Authority Review Sample Clauses

Authority Review. Upon not less than five (5) Business Days prior Notice, if a StadCo Event of Default has occurred and is continuing (except as otherwise provided in this Agreement), StadCo shall permit the Authority, by its representatives and agents, (i) to inspect any of the books and financial records of StadCo as such relate to the operation, management, Maintenance, and Capital Matters relating to the Premises; (ii) to examine and make copies of the books of accounts and records of StadCo as such relate to the use operation, management, Maintenance, and Capital Matters relating to the Premises; and (iii) to discuss the affairs, finances, and accounts of StadCo with, and to be advised as to the same by, its respective officers, at such reasonable times (but only during business hours and so long as no event or condition which constitutes an Authority Event of Default or which upon notice, lapse of time or both would, unless cured or waived, become an Authority Event of Default has occurred and is continuing) and intervals as the Authority may designate and as to which StadCo has reasonably agreed; provided that, any such visit, review or inspection, and the availability of any such books and records, shall be subject to any restrictions imposed by Applicable Law.
Sample 1Sample 2Sample 3See All (11)
AutoNDA by SimpleDocs
Authority Review. The list shall be comprised of Subcontractors proposed in the Technical Proposal Worksheet. The Subcontractors for the Equipment and associated Software listed above shall be subject to the Contracting Officer’s final approval. Subcontractor approval shall neither affect the Contract Price nor relieve the Contractor of any responsibility for performing the Contract.
Sample 1Sample 2
Authority Review. The Authority shall review the Operators activities in the performance of its obligations under this Agreement. The Authority shall review all reports submitted by the Operator pursuant to Schedule 4 and may query any information in the report at any time prior to the completion of the Project.
Sample 1Sample 2
Authority Review. The Authority shall conduct its review of submitted items within thirty (30) days of submission by the District. If the Authority determines that the Development Plan and Total Project Budget are not reasonable and adequate, or that any cost itemized in a submitted Periodic Development Budget is not reasonable or necessary for the development of the Facility, the Authority shall so advise the District in writing. The District shall either (1) revise such submittal to overcome the objections of the Authority (i.e. adjust any cost determined by the Authority to be either unreasonable or not necessary for the development of the Facility) and resubmit the document to the Authority or (2) request that the Authority meet and confer with the District with respect to such item. If the Authority and the District are unable to agree on any material matter, the question shall be submitted to the Attorney General for determination. Any determination by the Attorney General as to such matter shall be conclusive and binding on the Parties. Any Requisition submitted to the Escrow Agent shall be signed both by the Authority and the District, and no payment of any requisition from the Escrow Account shall be paid from the Escrow Account without such written evidence of the Authority’s approval pursuant to this subsection. The execution of any Requisition by the Authority shall be deemed a certification by the Authority to the Attorney General and the Department that all such costs set forth in such Requisition are reasonable and necessary for the development of the Facility. In the event the Authority does not conduct a review of submitted items within thirty (30) days of submission by the District in accordance with this subsection (c), the Attorney General may, upon the showing of good cause by the District, extend the Authority Option Date.
Sample 1
Authority Review. (a) The Authority may review the Facility, the financial position of the Borrower and any Security Provider, and the value of the Security Property, annually or at any other time determined by the Authority acting reasonably.
Sample 1
Authority Review. The Authority will consider whether an amendment request is so substantial as to necessitate reevaluating the Authority’s original funding decision on the Project. An amendment will be denied if it substantially alters the circumstances under which the Project funding was originally approved; if it does not meet requirements set forth in Iowa Administrative Code 261-23, as applicable; or if it conflicts with the Program Rules.
Sample 1
Authority Review. Upon request of a special rate adjustment, Authority will have the right to review any or all costs associated with Contractor's services under this Agreement and may consider any rate adjustments granted pursuant to Section 7.03.
Sample 1
AutoNDA by SimpleDocs
Authority Review. Complete Schematic Design Document Application21 7.2.4 Authority Review - Approval Standard 22 7.2.5 Amendments to Schematic Design Documents Approvals 22 7.3 REVIEW OF DESIGN DEVELOPMENT 22 7.3.1 Authority Review - Initial 23 7.3.2 City Agency Review – Complete Design Development Application 23 7.3.3 Authority Review – Complete Design Development Application 23 7.3.4 Authority Review - Approval Standard 24 7.3.5 Amendments to Design Development Documents Approvals 24 7.4 REVIEW OF CONSTRUCTION DOCUMENTS 25 7.4.1 DBI, Authority and City Agency Review – Complete Construction Documents Application 25 7.4.2 DBI Review – Complete Construction Documents Application 25 7.4.3 DBI and Authority Review - Approval Standard 26 7.4.4 Amendments to Construction Documents Approvals 27 8. BUILDINGS AND STRUCTURES THAT ARE PART OF INFRASTRUCTURE INCLUDING BUILDINGS IN PARKS AND OPEN SPACE 28 9. OTHER CITY PERMITS 28 9.1 COMPLIANCE WITH OTHER LAWS 28 9.2 AUTHORITY REVIEW OF CITY PERMITS 28 10. GOVERNMENT REQUIRED PROVISIONS, CHANGES 29 (continued) LIST OF EXHIBITS Exhibit 1 Definitions Exhibit 2. Documents to be Submitted for Major Phase Applications, Sub-Phase Applications and Vertical Applications Exhibit 3 Documents to be Submitted for Streetscape Master Plans and Signage Master Plans DISPOSITION AND DEVELOPMENT AGREEMENT (TREASURE ISLAND AND YERBA BUENA ISLAND ) DESIGN REVIEW AND DOCUMENT APPROVAL PROCEDURE This DRDAP implements and is part of the DDA. As used herein, certain capitalized terms are defined in Exhibit 1 (Definitions). Capitalized terms used but not otherwise defined in this DRDAP shall have the meanings for such terms set forth in the DDA.
Sample 1
Authority Review. For the rehabilitation of the landfill/dump site, the design has to be approved by the De- partment of Water and Sanitation. There must be an allowance for one meeting with DWS in Pretoria to discuss the designs and carry out the approval process. The appointed com- pany cannot guarantee the timeframes of the approval process or that approval will be granted. This is completely in the hands of the authorities. It must also commit itself to amend the designs if required for approval by DWS.
Sample 1

