METHOD OF COMPARISON Sample Clauses

METHOD OF COMPARISON. 1. The basis of comparison used to compare the jobs within the bargaining unit was: skills and responsibility effort working conditions 2. The results of the job comparison were as follows: Elementary A3 Secondary A4 None Elementary A2 Secondary A2 None Elementary A1 Secondary A1 None Secondary C Secondary A1 * Secondary B Secondary A1 * Elementary D Secondary A1 * Elementary C Secondary A1 * Elementary B Secondary A1 * *The parties to this Plan have agreed to Pay Equity adjustments for the job rates for all elementary and secondary teachers in Categories D, C and B, as follows:
Sample 1Sample 2Sample 3See All (4)
AutoNDA by SimpleDocs
METHOD OF COMPARISON. No female-dominated job classes were identified, therefore, no comparisons were necessary.
Sample 1Sample 2Sample 3See All (4)
METHOD OF COMPARISON. The method of comparison used was the CUPE 11-Factor Evaluation Plan. The plan measures a composite of skill, effort, responsibility and working conditions as required by the Pay Equity Act. The factors and weights applied are as follows: Skill 35% Knowledge 15 Experience 10 Judgement 10 Effort 20% Concentration 10 Physical Effort 5 Dexterity 5 Responsibility 35% Accountability 10 Safety of Others 8 Leadership of Others 7 Contacts 10 Working Conditions 10% Disagreeable Working Conditions 10 Each job was evaluated by a Joint Committee comprised of union and management representatives using the above noted factors.
Sample 1Sample 2Sample 3
METHOD OF COMPARISON. 1. The basis of comparison used to compare the jobs within the bargaining unit was: skill and qualifications responsibility effort working conditions. 2. The results of the job comparison were as follows: Job Class Comparison Pay Equity Adjustment Elementary A4 Secondary A4 None Elementary A3 Secondary A3 None Elementary A2 Secondary A2 None Elementary A1 Secondary A1 None .../3 -3- Job Class Comparison Pay Equity Adjustment Secondary C Secondary A1 * Secondary B Secondary A1 * Elementary D Secondary A1 * Elementary C Secondary A1 * Elementary B Secondary A1 * * The parties to this Plan have agreed to Pay Equity adjustments for the job rates for all elementary and secondary teachers in Categories D, C and B, as follows: PART I - ADJUSTMENTS PART II - IMPLEMENTATION
Sample 1
METHOD OF COMPARISON. No female-dominatedjob classes were identified, therefore, no comparisons were necessary.
Sample 1
METHOD OF COMPARISON. The proportional value method determines the HHS pay policy applicable to a representative group of male job classes throughout the Establishment, and then compares the pay of female job classes, to determine if the same pay policy applies to the female jobs. If any female job class is not paid according to the same policy, a Pay Equity Adjustment will be required. The proportional value method uses a statistical method called regression analysis to determine the male pay line, as required by the Pay Equity Act. The regression analysis of the evaluation results for this plan demonstrates that the HHS has had a consistent pay practice in compensating male jobs. A mathematical measure of the accuracy of the male pay line in reflecting the relationship between job value and pay is the r-squared value. In this case, the r-squared value is .89, which is considered very good; this means that the male pay line, on which all comparisons are based, is highly reliable. There are no permissible differences in compensation between the male and female job classes in this Plan, as referred to in Section 8(1) and 8(3) of the Pay Equity Act.
Sample 1

Related to METHOD OF COMPARISON

  • Method of Measurement All linear and area measurements under this Agreement are measured on the horizontal plane, unless specified otherwise in an attached Schedule.

  • Method of Computation To determine the Adviser’s liability with respect to the Excess Amount, each month the Fund Operating Expenses for the Fund shall be annualized as of the last day of the month. If the annualized Fund Operating Expenses for any month exceeds the Operating Expense Limit of the Fund, the Adviser shall first waive or reduce its investment advisory fee for such month by an amount sufficient to reduce the annualized Fund Operating Expenses to an amount no higher than the Operating Expense Limit. If the amount of the waived or reduced investment advisory fee for any such month is insufficient to pay the Excess Amount, the Adviser shall also remit to the Fund an amount that, together with the waived or reduced investment advisory fee, is sufficient to pay such Excess Amount.

  • Method of Calculation All calculations under this Section 4 shall be made to the nearest one hundredth of a share.

  • Method of Compensation It is understood by the parties that, insofar as pay is concerned, employees temporarily filling a position in a higher broadband level shall be paid according to the same compensation method as promoted employees pursuant to the Rules of the State Personnel System.

  • Method of Billing Consultant may submit invoices to the City for approval on a progress basis, but no more often than two times a month. Said invoice shall be based on the total of all Consultant’s services which have been completed to City’s sole satisfaction. City shall pay Consultant’s invoice within forty-five (45) days from the date City receives said invoice. Each invoice shall describe in detail, the services performed, the date of performance, and the associated time for completion. Any additional services approved and performed pursuant to this Agreement shall be designated as “Additional Services” and shall identify the number of the authorized change order, where applicable, on all invoices.

  • Method of Accounting The Company will use the method of accounting previously determined by the Members for financial reporting and tax purposes.

  • Method of Giving Consent Any consent of a member required by this Agreement may be given by a written consent.

  • Method of Service A Notice may be given by: (i) being personally delivered on a Party; (ii) being left at the Party’s current address for service; (iii) being sent to the Party’s current address for service by pre-paid ordinary mail; or (iv) being sent by facsimile transmission to the Party’s current facsimile number for service provided that a copy of the notice is then delivered by one of the means described above.

  • Method of Communication Except as otherwise provided in this Agreement, all notices and communications hereunder shall be in writing, or by telephone subsequently confirmed in writing. Any notice shall be effective if delivered by hand delivery or sent via telecopy, recognized overnight courier service or certified mail, return receipt requested, and shall be presumed to be received by a party hereto (i) on the date of delivery if delivered by hand or sent by telecopy, (ii) on the next Business Day if sent by recognized overnight courier service and (iii) on the third Business Day following the date sent by certified mail, return receipt requested. A telephonic notice to the Administrative Agent as understood by the Administrative Agent will be deemed to be the controlling and proper notice in the event of a discrepancy with or failure to receive a confirming written notice.

  • METHOD OF AWARD Select a method of award below for vehicles built to specifications at the OEM factory, and/or pre-existing inventory, as applicable. Method of Award for Vehicles Built to Specifications at the OEM Factory: Lowest price to a single contractor that can meet the specified delivery date, and supply the total number of vehicles requested. Method of Award for Pre-Existing Inventory Vehicles: Lowest price to a single contractor that can meet the specified delivery date, and provide the total number of vehicles requested. Lowest price for each contractor responding to the mini-bid will be determined by calculating the sum of the Total NYS Contract Price for Mini-Bid for all vehicles bid (i.e., the Grand Total NYS Contract Price of Vehicles Bid). Lowest price, per vehicle (i.e., the Total NYS Contract Price for Mini-Bid), to multiple Contractors that can meet the specified delivery date.

Draft better contracts in just 5 minutes Get the weekly Law Insider newsletter packed with expert videos, webinars, ebooks, and more!