Survey Description Sample Clauses

Survey Description. The survey was conducted in two rounds. The aim of the first round was to identify all the different goals of stakeholders regarding the DIT4TraM project pilots and the Key Performance Indicators needed to be measured. Subsequently, on the second round of the survey, the local stakeholders around the cities of DIT4TraM pilots were asked to prioritize the different objectives and assess the relative Key Performance Indicators according to their organizations' objectives. The survey was addressed to representatives from public and private operators, service providers, transport network companies, XxxX platforms, other enterprises in the wider industry, as well as authorities from countries of European Union with a greater focus on the stakeholders operating in DIT4TraM pilot cities. In the first round of the survey, all stakeholders were asked to indicate the areas of impact that they believed were relevant to the pilot(s) of their interest and then to indicate the goals of their organization regarding these areas of impact as well as to propose the Key Performance Indicators that they believed were the most appropriate to measure. As areas of impact, we considered network performance, network efficiency, traffic safety, energy/environment, socio- economic and cost. In the second round of the survey, the stakeholders were asked to prioritize the previously defined criteria and indicators according to how important they were to their organizations using Analytic Hierarchy Process and 0-100 scoring technique. The questionnaires of both rounds of the survey can be found in Appendix A and Appendix B respectively.
Sample 1
Survey Description. The survey was implemented in the form of an online set of questions created using LimeSurvey (xxxxx://xxx.xxxxxxxxxx.xxx/), an open-source tool for web surveys, and hosted on INCITES’ servers. An introductory page provides information on the project and the AHP methodology as portrayed indicatively in the following figures. Figure 3: End-user survey AHP methodology Figure 4 depicts an example of the AHP question implementation in the survey. Due to technical limitations of the survey tool used, the [1,9] range described in the methodology has been adapted into a [0,8] range while left hand side selection utilises the [-8,0] range. These adaptations come without loss in methodological effectiveness as the numerical representation of the responders’ assessments remains unaffected. 1.1.1. The full content of the End-user Questionnaire is available in Appendix A.: End-user questionnaire.
Sample 1
Survey Description. I designed the survey to find evidence of differences in beliefs and future expectations for ISA participants and non-participants. Each ISA applicant received a survey invitation email which explained that only Purdue University students were being invited and that I was conducting the survey to learn about how their “experiences, attitudes, expectations, and beliefs influence how [they] pay for college.” I did not explain that I was specifically studying the ISA program as I did not want students to be thinking about the ISA program when answering the questions. All students who completed the survey were immediately given a $20 Amazon gift card code. Approximately 60 percent of ISA applicants chose to complete the survey. To account for potential non-response bias, I use propensity score 10A large fraction of students go directly to graduate school, some take internships, and others report that they are still seeking full-time employment. weighting to weight the data by the inverse probability of responding. Very few observables affect the likelihood of responding to the survey and the weighting method does not change the results. After answering a few standard demographic questions, the students were asked to rate a set of 12 statements about debt aversion. Xxxxxxx, Xxxxxxxx and Xxxxxxxx (2011) show that framing a financial contract as a debt or as a loan affects the student’s reported willingness to enter into the contract. My hypothesis is that students with greater aversion to debt will be more likely to choose to participate in the ISA than students with less debt aversion. The debt aversion questions used in this survey were developed and tested for reliability by Xxxxxx and Xxx (1995). Students were asked to report that they either strongly agree, somewhat agree, neither agree or disagree, somewhat disagree, or strongly disagree with each statement. Of the 12 statements, 6 are “pro” statements and 6 are “anti” statements. Values of 5 through 1 are assigned to the responses for ease of reporting with the scale reversed for “anti” statements. Therefore, for all statements, higher values indicate greater aversion to debt. The questions are reported in Table 4 along with the mean score (on a 5 point scale) for each question for participants and non-participants. The final column reports the p-value for a t-test of the equality of means. As shown in Table 4, there is no evidence that ISA participants have greater debt aversion than ISA non-participants...
Sample 1

Related to Survey Description

  • Property Description The undersigned Xxxxxxxxx agrees to purchase from the undersigned owner (seller) through Ohio Real Estate Auctions, County, OH and known as

  • Site Description {Buyer Comment: Provide a legal description of the Site, including the Site map.}

  • Project Description In two or three brief sentences, provide a concise description of your exhibition. Include the subject matter, type of objects to be included (paintings, sculpture, manuscripts, etc.), those responsible for organizing the exhibition, and catalogue author(s).

  • Work Description T-804 Opening Roads - Removal of closure devices, cleaning ditches, removing berms, and blading the traveled-way T-811 Closing Roads - Entrance treatment for 150' cross-rip; debris block (slash, earth, berm, rocks, etc.) + seed + water bar T-811 Closing Roads - Water bar frequency per BMPs for remainder of road T-811 Closing Roads - Engineering Rep. or Construction Inspector must be notified prior to performing closeout ple S am 76P Single Lane / Level 1 76 0.00 Ending 0.30

  • ITEM DESCRIPTION Equipment (include VIN, make, model, year, serial no., accessories, or other identifying features): 12. NO. OF OPERATORS PER SHIFT 13. HRLY/ DAILY/ MILEAGE SHIFT BASIS 14. SPECIAL 15. GUARANTEE (8 HOURS) Portable Toilet Rental – Serviced(Includes first day delivery/last day pickup and daily rental rate per unit) 1 $75 Daily Ea. Portable Toilet Rental – Unserviced(Rental only, no daily service call) 1 $45 Daily Ea. Accessible Portable Toilet Rental – Serviced(Includes first day delivery/last day pickup and daily rental rate per unit) 1 $95 Daily Ea. Accessible Portable Toilet Rental – Unserviced(Rental only, no daily service call) 1 $65 Daily Ea.

