Urgent Decisions Sample Clauses

Urgent Decisions. On occasion, the Committee may be required to take urgent decisions. An urgent decision is one where the requirement for the decision to be made arises between the scheduled monthly meetings of the Committee and in relation to which a decision must be made prior to the next scheduled meeting. Where an urgent decision is required a supporting paper will be circulated to Committee members by the secretary to the Committee. The Committee members may meet either in person, via telephone conference or communicate by email to take an urgent decision. The quorum, as described in section 6, must be adhered to for urgent decisions. A minute of the discussion (including those performed virtually) and decision will be taken by the secretary to the Clinical Commissioning Executive Group and will be reported to the next meeting of the Clinical Commissioning Executive Group for formal ratification.
Sample 1Sample 2Sample 3
AutoNDA by SimpleDocs
Urgent Decisions. In circumstances of urgency in which it is not reasonably practicable to consult all members of the JCMG, the Director of Joint Commissioning, acting alone, is empowered to make decisions on behalf of the JCMG. The Director of Joint Commissioning shall take reasonable steps to consult as many members of the JCMG as possible before making an urgent decision, and after making such an urgent decision, shall notify all members of the JCMG that an urgent decision has been made, and the circumstances leading to that decision, as soon as reasonably practicable. The Pooled Fund Manager will report directly to the Director of Joint Commissioning and is responsible for managing the pooled and non-pooled budgets. This person will act as a non-voting member of both the JCB and JCMG. The Pooled Fund Manager may delegate the day-to-day management of pooled fund in accordance with the Council’s standing orders, financial regulations and such other applicable Scheme of Delegation. (This role will be an existing member of the JCU Management structure) • The Pooled Fund Manager shall supply to the JCMG on a monthly basis the financial and activity information as referred to at Schedule 4 on Resources and included in the Performance Reporting Framework set out here at Appendix 1. • The Annual Commissioning Plan as agreed by the JCB and revised annually thereafter will form the basis for delivery by the JCU against the Section 75. • Any variation to the Annual Commissioning Plan and/or the Revised Annual Finance Agreement must be agreed by the JCB. • The Pooled Fund Manager will refine the Aims and Objectives set out in Schedule 1 into targets and performance measures to be agreed by the JCMG from time to time and in any event by 30th April 2011, following a strategic and financial review to be led by the JCMG. • Service provider and Business Intelligence (CSU) clinical quality reports to be received and reviewed against quality standards and outcomes. Exception and assurance reports to be provided where performance is outside of agreed thresholds following review by the PCT quality team. The PCT Quality team will provide advice about what should be expected in a provider policy about clinical governance/clinical risk etc - the providers will have accountability for demonstrating that they deliver against these. The Quality team will provide an overview and scrutiny role of the providers as required - seeking assurance of quality standards, and directing any intervention requ...
Sample 1
Urgent Decisions. 4.8.1 On the application of any Party, a matter/decision may be categorised as urgent by the Chairperson (an “Urgent Decision”), in which case: (a) There will be an ad-hoc meeting of All NEMO Committee set up as soon as possible by the Secretary for which the urgent matter to be decided will be on the agenda (the agenda to clearly state that such decision is being dealt with under the urgent timetable). The final agenda plus any supporting documentation with respect to such ad-hoc meeting shall be sent to all members of the All NEMO Committee by no later than 17:00 CET on the day falling at least 2 Business Days before the meeting. (b) The maximum number of attempts by the All NEMO Committee to reach an urgent decision (either by unanimity or on an ANCA QMV basis) shall be two (2). (c) The period of time for any non-attending NEMO to object to an urgent unanimity decision shall be two (2) Business Days. (d) The period of time to raise minority protection grounds to object to an urgent ANCA QMV decision shall be two (2) Business Days from receipt of the relevant minutes of the meeting. 4.8.2 Urgent decision(s) of the All NEMO Committee shall be recorded by the Secretary in a separate written decision document, prepared, shown, discussed and approved after each decision is taken during the relevant All NEMO Committee meeting. A copy of this separate decision document shall be circulated to the members of the All NEMO Committee by the Secretary, on the very same date of the meeting. This separate decision document will also be reflected in the minutes of the All NEMO Committee meeting during which it was adopted. Such minutes are elaborated in accordance with the provisions below, it being understood, for the avoidance of any doubt, that neither the urgent decision(s) nor the separate decision document can be subject to any further challenge or modification by any of the NEMOs who attended such meeting and voted favour of the relevant urgent decision. With respect to those NEMOs either not attending the relevant NEMO Committee meeting in question or not voting in favour of such urgent decision, the relevant provisions of Section 4.2 shall apply.
Sample 1

