Challenge Procedure. XXXXX recognizes two distinct Challenges that may be submitted, as follows: Industry Representative vs Participant ‐ An Industry Representative may be another manufacturer, an inspector, an installer, an employee or anybody who has knowledge of, and/or actively participates within, the play and playground industry. Public vs Participant ‐ Public may be an end‐user, purchaser, or any party not affiliated with the play and playground industry. Challenges can only be addressed if they are related to the Standard(s) or specific sections of Standard(s) to which the XXXXX program validates. In the event the performance and/or design of certified product(s), or program compliance of a Participant, is Challenged, the process below shall be followed . The confidentiality of each party shall be maintained throughout each process. The Participant’s product being Challenged shall remain on the XXXXX website while the Challenge is in process. Failure to respond within the timeframe noted below may result in a determination unfavorable to the non‐responsive party. The following procedures must be followed to initiate a Challenge: The Challenger completes and submits the XXXXX Certification Challenge Form (form XXXXX 10e) to XXXXX. Submittal shall include supporting documentation outlining the detail of Challenge, applicable test data, and any other information relevant to the Challenge. If known, the documentation shall specify the section(s) of the particular standard(s) to which the product should comply.
Challenge Procedure. The PatentBook Administrator, Publisher or Subscriber may challenge the listing of any patent in the PatentBook or the Tier classification of a PatentBook Patent by recommending that it be removed from the PatentBook or reclassified into a lower Tier (such patent being referred to herein as the "Challenged Patent"). Similarly, a Publisher may challenge the Tier assignment of Publisher's Patent and recommend it be moved into a higher Tier.
Challenge Procedure. OCEA certifies to the County that it has adopted, implemented and will maintain constitutionally acceptable procedures to enable nonmember service fee payers to meaningfully challenge the propriety of the use of service fees. Those procedures shall be in accordance with the decision of the United States Supreme Court in Chicago Teachers Union, Local No. 1, AFT, AFL-CIO, et al. x. Xxxxxx, 106 S. Ct. 1066 (1986) and applicable California law.
Challenge Procedure. 1. In the event of a complaint by a supplier that there has been a breach of measures implementing the obligations of this Chapter in the context of a covered procurement, each Party shall encourage the supplier to seek resolution of its complaint in consultation with the procuring entity. In such instances the procuring entity shall accord impartial and timely consideration to any such complaint, in a manner that is not prejudicial to obtaining corrective measures under the challenge system.
Challenge Procedure. OCAA certifies to the County that it has adopted, implemented and will maintain constitutionally acceptable procedures to enable nonmember service fee payers to meaningfully challenge the propriety of the use of service fees. Those procedures shall be in accordance with applicable California law. In accordance with state laws and regulations, all non-members were informed of their specific right to challenge the agency fee for services following the first 60 days of the implementation of the agency shop provisions.
Challenge Procedure. The parties agree to work together with the Auditor in good faith to resolve any disputes arising out of or relating to the numbers verified and the results reported in an Auditor’s report in a timely, professional and non-adversarial manner. If the parties and the Auditor cannot so resolve a dispute, then disputes shall be resolved under the dispute resolution provisions of Article XVI of this Agreement.
Challenge Procedure. (1) The parties are free to agree on a procedure for challenging an arbitrator. Provided, this shall not apply to the provisions of paragraph (4).
Challenge Procedure. Check the box below ONLY if you wish to challenge the number of workdays listed above. You do NOT have to submit this form if the number of workdays above is accurate. All fields must be complete for your challenge to be accepted. Any challenges must be post-marked by no later than [60 days from notice mailing]. Challenges post-marked after this date will not be honored. □ I wish to challenge the number of workdays listed above. Below is a written statement of what I believe to be the correct number of days between March 5, 2015 and May 24, 2020 that I worked out of Temco’s Pomona, California warehouse as an employee driver and/or helper. My statement is supported by the enclosed information and/or documentary evidence that supports my challenge. I understand that, by submitting this challenge, I authorize the Settlement Administrator to consult with Class Counsel and Defense Counsel, review Temco’s records, and determine the validity of my challenge.
Challenge Procedure. IUOE certifies to the County that it has adopted, implemented and will maintain constitutionally acceptable procedures to enable nonmember service fee payers to meaningfully challenge the propriety of the use of service fees. Those procedures shall be in accordance with applicable California law. In accordance with state laws and regulations, all non-members were informed of their specific right to challenge the agency fee for services following the first 60 days of the implementation of the agency shop provisions.
Challenge Procedure. 1. The challenging party shall give written notice of the reasons for challenge to the arbitrator concerned, the other party and, if the arbitral tribunal consists of multiple arbitrators, the co-arbitrators. The notice shall be given within four weeks after the day of receipt of the communication referred to in Article 1034 or, in the absence thereof, within four weeks after the reason for challenge becomes known to the challenging party.
