Sources of Evaluation. An annual evaluation is a subjective assessment of an individual’s performance based on objective criteria. The criteria are useful tools for evaluating overall performance. The evaluation is intended to be comprehensive and not based on a single or limited number of criteria. Therefore, the person responsible for completing the faculty member’s annual evaluation shall consider all appropriate and available information that is relevant to the faculty member’s performance of assigned responsibilities. The materials in the evaluation file and documented information from the following sources: immediate supervisor, peers, students (if applicable), faculty member/self, other University officials who have responsibility for supervision of the faculty member, and individuals to whom the faculty members may be responsible in the course of a service assignment may be used in the evaluation process. Materials submitted by persons other than the faculty member shall be shown to the faculty member, who may attach a written response. Any materials that have not been shown to the faculty member cannot be used in the evaluation process. Whenever a single or limited number of criteria are deemed controlling, the written evaluation must justify that conclusion.
(a) Library Faculty Position Description
Sources of Evaluation. The sources of evaluation shall include:
Sources of Evaluation. (a) Faculty Annual Report. Each faculty member shall submit to his/her chair/supervisor a report of annual activities in teaching, research/scholarship/creative activities, service, and other University duties consistent with the provisions of Sections 18.6 through 18.8. Each department/unit shall specify the required format and minimum content of the faculty annual report pursuant to Sections 18.6 and 18.
Sources of Evaluation. (a) Faculty Annual Report. Every year, each faculty member shall submit to the chair/ or supervisor (hereafter, “chair”) a report of the faculty member’s annual activities in teaching, research/scholarship/creative activities, service, and other University duties for that year.
(1) Trustees shall specify the required format and minimum content of the faculty annual report, consistent with the provisions of Sections 18.5 through 18.7, below.
(2) The faculty annual report shall include any interpretive comments and/or supporting data that the faculty member deems appropriate in evaluating the faculty member’s performance.
(b) The person(s) responsible for completing the faculty member’s annual evaluation shall also consider, where appropriate and available, information from the following sources: immediate supervisor, peers, students, faculty member/self, other university officials who have responsibility for supervision of the faculty member, and individuals to whom the faculty member may be responsible in the course of a service assignment, including public school officials when a faculty member has a service assignment to the public schools. Any materials to be used in the evaluation process submitted by persons other than the faculty member shall be shown to the faculty member, who may attach a written response.
Sources of Evaluation. The sources of evaluation shall include administrative, student and peer review, and a self evaluation.
6.3.1 The Evaluation Committee shall consist, at a minimum, of two peers and the immediate administrator.
6.3.2 Peer review means involvement in the process of at least two full-time faculty, one of whom is selected by the administration and one of whom is selected by the faculty member being evaluated.
6.3.3 The immediate administrator and at least one of the peer evaluators shall make performance observations. (Use forms in Appendix C-5) The second peer evaluator may also make a performance observation and/or review course materials, clinical responsibilities, or other activities of the evaluatee. The Evaluation Committee will meet to summarize findings, and meet with the evaluatee to discuss these findings.
6.3.4 Components of the evaluation will include, at a minimum, student evaluations, peer and administrative classroom observations, and a self evaluation. (See Appendix C3a and C3b for Evaluation Timeline)
6.3.4.1 Student evaluation forms will be administered between the eighth and twelfth weeks of the semester of the evaluation. (Use forms in Appendix C-5)
6.3.4.2 Peer and administrative classroom observations will be conducted during weeks six through twelve. For faculty teaching both Distance Education and non-Distance Education classes, observations shall occur in both modalities. Peers may also review syllabi, graded papers, tests and quizzes, texts, and handouts used by the faculty member being evaluated.
6.3.4.3 A self-evaluation shall be written by the faculty member being evaluated. This evaluation should include goals and objectives for the next evaluation period; an analysis of previous objectives met or unmet; professional improvement activities; new curriculum created, especially in distance education; and could also include items such as scholarly publications or presentations; college and community participation. Faculty may include results of Student Learning Objectives measured in their courses if they so choose.
Sources of Evaluation. The sources of evaluation shall include both administrative and peer review.
a. The Evaluation Committee shall consist, at a minimum, of one peer and the immediate administrator.
b. Peer review means involvement in the process of at least one full-time faculty, who is mutually agreed upon by the evaluatee and the administrator.
c. The peer evaluator(s) or the immediate administrator shall, at a minimum, make one performance observation and meet with the Evaluation Committee to summarize findings. For faculty teaching both Distance Education and non-Distance Education classes, observations shall occur in both modalities. (Use forms in Appendix C-5) The immediate administrator will meet with the evaluatee to discuss these findings; the peer evaluator may meet with the evaluatee individually.
d. Where practical, self-evaluations should be used. (See content suggestions in Article 6.3.4.3).
e. Student evaluations are a required component of this process. (Use forms in Appendix C-5)
Sources of Evaluation. An annual evaluation is a subjective assessment of an individual’s performance based on objective criteria. The criteria are useful tools for evaluating overall performance. The evaluation is intended to be comprehensive and not based on a single or limited number of criteria sources of information. Therefore, the person responsible for completing the faculty member’s annual evaluation shall consider all appropriate and available information that is relevant to the faculty member’s performance of assigned responsibilities. This will include the faculty member’s annual self-evaluation portfolio of activities and documented information from the following sources: immediate supervisor, peers, students, faculty member/self, other University officials who have responsibility for supervision of the faculty member, and individuals to whom the faculty member may be responsible in the course of a service assignment. Any materials to be used in the evaluation process submitted by persons other than the faculty member shall be shown to the faculty member, who may attach a written response. Any materials that have not been shown to the faculty member cannot be used in the evaluation process. Whenever a single or limited number of criteria are deemed controlling, the written evaluation must justify that conclusion.
(a) Faculty Annual Self-Evaluation Portfolio. Each faculty member shall submit to his/her chair/supervisor a self-evaluation portfolio of annual activities in teaching, research/scholarship/creative activities, service, and other University duties for the previous year, and a self-evaluation of the faculty member’s performance for that year consistent with the provisions of Article 18.
Sources of Evaluation. A n annual evaluation is a subjective assessment of an individual’s performance based on objective criteria. The criteria are useful tools for evaluating overall performance. The evaluation is intended to be comprehensive and not based on a single or limited number of criteria. Therefore, the person responsible for completing the faculty member’s annual evaluation shall consider all appropriate and available information that is relevant to the
Sources of Evaluation. 29 30 An annual evaluation is a subjective assessment of an individual’s performance based on 31 objective criteria. The criteria are useful tools for evaluating overall performance. The 32 evaluation is intended to be comprehensive and not based on a single or limited number of
Sources of Evaluation. (a) Faculty Annual Report. Every year, each faculty member shall submit to the chair a report of the faculty member’s activities in teaching, research/scholarship/creative activities, service, and other University duties.
(1) The University shall specify the required format and minimum content of the faculty annual report, consistent with the provisions of Sections 18.5 through 18.7.
(2) The annual report shall include any interpretive comments and/or supporting data that the faculty member deems appropriate in evaluating the faculty member’s performance.
(b) The person(s) responsible for completing the faculty member’s annual evaluation shall also consider appropriate information from the following sources: immediate supervisor, peers, students, faculty member/self, other university officials who have responsibility for supervision of the faculty member, and individuals to whom the faculty member may be responsible in the course of a service assignment. Any materials used in the evaluation process submitted by persons other than the faculty member shall be shown to the faculty member, who may attach a written response.
