Monitoring and Evaluation Methodology. AGENCY will be monitored by THE PARTNERSHIP through review of deliverables submitted per the schedule outlined herein. Programmatic monitoring of the contract will be conducted annually either by on-site visit or by desk review of the contract, invoices and/or reports. THE PARTNERSHIP may review records, including patient records, that support the information contained on reports submitted and/or interview employees, to assure the satisfactory performance of the terms and conditions of this agreement.
Monitoring and Evaluation Methodology. The AAAPP will review and evaluate the performance of the Sub-Recipient under the terms of this contract. Monitoring shall be conducted through direct contact with the Sub-Recipient via telephone, in writing, or an on- site visit. The primary, secondary, or signatory of the contract must be available for any on-site programmatic monitoring visit. The AAAPP reserves the right to conduct an on-site visit unannounced by persons duly authorized by the AAAPP. The AAAPP’s determination of acceptable performance shall be conclusive. The Sub-Recipient agrees to cooperate with the AAAPP in monitoring the progress of completion of the service tasks and deliverables. The AAAPP may use, but is not limited to, one or more of the following methods for monitoring:
a. Desk reviews and analytical reviews;
b. Scheduled, unscheduled, and follow-up on-site visits;
c. Client visits;
d. Review of independent auditor’s reports;
e. Review of third-party documents and/or evaluation;
f. Review of progress reports;
g. Review of customer satisfaction surveys;
h. Agreed-upon procedures review by an external auditor or consultant;
i. Limited-scope reviews; and
j. Other procedures as deemed necessary by the AAAPP.
Monitoring and Evaluation Methodology a) By execution of this subcontract the Provider hereby acknowledges and agrees that its performance under the subcontract shall meet the standards and be bound by the conditions set forth herein. If the Provider fails to meet these standards, the Network, at its exclusive option, may allow up to three (3) months for the Provider to achieve compliance with the standards. If the Network affords the Provider an opportunity to achieve compliance, and the Provider fails to achieve compliance within the specified time frame, the Network will terminate the subcontract in the absence of any extenuating and mitigating circumstances. The determination of extenuating or mitigating circumstances is the exclusive right of the Network.
b) The Provider shall comply with the requirements of the Network’s Standard Subcontract, section I.E., with reference to monitoring by the Network. The Provider agrees to fully cooperate with the Network in the conduct of both performance audits and financial audits. The Provider will be evaluated through on-site monitoring visits and/or desk reviews of service reports and invoices. This component is intended to be in addition to other audit requirements found in other documents incorporated by reference in this subcontract and is not to be construed as a limitation upon them. The Provider agrees to include these audit and recordkeeping requirements in all approved subcontracts and assignments that result from this subcontract.
Monitoring and Evaluation Methodology. The Agency will review and evaluate the performance of the Contractor under the terms of this contract. Monitoring shall be conducted through direct contact with the Contractor through telephone, in writing, and/or on-site visit(s). The primary, secondary, or signatory of the contract must be available for any on-site programmatic monitoring visit. The Agency’s determination of acceptable performance shall be conclusive. The Contractor agrees to cooperate with the Agency in monitoring the progress of completion of the service tasks and deliverables. The Agency may use, but is not limited to, one or more of the following methods for monitoring:
a. Desk reviews and analytical reviews;
b. Scheduled, unscheduled, and follow-up on-site visits;
c. Client visits;
d. Review of independent auditor’s reports;
e. Review of third-party documents and/or evaluation;
f. Review of progress reports;
g. Review of customer satisfaction surveys;
h. Agreed-upon procedures review by an external auditor or consultant;
i. Limited-scope reviews; and
j. Other procedures as deemed necessary by the Agency.
