Quality Assurance Review Process. All quality assurance reviews conducted by AAQEP will be guided by AAQEP’s policies and procedures as specified in the Guide to AAQEP Accreditation, available at xxxxx://xxxxx.xxx. AAQEP’s process includes an optional proposal review stage two to three years prior to a scheduled site visit. All quality assurance reviews include an off-site review two months prior to each site visit, conducted virtually, which an EPSB consultant participates as an observer, and an on-site visit, the scope of which is determined by program size and complexity.
Quality Assurance Review Process. All Quality Assurance Reviews conducted by AAQEP will be guided by AAQEP’s policies and procedures as specified in the Guide to Accreditation, available at xxxxx://xxxxx.xxx. AAQEP’s process includes an optional proposal review stage two to three years prior to a schedule site visit. All Quality Assurance Reviews include an off-site review two months prior to each site visit, conducted virtually, which NYSED staff are welcome to attend, and an on-site visit, the scope of which is determined by program size and complexity. NYSED will appoint a staff member from the Office of College and University Evaluation (OCUE) to serve as a liaison in the Site Review, who will typically be the OCUE liaison assigned to the EPP for program registration purposes. The OCUE liaison will provide to the lead AAQEP Review Team member state-specific requirements for XXXx and other relevant State information prior to the Site Review, including the Inventory of Registered Programs listing for the EPP.
Quality Assurance Review Process. All quality assurance reviews conducted by AAQEP will be guided by AAQEP’s policies and procedures as specified in the Guide to AAQEP Accreditation, available at xxxxx://xxxxx.xxx. AAQEP’s process includes an optional proposal review process prior to a scheduled site visit. All quality assurance reviews include an off-site review prior to each site visit, conducted virtually, which HTSB staff are welcome to attend, and an on-site visit, the scope of which is determined by program size and complexity, which HTSB staff are also welcome to attend as observers. At or near the beginning of each quality assurance site visit, a representative of HTSB will make a presentation to the Quality Review Team regarding the Hawaiian context for educator preparation. This presentation will include sharing any information regarding the provider’s status with the HTSB.
Quality Assurance Review Process. All Quality Assurance Reviews will be guided by AAQEP’s policies and procedures as specified in the Guide to Accreditation, available at xxxxx://xxxxx.xxx, as well as TSPC policies and procedures, as specified in Oregon Administrative Rule. AAQEP’s process includes a proposal review stage prior to a scheduled site visit. Oregon providers will be approved to begin working with AAQEP contingent on writing a proposal that is reviewed as ‘complete’ by AAQEP staff. A successful proposal will include, but not be limited to, demonstration that appropriate data sources are available to address the standards and reliability and validity have been empirically investigated. After a provider’s initial review with AAQEP, the proposal step is optional unless the provider ceases then returns to work with AAQEP. AAQEP will ensure site visits are conducted in accordance with the timelines identified on the TSPC Site Visit Schedule. Timelines established for unit reviews and consideration of requests for extensions will be decided by AAQEP and TSPC on a case-by-case basis and in accordance with AAQEP and TSPC policies. All Quality Assurance Reviews include an off-site review two to three months prior to each site visit. Off-site reviews are conducted virtually and TSPC staff are welcome to attend as observers. A report of the off-site review will be distributed to the provider with a copy to TSPC at least two months prior to the Quality Assurance Review. Quality Assurance Reviews also include an on-site visit, the scope of which is determined by provider size and complexity.
Quality Assurance Review Process. All quality assurance reviews conducted by AAQEP will be guided by AAQEP’s policies and procedures as specified in the Guide to AAQEP Accreditation, available at xxxxx://xxxxx.xxx. ● AAQEP’s process includes an optional proposal review stage two to three years prior to a scheduled site visit. ● All quality assurance reviews leading to ‘accreditation’ status (7 years) include an off-site review conducted virtually two months prior to each site visit which ADE staff are welcome to attend, and an on-site visit, the scope of which is determined by program size and complexity. ● All quality assurance reviews leading to ‘initial accreditation’ (5 years) status include a preliminary virtual meeting with program staff and a virtual site visit which includes stakeholder meetings and review of data when appropriate; ADE/SBE staff are welcome to attend these meetings.
