Process of Review Sample Clauses

Process of Review. By resolution, the Board of Supervisors shall provide a procedure whereby the involuntary dismissal, demotion, reduction in compensation, or suspension of an employee, shall at the employee's request, be reviewed to determine whether such action was justified and should be upheld. The procedure shall include the right, after notice, to a hearing before a designated body or officer having power to affirm, revoke or modify the action reviewed.
Sample 1Sample 2
AutoNDA by SimpleDocs
Process of Review. Each Review Period will contain a number of periods of set duration, as follows: Nomination Period 1 February until 21 February Issue Notification Period 14 - 28 March or such period as is agreeable to the Authority and the Contractor Representatives. Submission Period The period of 28 days commencing on the day after the Authority gives notice to Contractor Representatives of Review Issues under item 8(a).
Sample 1
Process of Review. ‌ In this Chapter, a technical review of the Early Warning Systems (EWS) existing for the major hazards in Bangladesh are discussed. Review of each of the major hazards with their profound prediction, forecasting, technical preparedness measures, tools/models are carried out to better understand the existing context of hazard specific early warning system in operation. In this respect, the following major hazard EWSs (and for earthquake preparedness only) were explored: • Flood • Cyclone • Riverbank erosion • Earthquake (preparedness initiatives) • Tsunami • Flash flood • Drought, and • Climate change (as a trend that are anticipated to increase other hazards) The reviews are based on primarily on the secondary sources of the respective institutional documentations, project documents and or research outputs. The institutionally shared information through our outreach and discussions with respective sources agencies such as FFWC, BMD, ADPC EWS and so forth are carried out to collect more context based documentations. Agencies have shared their information with a good willingness and with a great deal on commitment towards developing a central level DMIN. The source agencies are also expressed their willingness to support DMIN through consultation and information sharing in future. ADPC-BCAS field team has carried out an outreach and interviewed the disaster management information source agencies and related institutions with a simple checklist and collected documents and information that are used in this Chapter and in the following two chapters as well in a sequential manner. The process of collection of information and validation remained as below: Outreach and interview “Information Source” agency representatives
Sample 1
Process of Review i. Role of the School Faculty Review Committee (SFRC) After reviewing the self-study and supporting documentation, the SFRC will prepare a report, taking specific note of the accomplishments achieved during the period of time since the previous review. In the alternative, if deemed by the SFRC to be appropriate, the SFRC may make recommendations for further professional development in the areas of teaching, scholarship and service. The written report shall be provided to the faculty member and the xxxx on or before December 15, and the faculty member shall have fourteen (14) days within which to submit to the xxxx a written response to the SFRC report. ii. Role of the Xxxx & Xxxxxxx The xxxx shall review all of the material available including, but not limited to, the report from the SFRC, and prepare a xxxx’x report on or before February 1. The xxxx’x report may vary in form and will address the faculty member’s accomplishments in the three categories of teaching, scholarship, and service. The xxxx may also respond with recommendations for further professional development in any of the three categories. The faculty member shall have an opportunity to respond in writing to the xxxx’x evaluation report on or before February 15. The xxxx shall then submit their evaluation report in writing to the xxxxxxx, with a copy to the faculty member. The xxxxxxx will issue their report, with a copy to the xxxx and faculty member on or before March 30. iii. Classroom Observations & Student Course Surveys The SFRC review will also include the results of student course surveys and results of classroom observations by the xxxx of the school and/or department chair. See Article VIII.E.1. iv. Schedule of Post-Tenure Review Oct. 1 Faculty submits materials Dec. 15 SFRC issues report Dec. 29 Faculty deadline for submitting written response to SFRC report Feb. 1 Xxxx issues report Feb. 15 Faculty deadline for submitting written response to Xxxx’x Report Mar. 30 Xxxxxxx issues report 2608 2609 2610 2611 2612
Sample 1

Related to Process of Review

  • Design Review ‌ (a) Where so specified in Schedule A (Scope of Goods and Services) or as otherwise instructed by the City, the Supplier shall submit design-related Documentation for review by the City, and shall not proceed with work on the basis of such design Documentation until the City’s approval of such Documentation has been received in writing. (b) None of: (i) the submission of Documentation to the City by the Supplier; (ii) its examination by or on behalf of the City; or (iii) the making of any comment thereon (including any approval thereof) shall in any way relieve the Supplier of any of its obligations under this Agreement or of its duty to take reasonable steps to ensure the accuracy and correctness of such Documentation, and its suitability to the matter to which it relates.

