Evaluation and Reappointment Sample Clauses

Evaluation and Reappointment. The Program will use formal evaluation forms as well as various examination results that are best suited to its specialty in conformity with the accreditation standards of the ACGME and as described in the Evaluation of Residents policy outlined in the House Staff Manual. The Resident’s progress will be evaluated and reviewed with Resident regularly by the faculty and the Program Director. All residents whose performance is satisfactory or above will be reappointed annually as outlined in the Resident Eligibility and Selection policy in the House Staff Manual until the completion of the program, when a Certificate of Completion of the residency training program will be presented. If Resident’s performance is deemed unsatisfactory under the terms of the Disciplinary Code and Grievance Policy in the House Staff Manual, the resident will be notified at evaluation by the Program Director, and corrective actions will be instituted as designated in the policy.

Evaluation and Reappointment. A. After the first of January of each year, the College will decide as to whether or not the unit member shall be offered a reappointment for the year beginning the following first of September. For each unit member to be offered a reappointment, a single written evaluation shall be prepared. Each person preparing all or any part of a written evaluation shall sign his or her name to the part he or she prepared, and every other person involved in the review of such evaluation may add any comments, remarks or observations to such written evaluation provided that such person shall sign his or her name to such comments, remarks or observations, if any. Such a written evaluation shall be prepared also for those who hold, or have been granted, continuing or career appointments. B. Whenever the College decides, after a careful review of all factors known to it, not to reappoint a unit member, this shall be communicated to that person by his or her immediate supervisor in a personal meeting before the decision not to reappoint is presented in writing to such unit member by the President. The unit member may request a meeting with his or her immediate supervisor to present his or her position in regard to the matter and this shall be granted within fifteen (l5) days, before the decision not to reappoint has been communicated in writing. At the meeting, the unit member may present any written or oral statement or other documents which he or she considers appropriate. Following the meeting, copies of all written statements or documents shall be forwarded to the President of the College for his or her information, together with any additional statement in writing which the unit member wishes to submit as a result of the meeting. The President of the College may, at his or her discretion, add to such file any comments or observations which he or she may deem appropriate. C. Failure to reappoint a unit member shall not be subject to the grievance procedure. D. In the case of those who shall be offered a reappointment, the supervisor shall discuss the evaluation with the unit member, who, prior thereto, shall have been given an opportunity to inspect and receive a copy of such evaluation. At the annual conference, the unit member shall have the right to bring in any material he or she feels is pertinent to the proper consideration of the nature and scope of the evaluation prior to its placement in the unit member's personal file.

Evaluation and Reappointment