Process for Project Evaluation and Selection Sample Clauses

Process for Project Evaluation and Selection. The Eligible Green Projects are aligned with Borrower’s sustainability and business strategy centered around helping customers electrify all aspects of their lives through solar energy systems, energy storage systems and related products and services. Borrower has internal processes to ensure continued alignment in all material respects with the Core Components and to identify, assess and mitigate environmental and social risks that could reasonably be expected to result in a Material Adverse Effect, and will utilize these processes in all material respects with regards to the Eligible Green Projects.
AutoNDA by SimpleDocs
Process for Project Evaluation and Selection. The Issuer’s Green Financing Working Group (“GFWG”) is responsible for the management of the Framework and the compliance of all financing instruments issued under the Framework. The GFWG consists of senior representatives from the following departments: • Treasury Department • Finance & Accounting • Risk ManagementWholesale Credit Department • Retail Credit Acquisition Department The GFWG may be supplemented from time to time, or expanded, by the inclusion of representatives from other relevant teams. For new issuances, Treasury Department will coordinate and compile the submission of identified projects for the GFWG’s review. The identified projects’ environmental credentials will be obtained and confirmed via liaison with relevant business partners and internal departments. The GFWG will consider potential projects, assess their eligibility, and approve those that qualify as eligible projects. The GFWG will consider all proposed projects holistically and aim to ensure that all approved projects financed under the Framework have positive environmental impact for stakeholders and the society. As part of the assessment process, the GFWG will consider: • any potential environmental or social risks; • the alignment of the projects with the Issuer’s sustainability strategies and policies, including SDG priorities; and • the projects’ compliance with relevant local, national, and/or international regulatory requirements and market standards, including those on environmental protection. The proceeds of each sustainable debt instrument can be used for both the financing and/or refinancing of eligible projects. A look-back period of three years will apply for refinancing. The GFWG will review the eligibility of those projects every year. Should a project be considered by GFWG to be no longer meeting the criteria detailed above or is subject to postponement, cancelation or divestment, the Issuer is committed to re-allocating the proceeds to ensure the full amount of the proceeds are allocated to eligible projects. Such monitoring will be implemented throughout the life of the GFTs.
Process for Project Evaluation and Selection. Eligible Green Projects are identified and selected via a process that involves participants from various functional areas. We have set up a Sustainable Development Management Committee (‘‘SDMC’’) to oversee the Group’s ESG and Sustainability reporting. SDMC will also resume the responsibility of Green Financing Transactions. SDMC is composed of representatives from the below departments with the required level of expertise and seniority: . Investment and Finance Center . Financial & Capital Center . Corporate Executive Center . Operation Development Center . Human Resources Center . Property Construction Centre . Risk Control Center SDMC will review and select Eligible Green Projects every 12 months. SDMC will ensure the selected Eligible Green Projects to comply with the Use of Proceeds as stated in this section and the environmental guidance under the ICMA Green Bond Principles 2018 and the APLMA Green Loan Principles 2018 that are applicable to us. MANAGEMENT OF PROCEEDS Our finance team will track the net proceeds of each Green Financing Transaction using an internal register to record the following information: . Type of funding transaction: key information including details such as issuer/ borrower entity, transaction date, number of transactions, principal amount of proceeds, repayment or amortization profile, maturity date, interest or coupon, and the ISIN number in case of bond transactions. . Allocation of use of proceeds: key information including amount of proceeds allocated to each Eligible Green Project and the balance of unallocated proceeds. We commit to allocating all proceeds from the Green Financing Transactions to Eligible Green Projects on a best effort basis within one year of issuance in accordance with the evaluation and selection process set out above. Pending allocation, the net proceeds from the Green Financing Transactions issued may be invested in cash or cash equivalents, or used to repay existing borrowings under our general credit facilities.
Process for Project Evaluation and Selection. Berlin Hyp firmly anchors the Framework in its internal process for evaluating and selecting Eligible Social Assets complying with the criteria described in Section 4.1. within its credit process. Berlin Hyp has established a Sustainable Finance Commission (“SFC”; previously Green Building Commission17) which consists of rep- resentatives from various divisions of the Bank. Among them are all departments involved in the financing/refinancing value chain: Origination, Portfolio Management, Credit, Appraisal and Treasury. Among others, Risk Controlling and Corporate Strategy are part of the SFC too. In its regular meetings the SFC discusses whether the eligibility criteria described in Section 4.1 are still in line with best market practices and relevant regulation. If not, the SFC will discuss potential changes and decide how to adapt the eligibility criteria. All potential further developments of the Eligibility Criteria are to be targeted at increasing the robustness and level of ambition of the Framework. Further develop- ments might also include the definition of social project categories beyond Affordable Housing Buildings, for instance loans to foundations who exclusively pursue charitable and non-profit making purposes in accordance with the section "Tax-Deductible Purposes" of German tax law (§52 and §53 AO).18 Berlin Hyp’s Process of Evaluation and Selection starts by proving compliance with the eligibility criteria defined in Section 4.1 at the earliest possible stage of loan origination. All Eligible Social Assets which are approved via the procedure set out in the Process of Evaluation and Selection will be included in the Social Finance Portfolio. As Berlin Hyp considers to set price incentives for Eligible Social Assets compared to loans for non-eligible residential buildings, an analysis of an asset’s compliance with the eligibility criteria described in Section 4.1 must be completed prior to pricing. To identify an asset’s compliance with the eligibility criteria, the Bank reviews documents which are regularly provided by the borrowers for the appraisal of the building and the cash flow analysis. Moreover, borrowers are asked to provide energy performance certificates or to disclose energy performance calculations. Borrowers which fall into the category “Private Housing Providers” should also provide relevant documents proving a traceable public commit- ment to affordable housing. Also, the Bank may ask borrowers to provide relevant addition...

