Evaluation and Reappointment. The Program will use formal evaluation forms as well as various examination results that are best suited to its specialty in conformity with the accreditation standards of the ACGME and as described in the Evaluation of Residents policy outlined in the House Staff Manual. The Resident’s progress will be evaluated and reviewed with Resident regularly by the faculty and the Program Director. All residents whose performance is satisfactory or above will be reappointed annually as outlined in the Resident Eligibility and Selection policy in the House Staff Manual until the completion of the program, when a Certificate of Completion of the residency training program will be presented. If Resident’s performance is deemed unsatisfactory under the terms of the Disciplinary Code and Grievance Policy in the House Staff Manual, the resident will be notified at evaluation by the Program Director, and corrective actions will be instituted as designated in the policy.
Evaluation and Reappointment. A. After the first of January of each year, the College will decide as to whether or not the unit member shall be offered a reappointment for the year beginning the following first of September. For each unit member to be offered a reappointment, a single written evaluation shall be prepared. Each person preparing all or any part of a written evaluation shall sign his or her name to the part he or she prepared, and every other person involved in the review of such evaluation may add any comments, remarks or observations to such written evaluation provided that such person shall sign his or her name to such comments, remarks or observations, if any. Such a written evaluation shall be prepared also for those who hold, or have been granted, continuing or career appointments.
Evaluation and Reappointment
