Union Review of Competitive Actions Sample Clauses

Union Review of Competitive Actions a. The Union will be permitted to conduct a review of the merit promotion file for a bargaining unit position in accordance with 5 U.S.C. 7114(b)(4) and the appropriate provisions of the Privacy Act. b. The Union will provide the Employer with the name of the Union representative who is responsible for conducting the review and reason for the review on a case-by-case basis. The representative designated to conduct the review will not have been an applicant for the promotion file being reviewed, nor eligible for similar positions.
AutoNDA by SimpleDocs
Union Review of Competitive Actions. A. The Union will be permitted to review (i.e. audit) competitive selection actions taken under this Article for all bargaining unit positions, when the Union has reason to believe a discrepancy exists or when requested to do so by an employee. This may be done at any time after the vacancy announcement posting up to forty-five (45) calendar days after selection is made. B. The Union will make the request to the SPO. The Union will provide the SPO with an updated written designation identifying the names of the Union designated union time users who are responsible for conducting audits. Any changes to the list will be sent to the SPO in writing. The union time user designated to conduct the audit will not have been an applicant for the promotion package being audited. C. Employees who believe they were improperly excluded from the BQL may request a review of the promotion package through the Union audit described above. D. The SPO will make the pertinent records from that package available to the Union auditor within seven (7) work days of the receipt of the timely written request. The Union will treat information confidentially. E. The Union may request additional information during the course of the audit. F. If an employee was excluded from the BQL due to an error, the provisions of Section 14 of this Article will apply. G. Employees who elect to use the grievance procedure rather than the Union audit procedure must adhere to the provisions of Article 28, Grievance Procedure.
Union Review of Competitive Actions. A. An employee who wishes to challenge a competitive action may seek the assistance of the Union in filing a grievance or requesting information on the competitive action. The Union may request information regarding the competitive selection packages pursuant to Article 4, Section 6
Union Review of Competitive Actions. A. The Union may review competitive selection actions taken under this Article when it has reason to believe a discrepancy exists or when requested to do so by an employee. B. The Union makes the request to the Chief Human Capital Officer or designee. The Union provides the Chief Human Capital Officer or designee with the names of the Union representatives who are responsible for conducting the reviews. Any changes to the designated representatives must be submitted in writing. The representative(s) designated to conduct the review must not have been an applicant for the promotion package being reviewed. C. Employees who believe they were improperly excluded from consideration may request review of the promotion package through the Union review process described below. D. If the employee chooses to use the Union procedure, they must make a written request to the Union within fifteen (15) business days after the selection is announced to all employees. A Union request under Subsection (A) above must be made within the same time limits E. The Agency makes the pertinent records from the package available to the Union within seven (7) business days of receipt of the written request. The Union treats the information confidentially and reviews it in a location designated by the Agency and in the presence of a designated Management official. F. If during the course of the review, additional information is determined necessary, such information is secured from the Agency’s designated Management official. G. Employees who elect to use the grievance procedure rather than the review procedure must initiate action in accordance with Article 24 Grievance Procedure.
Union Review of Competitive Actions. The Union will be permitted to conduct audits of competitive selection actions taken under this Article when it has reason to believe a discrepancy exists or when requested to do so by an employee. The Union will provide the designated agency official with the names of the Union representatives who are responsible for conducting audits. Any changes to the list of designated representatives will be sent to the Agency in writing. The representative designated to conduct the audit will not have been an applicant for the promotion package being audited. Employees who believe they were improperly excluded from inclusion as best qualified may request a review of the promotion package through the Union process described below. If the employee chooses to use the Union procedure, he/she must make a written or oral request to the Union within 15 working days after the selection is announced to all employees. A Union request under Subsection (A.) above may be made within 120 days following the date of selection. The designated official responsible for the package will make all pertinent records from that package available either electronically or via hard copy to the Union auditor within 7 working days of receipt of the written request. The Union will treat the information confidentially. For purpose of this section, the aforementioned pertinent records shall include the vacancy announcement, training and awards, applications, occupational questionnaire, employee answers to the occupational questionnaire, the total overall score for the questions, selection certificates, declinations and information in the promotion package in accordance with Section 13.A. While the parties agree that there is no need to meet the statutory standards of 5 USC 7114 (b)(4) to obtain the information, e.g., particularized need, the Agency nonetheless is legally entitled to protect the privacy of the applicants involved in the action. If an error is discovered which resulted in an employee’s exclusion from a well- qualified group, the provision of Section 16 of this article will apply. If during the course of the audit additional information is determined necessary, such information shall be secured from the designated management official.