Related to Process for Project Evaluation and Selection

  • Program Evaluation The School District and the College will develop a plan for the evaluation of the Dual Credit program to be completed each year. The evaluation will include, but is not limited to, disaggregated attendance and retention rates, GPA of high-school-credit-only courses and college courses, satisfactory progress in college courses, state assessment results, SAT/ACT, as applicable, TSIA readiness by grade level, and adequate progress toward the college-readiness of the students in the program. The School District commits to collecting longitudinal data as specified by the College, and making data and performance outcomes available to the College upon request. HB 1638 and SACSCOC require the collection of data points to be longitudinally captured by the School District, in collaboration with the College, will include, at minimum: student enrollment, GPA, retention, persistence, completion, transfer and scholarships. School District will provide parent contact and demographic information to the College upon request for targeted marketing of degree completion or workforce development information to parents of Students. School District agrees to obtain valid FERPA releases drafted to support the supply of such data if deemed required by counsel to either School District or the College. The College conducts and reports regular and ongoing evaluations of the Dual Credit program effectiveness and uses the results for continuous improvement.

  • Program Monitoring and Evaluation The Recipient shall prepare, or cause to be prepared, and furnish to the Association not later than six months after the Closing Date, a report of such scope and in such detail as the Association shall reasonably request, on the execution of the Program, the performance by the Recipient and the Association of their respective obligations under the Legal Agreements and the accomplishment of the purposes of the Financing.”

  • Project Monitoring Reporting and Evaluation The Recipient shall furnish to the Association each Project Report not later than forty-five (45) days after the end of each calendar semester, covering the calendar semester.

  • Investment Analysis and Implementation In carrying out its obligations under Section 1 hereof, the Advisor shall: (a) supervise all aspects of the operations of the Funds; (b) obtain and evaluate pertinent information about significant developments and economic, statistical and financial data, domestic, foreign or otherwise, whether affecting the economy generally or the Funds, and whether concerning the individual issuers whose securities are included in the assets of the Funds or the activities in which such issuers engage, or with respect to securities which the Advisor considers desirable for inclusion in the Funds' assets; (c) determine which issuers and securities shall be represented in the Funds' investment portfolios and regularly report thereon to the Board of Trustees; (d) formulate and implement continuing programs for the purchases and sales of the securities of such issuers and regularly report thereon to the Board of Trustees; and (e) take, on behalf of the Trust and the Funds, all actions which appear to the Trust and the Funds necessary to carry into effect such purchase and sale programs and supervisory functions as aforesaid, including but not limited to the placing of orders for the purchase and sale of securities for the Funds.

