REVIEW OF STRATEGIC ASSESSMENT. The Project Team have reviewed the Strategic Assessment (completed as part of the first stage of the process – Appendix 1) and the position in terms of the need for change, the benefits that need addressed, the links with National Investment Priorities and the prioritisation scoring, the position remains unchanged. Overall, the non-financial option appraisal process has identified that the current preferred strategic option is for the service to be delivered from a new build facility. The new build options have been scored as below: Option 6d) a New build at Tulliallan Primary School with 739 points, followed by option 6b) a New build at Feregait with 539 points and option 6c) a New build at Station Road with 509 points. Option 1 (The ‘Status Quo’) was placed last in this analysis with 221 points. Consequently, option 6d) represents a clearly favoured option for all stakeholders, with little to choose between options 6b) and 6c) for 2nd place. All options scored considerably higher than Option 1, ‘Do nothing’. In summary, it is possible to conclude that all of the stakeholder groups engaged in this process:  Are likely to support Option 6d) as an overall preferred option, unless something radical changes.  Do not support the ‘do nothing’ option in any way.  See little difference between the relative merits of options 6b) and 6c). The outturn of this appraisal provides NHS Fife with a clearly preferred strategic direction in support of developing a business case for a new build solution in Kincardine to deliver the developing service model. This will be further explored in an Outline Business Case along with a financial option appraisal of the options available In summary, NHS Fife intend to:  Conduct a formal financial appraisal relating to the options considered in order to agree an overall preferred option and rationale.  Continue to monitor any material issues that may alter this current position in any way and formally re-visit and review them throughout the business case process as appropriate.

REVIEW OF STRATEGIC ASSESSMENT. The Project Team have reviewed the Strategic Assessment (completed as part of the first stage of the process – Appendix 1) and the position in terms of the need for change, the benefits that need addressed, the links with National Investment Priorities and the prioritisation scoring, the position remains unchanged. Overall, the non-financial option appraisal process has identified that the current preferred strategic option is for the service to be delivered from a new build facility to support delivery of integrated health and social care for the Kincardine community. All of the stakeholder groups engaged in this process: Are likely to support Option 6d) as an overall preferred option, unless something radical changes. Do not support the ‘do nothing’ option in any way. See little difference between the relative merits of options 6b) and 6c). NHS Fife and Fife Health and Social Care Partnership have summarised the need for change in and around the facilities in Kincardine under a number of defined headings within the IAD. These are: Integrated clinical and care functionality (capacity) issues which have been identified as those problems associated with a lack of local space (area) that is essential for safe, effective, timely and appropriately compliant service delivery, e.g., a lack of clinical support, administrative support, group, sanitary, teaching and specialist areas. Service capacity related issues that predicate the need for change based on a lack of available physical capacity across the service delivery model that are hampering the delivery of integrated care locally. Clinical functionality (configuration) issues that seriously challenge the delivery of safe and effective modern services, e.g., access issues, room design, sound attenuation, security, patient flow, etc. Building and fabric issues including overall condition, suitability, statutory compliance issues and backlog maintenance.

REVIEW OF STRATEGIC ASSESSMENT. The Project Team have reviewed the Strategic Assessment (Appendix 1) and the position in terms of the need for change, the benefits that need addressed, the links with National Investment Priorities and the prioritisation scoring, the position remains unchanged. Overall, the non-financial option appraisal process has identified that the current preferred strategic option is for the service to be delivered from a new build facility. All of the stakeholder groups engaged in this process: Are likely to support Option 6e) as an overall preferred option, unless something radical changes. Do not support the “do nothing” option in any way. See little difference between the relative merits of options 5b), 5d) and 4b). NHS Fife and Fife Health and Social Care Partnership have summarised the need for change in and around the facilities in Lochgelly under a number of defined headings within the IAD. These are: Integrated clinical and care functionality (capacity) issues which have been identified as those problems associated with a lack of local space (area) that is essential for safe, effective, timely and appropriately compliant service delivery, e.g., a lack of clinical support, administrative support, group, sanitary, teaching, group work and specialist areas Service capacity related issues that predicate the need for change based on a lack of available physical capacity across the service delivery model that are hampering the delivery of integrated care locally Clinical functionality (configuration) issues that seriously challenge the delivery of safe and effective modern services, e.g., access issues, room design, sound attenuation, security, patient flow, etc Building and fabric issues including overall condition, suitability, statutory compliance issues and backlog maintenance A ppendix 1 – Strategic Assessment NHS Fife Estates maintain records on the suitability and condition of buildings in its estate. Below is the current information relating to the Lochgelly Health Centre building. Backlog (C and Below) £121,746 £0 £133,280 £0 Quality C (Not Satisfactory) Space Utilisation O (Overcrowded) Functional Suitability C (Unsatisfactory) Figure used from surveys were complete in December 2012 ccupied GIA (m2) 779 Land Value £70,200 Net Book Value £560,353 Tenure Owned

