District Evaluation Plan Sample Clauses

District Evaluation Plan. The Board’s and the Association’s Joint Evaluation Committee has developed a Teacher Evaluation Plan for all teachers. The Joint Evaluation Committee will continue to collaborate to ensure the Teacher Evaluation Plan is consistent with the requirements of the Illinois School Code and its administrative regulations. Teacher performance evaluations will be conducted pursuant to the evaluation procedures in the Teacher Evaluation Plan. A teacher’s evaluation, including any related rating, shall not be subject to the grievance and arbitration procedure set forth in this Agreement. A teacher xxx, however, file a grievance if he/she alleges that the Board has not complied with the procedural guidelines set forth in the Teacher Evaluation Plan. Absent compelling extenuating circumstances, in a school year in which a tenured teacher is being evaluated, the tenured teacher shall receive his/her evaluation at least ten (10) working days prior to the last teacher attendance day of the school year.
Sample 1Sample 2
AutoNDA by SimpleDocs
District Evaluation Plan. The Board in cooperation with the PREA has developed a teacher evaluation plan for all teachers covered by this Agreement and said plan has been approved by the State Board of Education. If there is any need for any changes in the teacher evaluation plan, the Board shall negotiate such changes with the PREA. The Board and PREA shall revise the District’s teacher evaluation plan pursuant to the time lines and requirements established under the Illinois educational reform laws (i.e., Performance Evaluation Reform Act and SB 7) and ISBE regulations. As may be necessary to comply with educational reform, the parties understand and agree that the evaluation procedures described below may need to be amended during the term of this Agreement. If there is any need for any changes in the teacher evaluation plan, the Board shall negotiate such changes with the PREA before submitting any changes to the State Board of Education for review and comment. A teacher’s evaluation, including any related rating, shall not be subject to the grievance and arbitration procedure set forth in this Agreement. A teacher may, however, file a grievance if he/she alleges that the Board has not complied with the following procedural guidelines: 1. A pre-evaluation conference shall be held early in the fall. 2. The evaluations for teachers shall include classroom observation(s) and may include other areas where a staff member has responsibilities. 3. Each evaluation shall include a conference and the completion of the official evaluation forms, with one copy being given to the evaluatee and one copy being placed in the evaluatee’s personnel file. Non-tenured teachers shall have a minimum of two (2) evaluations during their first two
Sample 1Sample 2

Related to District Evaluation Plan

  • TEACHER EVALUATION A. The administration will be evaluating the teacher’s performance within the time of formal responsibility. The evaluation process and form will be shared with the Association Building Representatives at the beginning of each school year. (a) Probationary teachers shall be evaluated at least two (2) times a year. The first evaluation will be completed prior to December 1st and the second prior to April 15th. Each evaluation will be based upon announced, unannounced, informal observations, on the performance of other duties and responsibilities and the goals developed in the Individualized Development Plan (IDP). The announced and unannounced observations should be a minimum of thirty (30) minutes in length. The observations may occur at anytime prior to the development of the written evaluation, but at least one of them must be planned in consultation with the probationary teacher. The results of formal observations will be discussed with the teacher in a timely manner. The information gathered during the observations will be used to write the evaluations. (b) Tenured teachers will be evaluated on a rotating schedule, but no less than once every three- (3) years. The administration reserves the right to evaluate a tenured teacher more often. The evaluation will be based upon announced, unannounced, informal observations and on the performance of other duties and responsibilities. The announced and unannounced observations should be a minimum of thirty (30) minutes in length. The observations may occur at any time prior to the development of the written evaluation, but at least one of them must be planned in consultation with the tenured teacher. The results of formal observations will be discussed with the teacher in a timely manner. The information gathered during the observations will be used to write the evaluations. 2. The administrator shall prepare and submit a written evaluation and recommendations to the teacher prior to May 30th of the year they are evaluated. The administrator shall hold a conference with the teacher to discuss the written evaluation and recommendations. 3. Upon receipt of the evaluation the teacher will sign the form indicating his/her receipt of the report. The signature on the form does not constitute his/her approval unless specifically noted. 4. Teachers involved with the instruction of Advanced Placement courses will be evaluated. This evaluation in the first year will be made part of the formal evaluation only at the request of the teacher. B. A teacher who disagrees with the content or procedure of evaluation may submit a written answer which shall be attached to the file copy of the evaluation in question and/or submit any complaints through Level 4 of the grievance procedure. C. If an administrator believes a teacher is doing unacceptable work, the reasons shall be set forth in specific terms. Included will be examples of specific ways in which the teacher is to improve and assistance may be given by the administrator and other staff members. In subsequent conferences it shall be the responsibility of the individual teacher to inquire whether adequate improvement has taken place. D. Monitoring and observation of the work performance of the teacher shall be conducted openly. The public address or audio system or similar types of communications will not be used for the purpose of evaluation. E. The Board and the Association recognize that the ability of pupils to progress and mature academically is a combined result of the school, home, economic and social environment and that teachers alone cannot be held accountable for all aspects of the academic achievement of the pupil in the classroom. Test results of academic progress of students shall not be used as the sole determinant or in isolated instances to evaluate the quality of a teacher's service or fitness for retention. F. All communications, including evaluations by Milan Administrators, commendations, and documented complaints directed toward the teacher which are to be included in the personnel file shall be made available for review of the teacher prior to placement in the file; a copy of any such communication will be provided to the teacher at this time. Pre-placement information such as confidential credentials, letters of reference from universities, individuals, or previous employers are exempt from such review. A written statement for inclusion in the personnel file may then be made by the teacher in regard to materials that were not signed by the teacher. A representative of the Association may accompany the teacher. G. Ordinarily, observations of teachers shall not be for less than a full class period or for the duration of a particular teaching lesson.

  • Project Management Plan Developer is responsible for all quality assurance and quality control activities necessary to manage the Work, including the Utility Adjustment Work. Developer shall undertake all aspects of quality assurance and quality control for the Project and Work in accordance with the approved Project Management Plan and

Draft better contracts in just 5 minutes Get the weekly Law Insider newsletter packed with expert videos, webinars, ebooks, and more!