Initial Project Review Sample Clauses

Initial Project Review. All Projects submitted to the Program shall be subject to the review process as detailed in the Contractor Resource Manual. With the exception of EmPower Electric Reduction (direct install) projects, it is strongly recommended that work not start on any project until the Participating Contractor has been notified that the submitted work scope has complied with Program requirements. This policy also applies to any field change order(s) submitted to the Program. Projects started without Program approval must be submitted to the Program no later than 14 days after the start of work. Program incentives will be calculated based upon the project submission date, not the date that work began on the project. Certain energy efficiency measures, including but not limited to windows and doors, may be subject to review by the State Historic Preservation Office (SHPO) and may require a SHPO form to be submitted and approved prior to commencement of work on these measures. See Contractor Resource Manual for further details. Any project that has been partially or fully completed prior to Project review and approval is at the Participating Contractor’s risk. In these cases, the Participating Contractor shall assume all financial liabilities associated with these projects (i.e., Contractor incentives and Program participant financing, as well as the value of the Program participant incentive and/or contractor incentive).
Sample 1Sample 2Sample 3See All (5)
AutoNDA by SimpleDocs
Initial Project Review. Screening Projects under Attachment 3 of the PA Most of the projects ADOT conducts include routine undertakings that have minimal risk for affecting cultural resources under certain conditions. In these cases, the PA provides for those projects to be screened and exempted from further Section 106 review. The screening process is described in Stipulations VIII.C.1 and Attachment 3 of the PA. The HPT Staff screens the project, following Attachment 3 of the PA, to determine if the project is exempt from further review. Depending on how well-defined the initial project scope was, this step may occur during the background research phase. A memo is used to document this project screening. The HPT Staff first assesses whether the project scope fits the activities listed in Attachment 3. If so, then the HPT Staff conducts background research (see Chapter 2 for detailed information on conducting background research) on the project area to determine whether the general and specific conditions that govern the applicability of Attachment 3 are met. If the background research conducted for the PEDS is sufficient to make a screening determination, it may not be necessary to conduct additional research. It is necessary to check all the general and specific conditions for a particular undertaking as part of the screening process. In addition, the following conditions need to be met in order for an undertaking to qualify as exempt from further review: • The APE has been previously surveyed or is completely disturbed and does not contain any historic properties or is not immediately adjacent to any historic properties, with the exception of historic roads. • The landowner(s) are signatories to the PA or local governments who are amenable to implementing the PA. • The APE is within existing ROW. • The project scope of work will not affect any character-defining feature of a historic road if one is present within the APE. If the project is exempt from further review, the HPT Staff documents this decision to the memo. There is no need to formally consult with any consulting parties if the project is exempt from further review; however, the HPT Staff conducts informal coordination with any landowners prior to finalizing and documenting the decision. The HPT Staff also forwards the documentation to SHPO in real time, rather than waiting for the submittal of the quarterly report.
Sample 1Sample 2Sample 3
Initial Project Review. In March 2007, the Napa County Board of Supervisors (the “Board”) received an initial application from Landowner for a General Plan amendment related to development of the Property. Following a series of City-County “study group” meetings in 2007-2008 to analyze water supply, traffic, and fiscal impacts, Landowner amended its application and the County initiated the preparation of a Draft Environmental Impact Report (the “Draft EIR”) in January 2009.
Sample 1Sample 2
Initial Project Review. Lender’s Inspector shall have performed an Initial Project Review for construction of the MOB and Borrower shall have satisfied all requirements reasonably made by Lender’s Inspector as a result of such review.
Sample 1Sample 2
Initial Project Review. Prior to closing of the construction financing for the Project, the Advisor will perform a detailed construction cost review for the Project (an "Initial Project Review") which will include the scope of work, including the size of the Project, the unit size, unit mix and density of the Project, and the type of building, amenity package and parking spaces and will render an opinion regarding:
Sample 1
Initial Project Review. In March 2007, the Napa County Board of Supervisors (the “Board”) received an initial application from Landowner for a General Plan amendment related to development of the Property. Following a series of City-County “study group” meetings in 2007-2008 to analyze water supply, traffic, and fiscal impacts, Landowner amended its application and the County initiated the preparation of a Draft Environmental Impact Report (the “Draft EIR”) in January 2009. D.2. County Housing Element. On June 23, 2009 (Resolution No. 09-88), the Board certified the County’s Housing Element Environmental Impact Report and adopted a General Plan amendment updating the Housing Element which identified the Property as a location for multifamily housing and contained the program to, among other things, rezone 20 acres of the Property to allow housing development at a minimum density of 20 dwelling units per acre (Housing Element Program H-4e). The Housing Element identified Program H-4e as 945 residential dwelling units with a state-required density bonus), up to 50,000 square feet of enclosed non-residential uses, one hotel with up to 150 suites and associated uses such as meeting space and spa, and a continuing care retirement and assisted living facility for seniors with up to 150 units (containing up to 225 beds). On the Eastern Parcel, outside of the Study Area, the GPA allows up to 319,000 gross square feet (“gsf”) of enclosed non-residential uses, including approximately 154,000 gsf of Membership Warehouse Store, 90,000 gsf of office use and 75,000 gsf of warehouse and R&D uses. As specified in Policy AG/LU-52 of the General Plan, the “Study Area” designation allows industrial uses to continue pursuant to existing zoning, but signals the need for further site- or area-specific planning to assess the potential for a mix of uses within the Study Area.
Sample 1
Initial Project Review. In March 2007, the Napa County Board of Supervisors (the “Board”) received an initial application from Landowner for a General Plan amendment related to development of the Property. Following a series of City-County “study group” meetings in 2007-2008 to analyze water supply, traffic, and fiscal impacts, Landowner amended its application and the County initiated the preparation of a Draft Environmental Impact Report (the “Draft EIR”) in January 2009. D.2. County Housing Element. On June 23, 2009 (Resolution No. 09-88), the Board certified the County’s Housing Element Environmental Impact Report and adopted a General Plan amendment updating the Housing Element which identified the Property as a location for multifamily housing and contained the program to, among other things, rezone 20 acres of the Property to allow housing development at a minimum density of 20 dwelling units per acre (Housing Element Program H-4e). The Housing Element identified Program H-4e as the likely first phase of a larger development, and required the County to rezone at least 20 acres of the Napa Pipe property, allowing at least 304 units (202 of them by right) to fulfill its Housing Element commitment.
Sample 1
AutoNDA by SimpleDocs

