Continuous Review Sample Clauses

Continuous Review. 4.1 The Contractor shall continuously review if the Approved XXXX is used internally in accordance with the respective XXXX License, the Principal's requirements and these provisions. In particular, the Contractor shall regularly examine if a) the XXXX has been published under a new or revised XXXX License; b) the XXXX is used in the goods or services in accordance with the conditions of the XXXX License, the XXXX Disclosure Document and the Principal's requirements; c) the XXXX is included in the goods or services in full, unless the use of parts of the XXXX is permitted under the corresponding XXXX License; d) for the XXXX, there are corrections, patches or new versions available, e.g. at the authors/ maintainers of the respective XXXX, and have the Principal decide if the same shall be used. 4.2 The Contractor shall provide the Principal with all items required to demonstrate the proper fulfilment of the obligations assumed by the Contractor (e.g. XXXX Disclosure Document, source code). 4.3 The Contractor shall report to the Principal on these matters regularly. Unless otherwise agreed, this mean every calendar month.
Sample 1Sample 2Sample 3See All (9)
Continuous Review. The process set out in the Rules should be followed. Specific elements relating to the role of the Overall Review Team (ORT) are set out below. In addition, Review team members should follow the guidelines for Periodic Review Teams to the extent they are applicable in establishing good practice. C.5.3.1. The signatory will provide the Committee with an overall Review programme for the Review period indicating when Accord Review Team visits are likely to occur. The programme will ensure that Accord Review Teams (ART) participate in not less than three accreditation visits within the Review period, where possible to separate educational providers. C.5.3.2. An ART consisting of a subset of the ORT will be formed by the ORT Team leader and the signatory being reviewed for each designated accreditation visit. ART will consist of two ORT members for major accreditation visits or one for smaller visits. The ORT Team leader will appoint one of the ART as the ART Team leader for each review visit. C.5.3.3. Each ART will produce a report, a copy of which will be provided to the signatory being reviewed, members of the ORT and the Committee. C.5.3.4. Any issues or recommendations identified by one ART will be considered by subsequent ARTs, with the signatory under review expected to provide a report on changes made between ART visits. C.5.3.5. The signatory being reviewed must ensure that at least one member of the ORT, in the last two years of the six year Review period, meets with the accreditation / recognition agency, reviews the accreditation / recognition procedures with the agency and observes an accreditation / recognition board decision meeting either physically or non-physically, that is, via electronic or other means. C.5.3.6. All discussions concerning the Review must be held in confidence by the ORT and ARTs as appropriate. C.5.3.7. Prior to the end of the Review period the Chair of the ORT will prepare a summary report and recommendations to the secretariat. A copy of that report must be furnished to each signatory through the secretariat, no later than 90 days prior to the next Annual Meeting of the Accord signatories. C.5.3.8. If, after at least 2 ART visits, but before the end of the Review period, the ORT concludes that there are substantive matters that call into question the substantial equivalence of the accreditation system of the signatory being reviewed, the ORT may prepare a summary report and recommendations to the secretariat. A copy of tha...
Sample 1Sample 2Sample 3See All (7)
Continuous Review. B.3.4.1. At the beginning of the six year Review period, three Reviewers from three different signatories, one of whom will be designated the Team leader, must be selected from the persons nominated under section B.3.2.1 by the Committee to form the Overall Review Team (ORT). The secretariat must take all reasonable steps to ensure that none of the persons selected through this process has had any substantial prior involvement in or commitment to the signatory being reviewed. The secretariat will inform those signatories that they will be required to nominate persons who are able to fulfil dual roles as accreditation panel members, and as the Accord Review Team. B.3.4.2. If for any reason a member of the ORT should become unavailable during the Review period, the committee may appoint a replacement Team member following consideration of nominations from the signatory who provided the initial Team member. B.3.4.3. The signatory responsible for the accreditation system to be reviewed must be advised by the secretariat of the proposed composition of the Overall Review Team, and invited to show cause why any member of the ORT is not suitable. In the event that such an objection is lodged, the secretariat must advise the Committee to take such steps as are necessary and appropriate to resolve the objection. If unable to do so, the Committee must consult all signatories before confirming the membership of the ORT. B.3.4.4. The signatory will provide the Committee with an overall Review programme for the Review period indicating when Accord Review Team visits are likely to occur. The programme will ensure that Accord Review Teams (ART) participate in not less than three accreditation visits within the Review period, where possible to separate educational providers. B.3.4.5. An ART consisting of a subset of the ORT will be formed by the ORT Team leader and the signatory being reviewed for each designated accreditation visit. An ART will consist of two ORT members for major accreditation visits or one for smaller visits. The ORT Team leader will appoint one of the ART as the ART Team leader for each review visit. B.3.4.6. Each ART will produce a report, a copy of which will be provided to the signatory being reviewed, members of the ORT and the Committee. B.3.4.7. Any issues or recommendations identified by one ART will be considered by subsequent ARTs, with the expectation that signatory under review will provide a report on changes made between ART visits. B.3.4....
Sample 1Sample 2Sample 3See All (6)
Continuous Review. (a) An Employee placed on an Absence Management Program will be subject to continuous review, and may be removed from the Absence Management Program, at any time, following demonstrated improvement in their attendance pattern. (b) Employees will be advised in writing of the decision to remove them from the Absence Management Program. However, should the Employee again come under notice for an unacceptable attendance pattern, the Employee may be placed back on an Absence Management Program
Sample 1
Continuous Review. The Chief of the Auburn Fire Department is authorized to make periodic reviews of all cases to determine the claimant's continued eligibility for benefits.
Sample 1
Continuous Review. 4.1 The Supplier shall continuously review if the Ap- proved XXXX is used internally in accordance with the respective XXXX License, the Principal's require- ments and these provisions. In particular, the Suppli- er shall regularly examine if a) the XXXX has been published under a new or re- vised XXXX License;
Sample 1
Continuous Review. 3.4.1 At the beginning of the six year Review period, three Reviewers from three different signatories, one of whom will be designated the Team leader, must be selected from the persons nominated under section B.3.2.1 by the Committee to form the Overall Review Team (ORT). The secretariat must take all reasonable steps to ensure that none of the persons selected through this process has had any substantial prior involvement in or commitment to the signatory being reviewed. The secretariat will inform those signatories that they will be required to nominate persons who are able to fulfil dual roles as accreditation panel members, and as the Accord Review Team.
Sample 1

