VOLUME II – Past Performance Sample Clauses

VOLUME II – Past Performance. FACTOR #2
Sample 1
AutoNDA by SimpleDocs
VOLUME II – Past Performance. This volume shall address the offeror’s relevant past and present experience from a qualitative aspect. The Government will perform a Confidence Assessment of the offeror’s past performance to arrive at a confidence rating. The Confidence Assessment represents the evaluation of an offeror's past work record to assess the Government's confidence in the offeror's probability of successfully performing as proposed. Offerors shall submit the following information for no more than ten recent (within the past three years) and relevant contracts. This volume shall not exceed 25 pages. Offerors shall submit information regarding Government contracts for the prime offeror, teaming or joint-venture partner, or major subcontractor currently in performance or which were awarded during the past three years (from the issue date of this RFP) which are relevant to the efforts required by this solicitation. Relevant efforts are defined as services/efforts that are the same or similar in size, scope, and complexity to the effort (as compared to NAICS code 541618) required by the RFP. Note that relevant BRAC experience needs to be at the program management, environmental coordinator, or munitions and explosives of concern policy and implementation level with senior level staffing and coordination, not performing BRAC site-specific or installation support or general environmental clean-up efforts or database/spreadsheet design or records keeping. (1) Data concerning the offeror shall be provided first, followed by the proposed teaming or joint-venture partners or major subcontractor, in alphabetical order. The offeror shall also submit the written consent of its teaming or joint-venture partners or major subcontractors to allow the disclosure of their past performance information to the offeror. In order for their past performance to be considered, the proposal shall include letters of commitment for each teaming partner and major subcontractor (in Section 3, Volume V - General). The Past Performance Information Retrieval System and other sources may be used to help determine if the relevant experience is the same or similar in nature, size, and complexity to the work specified by this solicitation. This volume shall be organized into four sections.
Sample 1
VOLUME II – Past Performance. The Past Performance factor indicates the relevant quantitative and qualitative aspects of each Offeror’s record of performing services, or delivering products, similar in size, content, and complexity of the requirements of this solicitation.
Sample 1
VOLUME II – Past Performance. The proposal must demonstrate satisfactory past performance and contractual completion of relevant projects. Relevant projects are recent projects that are similar to the solicited project in scope, size, and/or complexity. Scope relevancy is defined as those projects that demonstrate past performance in the management of facilities and related logistics for complex government entities and/or large corporations. All submitted projects must have been in performance or awarded during the past three (3) years from the issue date of this RFP. Offerors may submit ongoing projects, but they must be at least 75% physically complete. The Offeror will submit information on at least three (3), but not more than five (5) similar projects. At least one (1) of the projects must demonstrate the experience of the Primary Offeror; it is also applied to Joint Venture. Each Joint Venture partner must submit at least one of the projects listing the experience related with the requirement. Additional projects can represent the past performance of the Primary Offeror or major subcontractor. A major subcontractor is defined as one who will be responsible for efforts totaling at least 25% of the labor support cost. In the case of projects submitted by subcontractors, the subcontractor must submit the final cost of their portion of the project along with the other required information. The information that is required to be supplied is identified on the form provided below entitled “Past Performance Questionnaires (Attachment 2).” Provide copies of any Quality Deficiency Reports and Corrective Actions submitted by the Defense Contract Management Agency (DCMA) office within the past three (3) years for any noted contracts and task orders and subcontracts. For noted Government contracts that did not nor do not meet original requirements with regard to either cost, schedule or technical performance, provide a brief explanation of the reason(s) and any corrective actions taken to avoid recurrence. Provide the aforementioned information for all contracts terminated in whole or in part, for any reason during the past three (3) years, to include those currently in the process of such termination as well as those that are not for work similar to the proposed effort. Provide the aforementioned information for any proposed major subcontractor. The Government may also analyze past performance of the Offeror and major subcontractors by reviewing the Contractor Performance Assessment Reportin...
Sample 1
VOLUME II – Past Performance. This volume shall contain relevant past performance information regarding similar contracts. The Offeror shall not go back any farther than 36 months from the date of solicitation issuance for the submitted data. This volume shall not exceed 25 pages plus five pages for each major subcontractor, excluding Past Performance Questionnaire Forms (Attachment 12). Offeror’s shall submit all Government and/or commercial contracts for the prime Offeror and each major subcontractor in performance or awarded during the past three years, from the issue date of this RFP, which are relevant to the efforts required by this solicitation. Relevant efforts are defined as services/efforts which are the same as or similar to the effort and amounts (as compared to NAICS code 561210, Facilities Support Services) required by the RFP. Data concerning the Offeror shall be provided first, followed by each proposed major subcontractor, in alphabetical order. The Offeror shall also submit the written consent of its major subcontractors to allow the disclosure of major subcontractor’s past performance information by the Offeror. In addition, letters of commitment shall be included for all major subcontractors for their past performance to be considered. This volume shall be organized into the following sections: (a) VOLUME II Section 1 –
Sample 1
VOLUME II – Past Performance. The Past Performance portion of the proposal shall be submitted as part of Volume II, and shall be no more than two (2) pages for the narrative summary, not including the Past
Sample 1
VOLUME II – Past Performance. The Government may use past performance information obtained from other than the sources identified by the offeror. Information obtained may be used for the responsibility determination as well as the best value decision.
Sample 1
AutoNDA by SimpleDocs

Related to VOLUME II – Past Performance

  • Past Performance The Government will evaluate the contractor's performance on the NETCENTS-2 Orders provided in Exhibit B, CDRL B001. The PCO will determine the quality of the work performed based on an integrated assessment of data obtained in the Contractor Performance Assessment Reporting Systems (CPARS) and information obtained from Defense Contract Management Agency (DCMA) channels, interviews with customers, program managers and/or contracting officers for NETCENTS-2 task orders. Based on the contractor performance records above, the PCO will determine if there is an expectation that the contractor will successfully perform the required efforts under the unrestricted NetOps and Infrastructure Solutions contract.

