After the Evaluation Sample Clauses

After the Evaluation. 16.5.1 The Supervisor shall recommend the retention or termination from the position of the probationary employee by a check mark in the appropriate box. (This section is for probationary employees only). 16.5.2 The Supervisor shall then hold a conference with each employee for whom an evaluation is completed. (Note: The form may be completed at the time of the conference, if the supervisor so wishes). 16.5.2.1 The Supervisor shall explain to each employee the following: A. The purposes and uses made of performance evaluation forms. B. The significance of evaluations during the probationary period. C. The basis or reasons for the specific evaluations. D. Where appropriate, suggestions for changes. E. Should an employee receive an overall performance rating of “Below Work Performance Standards,” the employee’s immediate supervisor and the employee shall jointly develop a performance improvement plan to remedy the areas that have contributed to this rating. The immediate supervisor and employee shall meet within two weeks of the evaluation conference to finalize this plan. The immediate supervisor reserves the right to implement a plan in situations where the employee chooses not to agree to participate in developing a plan. Should the employee and supervisor not reach agreement on an improvement plan, the Human Resources Director will work with both parties in an attempt to resolve the differences. If an agreement still cannot be reached, the Human Resources Director shall determine the improvement plan.
AutoNDA by SimpleDocs
After the Evaluation. None of the Parties will seek to instruct the NEvaluator or PIcArbs (or any employee or representative of PIcArbs) as a consultant or arbitrator in any litigation or arbitration in relation to the Dispute and the NEvaluator and PIcArbs will not act voluntarily in any such capacity without the written agreement of all the Parties. Effective from November 2018. These rates are the recoverable rates: 4 hours = a half day; 8 hours = a full day Written Evaluation Half day Half day 3,600 2,400 1 day 1 day 7,200 4,800 more Please discuss this with us Meeting Evaluation Half day Half day 3,600 2,400 1 day 1day 7,200 4,800 Meeting rooms The Parties arrange these and pay the cost Travel of NEvaluator To be agreed with the NEvaluator’s clerks Additional hourly work: QC: £450 ph; Junior: £300 ph; PIcArbs Fees: Appointment and e-filing fee: £600 + VAT Parties request to remove NEvaluator fee: £300 + VAT Cancellation fees: Case settled &/or meeting cancelled over 2 months b4: £0 per diary day “ meeting cancelled 22 dys – 2 months b4: 25% “ meeting cancelled 21 - 15 days b4: 35% “ meeting cancelled 14 - 8 days b4: 50% “ meeting cancelled 7 days or less b4: 100% 1. Please download this standard form agreement from xxx.xxxxxxx.xx.xx, then both parties sign it. 2. Then both Parties must register at xxxxx://xxxxxxxxxxx.xxxxxxxxxxxxxx.xxx. 3. Then the Claimant starts the new case e-file from his/her home page and uploads the signed NE Agreement. 4. PIcArbs will appoint a Neutral Evaluator who will sign the Agreement and upload it onto the e-file. 5. The Evaluator will then communicate with the Parties through the e-filing system.
After the Evaluation. None of the Parties will seek to instruct the NEvaluator or PIcArbs (or any employee or representative of PIcArbs) as a consultant or arbitrator in any litigation or arbitration in relation to the Dispute and the NEvaluator and PIcArbs will not act voluntarily in any such capacity without the written agreement of all the Parties.
After the Evaluation. Make a note of any candidates who fail the evaluation.

Related to After the Evaluation

  • Final Evaluation IC must submit a final report and a project evaluation to the Arts Commission within thirty (30) days after the completion of the Services. Any and all unexpended funds from IC must be returned to City no later than sixty (60) days after the completion of the Services.

  • Self-Evaluation Each regular faculty member shall provide a self-evaluation. It shall address, among other items, the faculty member's fulfillment of professional responsibilities as referenced in Section 18.2.3 and an assessment of his or her own performance. The faculty member will share the self-evaluation with the Faculty Evaluation Committee and the first-level manager or designee. The self-evaluation will become part of the evaluation report.

  • Program Evaluation The School District and the College will develop a plan for the evaluation of the Dual Credit program to be completed each year. The evaluation will include, but is not limited to, disaggregated attendance and retention rates, GPA of high-school-credit-only courses and college courses, satisfactory progress in college courses, state assessment results, SAT/ACT, as applicable, TSIA readiness by grade level, and adequate progress toward the college-readiness of the students in the program. The School District commits to collecting longitudinal data as specified by the College, and making data and performance outcomes available to the College upon request. HB 1638 and SACSCOC require the collection of data points to be longitudinally captured by the School District, in collaboration with the College, will include, at minimum: student enrollment, GPA, retention, persistence, completion, transfer and scholarships. School District will provide parent contact and demographic information to the College upon request for targeted marketing of degree completion or workforce development information to parents of Students. School District agrees to obtain valid FERPA releases drafted to support the supply of such data if deemed required by counsel to either School District or the College. The College conducts and reports regular and ongoing evaluations of the Dual Credit program effectiveness and uses the results for continuous improvement.

