Remediation Plans Clause Samples

Remediation Plans. The County, in consultation with CDHS may develop a remediation plan if, during the term of this MOU, the County engages in any of the following actions: a) Spending, federal or state, Works Program funds in a manner disallowed by Federal or State law, which could include receipts or recoveries that are not reported; b) Failing to meet the WPR, after the caseload reduction credit is applied, as contained in this MOU and/or failing to meet the negotiated performance measures; c) Reducing the basic assistance grant, restricting eligibility or the provision of services, or imposing sanctions in a manner inconsistent with a federally compliant state law and state plan, and applicable program policy;
Remediation Plans. Whether formal or informal, remediation plans should address the following: 1. A clear description of the performance issues to be addressed; 2. Specific actions to be taken, along with timelines and milestone events, which may include but are not limited to: a. Mentoring by other faculty; b. Coaching by appropriate third party; c. Counseling; d. Referral for professional assistance; e. Additional training in the skill area(s) needing improvement. 3. A method for verifying completion of actions; 4. The consequences of not complying with the plan. For formal remediation plans, the above will be specified in writing and signed by the academic employee and the supervising administrator. Should circumstances arise during the execution of the plan that affect the academic employee’s ability to successfully complete the plan, the academic employee may request revisions to the plan. Requests must be in writing and are subject to the approval of the supervising administrator. If accepted, the request will be signed by both the supervising administrator and the academic employee and attached to the original remediation plan.
Remediation Plans a. The County, in consultation with CDEC, may develop a remediation plan if, during the term of this MOU, the County engages in any of the following actions: i. Spending federal or state Child Care Program funds in a manner disallowed by Federal or State law, which could include receipts or recoveries that are not reported; ii. Failing to meet the established performance measures; iii. Restricting eligibility or the provision of services, or imposing penalties in a manner inconsistent with a federally compliant state law and state plan, and applicable program regulation; iv. Failing to meet timely processing requirements or Child Care Program federal improper payment error rate guidelines, in accordance with the federal fiscal year and as described in section 3.
Remediation Plans. Timeline: 1. The remediation plan shall provide for mid-point and final evaluations and ratings to occur during the 90-school day remediation period. 2. The mid-point and final evaluations and ratings shall be conducted by a qualified Administrator. a. When a quarterly evaluation schedule requires an evaluation after the close of the school year, but on or before July 15. Such evaluation shall be scheduled to occur no later than two (2) weeks prior to the close of the preceding school year. b. When a quarterly evaluation schedule requires an evaluation after the close of the school year, but after July 15, such evaluation shall be scheduled to occur not later than two (2) weeks after student attendance commences in the following school year. c. Failure to strictly comply with the timeliness for the required evaluations because of events such as summer months, illness, or certain leaves granted teachers under a remediation" plan shall not invalidate the results of the remediation plan. 3. The remediation plan shall provide reinstatement to a schedule of biennial evaluations for any teacher who successfully completes the one year Remediation Plan by receiving a “Proficient” or better rating. The biennial schedule will be immediately reinstated if the deficiencies are satisfactorily remediated prior to the year's end. 4. The consulting teacher shall be informed, through a conference with the evaluator and the teacher under remediation, of the results of the mid-point evaluation in order to continue to provide assistance to the teacher under a remediation plan. Any teacher who fails to complete the 90-school day remediation plan with a “Proficient” or better rating shall be dismissed in accordance with Section 24-12 of The School Code. Participants in the remediation plan shall include, the teacher deemed unsatisfactory, an evaluator, and a consulting teacher. The remediation plan may include the participation of other personnel to assist in correcting areas identified as unsatisfactory or other persons representing the teacher's interests.
Remediation Plans. Each Loan Party, their respective Affiliates, and MidCountry Bank have fully-performed their respective obligations under the Remediation Plans (other than administrative and ministerial obligations expressly provided for under the terms thereof), and the Loan Parties do not have any reason to believe that there are any enforcement actions that may arise in the future based on the matters giving rise to the Remediation Plans.
Remediation Plans. Describe Remediation Plans below or write “None”.
Remediation Plans. The parties contemplate that any agreed upon Remediation Plan will provide that:
Remediation Plans. 7.2.4.1 From and after the Effective Date, the Parties will cooperate in good faith to establish performance metrics and minimum thresholds mutually agreed by the Parties, for (a) Production of Product, Unprocessed Cells and Components and services in support of the foregoing, which metrics and minimum thresholds and applicable cure periods will be incorporated into the Manufacturing Plan (or otherwise approved by the JMC) as performance metrics and expressly identified therein as being developed for purposes of this Section 7.2.4 of this Agreement (the “PSA Performance Metrics”)and (b) the supply of Lentivirus (the “Lentivirus Performance Metrics”). [***]. 7.2.4.2 In the event the PSA Performance Metrics are not met (such PSA Performance Metrics not achieved, the “Unmet PSA Performance Metrics”) the Parties shall comply with the procedures set forth in Exhibit C. The Parties may, from time to time during the Term, make such updates to Exhibit C as the Parties may mutually agree upon. 7.2.4.3 In the event the Lentivirus Performance Metrics are not met (such Lentivirus Performance Metrics not achieved, the “Unmet Lentivirus Performance Metrics”), [***].
Remediation Plans. The Parties agree to incorporate the polling place locations identified in Attachment A of this Addendum into Attachment A of the Agreement. All of the Agreement’s requirements related to the polling place locations included in Attachment A of the Agreement shall also apply to the polling place locations in Attachment A of this Addendum. The Board shall provide remediation plans, approved or created by the Expert, for the polling place locations in Attachment A of the Agreement and this Addendum to the United States on a rolling, weekly basis with all such remediation plans provided to the United States no later than January 26, 2024.
Remediation Plans. (a) The ICFR Plan is sufficient to enable the Sponsor to (i) achieve each of the milestones contemplated therein by the dates set forth in the ICFR Plan; and (ii) receive, on or prior to March 31, 2027, audited Financial Statements (including the report contemplated in Section 8.01(a)(iii) (Annual Financial Statements)) that do not identify any material weaknesses in its or the Borrower Entitiesinternal control over financial reporting. (b) The Borrower’s KYC Implementation Plan is sufficient to enable the Borrower to implement adequate “know your customerpolicies and procedures on or prior to the First Advance Date. (c) The Borrower’s Cyber-Security Plan is sufficient to enable the Borrower to implement a program of adequate periodic privacy and security audits and penetration tests and address the deficiencies identified thereby on or prior to April 30, 2025. (d) The Borrower’s Reconciliation Plan is sufficient to enable the Obligors to prepare Financial Statements of the Obligors that reconciles IFRS to GAAP for an adequate comparison to prior Fiscal Years or Fiscal Quarters.