Related to Continuous Review

  • Continuous Operation The work week shall provide for continuous operation based on a seven (7) day week, twenty-four (24) hours per day.

  • Continuous Operations Any employee or group of employees engaged in an operation for which there is regularly scheduled employment on a twenty-four (24) hour a day, seven (7) day a week basis shall be known as continuous operations employees.

  • Continuous Employment For purposes of this Agreement, the continuous employment of the Grantee with the Company or a Subsidiary shall not be deemed to have been interrupted, and the Grantee shall not be deemed to have ceased to be an employee of the Company or Subsidiary, by reason of (a) the transfer of the Grantee’s employment among the Company and its Subsidiaries or (b) an approved leave of absence.

  • Performance Review Where a performance review of an employee’s performance is carried out, the employee shall be given sufficient opportunity after the interview to read and review the performance review. Provision shall be made on the performance review form for an employee to sign it. The form shall provide for the employee’s signature in two (2) places, one (1) indicating that the employee has read and accepts the performance review, and the other indicating that the employee disagrees with the performance review. The employee shall sign in only one (1) of the places provided. No employee may initiate a grievance regarding the contents of a performance review unless the signature indicates disagreement. An employee shall, upon request, receive a copy of this performance review at the time of signing. An employee’s performance review shall not be changed after an employee has signed it, without the knowledge of the employee, and any such changes shall be subject to the grievance procedure of this Agreement. The employee may respond, in writing, to the performance review. Such response will be attached to the performance review.

  • Performance Reviews The Employee will be provided with a written performance appraisal at least once per year and said appraisal will be reviewed at which time all aspects of the assessment can be fully discussed.

