North West Planning Advisory Committee Sample Clauses

North West Planning Advisory Committee. At its meeting on January 6, 2021, the North West Planning Advisory Committee (PAC) recommended that the application be approved, with consideration given to retaining as many trees as possible on the site. A memorandum from the PAC to North West Community Council will be provided under separate cover.
North West Planning Advisory Committee. On June 1, 2016, the North West Planning Advisory Committee (PAC) recommended that the application be approved. In response to concerns raised by the PAC, the development agreement limits the number of residents and staff.
North West Planning Advisory Committee. On May 27, 2020, the North West Planning Advisory Committee (PAC) recommended that the application be refused due to traffic impacts, loss of vegetation, impact on adjacent areas and overall compatibility with the existing neighborhood. In response to the comments from PAC, the applicant revised the proposal to reduce the number of surface parking spots from 25 to 14, increasing the amount of open space and protecting existing vegetation. increasing the amount of open space and protecting existing vegetation by providing a larger lawn. Many of the trees that the public was concerned about losing are located on an adjacent property but, increasing the green space around them will reduce the risk that construction related disturbances will affect the trees. A report from the PAC to Community Council will be provided under separate cover.
North West Planning Advisory Committee. On September 1, 2021, the North West Planning Advisory Committee (PAC) recommended that the application be approved with consideration given to excluding a recycling depot as a permitted use under the development agreement. The proposed amending development agreement does not permit recycling depots on the subject lands. A report from the NWPAC to Community Council will be provided under separate cover.
North West Planning Advisory Committee. The North West Planning Advisory Committee (NWPAC) reviewed this development application at their April 2, 2014 meeting. Staff advise that matters raised by the Committee have been reasonably addressed through amendments since made to the proposal and/or are addressed through the standard HRM permitting process. Specific questions were posed with regard to vehicle access and egress to the site given concern for existing levels of traffic on Sackville Drive. In assessing the traffic impact statement submitted with this application, Engineering and Traffic staff have determined that no limitations on turning movements in and out of the site are warranted at this point. However, these movements will be analysed as the street continues to redevelop, and adjustments can be taken in the future if so warranted. A report from the NWPAC will be provided to Community Council under separate cover.
North West Planning Advisory Committee. On February 2, 2022, the North West Planning Advisory Committee (PAC) recommended the application be approved subject to consideration of traffic mitigation, exterior design, duration of time extensions, and access to the parking garage. It should be noted that this recommendation was provided to Community Council in advance of changes to the HRM Charter. These changes, passed in April 2022, legislated that decisions on Planning matters may not be referred to a planning advisory committee for a recommendation prior to Community Council's decision on the matter. The proposed amending development agreement addresses some of PAC’s concerns, including exterior design improvements. The applicant continues to request an eight (8) year time extension because the size of the project is large, consisting of two multiple unit buildings. In the traffic impact statement Case 22691: Amending Development Agreement 0 Xxxxxx Xxx., Lower Sackville Community Council Report - 4 - November 21, 2022 submitted by the applicant, the traffic engineer required that one of the driveway accesses at Old Sackville Road be restricted to right-in / right-out traffic movements to and from the ground level parking lot due to limited visibility. The second driveway access to the underground parking lot was recommended to remain with no restrictions as it is an existing access with good visibility. HRM Engineering reviewed the traffic impact study and did not raise concerns. A report from the PAC to Community Council will be provided under separate cover.
North West Planning Advisory Committee. On April 6, 2022, the North West Planning Advisory Committee (PAC) recommended that the application be approved with consideration given to reviewing the location of the driveway and installing traffic lights at the intersection of Windgate Drive and Beaver Bank Road. The location of the driveway shown at Schedule B of the proposed development agreement was reviewed by HRM Development Engineering and meets both the minimum and turning sight distance as required under HRM’s Municipal Design Guidelines (2013). Off-site benefits such as installation of traffic lights at the intersection of Windgate Drive and Beaver Bank Road are beyond the consideration of the proposed development agreement. It should be noted that this application was reviewed by the PAC in advance of changes to the Halifax Regional Municipality Charter in April which prohibited Council from seeking the recommendations of this committee prior to deciding on a planning application. New applications received today would not be considered by the PAC.
North West Planning Advisory Committee. On May 3, 2017, the North West Planning Advisory Committee (PAC) recommended that North West Community Council reject the application due to traffic concerns due to a busy intersection on Duke and Damascus and second entrance on Duke Street, environmental impact of infilling the wetland, and concerns over the role of Halifax Water in the ownership and maintenance of the hydro storage water and/or drainage technology. On April 12, 2017, the Regional Waters Advisory Board (RWAB) recommended that the application be approved subject to best management construction and sediment control practices being followed by the developer to minimize any negative impacts to the wetland noting that a redesigned buffer enhances the ecological functions of the area, encourages ground water recharge and creates a viable riparian habitat.

