Readiness Assessment. Conduct not less than one (1) Readiness Assessment during each calendar year during the Term, using an industry standard framework including the NIST Cyber Framework.

Readiness Assessment. A successful go-live starts with detailed planning of the activities, timeframes, and decision points necessary to ensure predictable results. This reduces the risk involved in the phase transition to Odyssey. While each Court will have unique characteristics, generally the methodology used to conduct go-live activities remains unchanged. Tyler will conduct a Readiness Assessment to determine go-live readiness. This assessment will be a multi-pronged review of several key areas of the project. This review is documented, the end result of which is a recommendation as to whether the go-live should occur as scheduled, or whether the go-live should be delayed in order to work specific issues. If it is determined that the go-live will proceed, then training of the end users can begin as scheduled. Go-Live Readiness Deliverables Description Responsibility Readiness Assessment A multi-point analysis of go-live readiness which provides the necessary information to make the go/no-go decision. Tyler Xxxx County offices will migrate to the Odyssey products with a single Go-Live Event. The Go-Live event includes the following activities: • Completion of end user training • Conversion of Legacy data to the Odyssey production environment • Verification of the converted data • Tyler presence with the users when they come in to use the new system • Project acceptance Go-Live itself is a specific day—the first day the users come in to use the new system (Odyssey). To assist with the actual go-live transition, Tyler will have a presence at Xxxx County in order to ease the transition to Odyssey. The number of people and weeks on site will be documented in the Go-Live Plan. Additionally, Xxxx County will benefit from having their key personnel available during this period. The weeks prior to and after the go-live will be planned in detail. This includes activities regarding configuration, environments, data conversion, operations, court calendars, and personnel. The Xxxx County and Tyler project managers will establish the go-live plan and the method by which its status will be communicated to all involved. For every go-live, Tyler strives to maintain business continuity and minimize downtime during regular business hours. One preferred strategy is to start the final conversion and go-live activities on Friday and finish by Monday morning, allowing for maximum use of non-business hours for go-live activities. For this scenario, data conversion run times are known well in adva...

Readiness Assessment. Department and/or its authorized third party may conduct or have conducted a readiness assessment of specific claims or other areas of the Awarded Respondent as determined by Department prior to the Implementation Date. Such assessment may include, but shall not be limited to, procedures, computer systems, claims files, customer service records, accounting records, internal audits, and quality control assessments.

Readiness Assessment. Starting at least 45 Calendar Days prior to the Effective Date of Services, FHKC shall conduct a readiness assessment to ensure Vendor’s readiness and ability to perform its obligations under this Contract. The readiness assessment shall include: a. Desk and onsite reviews of policies and procedures and related documents; b. Process demonstrations; c. System demonstrations; and d. Interviews with Vendor staff. Vendor shall participate and cooperate in any readiness assessment, including making documents and appropriate staff available. Vendor shall pass any readiness assessment to FHKC’s satisfaction by the dates established during the readiness assessment. In the event Vendor fails to pass any readiness assessment by the established due date, Vendor may be subject to a Corrective Action Plan as set forth in Section 4.9. Vendor's failure to meet this obligation may also be an Event of Default, subject to cure upon Notice from FHKC as provided in Section 7.5 and will entitle FHKC to recover any other damages it incurs (including any actual out-of-pocket expenses incurred by FHKC to investigate and remediate the violation) and to pursue injunctive relief.