  • Performance Tests Contractor shall perform Performance Tests in accordance with Section 11.2 of the Agreement and Attachment S.

  • Annual Performance Review The Employee’s performance of his duties under this Agreement shall be reviewed by the Board of Directors or a committee of the Board of Directors at least annually and finalized within thirty (30) days of the receipt of the annual audited financial statements. The Board of Directors or a committee of the Board of Directors shall additionally review the base salary, bonus and benefits provided to the Employee under this Agreement and may, in their discretion, adjust the same, as outlined in Addendum B of this Agreement, provided, however, that Employee’s annual base salary shall not be less than the base salary set forth in Section 4(A) hereof.

  • Independent Review Contractor shall provide the Secretary of ADS/CIO an independent expert review of any Agency recommendation for any information technology activity when its total cost is $1,000,000.00 or greater or when CIO requires one. The State has identified two sub-categories for Independent Reviews, Standard and Complex. The State will identify in the SOW RFP the sub-category they are seeking. State shall not consider bids greater than the maximum value indicated below for this category. Standard Independent Review $25,000 Maximum Complex Independent Review $50,000 Maximum Per Vermont statute 3 V.S.A. 2222, The Secretary of Administration shall obtain independent expert review of any recommendation for any information technology initiated after July 1, 1996, as information technology activity is defined by subdivision (a) (10), when its total cost is $1,000,000 or greater or when required by the State Chief Information Officer. Documentation of this independent review shall be included when plans are submitted for review pursuant to subdivisions (a)(9) and (10) of this section. The independent review shall include: • An acquisition cost assessment • A technology architecture review • An implementation plan assessment • A cost analysis and model for benefit analysis • A procurement negotiation advisory services contract • An impact analysis on net operating costs for the agency carrying out the activity In addition, from time to time special reviews of the advisability and feasibility of certain types of IT strategies may be required. Following are Requirements and Capabilities for this Service: • Identify acquisition and lifecycle costs; • Assess wide area network (WAN) and/or local area network (LAN) impact; • Assess risks and/or review technical risk assessments of an IT project including security, data classification(s), subsystem designs, architectures, and computer systems in terms of their impact on costs, benefits, schedule and technical performance; • Assess, evaluate and critically review implementation plans, e.g.: • Adequacy of support for conversion and implementation activities • Adequacy of department and partner staff to provide Project Management • Adequacy of planned testing procedures • Acceptance/readiness of staff • Schedule soundness • Adequacy of training pre and post project • Assess proposed technical architecture to validate conformance to the State’s “strategic direction.” • Insure system use toolsets and strategies are consistent with State Chief Information Officer (CIO) policies, including security and digital records management; • Assess the architecture of the proposed hardware and software with regard to security and systems integration with other applications within the Department, and within the Agency, and existing or planned Enterprise Applications; • Perform cost and schedule risk assessments to support various alternatives to meet mission need, recommend alternative courses of action when one or more interdependent segment(s) or phase(s) experience a delay, and recommend opportunities for new technology insertions; • Assess the architecture of the proposed hardware and software with regard to the state of the art in this technology. • Assess a project’s backup/recovery strategy and the project’s disaster recovery plans for adequacy and conformance to State policy. • Evaluate the ability of a proposed solution to meet the needs for which the solution has been proposed, define the ability of the operational and user staff to integrate this solution into their work.

  • Performance Period This Agreement shall be performed during the period which begins Oct 01 2020 and ends Sep 30 2022. All services under this Agreement must be rendered within this performance period, unless directly specified under a written change or extension provisioned under Article 14, which shall be fully executed by both parties to this Agreement.

  • CONTINUOUS IMPROVEMENT 3.1 The Supplier shall adopt a policy of continuous improvement in relation to the Services pursuant to which it will regularly review with the Authority the Services and the manner in which it is providing the Services with a view to reducing the Authority's costs (including the Framework Prices), the costs of Contracting Bodies and/or improving the quality and efficiency of the Services. The Supplier and the Authority will provide to each other any information which may be relevant to assisting the objectives of continuous improvement and in particular reducing costs.