  • System Description The wet detention basin is designed to trap 80% of sediment in runoff and maintain pre-development downstream peak flows. The basin has two forebays (smaller ponds) located at the low end of two grass xxxxxx. In addition to runoff conveyance, the grass xxxxxx also allow infiltration and filtering of pollutants, especially from smaller storms. The forebays are each 4 feet deep. They are connected to the main pool by 18 and 24-inch metal pipes that outlet onto a rock chute. The forebays will trap coarse sediments in runoff, such as road sands, thus reducing maintenance of the main basin. The main pool will trap the finer suspended sediment. To do this, the pond size, water level and outlet structures must be maintained as specified in this Agreement (see Figures 1, 2 and 3). The main basin receives runoff from a 67.1 acre drainage area (41.2 acres within the subdivision and 25.9 acres off-site drainage coming from the east). During high rainfall or snow melt events, the water level will temporarily rise and slowly drain down to the elevation of the control structure. The water level is controlled by a 12-inch concrete pipe extending through the berm in the northwest corner of the basin (see Figures 1 and 3). On the face of the 12-inch pipe, there is metal plate with a 3-inch drilled hole (orifice) with stone in front of it. This orifice controls the water level and causes the pond to temporarily rise during runoff events. Washed stone (1- 2” diameter) is placed in front of the orifice to prevent clogging. High flows may enter the grated concrete riser or flow over the rock lined emergency spillway. “As-built” construction drawings of the basin, showing actual dimensions, elevations, outlet structures, etc. will be recorded as an addendum(s) to this agreement within 60 days after [Municipality Name] accepts verification of construction from the project engineer.

  • Task Description This task includes activities associated with permit-required monitoring conducted in accordance with the conditions specified by state or federal regulatory agencies. All monitoring tasks must be located within or adjacent to the Project area and follow the Department’s Regional Coastal Monitoring Program and FWC's marine turtle and shorebird monitoring programs. Guidance for monitoring of nearshore resources is available in the Department's Standard Operation Procedures For Nearshore Hardbottom Monitoring Of Beach Nourishment Projects. The Local Sponsor must submit work products directly to the appropriate state or federal regulatory agencies in accordance with permit conditions to be eligible for reimbursement under this task, unless otherwise directed.

  • Overtime Description Time and one half the regular rate for Saturday for the first eight hours worked. Double time the regular rate for Saturday for work performed in excess of eight hours. Overtime Time and one half the regular rate after an 8 hour day. Double time the regular rate for Sunday. Double time the regular rate for work on the following holiday(s). Paid Holidays New Year's Day Xxxxxxx's Birthday President's Day Memorial Day Independence Day Labor Day Columbus Day Veteran's Day Thanksgiving Day Christmas Day Employees must work at least one day in the payroll week in which the holiday occurs to receive the paid holiday (Operating Engineer Local #15-D) ENGINEER - OPERATING‌ Back Filling Machines, Cranes, Mucking Machines and Dual Drum Paver. Effective Period: 7/1/2015 - 6/30/2016 Wage Rate per Hour: $71.75 Backhoes, Power Shovels, Hydraulic Clam Shells, Steel Erection, Moles and machines of a similar nature. Effective Period: 7/1/2015 - 6/30/2016 Wage Rate per Hour: $74.29 Mine Hoists, Cranes, etc. (Used as Mine Hoists) Effective Period: 7/1/2015 - 6/30/2016 Wage Rate per Hour: $76.67 Gradealls, Keystones, Cranes on land or water (with digging buckets), Bridge Cranes, Vermeer Cutter and machines of a similar nature, Trenching Machines. Effective Period: 7/1/2015 - 6/30/2016 Wage Rate per Hour: $74.84 Pile Drivers & Rigs (employing Dock Builder foreperson): Xxxxxxx Xxxxx, Tunnel Shovels. Effective Period: 7/1/2015 - 6/30/2016 Wage Rate per Hour: $73.36 Mixers (Concrete with loading attachment), Concrete Pavers, Cableways, Land Derricks, Power Houses (Low Air Pressure Units). Effective Period: 7/1/2015 - 6/30/2016 Wage Rate per Hour: $69.69 Barrier Movers , Barrier Transport and Machines of a Similar Nature. Effective Period: 7/1/2015 - 6/30/2016 Wage Rate per Hour: $56.25 Utility Compressors Effective Period: 7/1/2015 - 6/30/2016 Wage Rate per Hour: $43.63 Horizontal Boring Rig Effective Period: 7/1/2015 - 6/30/2016 Wage Rate per Hour: $66.26 Elevators (manually operated as personnel hoist). Effective Period: 7/1/2015 - 6/30/2016 Wage Rate per Hour: $60.89 Compressors (Portable 3 or more in battery), Driving of Truck Mounted Compressors, Well-point Pumps, Tugger Machines Well Point Pumps, Churn Drill. Effective Period: 7/1/2015 - 6/30/2016 Wage Rate per Hour: $47.28

  • Additional Description If any additional information would help describe the property, include it here. Step 3 – Identify Lease Term 7.

  • Position Description The employee shall be responsible for drafting his/her position description form and shall forward it to his/her supervisor for approval. When the employee and the supervisor disagree on the job description, they shall meet promptly and attempt to reach an agreement on the employee's job duties. In the event that an agreement cannot be reached, the supervisor will finalize the job description in accordance with the supervisor's understanding and expectations of the position. The employee may submit his or her comments for the classification analyst to consider when reviewing the position description.