Related to North West Planning Advisory Committee

  • JOINT LABOUR MANAGEMENT COMMITTEE A Joint Labour Management Committee shall be established to attend to those matters which are of mutual interest. To ensure its effectiveness the Committee shall be separate and apart from the grievance procedure.

  • Labour Management Committee (a) Where the parties mutually agree that there are matters of mutual concern and interest that would be beneficial if discussed at a Labour Management Committee Meeting during the term of this Agreement, the following shall apply. (b) An equal number of representatives of each party as mutually agreed shall meet at a time and place mutually satisfactory. A request for a meeting hereunder will be made in writing prior to the date proposed and accompanied by an agenda of matters proposed to be discussed, which shall not include matters that are properly the subject of grievance or negotiations for the amendment or renewal of this agreement. Any representative(s) attending such meetings during their regularly scheduled hours of work shall not lose regular earnings as a result of such attendance. (c) It is agreed that the topic of a rehabilitation program for drug and alcohol abuse is an appropriate topic for the Labour-Management Committee. It is also agreed that the topic of the utilization of full-time and part-time staff is an appropriate topic for the Labour-Management Committee. The committee shall have access to work schedules and job postings upon request. (d) It is understood that joint meetings with other Labour-Management Committees in the Hospital may be scheduled concerning issues of mutual interest if satisfactory to all concerned. (e) Where two or more agreements exist between a Hospital and CUPE the Committee may be a joint one representing employees under both agreements, unless otherwise agreed.

  • Advisory Committee The Settling State shall designate an Opioid Settlement Remediation Advisory Committee (the “Advisory Committee”) to provide input and recommendations regarding remediation spending from that Settling State’s Abatement Accounts Fund. A Settling State may elect to use an existing advisory committee or similar entity (created outside of a State-Subdivision Agreement or Allocation Statute); provided, however, the Advisory Committee or similar entity shall meet the following requirements: (i) Written guidelines that establish the formation and composition of the Advisory Committee, terms of service for members, contingency for removal or resignation of members, a schedule of meetings, and any other administrative details; (ii) Composition that includes at least an equal number of local representatives as state representatives; (iii) A process for receiving input from Subdivisions and other communities regarding how the opioid crisis is affecting their communities, their abatement needs, and proposals for abatement strategies and responses; and (iv) A process by which Advisory Committee recommendations for expenditures for Opioid Remediation will be made to and considered by the appropriate state agencies.

  • Training Committee The parties to this Agreement may form a Training Committee. The Training Committee will be constituted by equal numbers of Employer nominees and ETU employee representatives and have a charter which clearly states its role and responsibilities. It shall monitor the clauses of this Agreement which relate to training and ensure all employees have equal access to training.