  • Post Review With respect to each contract not governed by paragraph 2 of this Part, the procedures set forth in paragraph 4 of Appendix 1 to the Guidelines shall apply.

  • Office of Inspector General Investigative Findings Expert Review In accordance with Senate Bill 799, Acts 2021, 87th Leg., R.S., if Texas Government Code, Section 531.102(m-1)(2) is applicable to this Contract, Contractor affirms that it possesses the necessary occupational licenses and experience.

  • Log Reviews All systems processing and/or storing PHI COUNTY discloses to 11 CONTRACTOR or CONTRACTOR creates, receives, maintains, or transmits on behalf of COUNTY 12 must have a routine procedure in place to review system logs for unauthorized access.

  • Project Review A. Programmatic Allowances 1. If FEMA determines that the entire scope of an Undertaking conforms to one or more allowances in Appendix B of this Agreement, with determinations for Tier II Allowances being made by SOI-qualified staff, FEMA shall complete the Section 106 review process by documenting this determination in the project file, without SHPO review or notification. 2. If the Undertaking involves a National Historic Landmark (NHL), FEMA shall notify the SHPO, participating Tribe(s), and the NPS NHL Program Manager of the NPS Midwest Regional Office that the Undertaking conforms to one or more allowances. FEMA shall provide information about the proposed scope of work for the Undertaking and the allowance(s) enabling FEMA’s determination. 3. If FEMA determines any portion of an Undertaking’s scope of work does not conform to one or more allowances listed in Appendix B, FEMA shall conduct expedited or standard Section 106 review, as appropriate, for the entire Undertaking in accordance with Stipulation II.B, Expedited Review for Emergency Undertakings, or Stipulation II.C, Standard Project Review. 4. Allowances may be revised and new allowances may be added to this Agreement in accordance with Stipulation IV.A.3, Amendments. B. Expedited Review for Emergency Undertakings

  • Periodic Review The General Counsel shall periodically review the Procurement Integrity Procedures with OSC personnel in order to ascertain potential areas of exposure to improper influence and to adopt desirable revisions for more effective avoidance of improper influences.

  • Program Review The State ECEAP Office will conduct a review of each contractor’s compliance with the ECEAP Contract and ECEAP Performance Standards every four years. The review will involve ECEAP staff and parents. After the Program Review, the State ECEAP Office will provide the contractor with a Program Review report. The contractor must submit an ECEAP Corrective Action Plan for non-compliance with ECEAP Performance Standards. The Plan must be approved by the State ECEAP Office.

  • Termination of Review If a Review is in process and the Notes will be paid in full on the next Payment Date, the Servicer will notify the Asset Representations Reviewer and the Indenture Trustee no less than ten days before that Payment Date. On receipt of notice, the Asset Representations Reviewer will terminate the Review immediately and will not be obligated to deliver a Review Report.

  • Contract Review Agent shall have reviewed all material contracts of Borrowers including, without limitation, leases, union contracts, labor contracts, vendor supply contracts, license agreements and distributorship agreements and such contracts and agreements shall be satisfactory in all respects to Agent;

  • Completion of Review for Certain Review Receivables Following the delivery of the list of the Review Receivables and before the delivery of the Review Report by the Asset Representations Reviewer, the Servicer may notify the Asset Representations Reviewer if a Review Receivable is paid in full by the Obligor or purchased from the Issuer in accordance with the terms of the Basic Documents. On receipt of such notice, the Asset Representations Reviewer will immediately terminate all Tests of the related Review Receivable, and the Review of such Review Receivables will be considered complete (a “Test Complete”). In this case, the related Review Report will indicate a Test Complete for such Review Receivable and the related reason.

Draft better contracts in just 5 minutes Get the weekly Law Insider newsletter packed with expert videos, webinars, ebooks, and more!