Reporting and Review Process Sample Clauses

Reporting and Review Process. This will involve monitoring overall progress against: • delivery of the strategic objectives in the integrated commissioning plans, • delivery of the contracts as detailed in Schedule 4 • identifying the reasons for any under-performance of service providers.
Sample 1Sample 2Sample 3See All (7)
AutoNDA by SimpleDocs
Reporting and Review Process. Regular meetings should be held between the Host Partner and the service provider to review the latter’s performance. The Host Partner shall monitor services having regard to national, regional and local key performance indicators, including: • Performance assessment framework indicators • National performance indicators • Audit and inspection recommendations • Self-assessment Statement actions • Relevant operational plan indicators • South Yorkshire Integrated Care board targets • Relevant core and Care Quality Commission standards • Patient and Customer feedback 11.10 Performance Reporting and Review of the Section 75 Agreement The pooled fund manager will be responsible for producing quarterly reports to the BCF Executive Group and Health and Wellbeing Board on a quarterly basis. The pooled fund manager will be responsible for producing an annual report to the BCF Executive Group and Health and Wellbeing Board. The BCF Executive Group will be responsible for ensuring the timeline to ensure the data is collected, reported, authorised by the health and wellbeing Board, and submitted to the NHS England on their specified reporting dates, these being one day after the dates specified in section 9.1.
Sample 1Sample 2Sample 3See All (6)
Reporting and Review Process. 5.1. This will involve monitoring overall progress against:
Sample 1Sample 2Sample 3See All (4)
Reporting and Review Process. 9.1. Regular meetings should be held between the Host Partner and the service provider to review the latter’s performance.
Sample 1Sample 2Sample 3See All (4)
Reporting and Review Process. 5.2.1 Overall progress against delivery of the outcomes in the Commissioning Plans.
Sample 1

Related to Reporting and Review Process

  • Monitoring and Review 5.1 The Council and the BID Company shall set up the Standard Services Review Panel within 28 days from the date of this Agreement the purpose of which shall be to:

  • Evaluation, Testing, and Monitoring 1. The System Agency may review, test, evaluate and monitor Grantee’s Products and services, as well as associated documentation and technical support for compliance with the Accessibility Standards. Review, testing, evaluation and monitoring may be conducted before and after the award of a contract. Testing and monitoring may include user acceptance testing. Neither the review, testing (including acceptance testing), evaluation or monitoring of any Product or service, nor the absence of review, testing, evaluation or monitoring, will result in a waiver of the State’s right to contest the Grantee’s assertion of compliance with the Accessibility Standards.

  • Review Process A/E's Work Product will be reviewed by County under its applicable technical requirements and procedures, as follows:

  • Reporting and Monitoring Please provide a brief description of the mechanisms proposed for this project for reporting to the UNDP and partners, including a reporting schedule.

  • Peer Assistance and Review Program 1. MCEA and MCPS agree to jointly operate a Peer Assistance and Review (PAR) Program. The PAR Program is a mechanism for maintaining systemwide quality control and ensuring that all MCPS teachers responsible for teaching students are functioning at or above the high MCPS standards of performance. It provides intensive assistance for any teacher who has not yet achieved that standard or who falls below acceptable standards. Assistance and review are provided to both experienced MCPS teachers in need of significant improvement and teachers in their first year of teaching.

  • PERFORMANCE MONITORING AND REPORTING Performance indicators

  • COUNTY’S QUALITY ASSURANCE PLAN The County or its agent will evaluate the Contractor’s performance under this Contract on not less than an annual basis. Such evaluation will include assessing the Contractor’s compliance with all Contract terms and conditions and performance standards. Contractor deficiencies which the County determines are severe or continuing and that may place performance of the Contract in jeopardy if not corrected will be reported to the Board of Supervisors. The report will include improvement/corrective action measures taken by the County and the Contractor. If improvement does not occur consistent with the corrective action measures, the County may terminate this Contract or impose other penalties as specified in this Contract.

  • Project Monitoring Reporting and Evaluation The Recipient shall furnish to the Association each Project Report not later than forty-five (45) days after the end of each calendar semester, covering the calendar semester.

  • Review Protocol A narrative description of how the Claims Review was conducted and what was evaluated.

  • Quality Assurance Program An employee shall be entitled to leave of absence without loss of earnings from her or his regularly scheduled working hours for the purpose of writing examinations required by the College of Nurses of Ontario arising out of the Quality Assurance Program.

Time is Money Join Law Insider Premium to draft better contracts faster.