Related to REVIEW OF STRATEGIC ASSESSMENT

Performance Assessment 6.1 The Performance Plan (Annexure A) to this Agreement sets out key performance indicators and competencies that needs to be evaluated in terms of – 6.1.1 The standards and procedures for evaluating the Employee’s performance; and 6.1.2 During the intervals for the evaluation of the Employee’s performance. 6.2 Despite the establishment of agreed intervals for evaluation, the Employer may in addition review the Employee’s performance at any stage while the contract of employment remains in force; 6.3 Personal growth and development needs identified during any performance review discussion must be documented in a Personal Development Plan as well as the actions agreed to and implementation must take place within set time frames; 6.4 The Employee’s performance will also be measured in terms of contributions to the goals and strategies set out in the Employer’s Integrated Development Plan (IDP) as described in 6.6 – 6.13 below; 6.5 The Employee will submit quarterly performance reports (SDBIP) and a comprehensive annual performance report at least one week prior to the performance assessment meetings to the Evaluation Panel Chairperson for distribution to the panel members for preparation purposes; 6.6 Assessment of the achievement of results as outlined in the performance plan: 6.6.1 Each KPI or group of KPIs shall be assessed according to the extent to which the specified standards or performance targets have been met (qualitative and quantitative) and with due regard to ad-hoc tasks that had to be performed under the KPI; 6.6.2 A rating on the five-point scale described in 6.9 below shall be provided for each KPI or group of KPIs which will then be multiplied by the weighting to calculate the final score; 6.6.3 The Employee will submit his self-evaluation to the Employer prior to the formal assessment; 6.6.4 In the instance where the employee could not perform due to reasons outside the control of the employer and employee, the KPI will not be considered during the evaluation. The employee should provide sufficient evidence in such instances; and 6.6.5 An overall score will be calculated based on the total of the individual scores calculated above.
Review of assessment The assessment of the applicable percentage should be subject to annual review or earlier on the basis of a reasonable request for such a review. The process of review shall be in accordance with the procedures for assessing capacity under the Supported Wage System.
Report on Assessment of Compliance and Attestation (a) On or before March 1 of each calendar year, commencing in 2007, the Servicer shall: (i) deliver to the Owner and any Depositor a report (in form and substance reasonably satisfactory to the Owner and such Depositor) regarding the Servicer’s assessment of compliance with the Servicing Criteria during the immediately preceding calendar year, as required under Rules 13a-18 and 15d-18 of the Exchange Act and Item 1122 of Regulation AB. Such report shall be addressed to the Owner and such Depositor and signed by an authorized officer of the Servicer, and shall address each of the Servicing Criteria specified on a certification substantially in the form of Exhibit 7 hereto delivered to the Owner concurrently with the execution of this Agreement; (ii) deliver to the Owner and any Depositor a report of a registered public accounting firm reasonably acceptable to the Owner and such Depositor that attests to, and reports on, the assessment of compliance made by the Servicer and delivered pursuant to the preceding paragraph. Such attestation shall be in accordance with Rules 1-02(a)(3) and 2-02(g) of Regulation S-X under the Securities Act and the Exchange Act; (iii) cause each Subservicer, and each Subcontractor determined by the Company pursuant to Section 12.06(b) to be “participating in the servicing function” within the meaning of Item 1122 of Regulation AB, to deliver to the Owner and any Depositor an assessment of compliance and accountants’ attestation as and when provided in paragraphs (a) and (b) of this Section; and (iv) if requested by the Owner or any Depositor not later than February 1 of the calendar year in which such certification is to be delivered, deliver to the Owner, any Depositor and any other Person that will be responsible for signing the certification (a “Sarbanes Certification”) required by Rules 13a-14(d) and 15d-14(d) under the Exchange Act (pursuant to Section 302 of the Xxxxxxxx-Xxxxx Act of 2002) on behalf of an asset-backed issuer with respect to a Securitization Transaction a certification in the form attached hereto as Exhibit 6. The Servicer acknowledges that the parties identified in clause (a)(iv) above may rely on the certification provided by the Servicer pursuant to such clause in signing a Sarbanes Certification and filing such with the Commission. Neither the Owner nor any Depositor will request delivery of a certification under clause (a)(iv) above, unless a Depositor is required under the Exchange Act to file an annual report on Form 10-K with respect to an issuing entity whose asset pool includes Mortgage Loans. (b) Each assessment of compliance provided by a Subservicer pursuant to Section 12.05(a)(i) shall address each of the Servicing Criteria specified on a certification substantially in the form of Exhibit 7 hereto delivered to the Owner concurrently with the execution of this Agreement or, in the case of a Subservicer subsequently appointed as such, on or prior to the date of such appointment. An assessment of compliance provided by a Subcontractor pursuant to Section 12.05(a)(iii) need not address any elements of the Servicing Criteria other than those specified by the Servicer pursuant to Section 12.06.
Needs Assessment The determination of whether the Annual Income of a family or individual occupying or seeking to occupy a Qualifying Unit complies with the requirements for Extremely Low-Income Households or Low- to Moderate-Income Households shall be made by the applicable housing authority in the CDBG-DR Program area prior to admission of such family or individual to occupancy of a Qualifying Unit.