Related to Union Review of Competitive Actions

  • Corrective Action Plans If the OAG finds deficiencies in XXXXXXX’s performance under this Grant Contract, the OAG, at its sole discretion, may impose one or more of the following remedies as part of a corrective action plan: increase of monitoring visits; require additional or more detailed financial and/or programmatic reports be submitted; require prior approval for expenditures; require additional technical or management assistance and/or make modifications in business practices; reduce the contract amount; and/or terminate this Grant Contract. The foregoing are not exclusive remedies, and the OAG may impose other requirements that the OAG determines will be in the best interest of the State.

  • Corrective Actions The Government will use its best efforts to ensure that each Covered Provider (i) takes, where necessary, appropriate and timely corrective actions in response to audits, (ii) considers whether the results of the Covered Provider’s audit necessitates adjustment of the Government’s records, and (iii) permits independent auditors to have access to its records and financial statements as necessary.

  • Corrective Action Plan Within fifteen (15) Business Days following the establishment of the Joint Remediation Committee, the Purchasers, in consultation with the Sellers, shall prepare and submit to the Joint Remediation Committee an initial draft of the Corrective Action Plan. The parties shall work in good faith through the Joint Remediation Committee to finalize the Corrective Action Plan within fifteen (15) Business Days of the Purchasers’ submission of the initial draft of the Correct Action Plan. At the end of such period, if the Sellers reasonably determine that the Corrective Action Plan proposed by the Purchasers (as may be modified over the course of such period) would not reasonably be expected to satisfactorily address the Major Default, then the Sellers may escalate the issue to the Head of Commercial Capital (or equivalent leader of any successor business unit) of the Seller Group and the Chief Executive Officer of the Bank Assets Purchaser (the “Senior Executives”) and the Senior Executives shall work collaboratively (including with the Joint Remediation Committee) to develop a mutually agreeable Corrective Action Plan within fifteen (15) Business Days.

  • Office of Inspector General Investigative Findings Expert Review In accordance with Senate Bill 799, Acts 2021, 87th Leg., R.S., if Texas Government Code, Section 531.102(m-1)(2) is applicable to this Contract, Contractor affirms that it possesses the necessary occupational licenses and experience.

  • Proposed Corrective Action Plan Simultaneously with the submission of the Audit, the District will submit to OCR for its review and approval a proposed Corrective Action Plan to address all inaccessible content and functionality identified during the District’s Audit. The proposed Corrective Action Plan will set out a detailed schedule for: (1) addressing problems, taking into account identified priorities, with all corrective actions to be completed within 18 months of the date OCR approved the Corrective Action Plan; (2) setting up systems of accountability and verifying claims of accessibility by vendors or open sources; and setting up a system of testing and accountability to maintain the accessibility of all online content and functionality on an ongoing basis. In its Corrective Action Plan, the District will acknowledge that if all inaccessible content and functionality identified during the Audit is not removed or made accessible on a timely basis, the District will be in violation of this Agreement, Section 504, and Title II and OCR may initiate administrative enforcement or judicial proceedings to enforce the specific terms and obligations of the Agreement.

  • Corrective Action Despite its right to terminate this Agreement pursuant to this Article, the LHIN may choose not to terminate this Agreement and may take whatever corrective action it considers necessary and appropriate, including suspending Funding for such period as the LHIN determines, to ensure the successful completion of the Services in accordance with the terms of this Agreement.

  • Disciplinary Information There are no legal or disciplinary events to disclose in response to this item.

  • Employer Grievance The Employer may institute a grievance by delivering the same in writing to the President of the Local Union and the President shall answer such grievance in writing within five working (5) days. If the answer is not acceptable to the Employer, the Employer may, within ten (10) working days from the day the President gives her answer, give ten (10) working days notice to the President of the Local Union of its intention to refer the dispute to arbitration.

  • Procurement Related Complaints and Administrative Review 49.1 The procedures for making a Procurement-related Complaint are as specified in the TDS. 49.2 A request for administrative review shall be made in the form provided under contract forms.

  • Log Reviews All systems processing and/or storing PHI COUNTY discloses to 11 CONTRACTOR or CONTRACTOR creates, receives, maintains, or transmits on behalf of COUNTY 12 must have a routine procedure in place to review system logs for unauthorized access.

Draft better contracts in just 5 minutes Get the weekly Law Insider newsletter packed with expert videos, webinars, ebooks, and more!