Related to Initial Project Review

  • Project Plan Development of Project Plan Upon the Authorized User’s request, the Contractor must develop a Project Plan. This Project Plan may include Implementation personnel, installation timeframes, escalation procedures and an acceptance plan as appropriate for the Services requested. Specific requirements of the plan will be defined in the RFQ. In response to the RFQ, the Contractor must agree to furnish all labor and supervision necessary to successfully perform Services procured from this Lot. Project Plan Document The Contractor will provide to the Authorized User, a Project Plan that may contain the following items: • Name of the Project Manager, Contact Phone Numbers and E-Mail Address; • Names of the Project Team Members, Contact Phone Numbers and E-Mail Address; • A list of Implementation milestones based on the Authorized User’s desired installation date; • A list of responsibilities of the Authorized User during system Implementation; • A list of designated Contractor Authorized Personnel; • Escalation procedures including management personnel contact numbers; • Full and complete documentation of all Implementation work; • Samples of knowledge transfer documentation; and • When applicable, a list of all materials and supplies required to complete the Implementation described in the RFQ. Materials and Supplies Required to Complete Implementation In the event that there are items required to complete an Implementation, the Contractor may request the items be added to its Contract if the items meet the scope of the Contract. Negotiation of Final Project Plan If the Authorized User chooses to require a full Project Plan, the State further reserves the right for Authorized Users to negotiate the final Project Plan with the apparent RFQ awardee. Such negotiation must not substantively change the scope of the RFQ plan, but can alter timeframes or other incidental factors of the final Project Plan. The Authorized User will provide the Contractor a minimum of five (5) business days’ notice of the final negotiation date. The Authorized User reserves the right to move to the next responsible and responsive bidder if Contractor negotiations are unsuccessful.

  • Development Schedule The Project shall substantially comply with the specific timetables and triggers for action set forth in Article 5 of this Agreement. The parties acknowledge that, as provided in G.S. 160A-400.25(b), the failure to meet a commencement or completion date shall not, in and of itself, constitute a material breach of this Agreement pursuant to G.S. 160A-400.27 but must be judged based upon the totality of the circumstances.