Related to Urgent Decisions

  • Investment Decisions The Subadviser shall determine from time to time what investments and securities will be purchased, retained, sold or loaned by the Series, and what portion of such assets will be invested or held uninvested as cash.

  • ADB’s Review of Procurement Decisions 11. All contracts procured under international competitive bidding procedures and contracts for consulting services shall be subject to prior review by ADB, unless otherwise agreed between the Borrower and ADB and set forth in the Procurement Plan.

  • Independent Decision The Investor is not relying on the Issuer or on any legal or other opinion in the materials reviewed by the Investor with respect to the financial or tax considerations of the Investor relating to its investment in the Shares. The Investor has relied solely on the representations and warranties, covenants and agreements of the Issuer in this Agreement (including the exhibits and schedules hereto) and on its examination and independent investigation in making its decision to acquire the Shares.

  • Arbitration Decisions Unless otherwise agreed by the Parties, the arbitrator(s) shall render a decision within ninety (90) Calendar Days of appointment and shall notify the Parties in writing of such decision and the reasons therefor. The arbitrator(s) shall be authorized only to interpret and apply the provisions of this LGIA and shall have no power to modify or change any provision of this Agreement in any manner. The decision of the arbitrator(s) shall be final and binding upon the Parties, and judgment on the award may be entered in any court having jurisdiction. The decision of the arbitrator(s) may be appealed solely on the grounds that the conduct of the arbitrator(s), or the decision itself, violated the standards set forth in the Federal Arbitration Act or the Administrative Dispute Resolution Act. The final decision of the arbitrator(s) must also be filed with FERC if it affects jurisdictional rates, terms and conditions of service, Interconnection Facilities, or Network Upgrades.

  • Investment Decision The Purchaser understands that nothing in the Agreement or any other materials presented to the Purchaser in connection with the purchase and sale of the Shares constitutes legal, tax or investment advice. The Purchaser has consulted such legal, tax and investment advisors as it, in its sole discretion, has deemed necessary or appropriate in connection with its purchase of the Shares.

  • Review of Decision Within sixty (60) days after the Secretary’s receipt of a request for review, he or she will review the Company’s determination. After considering all materials presented by the Claimant, the Secretary will render a written opinion, written in a manner calculated to be understood by the Claimant, setting forth the specific reasons for the decision and containing specific references to the pertinent provisions of this Agreement on which the decision is based. If special circumstances require that the sixty (60) day time period be extended, the Secretary will so notify the Claimant and will render the decision as soon as possible, but no later than one hundred twenty (120) days after receipt of the request for review.

  • Automated decisions For purposes hereof “automated decision” shall mean a decision by the data exporter or the data importer which produces legal effects concerning a data subject or significantly affects a data subject and which is based solely on automated processing of personal data intended to evaluate certain personal aspects relating to him, such as his performance at work, creditworthiness, reliability, conduct, etc. The data importer shall not make any automated decisions concerning data subjects, except when: a) i. such decisions are made by the data importer in entering into or performing a contract with the data subject, and

  • Review by the Association of Procurement Decisions The Procurement Plan shall set forth those contracts which shall be subject to the Association’s Prior Review. All other contracts shall be subject to Post Review by the Association.