  • TECHNICAL EVALUATION (a) Detailed technical evaluation shall be carried out by Purchase Committee pursuant to conditions in the tender document to determine the substantial responsiveness of each tender. For this clause, the substantially responsive bid is one that conforms to all the eligibility and terms and condition of the tender without any material deviation. The Institute’s determination of bid’s responsiveness is to be based on the contents of the bid itself without recourse to extrinsic evidence. The Institute shall evaluate the technical bids also to determine whether they are complete, whether required sureties have been furnished, whether the documents have been properly signed and whether the bids are in order. (b) The technical evaluation committee may call the responsive bidders for discussion or presentation to facilitate and assess their understanding of the scope of work and its execution. However, the committee shall have sole discretion to call for discussion / presentation. (c) Financial bids of only those bidders who qualify the technical criteria will be opened provided all other requirements are fulfilled. (d) AIIMS Jodhpur shall have right to accept or reject any or all tenders without assigning any reasons thereof.

  • Benchmarks for Measuring Accessibility For the purposes of this Agreement, the accessibility of online content and functionality will be measured according to the W3C’s Web Content Accessibility Guidelines (WCAG) 2.0 Level AA and the Web Accessibility Initiative Accessible Rich Internet Applications Suite (WAI-ARIA) 1.0 for web content, which are incorporated by reference.

  • Evaluation, Testing, and Monitoring 1. The System Agency may review, test, evaluate and monitor Grantee’s Products and services, as well as associated documentation and technical support for compliance with the Accessibility Standards. Review, testing, evaluation and monitoring may be conducted before and after the award of a contract. Testing and monitoring may include user acceptance testing. Neither the review, testing (including acceptance testing), evaluation or monitoring of any Product or service, nor the absence of review, testing, evaluation or monitoring, will result in a waiver of the State’s right to contest the Grantee’s assertion of compliance with the Accessibility Standards. 2. Grantee agrees to cooperate fully and provide the System Agency and its representatives timely access to Products, records, and other items and information needed to conduct such review, evaluation, testing, and monitoring.

  • Information Systems Acquisition Development and Maintenance a. Client Data – Client Data will only be used by State Street for the purposes specified in this Agreement.

  • Monitoring and Evaluation a. The AGENCY shall expeditiously provide to the COUNTY upon request, all data needed for the purpose of monitoring, evaluating and/or auditing the program(s). This data shall include, but not be limited to, clients served, services provided, outcomes achieved, information on materials and services delivered, and any other data required, in the sole discretion of the COUNTY, that may be required to adequately monitor and evaluate the services provided under this Contract. Monitoring shall be performed in accordance with COUNTY’S established Noncompliance Standards, a copy of which is attached hereto and incorporated by reference as Attachment “C”. b. The AGENCY agrees to permit persons duly authorized by the COUNTY to interview any clients and all current and/or former employees of the AGENCY to be assured of the AGENCY’S satisfactory performance of the terms of this Contract. c. Following such evaluation, monitoring, and/or audit, the COUNTY will deliver a report of its findings and recommendations with regard to the AGENCY’S conformance with this Contract’s terms and conditions to the AGENCY and/or Board of Directors’ President, and members, whenever applicable. If deficiencies are noted, a written notice of corrective action will be issued to the AGENCY which will specify deficiencies and provide a timeline for correction of those deficiencies. Within the designated timeframe in the written notice of corrective action, the AGENCY shall submit to the COUNTY’S CCC manager (“Manager”), or their designee, a corrective action plan to rectify all deficiencies identified by the COUNTY. d. Failure by the AGENCY to correct noted deficiencies, as outlined in the written notice of corrective action, may result in the AGENCY being deemed in breach of the Contract terms. e. The AGENCY shall cooperate with the COUNTY on all reviews to ensure compliance with all applicable COUNTY guidelines and requirements for general fund recipients.

  • Prices and Services Billing 8.1 SCHEDULE OF PRICES AND TERMS Competitive Supplier agrees to provide Firm Full-Requirements Power Supply and other related services as expressly set forth herein in accordance with the prices and terms included in EXHIBIT A to this ESA, which exhibit is hereby incorporated by reference into this ESA.

Draft better contracts in just 5 minutes Get the weekly Law Insider newsletter packed with expert videos, webinars, ebooks, and more!