Related to Authority Review

  • Departmental Review If informal resolution of the problem through conciliation and negotiation cannot be effected, an aggrieved person may file a formal complaint with the departmental affirmative action coordinator or other designated official. Such a complaint must be filed on a form provided for this purpose and within five working days after the attempted resolution of the problem by the equal employment opportunity counselor or within twenty-five (25) working days after the date of the alleged discriminatory action, whichever shall first occur. The affirmative action coordinator will decide whether the complaint falls within the jurisdiction of the procedure and accept or reject it. Upon acceptance of the complaint, the affirmative action coordinator shall obtain the notes on the case from the equal employment opportunity counselor; may conduct a prompt, impartial investigation if he deems it necessary; shall explore the possibility of resolving the problem through negotiation or conciliation; shall present findings and recommendations on resolving the complaint to the agency/department head; and within forty-five (45) working days from the date the formal complaint was filed, shall present his written decision, as approved by the agency/department head, to the complainant, with a copy of the complaint and decision to be forwarded to the director of personnel.

  • Department Review If a mutually acceptable solution has not been reached during Step 1, and the employee intends to pursue the grievance formally, the employee shall submit the grievance in writing on the Employee Grievance Resolution Form to the Department Head with a copy to the Labor Relations Division not later than ten (10) working days after the supervisor’s written response. The Department Head shall consider the grievance and render a written decision within ten (10) working days of receipt of the formal grievance. The written decision shall include a clear and concise statement including the reason(s) for the decision. The Department Head may hold a meeting with the employee to achieve any of the following purposes: 1) to identify why the employee feels there is a grievance and facilitate communication and resolution; 2) to clearly identify issues and areas of agreement/disagreement; and 3) to have the parties present whatever available information/ documentation necessary to fully attempt to resolve the grievance. The employee may be accompanied by his/her shop xxxxxxx during the Department Review, provided that the xxxxxxx is in the same department as the employee, and has been identified by the employee on the Employee Grievance Resolution Form. If the department, in consultation with the Labor Relations Division, determines that the grievance is outside of the Department Head’s authority, or the grievance involves employees working in separate departments, then such grievance shall be submitted to Step 3.

  • Log Reviews All systems processing and/or storing PHI COUNTY discloses to 11 CONTRACTOR or CONTRACTOR creates, receives, maintains, or transmits on behalf of COUNTY 12 must have a routine procedure in place to review system logs for unauthorized access.