  • Product Performance Contractor hereby warrants and represents that the Products acquired by the Authorized User under the terms and conditions of this Contract conform to the specifications, performance standards and documentation in the Authorized User Agreement., and the documentation fully describes the proper procedure for using the Products. Contractor further warrants and represents that if the Products acquired by the Authorized User pursuant to an Authorized User Agreement under this Contract include software application development, software application customization, software programming, software integration or similar items (“Software Deliverables”) then such Software Deliverables shall be free from defects in material and workmanship and conform with all requirements of the Contract and Authorized User Agreement for the warranty period of one (1) year from the date of acceptance of the completed project (“Project warranty period”). Contractor also warrants that the Products, in the form provided to the Authorized User, do not infringe any copyright, trademark, trade secret or other right of any third party.

  • Continuing Performance (a) The obligations under this Agreement continue until satisfied in full and do not merge with any action performed or document executed by any Party for the purposes of performance of this Agreement. (b) Any representation in this Agreement survives the execution of any document for the purposes of, and continues after, performance of this Agreement. (c) Any indemnity given by any Party under this Agreement: (i) constitutes a liability of that Party separate and independent from any other liability of that Party under this Agreement or any other agreement; and (ii) survives and continues after performance of this Agreement.

  • Ongoing Performance Measures The Department intends to use performance-reporting tools in order to measure the performance of Contractor(s). These tools will include the Contractor Performance Survey (Exhibit H), to be completed by Customers on a quarterly basis. Such measures will allow the Department to better track Vendor performance through the term of the Contract(s) and ensure that Contractor(s) consistently provide quality services to the State and its Customers. The Department reserves the right to modify the Contractor Performance Survey document and introduce additional performance-reporting tools as they are developed, including online tools (e.g. tools within MFMP or on the Department's website).

  • Excuse for Nonperformance or Delayed Performance Except with respect to defaults of subcontractors, Contractor/Vendor shall not be in default by reason of any failure in performance of this contract in accordance with its terms (including any failure by Contractor/Vendor to make progress in the prosecution of the work hereunder which endangers such performance) if Contractor/Vendor has notified the Commission or designee within 15 days after the cause of the delay and the failure arises out of causes such as: acts of God; acts of the public enemy; acts of the State and any other governmental entity in its sovereign or contractual capacity; fires; floods; epidemics; quarantine restrictions; strikes or other labor disputes; freight embargoes; or unusually severe weather. If the failure to perform is caused by the failure of a subcontractor to perform or to make progress, and if such failure arises out of causes similar to those set forth above, Contractor/Vendor shall not be deemed to be in default, unless the services to be furnished by the subcontractor were reasonably obtainable from other sources in sufficient time to permit Contractor to meet the contract requirements. Upon request of Contractor, the Commission or designee shall ascertain the facts and extent of such failure, and, if such officer determines that any failure to perform was occasioned by any one or more of the excusable causes, and that, but for the excusable cause, Contractor’s progress and performance would have met the terms of the contract, the delivery schedule shall be revised accordingly, subject to the rights of the State under the clause entitled (in fixed-price contracts, “Termination for Convenience,” in cost-reimbursement contracts, “Termination”). (As used in this Paragraph of this clause, the term “subcontractor” means subcontractor at any tier).

  • Due Performance Each party to this Agreement undertakes the obligation that the other's expectation of receiving due performance will not be impaired. When reasonable grounds for insecurity arise with respect to the performance of either party, the other may, in writing, demand adequate assurance of due performance and until such written assurance is received may, if commercially reasonable, suspend any performance for which the agreed return has not been received.

  • Continuing Contract Performance Pending final resolution of a Claim, except as otherwise agreed in writing or as provided in Section 9.7 and Article 13, the Design-Builder shall proceed diligently with performance of the Contract and the Owner shall continue to make payments in accordance with the Design-Build Documents.

  • Prompt Performance All actions required to be taken (including payments) by any party under this Agreement shall be performed within the time prescribed for performance in this Agreement, or if no period is prescribed, such actions shall be performed promptly.

  • Work Performance Xxxxxx agrees that all Services performed hereunder shall be performed on a best effort basis by employees, students, faculty, graduate assistants and staff having an appropriate experience and skill level and in compliance with the statement of work.

  • Contract Performance C19.1 The Contractor shall ensure that: C19.1.1 the Goods conform in all respects with the Specification and, where applicable, with any sample or performance demonstration approved by the Authority; C19.1.2 the Goods operate in accordance with the relevant technical specifications and correspond with the requirements of the Specification and any particulars specified in the Contract; C19.1.3 the Goods conform in all respects with all applicable Laws; and C19.1.4 the Goods are free from defects in design, materials and workmanship and are fit and sufficient for all the purposes for which such Goods are ordinarily used and for any particular purpose made known to the Contractor by the Authority.

Draft better contracts in just 5 minutes Get the weekly Law Insider newsletter packed with expert videos, webinars, ebooks, and more!