  • Project Completion Part 1 – Material Completion

  • Development Reports Beginning six months after Effective Date and ending on the date of first commercial sale of a Licensed Product in the United States, LICENSEE shall report to Cornell progress covering LICENSEE's (and Affiliate's and Sublicensee's) activities and efforts in the development of rights granted to LICENSEE under this Agreement for the preceding six months. The report shall include, but not be limited to, activities and efforts to develop and test all Licensed Products and obtain governmental approvals necessary for marketing the same. Such semi-annual reports shall be due within sixty days (60) of the reporting period and shall use the form as provided herein as Appendix C.

  • Feasibility Study Buyer will, at Buyer's expense and within ____ days from Effective Date ("Feasibility Study Period"), determine whether the Property is suitable, in Buyer's sole and absolute discretion, for ___________________ use. During the Feasibility Study Period, Buyer may conduct a Phase I environmental assessment and any other tests, analyses, surveys and investigations ("Inspections") that Buyer deems necessary to determine to Buyer's satisfaction the Property's engineering, architectural and environmental properties; zoning and zoning restrictions; subdivision statutes; soil and grade; availability of access public roads, water, and other utilities; consistency with local, state and regional growth management plans, availability of permits, government approvals, and licenses; and other inspections that Buyer deems appropriate to determine the Property's suitability for the Buyer's intended use. If the Property must be rezoned, Buyer will obtain the rezoning from the appropriatx xxxernment agencies. Seller will sign all documents Buyer is required to file in connection with development or rezoning approvals. Seller gives Buyer, its agents, contractors and assigns, the right to enter the Property at any time during the Feasibility Study Period for the purpose of conducting inspections; provided, however, that Buyer, its agents, contractors and assigns enter the Property and conduct inspections at their own risk. Buyer will indemnify and hold Seller harmless from xxxxes, damages, costs, claims and expenses of any nature, including attorney's fees, expenses and liability incurred in application for rezoning or related proceedings, and from liability to any person, arising from the conduct of any and all inspections of any work authorized by Buyer. Buyer will not engage in any activity that xxxxx result in a construction lien being filed against the Property without Seller's prior written consent. If this transaction does not close, Buyer will, at Buyer's expense, (1) repair all damages to the Property resulting from the Inspections and return the Property to the condition it was in prior to conduct of the Inspections, and (2) release to Seller all reports and other work generated as a result of the Inspections. Buyer will deliver written notice to Seller prior to the expiration of the Feasibility Study Period of Buyer's determination of whether or not the Properxx xx acceptable. Buyer's failure to comply with this notice requirement will constitute acceptance of the Property as suitable for Buyer's intended use in its "as is" condition. If the Property is unacceptable to Buyer and written notice of this fact is timely delivered to Seller, this Contract will be deemed terminated as of the day after the Feasibility Study period ends and Buyer's deposit(s) will be returned after Escrow Axxxx receives proper authorization form all interested parties.

  • Development Plan document specifying the work program, schedule, and relevant investments required for the Development and the Production of a Discovery or set of Discoveries of Oil and Gas in the Contract Area, including its abandonment.

  • Project Schedule Construction must begin within 30 days of the date set forth in Appendix A, Page 2, for the start of construction, or this Agreement may become null and void, at the sole discretion of the Director. However, the Recipient may apply to the Director in writing for an extension of the date to initiate construction. The Recipient shall specify the reasons for the delay in the start of construction and provide the Director with a new start of construction date. The Director will review such requests for extensions and may extend the start date, providing that the Project can be completed within a reasonable time frame.

  • Development Work The Support Standards do not include development work either (i) on software not licensed from CentralSquare or (ii) development work for enhancements or features that are outside the documented functionality of the Solutions, except such work as may be specifically purchased and outlined in Exhibit 1. CentralSquare retains all Intellectual Property Rights in development work performed and Customer may request consulting and development work from CentralSquare as a separate billable service.

  • Statement of Work The Contractor shall provide the services and staff, and otherwise do all things necessary for or incidental to the performance of work, as set forth below:

Time is Money Join Law Insider Premium to draft better contracts faster.