  • Technical Advisory Committee (TAC The goal of this subtask is to create an advisory committee for this Agreement. The TAC should be composed of diverse professionals. The composition will vary depending on interest, availability, and need. TAC members will serve at the CAM’s discretion. The purpose of the TAC is to: • Provide guidance in project direction. The guidance may include scope and methodologies, timing, and coordination with other projects. The guidance may be based on: o Technical area expertise; o Knowledge of market applications; or o Linkages between the agreement work and other past, present, or future projects (both public and private sectors) that TAC members are aware of in a particular area. • Review products and provide recommendations for needed product adjustments, refinements, or enhancements. • Evaluate the tangible benefits of the project to the state of California, and provide recommendations as needed to enhance the benefits. • Provide recommendations regarding information dissemination, market pathways, or commercialization strategies relevant to the project products. The TAC may be composed of qualified professionals spanning the following types of disciplines: • Researchers knowledgeable about the project subject matter; • Members of trades that will apply the results of the project (e.g., designers, engineers, architects, contractors, and trade representatives); • Public interest market transformation implementers; • Product developers relevant to the project; • U.S. Department of Energy research managers, or experts from other federal or state agencies relevant to the project; • Public interest environmental groups; • Utility representatives; • Air district staff; and • Members of relevant technical society committees. • Prepare a List of Potential TAC Members that includes the names, companies, physical and electronic addresses, and phone numbers of potential members. The list will be discussed at the Kick-off meeting, and a schedule for recruiting members and holding the first TAC meeting will be developed. • Recruit TAC members. Ensure that each individual understands member obligations and the TAC meeting schedule developed in subtask 1.11. • Prepare a List of TAC Members once all TAC members have committed to serving on the TAC. • Submit Documentation of TAC Member Commitment (such as Letters of Acceptance) from each TAC member. • List of Potential TAC Members • List of TAC Members • Documentation of TAC Member Commitment

  • Development Committee Arcadia and Xxxxxx shall establish a development committee (the “Development Committee”) comprised of no more than three (3) representatives of each of Arcadia and Xxxxxx. The Development Committee shall be chaired by a member thereof designated from time to time by Arcadia. The Development Committee shall oversee the Research Plan, Milestones and development and production of plants and microorganisms that produce Transgenic Oil in accordance with the Research Plan. The Development Committee may revise the Research Plan and the Milestones as deemed necessary and appropriate by unanimous written consent of all members. Meetings of the Development Committee shall be at least biannual and at such times and places or in such form (e.g., in person, telephonic or video conference) as the members of the Development Committee shall determine. Representatives of both Parties shall be present at any meeting of the Development Committee. Decisions of the Development Committee shall be made by a written consent signed by all six (6) members thereof. The Development Committee shall keep minutes of its deliberations setting forth, among other matters, all proposed actions and all votes thereon. All records of the Development Committee shall at all times be available to both Parties. The Development Committee by unanimous consent may delegate to one Party or to a specific representative the authority to make certain decisions. The Development Committee may revoke such authority by the written consent of four members. All disagreements within the Development Committee shall be subject to the following: (i) The members of the committee will endeavor in good faith for a period of not more than ninety (90) days to attempt to resolve the disagreement; (ii) If the members of the committee are unable to resolve the disagreement by the end of such period, the committee shall promptly present the disagreement to the President of Xxxx Products Division and the President of Arcadia or their respective designees, and the two executives shall endeavor to resolve the disagreement for a period of not more than thirty (30) days; (iii) If the two executives are unable to resolve this disagreement, the disagreement shall be submitted for ADR as provided in Section 12(a).

  • Joint Union/Management Committee It shall be appropriate for either the Union or the University to request that a Joint Union/Management committee be convened, with Environmental Health and Safety as a participating member, to discuss health and safety concerns and to explore options for addressing those concerns through appropriate training or other approaches.

  • Operating Committee the Consortium’s managing body, composed of representatives of the Manager and the Contractors, pursuant to Annex XI.

