Does Not Meet Expectations. Does not fulfill teaching responsibilities; class meetings not fulfilled; syllabi and instructional materials not satisfactory; poor course evaluations; pattern of student complaints. Faculty Member Signature*/ Date Department Chair Signature/ Date Xxxx Signature/ Date *This signature indicates receipt of evaluation form only. Xxxxxxxxxx Adjunct and Part‐Time Instructor Performance Review and Evaluation PERSONAL AND CONFIDENTIAL Faculty Member’s Name: Course(s): Semester: School or Division and Department: Department Chair: Adjunct: □ Part‐time: □ Years as Adjunct or Part‐Time Instructor: Date of Performance review Meeting: Part I: Teaching Performance
Does Not Meet Expectations. Scholarly and creative projects are somewhat below the norms or expectations, and do not demonstrate adequate progress toward executing a scholarly or creative agenda as shown by the performance indicators below. Performance indicators that may be used to support “Does Not Meet Expectations” ratings: • Scholarly agenda or creative plan is somewhat developed, but lacks a clear focus or connection to the subject area leading to publications; • Limited or lack of completion of scholarly or creative projects; • Limited pursuit of grant proposals or funding opportunities; and • Limited collaboration with colleagues or student scholars. Unsatisfactory An “Unsatisfactory” performance rating demonstrates failure to meet expectations that reflect disregard or failure to follow previous advice or other efforts to provide correction or assistance, or performance involves incompetence or misconduct as defined in applicable university regulations and policies." Performance indicators that may be used to support “Unsatisfactory” ratings include: • Scholarly agenda or creative plan has not been developed with a clear focus or connection to a discipline; • Minimal pursuit of scholarly and creative projects; • Lack of grant proposals or funding opportunities; and • Lack of collaboration with colleagues or student scholars. Statement on Service Service is broadly defined and should include a wide range of activities. Service is most valued when there is a relationship between the activity and the faculty member’s area of expertise. The School of Education strongly supports faculty service related to their area of expertise and in accordance with rank. The service aspect of a faculty member's responsibilities is multifaceted, encompassing the department, university, community, and professional discipline. Key Indicators for a Performance Rating of ‘Meets Expectations’ Meets Expectations: Demonstrates satisfactory execution of service contributions. The indicators below will help faculty build a case for Service that Meets Expectations. • Service to university, SOE and/or department (i.e., committee participation and leadership) • Discipline-related service to the community (i.e., grant development, teaching K-12 students, board member, workshops, student organizations, advisory councils) • Service to academic or professional organizations (e.g., conference proposal reviewer, editorial review boards, organization leadership; conference organizer) • Accreditation and continuou...
Does Not Meet Expectations. 16.08.6 The Member shall have the opportunity to review the completed evaluation and add their own comments to the evaluation. The Member shall sign the evaluation acknowledging only that they have read the evaluation.
Does Not Meet Expectations. Does not fulfill teaching responsibilities; class meetings not fulfilled; syllabi and instructional materials not satisfactory; poor course evaluations; pattern of student complaints. Faculty Member Signature*/ Date Department Chair Signature/ Date Xxxx Signature/ Date *This signature indicates receipt of evaluation form only. Markers of Teaching Excellence: Adjunct Faculty (School of Education) PERSONAL AND CONFIDENTIAL Faculty Member Name: Department: Course(s): Semester: Date:
Does Not Meet Expectations. The employee’s work is not up to the reasonable standards for the position.