Related to Readiness Assessment

Needs Assessment The determination of whether the Annual Income of a family or individual occupying or seeking to occupy a Qualifying Unit complies with the requirements for Extremely Low-Income Households or Low- to Moderate-Income Households shall be made by the applicable housing authority in the CDBG-DR Program area prior to admission of such family or individual to occupancy of a Qualifying Unit.
Risk Assessment An assessment of any risks inherent in the work requirements and actions to mitigate these risks.
Loss Assessment We will pay up to $1000 for your share of loss assessment charged during the policy period against you by a corporation or as- sociation of property owners, when the assess- ment is made as a result of:
Diagnostic Assessment 6.3.1 Boards shall provide a list of pre-approved assessment tools consistent with their Board improvement plan for student achievement and which is compliant with Ministry of Education PPM (PPM 155: Diagnostic Assessment in Support of Student Learning, date of issue January 7, 2013). 6.3.2 Teachers shall use their professional judgment to determine which assessment and/or evaluation tool(s) from the Board list of preapproved assessment tools is applicable, for which student(s), as well as the frequency and timing of the tool. In order to inform their instruction, teachers must utilize diagnostic assessment during the school year.
Risk Assessments a. Risk Assessment - DST shall, at least annually, perform risk assessments that are designed to identify material threats (both internal and external) against Fund Data, the likelihood of those threats Schedule 10.2 p.2 occurring and the impact of those threats upon DST organization to evaluate and analyze the appropriate level of information security safeguards (“Risk Assessments”). b. Risk Mitigation - DST shall use commercially reasonable efforts to manage, control and remediate threats identified in the Risk Assessments that it believes are likely to result in material unauthorized access, copying, use, processing, disclosure, alteration, transfer, loss or destruction of Fund Data, consistent with the Objective, and commensurate with the sensitivity of the Fund Data and the complexity and scope of the activities of DST pursuant to the Agreement. c. Security Controls Testing - DST shall, on approximately an annual basis, engage an independent external party to conduct a review (including information security) of DST’s systems that are related to the provision of services. DST shall have a process to review and evaluate high risk findings resulting from this testing.
Study Population ‌ Infants who underwent creation of an enterostomy receiving postoperative care and awaiting enterostomy closure: to be assessed for eligibility: n = 201 to be assigned to the study: n = 106 to be analysed: n = 106 Duration of intervention per patient of the intervention group: 6 weeks between enterostomy creation and enterostomy closure Follow-up per patient: 3 months, 6 months and 12 months post enterostomy closure, following enterostomy closure (12-month follow-up only applicable for patients that are recruited early enough to complete this follow-up within the 48 month of overall study duration).
Periodic Risk Assessment Provider further acknowledges and agrees to conduct periodic risk assessments and remediate any identified security and privacy vulnerabilities in a timely manner.
Data Protection Impact Assessment If, pursuant to Data Protection Law, Customer (or its Controllers) are required to perform a data protection impact assessment or prior consultation with a regulator, at Customer’s request, SAP will provide such documents as are generally available for the Cloud Service (for example, this DPA, the Agreement, audit reports or certifications). Any additional assistance shall be mutually agreed between the Parties.
Performance Assessment 6.1 The Performance Plan (Annexure A) to this Agreement sets out key performance indicators and competencies that needs to be evaluated in terms of – 6.1.1 The standards and procedures for evaluating the Employee’s performance; and 6.1.2 During the intervals for the evaluation of the Employee’s performance. 6.2 Despite the establishment of agreed intervals for evaluation, the Employer may in addition review the Employee’s performance at any stage while the contract of employment remains in force; 6.3 Personal growth and development needs identified during any performance review discussion must be documented in a Personal Development Plan as well as the actions agreed to and implementation must take place within set time frames; 6.4 The Employee’s performance will also be measured in terms of contributions to the goals and strategies set out in the Employer’s Integrated Development Plan (IDP) as described in 6.6 – 6.13 below; 6.5 The Employee will submit quarterly performance reports (SDBIP) and a comprehensive annual performance report at least one week prior to the performance assessment meetings to the Evaluation Panel Chairperson for distribution to the panel members for preparation purposes; 6.6 Assessment of the achievement of results as outlined in the performance plan: 6.6.1 Each KPI or group of KPIs shall be assessed according to the extent to which the specified standards or performance targets have been met (qualitative and quantitative) and with due regard to ad-hoc tasks that had to be performed under the KPI; 6.6.2 A rating on the five-point scale described in 6.9 below shall be provided for each KPI or group of KPIs which will then be multiplied by the weighting to calculate the final score; 6.6.3 The Employee will submit his self-evaluation to the Employer prior to the formal assessment; 6.6.4 In the instance where the employee could not perform due to reasons outside the control of the employer and employee, the KPI will not be considered during the evaluation. The employee should provide sufficient evidence in such instances; and 6.6.5 An overall score will be calculated based on the total of the individual scores calculated above.
Conformity Assessment Procedures 1. Each Party shall give positive consideration to accepting the results of conformity assessment procedures of other Parties, even where those procedures differ from its own, provided it is satisfied that those procedures offer an assurance of conformity with applicable technical regulations or standards equivalent to its own procedures. 2. Each Party shall seek to enhance the acceptance of the results of conformity assessment procedures conducted in the territories of other Parties with a view to increasing efficiency, avoiding duplication and ensuring cost effectiveness of the conformity assessments. In this regard, each Party may choose, depending on the situation of the Party and the specific sectors involved, a broad range of approaches. These may include but are not limited to: (a) recognition by a Party of the results of conformity assessments performed in the territory of another Party; (b) recognition of co-operative arrangements between accreditation bodies in the territories of the Parties; (c) mutual recognition of conformity assessment procedures conducted by bodies located in the territory of each Party; (d) accreditation of conformity assessment bodies in the territory of another Party; (e) use of existing regional and international multilateral recognition agreements and arrangements; (f) designating conformity assessment bodies located in the territory of another Party to perform conformity assessment; and (g) suppliers’ declaration of conformity. 3. Each Party shall exchange information with other Parties on its experience in the development and application of the approaches in Paragraph 2(a) to (g) and other appropriate approaches with a view to facilitating the acceptance of the results of conformity assessment procedures. 4. A Party shall, upon request of another Party, explain its reasons for not accepting the results of any conformity assessment procedure performed in the territory of that other Party.

Readiness Assessment Sample Clauses

Filter & Search

Related Clauses

Parent Clauses

Related to Readiness Assessment