After the Evaluation Sample Clauses

The "After the Evaluation" clause outlines the procedures and obligations that apply once an evaluation period or assessment has concluded. Typically, this clause specifies what happens to any materials, data, or confidential information exchanged during the evaluation, such as requirements to return or destroy proprietary items, or restrictions on further use. Its core function is to ensure that both parties understand their responsibilities after the evaluation ends, thereby protecting sensitive information and clarifying next steps to prevent misunderstandings or misuse.
After the Evaluation. 16.5.1 The Supervisor shall recommend the retention or termination from the position of the probationary employee by a check mark in the appropriate box. (This section is for probationary employees only). 16.5.2 The Supervisor shall then hold a conference with each employee for whom an evaluation is completed. (Note: The form may be completed at the time of the conference, if the supervisor so wishes). 16.5.2.1 The Supervisor shall explain to each employee the following: A. The purposes and uses made of performance evaluation forms. B. The significance of evaluations during the probationary period. C. The basis or reasons for the specific evaluations. D. Where appropriate, suggestions for changes. E. Should an employee receive an overall performance rating of “Below Work Performance Standards,” the employee’s immediate supervisor and the employee shall jointly develop a performance improvement plan to remedy the areas that have contributed to this rating. The immediate supervisor and employee shall meet within two weeks of the evaluation conference to finalize this plan. The immediate supervisor reserves the right to implement a plan in situations where the employee chooses not to agree to participate in developing a plan. Should the employee and supervisor not reach agreement on an improvement plan, the Human Resources Director will work with both parties in an attempt to resolve the differences. If an agreement still cannot be reached, the Human Resources Director shall determine the improvement plan.
View SourceView Similar (2)
After the Evaluation. None of the Parties will seek to instruct the NEvaluator or PIcArbs (or any employee or representative of PIcArbs) as a consultant or arbitrator in any litigation or arbitration in relation to the Dispute and the NEvaluator and PIcArbs will not act voluntarily in any such capacity without the written agreement of all the Parties. Effective from November 2018. These rates are the recoverable rates: 4 hours = a half day; 8 hours = a full day Written Evaluation Half day Half day 3,600 2,400 1 day 1 day 7,200 4,800 more Please discuss this with us Meeting Evaluation Half day Half day 3,600 2,400 1 day 1day 7,200 4,800 Meeting rooms The Parties arrange these and pay the cost Travel of NEvaluator To be agreed with the NEvaluator’s clerks Additional hourly work: QC: £450 ph; Junior: £300 ph; PIcArbs Fees: Appointment and e-filing fee: £600 + VAT Parties request to remove NEvaluator fee: £300 + VAT Cancellation fees: Case settled &/or meeting cancelled over 2 months b4: £0 per diary day “ meeting cancelled 22 dys – 2 months b4: 25% “ meeting cancelled 21 - 15 days b4: 35% “ meeting cancelled 14 - 8 days b4: 50% “ meeting cancelled 7 days or less b4: 100% 1. Please download this standard form agreement from ▇▇▇.▇▇▇▇▇▇▇.▇▇.▇▇, then both parties sign it. 2. Then both Parties must register at ▇▇▇▇▇://▇▇▇▇▇▇▇▇▇▇▇.▇▇▇▇▇▇▇▇▇▇▇▇▇▇.▇▇▇. 3. Then the Claimant starts the new case e-file from his/her home page and uploads the signed NE Agreement. 4. PIcArbs will appoint a Neutral Evaluator who will sign the Agreement and upload it onto the e-file. 5. The Evaluator will then communicate with the Parties through the e-filing system.
View Source
After the Evaluation. None of the Parties will seek to instruct the NEvaluator or PIcArbs (or any employee or representative of PIcArbs) as a consultant or arbitrator in any litigation or arbitration in relation to the Dispute and the NEvaluator and PIcArbs will not act voluntarily in any such capacity without the written agreement of all the Parties.
View Source
After the Evaluation. Make a note of any candidates who fail the evaluation.
View Source

Related to After the Evaluation

  • Final Evaluation IC must submit a final report and a project evaluation to the Arts Commission within thirty (30) days after the completion of the Services. Any and all unexpended funds from IC must be returned to City no later than sixty (60) days after the completion of the Services.

  • Self-Evaluation Each regular faculty member shall provide a self-evaluation. It shall address, among other items, the faculty member's fulfillment of professional responsibilities as referenced in Section 18.2.3 and an assessment of his or her own performance. The faculty member will share the self-evaluation with the Faculty Evaluation Committee and the first-level manager or designee. The self-evaluation will become part of the evaluation report.

  • Program Evaluation The School District and the College will develop a plan for the evaluation of the Dual Credit program to be completed each year. The evaluation will include, but is not limited to, disaggregated attendance and retention rates, GPA of high-school-credit-only courses and college courses, satisfactory progress in college courses, state assessment results, SAT/ACT, as applicable, TSIA readiness by grade level, and adequate progress toward the college-readiness of the students in the program. The School District commits to collecting longitudinal data as specified by the College, and making data and performance outcomes available to the College upon request. HB 1638 and SACSCOC require the collection of data points to be longitudinally captured by the School District, in collaboration with the College, will include, at minimum: student enrollment, GPA, retention, persistence, completion, transfer and scholarships. School District will provide parent contact and demographic information to the College upon request for targeted marketing of degree completion or workforce development information to parents of Students. School District agrees to obtain valid FERPA releases drafted to support the supply of such data if deemed required by counsel to either School District or the College. The College conducts and reports regular and ongoing evaluations of the Dual Credit program effectiveness and uses the results for continuous improvement.

  • JOC EVALUATION If any materials being utilized for a project cannot be found in the RS Means Price Book, this question is what is the markup percentage on those materials? When answering this question please insert the number that represents your percentage of proposed markup. Example: if you are proposing a 30 percent markup, please insert the number "30". Remember that this is a ceiling markup. You may markup a lesser percentage to the TIPS Member customer when pricing the project, but not a greater percentage. EXAMPLE: You need special materials that are not in the RS Means Unit Price Book for a project. You would buy the materials and ▇▇▇▇ them up to the TIPS Member customer by the percentage you propose in this question. If the materials cost you, the contractor, $100 and you proposed a markup on this question for the material of 30 percent, then you would charge the TIPS Member customer $130 for the materials. TIPS/ESC Region 8 is required by Texas Government Code § 791 to be compensated for its work and thus, failure to agree shall render your response void and it will not be considered. Vendor agrees to remit to TIPS the required administration fee or, if resellers are named, guarantee the fee remittance by or for the reseller named by the vendor?

  • Liability of the Evaluator The Trustee, the Depositor and the Unit holders may rely on any Evaluation furnished by First Trust Advisors L.P., acting in its capacity as Evaluator, and shall have no responsibility for the accuracy thereof. The determinations made by the Evaluator hereunder shall be made in good faith upon the basis of the best information available to it. The Evaluator shall be under no liability to the Trustee, the Depositor or the Unit holders for errors in judgment; provided, however, that this provision shall not protect the Evaluator against any liability to which it would otherwise be subject by reason of willful misfeasance, bad faith or gross negligence in the performance of its duties or by reason of its reckless disregard of its obligations and duties hereunder.