  • System Security Review All systems processing and/or storing DHCS PHI or PI must have at least an annual system risk assessment/security review which provides assurance that administrative, physical, and technical controls are functioning effectively and providing adequate levels of protection. Reviews should include vulnerability scanning tools.

  • Independent Review Contractor shall provide the Secretary of ADS/CIO an independent expert review of any Agency recommendation for any information technology activity when its total cost is $1,000,000.00 or greater or when CIO requires one. The State has identified two sub-categories for Independent Reviews, Standard and Complex. The State will identify in the SOW RFP the sub-category they are seeking. State shall not consider bids greater than the maximum value indicated below for this category. Standard Independent Review $25,000 Maximum Complex Independent Review $50,000 Maximum Per Vermont statute 3 V.S.A. 2222, The Secretary of Administration shall obtain independent expert review of any recommendation for any information technology initiated after July 1, 1996, as information technology activity is defined by subdivision (a) (10), when its total cost is $1,000,000 or greater or when required by the State Chief Information Officer. Documentation of this independent review shall be included when plans are submitted for review pursuant to subdivisions (a)(9) and (10) of this section. The independent review shall include: • An acquisition cost assessment • A technology architecture review • An implementation plan assessment • A cost analysis and model for benefit analysis • A procurement negotiation advisory services contract • An impact analysis on net operating costs for the agency carrying out the activity In addition, from time to time special reviews of the advisability and feasibility of certain types of IT strategies may be required. Following are Requirements and Capabilities for this Service: • Identify acquisition and lifecycle costs; • Assess wide area network (WAN) and/or local area network (LAN) impact; • Assess risks and/or review technical risk assessments of an IT project including security, data classification(s), subsystem designs, architectures, and computer systems in terms of their impact on costs, benefits, schedule and technical performance; • Assess, evaluate and critically review implementation plans, e.g.: • Adequacy of support for conversion and implementation activities • Adequacy of department and partner staff to provide Project Management • Adequacy of planned testing procedures • Acceptance/readiness of staff • Schedule soundness • Adequacy of training pre and post project • Assess proposed technical architecture to validate conformance to the State’s “strategic direction.” • Insure system use toolsets and strategies are consistent with State Chief Information Officer (CIO) policies, including security and digital records management; • Assess the architecture of the proposed hardware and software with regard to security and systems integration with other applications within the Department, and within the Agency, and existing or planned Enterprise Applications; • Perform cost and schedule risk assessments to support various alternatives to meet mission need, recommend alternative courses of action when one or more interdependent segment(s) or phase(s) experience a delay, and recommend opportunities for new technology insertions; • Assess the architecture of the proposed hardware and software with regard to the state of the art in this technology. • Assess a project’s backup/recovery strategy and the project’s disaster recovery plans for adequacy and conformance to State policy. • Evaluate the ability of a proposed solution to meet the needs for which the solution has been proposed, define the ability of the operational and user staff to integrate this solution into their work.

  • Midterm Review The Recipient shall:

  • Program Review The Contracting Officer or other authorized government representative may hold semi- annual program review meetings. Such meetings will be held via telecom or video teleconferencing. However, the Government reserves the right to request a meeting in person. The meetings will include all BPA holders, representatives from prospective customer agencies, a combination of current and prospective customer agencies, or individual BPA holders. Some Federal Government Agencies and any approved State, Local and Tribal agencies may establish a central program management function. Such users may require their primary suppliers to participate in agency program review meetings on a periodic basis, at no additional cost to the Government.

  • Peer Review Dental Group, after consultation with the Joint ----------- Operations Committee, shall implement, regularly review, modify as necessary or appropriate and obtain the commitment of Providers to actively participate in peer review procedures for Providers. Dental Group shall assist Manager in the production of periodic reports describing the results of such procedures. Dental Group shall provide Manager with prompt notice of any information that raises a reasonable risk to the health and safety of Group Patients or Beneficiaries. In any event, after consultation with the Joint Operations Committee, Dental Group shall take such action as may be reasonably warranted under the facts and circumstances.

  • Systems Review The Construction Administrator will conduct reviews of proposed roof, structural, mechanical, electrical, plumbing, conveyance, sprinkler, telecommunications, and life safety systems, and will consider initial cost, availability, impact on the overall program, comfort and convenience, long-term maintenance and operating costs, and impacts on schedule.

  • Mid-Term Review The Borrower shall:

Time is Money Join Law Insider Premium to draft better contracts faster.