  • Claim Decision Upon receipt of such claim, the Plan Administrator shall respond to such claimant within ninety (90) days after receiving the claim. If the Plan Administrator determines that special circumstances require additional time for processing the claim, the Plan Administrator can extend the response period by an additional ninety (90) days for reasonable cause by notifying the claimant in writing, prior to the end of the initial ninety (90) day period, that an additional period is required. The notice of extension must set forth the special circumstances and the date by which the Plan Administrator expects to render its decision. If the claim is denied in whole or in part, the Plan Administrator shall notify the claimant in writing of such denial. The Plan Administrator shall write the notification in a manner calculated to be understood by the claimant. The notification shall set forth: (i) The specific reasons for the denial; (ii) The specific reference to pertinent provisions of the Agreement on which the denial is based; (iii) A description of any additional information or material necessary for the claimant to perfect the claim and an explanation of why such material or information is necessary; (iv) Appropriate information as to the steps to be taken if the claimant wishes to submit the claim for review and the time limits applicable to such procedures; and (v) A statement of the claimant’s right to bring a civil action under ERISA Section 502(a) following an adverse benefit determination on review.

  • Major Decisions (A) Subject to Sections 7.3(C) and 7.3(D) with respect to the Company, all major decisions of the Company set forth below in clauses (A)(1) through (A)(6) (“Major Decisions”) shall be subject to the Company’s Articles of Incorporation and joint approval by the Advisor and Sub-advisor. For the avoidance of doubt, Major Decisions specifically exclude any decisions regarding the day-to-day operations of the Company, the decision-making authority for which has been delegated to the Sub-advisor pursuant to this Agreement. Major Decisions shall consist of the following: (1) Decisions to recommend to the Board of Directors that the Company acquire or sell Properties, Loans and other Permitted Investments; (2) Retention of investment banks for the Company; (3) Marketing methods for the Company’s sale of Shares; (4) Extending, initiating or terminating the Initial Public Offering or any subsequent Offering of the Shares; (5) Issuing press releases involving the major decisions of the Company or the Advisor or Sub-advisor or their Affiliates with respect to the business or operations of the Company; provided, that the Sub-advisor need not obtain consent to any press releases regarding acquisitions or dispositions of Properties, Loans or other Permitted Investments; and provided further, however, that notwithstanding the immediately preceding proviso, any mention of the Advisor or its Affiliates in such press releases regarding acquisitions or dispositions shall be pre-approved by the Advisor; and (6) Merging or otherwise engaging in any change of control transaction for the Company. (B) Notwithstanding anything in this Agreement to the contrary, if the Parties do not agree to any action constituting a Major Decision that is described in any of clauses (A)(2) through (A)(6) above and that has been proposed by either Party, the Parties shall meet (in person or by phone) to discuss the issue in dispute in good faith over the five-business day period beginning with the delivery of notice of the proposed action to the other Party. (C) Notwithstanding anything in this Agreement to the contrary, with respect to Major Decisions described in clause (A)(1) above (but subject to Section 7.3(D)), (1) joint approval shall not be required, (2) the Sub-advisor and the Advisor shall discuss the proposed transaction (either in person or by phone) prior to either Party making any recommendation of the proposed transaction to the Board of Directors, and (3) the Sub-Advisor and the Advisor shall each give due consideration to the opinions of the other Party. Ordinarily, such discussions shall begin at least five business days before a recommendation is made to the Board of Directors; however, if in the sole discretion of the Sub-advisor it is in the best interest of the Company to make a recommendation to the Board of Directors more promptly, then the Sub-advisor may do so. In the event the Parties do not agree as to whether to recommend the proposed transaction to the Board of Directors, the Sub-advisor’s decision shall govern. (D) Notwithstanding the provisions of this Section 7.3 or any other provision in this Agreement to the contrary, in all events, including Major Decisions, the Company will be managed under the direction of the Board of Directors. (E) Notwithstanding anything in this Agreement to the contrary (but subject to Section 7.3(D)), the Sub-advisor shall have sole authority to act on behalf of the Company regarding amending the Advisory Agreement.

Draft better contracts in just 5 minutes Get the weekly Law Insider newsletter packed with expert videos, webinars, ebooks, and more!