Performance Goals and Evaluation Sample Clauses

Performance Goals and Evaluation. (A) Board Policy 2.14, dated revised June 11, 2012, is attached hereto and incorporated herein by this reference as Schedule B, and shall govern the process for the Board’s formal and informal evaluation of the Superintendent; however, notwithstanding the foregoing, during the first Agreement year (July 1, 2018 through June 30, 2019), the Board and Superintendent agree to discuss, and the Board will determine the timing and method of one (1) evaluation in lieu of Board Policy 2.14. Any subsequent amendment to Board Policy 2.14 shall automatically amend this Agreement and be incorporated herein by this reference.
Sample 1
AutoNDA by SimpleDocs
Performance Goals and Evaluation. In each year of this Agreement, the parties shall jointly establish objective performance goals for the Superintendent. A meeting for this purpose shall take place in September of each year of the Agreement. The Board shall meet with the Superintendent in July and August of each year to review District needs and subsequent to that meeting shall announce its goals for the year. The Superintendent shall be evaluated by the Board annually prior to June 30. The evaluation shall be in writing utilizing a form mutually agreed upon by the Board and the Superintendent. The Board shall hold an executive session for the purpose of discussing this performance evaluation with the Superintendent.
Sample 1
Performance Goals and Evaluation. Section 8 of the Agreement shall be amended in its entirety to read as follows: “The City Council shall review and evaluate the performance of WAN annually. These evaluations shall be private and confidential, and the results shall be summarized and discussed in closed session, to the extent permitted by laws. Nothing in this provision shall prevent the parties from evaluation of performance at times other than as stated herein. Any delay or other failure to satisfy any or all of the evaluation steps described herein shall not affect the CITY’s or WAN’s rights regarding separation from employment or obligations under this Agreement. For each Fiscal Year beginning July 1, 2012, WAN shall received a monthly performance pay equal to 2.5% of his monthly base salary, only if the City Council determines in its discretion to include such performance pay amount as part of the fiscal year budget resolution adopted for said Fiscal Year.” Formatted: List Paragraph, Outline numbered + Level: 1 + Numbering Style: 1, 2, 3, … + Start at: 1 + Alignment: Left + Aligned at: 0" + Indent at: 0.25" Formatted: List Paragraph Formatted: No underline Formatted: No underline Formatted: List Paragraph, Numbered + Level: 1 + Numbering Style: 1, 2, 3, … + Start at: 1 + Alignment: Left + Aligned at: 1" + Indent at: 1.25" Formatted: No underline
Sample 1
Performance Goals and Evaluation. Performance goals and objectives will be set for all Union represented employees based on procedures developed and administered by the Human Resources Manager. Goals and objectives shall be developed cooperatively between managers and those whom they report. Those doing the evaluation shall have the ultimate authority to set goals and objectives. Employees shall be rated annually based on their attainment of predetermined performance goals in the manner set forth in this section and Section 2.B. of this Agreement. The Human Resources Manager shall provide a report of the results of the evaluations process and compliance with these requirements and provide a copy of all of the performance evaluations to the Executive Director. The Human Resources Manager and ultimately the Executive Director will review the performance evaluations to ensure that reasonable goals were established within the time frames provided under the procedure and that the resulting ratings are in conformance with the goals. Each year, eligible persons will receive a lump sum incentive payment based on the rating achieved. Such payment shall be deemed compensation for the purposes of retirement.
Sample 1

Related to Performance Goals and Evaluation

  • Performance Goals A. The Trust and State Street have developed mutually acceptable performance goals dated March 1, 2011 , and as may be amended from time to time, regarding the manner in which they expect to deliver and receive the services under this Agreement (hereinafter referred to as “Service Level Agreement”). The parties agree that such Service Level Agreement reflects performance goals and any failure to perform in accordance with the provisions thereof shall not be considered a breach of contract that gives rise to contractual or other remedies. It is the intention of the parties that the sole remedy for failure to perform in accordance with the provisions of the Service Level Agreement, or any dispute relating to performance goals set forth in the Service Level Agreement, will be a meeting of the parties to resolve the failure pursuant to the consultation procedure described in Sections V. B. and V.C. below. Notwithstanding the foregoing, the parties hereby acknowledge that any party’s failure (or lack thereof) to meet the provisions of the Service Level Agreement, while not in and of itself a breach of contract giving rise to contractual or other remedies, may factor into the Trust’s reasonably determined belief regarding the standard of care exercised by State Street hereunder.

  • Performance Targets Threshold, target and maximum performance levels for each performance measure of the performance period are contained in Appendix B.

  • Performance Criteria The Performance Criteria are set forth in Exhibit A to this Agreement.

  • PERFORMANCE OBJECTIVES 4.1 The Performance Plan (Annexure A) sets out-

  • Performance Factors (a) Each party will notify the other party of the existence of a Performance Factor, as soon as reasonably possible after the party becomes aware of the Performance Factor. The Notice will:

  • Performance Evaluations 34.1. The Contractor is subject to an annual performance evaluation to be conducted by NYCDOT pursuant to the PPB Rules.

  • Performance Measures and Metrics This section outlines the performance measures and metrics upon which service under this SLA will be assessed. Shared Service Centers and Customers will negotiate the performance metric, frequency, customer and provider service responsibilities associated with each performance measure. Measurements of the Port of Seattle activities are critical to improving services and are the basis for cost recovery for services provided. The Port of Seattle and The Northwest Seaport Alliance have identified activities critical to meeting The NWSA’s business requirements and have agreed upon how these activities will be assessed.

  • PERFORMANCE MEASUREMENTS Upon a particular Commission’s issuance of an Order pertaining to Performance Measurements in a proceeding expressly applicable to all CLECs generally, BellSouth shall implement in that state such Performance Measurements as of the date specified by the Commission. Performance Measurements that have been Ordered in a particular state can currently be accessed via the internet at xxxx://xxxx.xxxxxxxxx.xxx. The following Service Quality Measurements (SQM) plan as it presently exists and as it may be modified in the future, is being included as the performance measurements currently in place for the state of Tennessee. At such time that the TRA issues a subsequent Order pertaining to Performance Measurements, such Performance Measurements shall supersede the SQM contained in the Agreement. BellSouth Service Quality Measurement Plan‌ (SQM) Tennessee Performance Metrics Measurement Descriptions Version 2.00 Issue Date: July 1, 2003 Introduction

  • Goals Goals define availability, performance and other objectives of Service provisioning and delivery. Goals do not include remedies and failure to meet any Service Goal does not entitle Customer to a Service credit.

  • Metrics The DISTRICT and PARTNER will partake in monthly coordination meetings at mutually agreed upon times and dates to discuss the progress of the program Scope of Work. DISTRICT and PARTNER will also mutually establish criteria and process for ongoing program assessment/evaluation such as, but not limited to the DISTRICT’s assessment metrics and other state metrics [(Measures of Academic Progress – English, SBAC – 11th grade, Redesignation Rates, mutually developed rubric score/s, student attendance, and Social Emotional Learning (SEL) data)]. The DISTRICT and PARTNER will also engage in annual review of program content to ensure standards alignment that comply with DISTRICT approved coursework. The PARTNER will provide their impact data based upon these metrics.

Time is Money Join Law Insider Premium to draft better contracts faster.