends less than $750,000 in Federal Awards, Grantee is subject to the following audit requirements:

  • Joint Review JADRC may, at the request of either party, review issues arising from the application of this Article.

  • Independent Review Contractor shall provide the Secretary of ADS/CIO an independent expert review of any Agency recommendation for any information technology activity when its total cost is $1,000,000.00 or greater or when CIO requires one. The State has identified two sub-categories for Independent Reviews, Standard and Complex. The State will identify in the SOW RFP the sub-category they are seeking. State shall not consider bids greater than the maximum value indicated below for this category. Standard Independent Review $25,000 Maximum Complex Independent Review $50,000 Maximum Per Vermont statute 3 V.S.A. 2222, The Secretary of Administration shall obtain independent expert review of any recommendation for any information technology initiated after July 1, 1996, as information technology activity is defined by subdivision (a) (10), when its total cost is $1,000,000 or greater or when required by the State Chief Information Officer. Documentation of this independent review shall be included when plans are submitted for review pursuant to subdivisions (a)(9) and (10) of this section. The independent review shall include: • An acquisition cost assessment • A technology architecture review • An implementation plan assessment • A cost analysis and model for benefit analysis • A procurement negotiation advisory services contract • An impact analysis on net operating costs for the agency carrying out the activity In addition, from time to time special reviews of the advisability and feasibility of certain types of IT strategies may be required. Following are Requirements and Capabilities for this Service: • Identify acquisition and lifecycle costs; • Assess wide area network (WAN) and/or local area network (LAN) impact; • Assess risks and/or review technical risk assessments of an IT project including security, data classification(s), subsystem designs, architectures, and computer systems in terms of their impact on costs, benefits, schedule and technical performance; • Assess, evaluate and critically review implementation plans, e.g.: • Adequacy of support for conversion and implementation activities • Adequacy of department and partner staff to provide Project Management • Adequacy of planned testing procedures • Acceptance/readiness of staff • Schedule soundness • Adequacy of training pre and post project • Assess proposed technical architecture to validate conformance to the State’s “strategic direction.” • Insure system use toolsets and strategies are consistent with State Chief Information Officer (CIO) policies, including security and digital records management; • Assess the architecture of the proposed hardware and software with regard to security and systems integration with other applications within the Department, and within the Agency, and existing or planned Enterprise Applications; • Perform cost and schedule risk assessments to support various alternatives to meet mission need, recommend alternative courses of action when one or more interdependent segment(s) or phase(s) experience a delay, and recommend opportunities for new technology insertions; • Assess the architecture of the proposed hardware and software with regard to the state of the art in this technology. • Assess a project’s backup/recovery strategy and the project’s disaster recovery plans for adequacy and conformance to State policy. • Evaluate the ability of a proposed solution to meet the needs for which the solution has been proposed, define the ability of the operational and user staff to integrate this solution into their work.

  • Independent Audit The Grantee shall submit, in a format specified by the department, the independent financial compliance audit prepared by an independent Certified Public Accountant for the previous fiscal year. The audit shall follow the General Grant Requirements of Sections VIII (F) and (G) and be submitted no later than March 1 of the current fiscal year.

  • Problem Statement School bus fleets are aging, and our communities have poor air quality. Replacing school buses with zero emission school buses will address both of these issues.

  • Program Narrative All restricted xxxxxx courses which are taught for the purpose of qualifying an individual for restricted xxxxxx license to practice barbering shall consist of a minimum of 1200 hours of training to prepare each restricted xxxxxx to service their communities.

  • Physician's Statement Employees requesting Temporary Disability Leave shall submit to the Chief, through the chain of command, a written statement from their physician verifying their condition, recommending limited duty or leave of absence, and describing their limitations and prognosis. The Chief may refer employees for additional evaluation of their condition. A written medical release from a physician shall be submitted prior to an employee's return to full or limited duty.

  • Positive Time Reporting Employees will accurately report time worked in accordance with a positive time reporting process as determined by each agency.

  • FINANCIAL STATUS REPORTS (FSRS Except as otherwise provided, for contracts with categorical budgets, Grantee shall submit quarterly FSRs to System Agency by the last business day of the month following the end of each quarter for System Agency review and financial assessment. Grantee shall submit the final FSR no later than forty-five (45) calendar days following the end of the applicable term.

  • Auditor 28.2.1 The Department (in accordance with Post-16 audit code of practice - XXX.XX (xxx.xxx.xx)), the European Commission, the European Court of Auditors and/or a Crown Body may at any time conduct audits for the following purposes:-

Time is Money Join Law Insider Premium to draft better contracts faster.