  • JOC EVALUATION If any materials being utilized for a project cannot be found in the RS Means Price Book, this question is what is the markup percentage on those materials? When answering this question please insert the number that represents your percentage of proposed markup. Example: if you are proposing a 30 percent markup, please insert the number "30". Remember that this is a ceiling markup. You may markup a lesser percentage to the TIPS Member customer when pricing the project, but not a greater percentage. EXAMPLE: You need special materials that are not in the RS Means Unit Price Book for a project. You would buy the materials and xxxx them up to the TIPS Member customer by the percentage you propose in this question. If the materials cost you, the contractor, $100 and you proposed a markup on this question for the material of 30 percent, then you would charge the TIPS Member customer $130 for the materials. TIPS/ESC Region 8 is required by Texas Government Code § 791 to be compensated for its work and thus, failure to agree shall render your response void and it will not be considered. Vendor agrees to remit to TIPS the required administration fee or, if resellers are named, guarantee the fee remittance by or for the reseller named by the vendor?

  • MANAGEMENT OF EVALUATION OUTCOMES 12.1 Where the Employer is, any time during the Employee’s employment, not satisfied with the Employee’s performance with respect to any matter dealt with in this Agreement, the Employer will give notice to the Employee to attend a meeting; 12.2 The Employee will have the opportunity at the meeting to satisfy the Employer of the measures being taken to ensure that his performance becomes satisfactory and any programme, including any dates, for implementing these measures; 12.3 Where there is a dispute or difference as to the performance of the Employee under this Agreement, the Parties will confer with a view to resolving the dispute or difference; and 12.4 In the case of unacceptable performance, the Employer shall – 12.4.1 Provide systematic remedial or developmental support to assist the Employee to improve his performance; and 12.4.2 After appropriate performance counselling and having provided the necessary guidance and/or support as well as reasonable time for improvement in performance, the Employer may consider steps to terminate the contract of employment of the Employee on grounds of unfitness or incapacity to carry out his or her duties.

  • Written Evaluation The Superintendent in consultation with the Board shall review and assess the Administrator’s performance on or before February 1 of each year. The Administrator shall be formally evaluated in writing annually by the Superintendent on or before February 1 of each year. The evaluation shall include a description of the Administrator’s duties and responsibilities and the standards to which the Administrator is to perform. It shall consider the Administrator’s specific duties, responsibilities, management and competence as an Administrator; specify the Administrator’s strengths and weaknesses with supporting reasons; align with research based standards established by the Illinois State Board of Education and use data and indicators on student growth as a significant factor in rating performance. The evaluation shall also consist of a review of the Administrator’s progress toward meeting established professional, student performance and academic goals set forth in Appendix A and a review of the Administrator’s leadership and management performance relative to his current assignment. The written evaluation shall be signed by both the Superintendent and the Administrator. The Administrator may respond to the evaluation in writing and such response shall be attached to and included in the Administrator’s personnel file.

  • PROGRESS EVALUATION Engineer shall, from time to time during the progress of the Engineering Services, confer with County at County’s election. Engineer shall prepare and present such information as may be pertinent and necessary, or as may be reasonably requested by County, in order for County to evaluate features of the Engineering Services. At the request of County or Engineer, conferences shall be provided at Engineer's office, the offices of County, or at other locations designated by County. When requested by County, such conferences shall also include evaluation of the Engineering Services. County may, from time to time, require Engineer to appear and provide information to the Williamson County Commissioners Court. Should County determine that the progress in Engineering Services does not satisfy an applicable Work Authorization or any Supplemental Work Authorization related thereto, then County shall review same with Engineer to determine corrective action required. Engineer shall promptly advise County in writing of events which have or may have a significant impact upon the progress of the Engineering Services, including but not limited to the following: A. Problems, delays, adverse conditions which may materially affect the ability to meet the objectives of an applicable Work Authorization or any Supplemental Work Authorization related thereto, or preclude the attainment of Project Engineering Services units by established time periods; and such disclosure shall be accompanied by statement of actions taken or contemplated, and County assistance needed to resolve the situation, if any; and B. Favorable developments or events which enable meeting goals sooner than anticipated in relation to an applicable Work Authorization’s or any Supplemental Work Authorization related thereto.

  • Program Monitoring and Evaluation The Recipient shall prepare, or cause to be prepared, and furnish to the Association not later than six months after the Closing Date, a report of such scope and in such detail as the Association shall reasonably request, on the execution of the Program, the performance by the Recipient and the Association of their respective obligations under the Legal Agreements and the accomplishment of the purposes of the Financing.”

  • Performance Evaluations The Contractor is subject to an annual performance evaluation to be conducted by NYCDOT pursuant to the PPB Rules.

  • Annual Evaluations The purpose of the annual evaluation is to assess and communicate the nature and extent of an employee's performance of assigned duties consistent with the criteria specified below in this Policy. Except for those employees who have received notice of non-reappointment pursuant to the BOT- UFF Policy on Non- reappointment, every employee shall be evaluated at least once annually. Personnel decisions shall take such annual evaluations into account, provided that such decisions need not be based solely on written faculty performance evaluations.

Draft better contracts in just 5 minutes Get the weekly Law Insider newsletter packed with expert videos, webinars, ebooks, and more!