Quality Assurance Review Process. Consultant shall incorporate one or more structured quality assurance reviews into their project work plan.
Quality Assurance Review Process. All Quality Assurance Reviews conducted by AAQEP will be guided by AAQEP’s policies and procedures as specified in the Guide to Accreditation, available at xxxxx://xxxxx.xxx. AAQEP’s process includes an optional proposal review stage two to three years prior to a scheduled site visit. All Quality Assurance Reviews include a virtual off-site review two months prior to each site visit and an on-site visit, both the Department staff will attend. The number of teams and team members are determined by the provider size and complexity of the programs. The provider will work in collaboration with the Department and AAQEP to schedule the off-site and on-site visits.
Quality Assurance Review Process. Quality Assurance reviewing will be conducted by the QA department and the Operation Supervisors or Operation Shift Lead. Each month the QA Analyst will have a target number of sessions to complete. The Analyst may conduct a review through the use of voice recorded sessions. During a review session, the eRep’s voice session is either *** or through *** session. Sessions are analyzed and scored by QA Analyst on the QA Score Sheet. After this process, the QA Analyst meets with the eRep to deliver targeted feedback on his/her performance and provides coaching, if necessary. QA Score Sheet results detailing individual and team performance are reported to the Supervisors in the weekly team reports. Trending analysis will be provided to Client on a weekly basis. Individual and detailed information will be provided at the Client’s request. In addition, Operation Supervisors review a sample of sessions on a weekly basis. This review process, is similar to the QA process and is documented on the same score sheet. The feedback is given to the eRep either immediately or during a later review session. The Supervisor provides positive feedback or any necessary coaching. If remedial action is required, the Production Supervisor may recommend coaching from a Subject Matter Expert, listening to other eReps during sessions, or providing additional focused training. * CONFIDENTIAL MATERIAL REDACTED AND FILED SEPARATELY WITH THE COMMISSION. This document contains unpublished, confidential and proprietary information of PeopleSupport, Inc. No disclosure, duplication or use of any portion of the contents of these materials, for any purpose, may be made without the prior express written consent of PeopleSupport, Inc.
Quality Assurance Review Process. All Quality Assurance Reviews conducted by AAQEP will be guided by AAQEP’s policies and procedures as specified in the Guide to Accreditation, available at xxx.xxxxx.xxx. AAQEP’s process includes an optional proposal review stage two to three years prior to a scheduled site visit. All Quality Assurance Reviews include an off-site review two months prior to each site visit, conducted virtually, and an on-site visit, the scope of which is determined by program size and complexity. MDE staff are welcome to attend both off-site and on-site visits.
Quality Assurance Review Process. All Quality Assurance Reviews conducted by AAQEP will be guided by AAQEP’s policies and procedures as specified in the Guide to Accreditation, available at xxx.xxxxx.xxx. AAQEP’s process includes an optional proposal review stage two to three years prior to a scheduled site visit. All Quality Assurance Reviews include an off-site review process two months prior to each site visit, conducted virtually, which Commission staff are welcome to attend, and an on-site visit the scope of which is determined by program size and complexity. The institution’s California accreditation activities as defined in the Commission’s accreditation schedule will continue to take place. These activities include annual data submission, submission of Preconditions, Program Review and Common Standards Submission as well as the accreditation site visit. Should the Commission change its required accreditation activities in any way, the institution must adhere to those as well. The AAQEP Quality Assurance site visit may be scheduled concurrent to the institution’s Commission accreditation site visit. If the visit is scheduled concurrently with the Commission’s accreditation site visit, the teams may share interviews and the review of data or other information. Both site visit teams (AAQEP’s and the Commission’s) will each prepare their own reports. Each report will continue through the agency’s standard process.