  • Technical Committee 1. The Technical Committee shall comprise: (a) nine experts representing different regions of the Agreement Area, in accordance with a balanced geographical distribution; (b) one representative from the International Union for Conservation of Nature and Natural Resources (IUCN), one from the International Waterfowl and Wetlands Research Bureau (IWRB) and one from the International Council for Game and Wildlife Conservation (CIC); and (c) one expert from each of the following fields: rural economics, game management, and environmental law. The procedure for the appointment of the experts, the term of their appointment and the procedure for designation of the Chairman of the Technical Committee shall be determined by the Meeting of the Parties. The Chairman may admit a maximum of four observers from specialized international inter- governmental and non-governmental organizations. 2. Unless the Meeting of the Parties decides otherwise, meetings of the Technical Committee shall be convened by the Agreement secretariat in conjunction with each ordinary session of the Meeting of the Parties and at least once between ordinary sessions of the Meeting of the Parties. 3. The Technical Committee shall: (a) provide scientific and technical advice and information to the Meeting of the Parties and, through the Agreement secretariat, to Parties; (b) make recommendations to the Meeting of the Parties concerning the Action Plan, implementation of the Agreement and further research to be carried out; (c) prepare for each ordinary session of the Meeting of the Parties a report on its activities, which shall be submitted to the Agreement secretariat not less than one hundred and twenty days before the session of the Meeting of the Parties, and copies shall be circulated forthwith by the Agreement secretariat to the Parties; and (d) carry out any other tasks referred to it by the Meeting of the Parties. 4. Where in the opinion of the Technical Committee there has arisen an emergency which requires the adoption of immediate measures to avoid deterioration of the conservation status of one or more migratory waterbird species, the Technical Committee may request the Agreement secretariat to convene urgently a meeting of the Parties concerned. These Parties shall meet as soon as possible thereafter to establish rapidly a mechanism to give protection to the species identified as being subject to particularly adverse threat. Where a recommendation has been adopted at such a meeting, the Parties concerned shall inform each other and the Agreement secretariat of measures they have taken to implement it, or of the reasons why the recommendation could not be implemented. 5. The Technical Committee may establish such working groups as may be necessary to deal with specific tasks.

  • Joint Development Committee (a) The Parties shall establish a Joint Development Committee (the “Joint Development Committee” or “JDC”), comprised of [**] representatives of Ikaria and [**] representatives of BioLineRx, to oversee the Development of Products. Each Party shall make its initial designation of its representatives not later than [**] days after the Effective Date. Each Party may change any one or more of its representatives to the Joint Development Committee at any time upon notice to the other Party. (b) The JDC shall meet at least [**] during the Development Term or more or less frequently as the JDC may agree. The JDC may meet in person or by means of a telephone or video conference call. One meeting of the JDC per year shall be held in person at Ikaria’s headquarters in Clinton, NJ and one meeting of the JDC per year shall be held in person at BioLineRx’s headquarters in Israel, provided, that the Parties’ representatives may participate in person, via telephone, or video conference in their discretion. Each Party shall use reasonable efforts to cause its representatives to attend the meetings of the JDC. If a representative of a Party is unable to attend a meeting, such Party may designate an alternate to attend such meeting in place of the absent representative. Each Party shall bear its own costs with respect to its participation on the JDC. Prior to every meeting of the JDC, Ikaria will provide to the JDC detailed reports describing Ikaria’s current clinical and development activities and plans. (c) The JDC shall be the vehicle by which BioLineRx may offer insight and guidance to Ikaria with respect to (i) establishing the Development Plan setting forth the Development Program’s objectives and the activities to be conducted, (ii) reviewing and updating the Development Plan from time to time, (iii) monitoring the progress and results of the Development Program, (iv) determining future Development Program activities, including Development activities relating to Manufacturing, to be conducted during the Development Term, and (v) establishing success criteria for the clinical trials (other than those for which success criteria are set forth in this Agreement), and determining whether the results of such clinical trials have achieved the applicable success criteria. (d) The JDC shall only act unanimously, with each Party given one (1) vote regardless of the number of representatives. If, however, the JDC is unable to reach agreement with respect to any matter within [**] days, the matter shall be referred to the Parties’ respective Executive Officers for resolution. If the Executive Officers are not able to resolve any such matter by consensus within [**] days following referral, Ikaria’s Executive Officer shall have the right to decide the matter taking into account Ikaria’s obligation to use Commercially Reasonable Efforts under Section 3.8. Notwithstanding anything in this Section 3.2, neither Party shall have a unilateral right to resolve any dispute involving the breach or alleged breach of this Agreement, to amend or modify this Agreement or the Parties’ respective rights and obligations hereunder or, except as expressly provided in this Section 3.2, any Development Plan or the Parties’ respective rights and obligations thereunder.