Conformity Assessment Procedures 1. Each Party shall give positive consideration to accepting the results of conformity assessment procedures of other Parties, even where those procedures differ from its own, provided it is satisfied that those procedures offer an assurance of conformity with applicable technical regulations or standards equivalent to its own procedures. 2. Each Party shall seek to enhance the acceptance of the results of conformity assessment procedures conducted in the territories of other Parties with a view to increasing efficiency, avoiding duplication and ensuring cost effectiveness of the conformity assessments. In this regard, each Party may choose, depending on the situation of the Party and the specific sectors involved, a broad range of approaches. These may include but are not limited to: (a) recognition by a Party of the results of conformity assessments performed in the territory of another Party; (b) recognition of co-operative arrangements between accreditation bodies in the territories of the Parties; (c) mutual recognition of conformity assessment procedures conducted by bodies located in the territory of each Party; (d) accreditation of conformity assessment bodies in the territory of another Party; (e) use of existing regional and international multilateral recognition agreements and arrangements; (f) designating conformity assessment bodies located in the territory of another Party to perform conformity assessment; and (g) suppliers’ declaration of conformity. 3. Each Party shall exchange information with other Parties on its experience in the development and application of the approaches in Paragraph 2(a) to (g) and other appropriate approaches with a view to facilitating the acceptance of the results of conformity assessment procedures. 4. A Party shall, upon request of another Party, explain its reasons for not accepting the results of any conformity assessment procedure performed in the territory of that other Party.
Diagnostic Assessment 6.3.1 Boards shall provide a list of pre-approved assessment tools consistent with their Board improvement plan for student achievement and which is compliant with Ministry of Education PPM (PPM 155: Diagnostic Assessment in Support of Student Learning, date of issue January 7, 2013). 6.3.2 Teachers shall use their professional judgment to determine which assessment and/or evaluation tool(s) from the Board list of preapproved assessment tools is applicable, for which student(s), as well as the frequency and timing of the tool. In order to inform their instruction, teachers must utilize diagnostic assessment during the school year.
Risk Assessment An assessment of any risks inherent in the work requirements and actions to mitigate these risks.
Environmental Assessment Buyer shall have the right for a period commencing upon execution of this Agreement by both parties and ending on November 28, 2012, to conduct an environmental assessment of the Assets, at Buyer’s sole risk, liability and expense. Seller shall make available to Buyer, during the environmental assessment period described above, Seller’s historical files regarding prior operations on the Assets, and provide Buyer and its representatives with reasonable access to the Assets to conduct the environmental assessment. Buyer shall provide Seller three (3) days prior written notice of a desired date(s) for such assessment and Seller shall have the right to be present during any assessment and, if any testing is conducted pursuant to Seller’s express prior written consent, Seller may require splitting of all samples. Notwithstanding any other provision of this Agreement to the contrary, Buyer shall not have the right to drill any test, monitor or other xxxxx or to extract samples of any air, soil, water or other substance from the Assets without Seller’s express prior written consent. If Buyer proposes a reasonable request to drill a test well or extract a sample pursuant to a systematic and customary procedure for the assessment of the environmental condition of the Assets and Seller refuses to grant its consent to such a well or sampling, then Buyer shall have the right, for a period of seventy-two (72) hours following notification of Seller’s refusal to consent, to deliver written notice to Seller of Buyer’s election to exclude from this transaction the portion of the Assets affected by such proposed test well or sample, and the Purchase Price shall be adjusted accordingly by the Allocated Value of such portion of the Assets so excluded. Under no circumstances whatsoever shall Seller ever be obligated to grant its consent to any such test xxxxx or sampling proposed by Buyer, and Buyer’s sole and exclusive remedy for any refusal by Seller to grant its consent shall be the limited right contained in the preceding sentence to exclude the affected Assets from the transactions contemplated by this Agreement. If Buyer fails to exercise the right to exclude such Assets by written notice to Seller delivered prior to the expiration of the seventy-two hour period described above, then Buyer shall be conclusively deemed to have waived such right and shall be obligated to purchase the affected Assets without conducting such testing or sampling or any adjustment of the Purchase Price unless otherwise provided in this Agreement.
Geotechnical Engineer « »« » « » « » « » « »
Program Overview Microsoft extends to eligible partners the opportunity to participate in the Program referenced above subject to these Program Terms & Conditions (“Program Terms”). Each entity participating in the Program is hereinafter referred to as a “Participant.” Participation in the Program is voluntary. The Program is governed by the Program Terms, which incorporate by reference the Microsoft Partner Network Agreement (as in effect between Microsoft and Participant, the “MPN Agreement”). Capitalized terms used but not defined in these Program Terms have the meanings assigned to them in the MPN Agreement. These Program Terms are subject to local requirements and may vary by jurisdiction, and Participant retains sole discretion to set pricing for sales of applicable products.

REVIEW OF STRATEGIC ASSESSMENT Sample Clauses

Filter & Search

Related Clauses

Parent Clauses

Related to REVIEW OF STRATEGIC ASSESSMENT