We use cookies on our site to analyze traffic, enhance your experience, and provide you with tailored content.

For more information visit our privacy policy.

Court Hearings Sample Clauses

Court HearingsAn Employee subpoenaed by a court as a defendant or witness as the result of performing management duties and responsibilities shall be compensated for the difference between the Employee’s regular daily salary and witness fees for each duty day of absence. This shall not apply to court cases initiated by the Employee against the School District.
Court HearingsIn the event an employee is required to appear in night court in the Company’s interest, the employee shall be paid straight time for the hours spent in court and for time spent in travel.
Court HearingsA Community School Coordinator subpoenaed by a court as a defendant or witness as a result of performing management or supervisory duty shall be compensated for the difference between the coordinator’s regular daily salary and witness fees for each duty day of absence. However, this shall not include cases concerning Community School Coordinators versus Anoka-Hennepin Independent School District No. 11.
Court Hearings. A Principal subpoenaed by a court as a defendant or a witness as the result of performing management duties and responsibilities shall be compensated for the difference between the Principal's regular daily salary and witness fees for each duty day of absence. This shall not apply to court cases initiated by the Principal or the Association against the School District.
Court Hearings. The NMD’s court case will remain open under the jurisdiction of the juvenile court for monitoring and oversight of the case plan. The NMD will continue to have six-month court hearings and their own counsel. The focus of the six-month court hearings is no longer reunification with birth parents, the establishment of a guardianship, or termination of parental rights. The hearing will focus on the assistance and supports the young adults need to reach transitional living, education, and employment case plan goals. Hearings for NMD’s are conducted under W&IC section 366.3 or section 727.2 and pursuant to Rules of Court section 5.903. The court shall appoint counsel for minors and NMDs under transition jurisdiction and, when possible, provide continuity of representation by retaining the same attorney to represent the minors and NMDs who are modified to transition or dependency jurisdiction (W&IC section 451[d]). Parents are no longer parties to the hearings nor have counsel. Xxxxxxxx may be attended by persons the NMD invites, including a parent or guardian. The NMD may request telephonic appearance at the hearings, unless court ordered to appear personally. Rules of court are available at: xxxx://xxx.xxxxxx.xx.xxx/rules.htm Click HTML or PDF link to Title Five. Family and Juvenile Rules (Rules 5.1-5.830) The NMD (unless still under delinquency jurisdiction) may exit the EFC Program at any time (prior to reaching the age limit) through the termination of dependency, or transition jurisdiction. Termination of delinquency jurisdiction is possible only when the NMD completes his rehabilitative goals. Termination of jurisdiction falls into three different categories:  Dependency Jurisdiction - W&IC section 391(not discussed in this ACL);  Transition Jurisdiction – W&IC section 452; and  Delinquency Jurisdiction - W&IC 607.2 & 607.3. A new mechanism was developed to allow a NMD or xxxxxx youth who exits care at or after age 18 to be eligible for re-entry to the EFC Program prior to reaching the maximum age of EFC. Beginning January 1, 2012, when terminating jurisdiction over a NMD or a xxxxxx youth who has reached age 18 and does not elect to remain in the EFC Program, the Juvenile Court now retains general jurisdiction over a NMD up to age 21, per W&IC section 303(b). This will allow the young adult to re-enter the EFC Program at a later date if the NMD is still under the maximum age of EFC.
Court HearingsWhen an Employee is required by the Employer to attend court as part of their duties at a time when they are not scheduled to work, the following will apply: (a) They will be paid for the time they are required to be in attendance at court, at a rate of 1½ times their hourly rate subject to a minimum of 4 hours. If the attendance at court is less than 4 hours, the Employee may be required to work the balance of the 4 hours. (b) If they are scheduled to work the night Shift prior to or following the court appearance, so that they will not have time to rest, the Employer will arrange for the Employee to leave work early or arrive at work late on the night Shift, so that they will have 8 hours between the night Shift and the court appearance. Application of this Article 27.03(b) may be waived if the Employer and the Employee mutually agree. (c) An Employee’s regular working hours shall not be reduced as a result of attending court hearings unless a reduction is required to meet the Employer’s obligation set out in Article 27.03(b), or pursuant to the ESA.
Court Hearings. Description The court adds a new hearing, resets a hearing, or enters a result on a hearing in Case Manager.
Court Hearings. A Building Supervisor subpoenaed by a court as a defendant or witness as a result of performing management or supervisory duty shall be compensated for the difference between the Building Supervisor’s regular daily salary and witness fees for each duty day of absence. However, this shall not include cases involving Building Supervisors vs. Anoka-Hennepin Independent School District No. 11.
Court Hearings. (a) When an employee is required by the Employer to attend court as a witness on a day when she is not scheduled to work, she will be paid for the time she is required to be in attendance at court at a rate of 1½ times her hourly rate subject to a minimum of 4 hours. (b) When an employee is required to attend court as part of her duties, and is scheduled to work the night Shift prior to or following the court appearance, so that she will not have time to rest, the Employer will arrange for the employee to leave work early or arrive at work late on the night Shift, so that she will have 8 hours between the night Shift and the court appearance. Application of this Article 27.03(b) may be waived if the Employer and the employee mutually agree. (c) An employee’s regular working hours shall not be reduced as a result of attending court hearings.
Court HearingsWhen an Employee is required by the Employer to attend court as part of their duties at a time when they are not scheduled to work, the following will apply: a) They will be paid for the time they are required to be in attendance at court, at a rate of 1½ times their hourly rate subject to a minimum of 4 hours. If the attendance at court is less than 4 hours, the Employee may be required to work the balance of the 4 hours. b) If they are scheduled to work the night Shift prior to or following the court appearance, so that they will not have time to rest, the Employer will arrange for the Employee to leave work early or arrive at c) An Employee’s regular working hours shall not be reduced as a result of attending court hearings unless a reduction is required to meet the Employer’s obligation set out in Article 27.03(b), or pursuant to the ESA.