Monitoring and Evaluation Methodology. The AAAPP will review and evaluate the performance of the Sub-Recipient under the terms of this contract. Monitoring shall be conducted through direct contact with the Sub-Recipient through telephone, in writing, and/or on-site visit(s). The primary, secondary, or signatory of the contract must be available for any on-site programmatic monitoring visit. The AAAPP’s determination of acceptable performance shall be final. The Sub-Recipient agrees to cooperate with the AAAPP in monitoring the progress of completion of the service tasks and deliverables. The AAAPP may use, but is not limited to, one or more of the following methods for monitoring:
a. Desk reviews and analytical reviews;
b. Scheduled, unscheduled, and follow-up on-site visits;
c. Client visits;
d. Review of independent auditor’s reports;
e. Review of third-party documents and/or evaluation;
f. Review of progress reports;
g. Review of customer satisfaction surveys;
h. Agreed-upon procedures review by an external auditor or consultant;
i. Limited-scope reviews; and
j. Other procedures as deemed necessary by the AAAPP.
Monitoring and Evaluation Methodology. The AAAPP will review and evaluate the performance of the vendor under the terms of this agreement. Monitoring shall be conducted through direct contact with the vendor through telephone, desk review, or an on-site visit. The AAAPP’s determination of acceptable performance shall be conclusive. The vendor agrees to cooperate with the AAAPP in monitoring the progress of completion of the service tasks and deliverables. The vendor will permit persons duly authorized by the AAAPP/DOEA to inspect and copy any records, papers, documents, facilities, goods and services of the vendor which are relevant to this agreement, and to interview any clients, employees and vendor employees of the vendor to assure the AAAPP/DOEA of the satisfactory performance of the terms and conditions of this agreement. Following such review, the AAAPP/DOEA will deliver to the vendor a written report of its findings and request for development, by the vendor, of a corrective action plan where appropriate. The vendor hereby agrees to timely correct all deficiencies identified in the corrective action plan. Client signatures verifying billed services, timesheets, service logs, service delivery verification and evidence of background screening compliance must also be available during annual onsite, or desk review monitoring conducted by the AAAPP.
Monitoring and Evaluation Methodology. The AAAPP will review and evaluate the performance of the sub-recipient under the terms of this contract. Monitoring shall be conducted through direct contact with the sub- recipient through telephone, in writing, or an on-site visit. The AAAPP’s determination of acceptable performance shall be conclusive. The sub-recipient agrees to cooperate with the AAAPP/DOEA in monitoring the progress of completion of the service tasks and deliverables.
Monitoring and Evaluation Methodology. 1) By execution of this subcontract the Provider hereby acknowledges and agrees that its performance under the subcontract shall meet the standards and be bound by the conditions set forth herein. If the Provider fails to meet these standards, the Council, at its exclusive option, may allow up to six (6) months for the Provider to remedy deficiencies identified by the Council or its agent. If the Council affords the Provider an opportunity to achieve compliance, and the Provider fails to achieve compliance within the specified time frame, the Council will terminate the subcontract in the absence of any extenuating and/or mitigating circumstances. The determination of extenuating or mitigating circumstances is the exclusive right of the Council.
2) The Provider shall comply with the requirements of the Council’s Standard Subcontract, section I.E., with reference to monitoring by the Council. The Provider agrees to fully cooperate with the Council in the conduct of both performance and financial audits. The Provider will be evaluated through onsite monitoring visits and desk reviews of reports and invoices. This component is intended to be in addition to other audit requirements found in other documents incorporated by reference in this subcontract and is not to be construed as a limitation upon them. The Provider agrees to include these audit and record keeping requirements in all approved subcontracts and assignments that result from this subcontract.
Monitoring and Evaluation Methodology. The Sub-Recipient shall monitor its performance under this contract, as well as that of its subcontractors, subrecipients and consultants who are paid from funds provided under this contract, to ensure that the scope of work is accomplished within the specified time periods and budgets set and that other performance goals stated in this contract are achieved. Such review shall be made for each function or activity set forth in this contract and reported in the monthly client service report.
Monitoring and Evaluation Methodology. The department shall monitor performance of the provider by review of the deliverables and by attending at least one of the sampling events to observe if sampling procedures outlined in the QAPP are followed. Any observed shortcomings shall be noted to and resolved by the provider.
