Evaluation and Testing Sample Clauses
Evaluation and Testing. Prior to installing a new Upgrade, Major Release, or Minor Release, Successful Respondent shall evaluate and test such Software to verify that it shall perform in accordance with this Agreement and the DIR Standards and Strategic Plans and that it shall not (i) increase DIR's or the DIR Customers' total cost of receiving the Services, (ii) have an adverse impact on performance or require changes as described in Section 9.6(c), or (iii) violate or be inconsistent with DIR Standards, Strategic Plans, or applicable Laws. The evaluation and testing performed by Successful Respondent shall be at least consistent with the reasonable and accepted industry norms applicable to the performance of such Services and shall be at least as rigorous and comprehensive as the evaluation and testing usually performed by highly qualified service providers under such circumstances.
Evaluation and Testing. Testing and evaluation will be done according to the AFSL Standard for the appropriate classification number. The documented testing by the manufacturer against the Quality Control/Design Checklist for manufacturing the item must be submitted with the test samples. All test records and reports for this item will be maintained as confidential until six months after the item is available commercially or until the manufacturer releases SGS confidential status. Excess sample unSGS will be retained or destroyed at the option of the AFSL Scheduling: Every effort will be made to complete the testing and mail the report within 4 weeks of receipt of the samples at AFSL. Close attention to the instructions included in this application and early or off-season submission of the samples will help to assure that emergency requests are rare.
Evaluation and Testing. Prior to installing a new Major Release or Minor Release, Supplier shall evaluate and test such Release to verify that it will perform in accordance with this Agreement and the Kraft Standards and Strategic Plans and that it will not (i) increase Kraft’s total cost of receiving the Services; (ii) require material changes to Kraft’s or the Eligible Recipient’s business, facilities, systems, software or equipment; (iii) adversely impact the functionality, interoperability, performance, accuracy, speed, responsiveness, quality or resource efficiency of the Services; or (iv) violate or be inconsistent with Kraft Standards or Strategic Plans or applicable Laws. The evaluation and testing performed by Supplier shall be at least consistent with the reasonable and accepted industry norms applicable to the performance of such Services and shall be at least as rigorous and comprehensive as the evaluation and testing usually performed by highly qualified service providers under such circumstances.
Evaluation and Testing. If Microsoft offers a “device unlock” service, however named, through the Developer Website, you may use such service to unlock a reasonable number of Windows Phone 7 or Windows Phone 8 Devices, in accordance with any specifications and technical limitations of the service, solely for the purpose of using such unlocked Windows Phone 7 or Windows Phone 8 Device to test and evaluate your Applications. For purposes of this Section 3.b, “unlock” means to enable the Windows Phone 7 or Windows Phone 8 Device to load and run Applications that are being developed for the Windows Phone Marketplace.
Evaluation and Testing. Prior to installing a new Major Release or Minor Release, Amdocs shall evaluate and test such Release to verify that it will perform in accordance with this Agreement and the architectures [**] of the Services. The evaluation and testing performed by Amdocs shall [**] under such circumstances.
Evaluation and Testing a. The Vendor responsibilities include the following:
(1) With direction and final approval from ACI, assume primary responsibility for evaluating and testing Equipment, Software, and related products or Services prior to their use or deployment in ACI’s environment.
(2) Participate in evaluations involving new third-party products and services.
(3) Upon request, provide corporate reports, summaries, or results of its evaluation and testing of Third-Party products and services.
(4) Benchmark new types of Equipment and Software (including testing of various configurations and combinations of Equipment and Software) that may be considered for deployment within ACI.
(5) Determine interoperability and performance measures for specific configurations of Equipment and/or Software, including unit testing, systems integration testing, connectivity testing, load testing. Confidential Exhibit A-1 — Delivery Management Services (Cross Functional)
(6) Identify, support, and coordinate as necessary with other ACI IT functions and third-party vendors, any specific Equipment, Software, and/or telecommunications required for interoperability and performance testing.
(7) Provide a complete test plan, for Vendor proposed changes, for ACI’s approval prior to testing.
(8) Report test findings and recommendations to ACI.
(9) Establish criteria that will be used to support the evaluation, technology selection, and testing for ACI’s review and approval.
b. ACI will:
(1) Assist Vendor in evaluating and testing Equipment, Software, and related products or services prior to their use or deployment in ACI’s environment.
(2) Determine interoperability and performance measures for specific configurations of Equipment and/or Software, including, applications integration testing.
Evaluation and Testing. The Service Provider will provide the infrastructure and processes for the Evaluation and Testing of hardware and software that are part of the Services to ensure compatibility and performance to Service commitments. Service Provider responsibilities include:
1. Cooperate and coordinate with the MSI to report on evaluation and testing activities.
2. With direction and final approval from DIR, assume primary responsibility for evaluating and testing Equipment, Software, and related products or Services prior to their use or deployment in DIR’s and DIR Customers’ environments.
3. Participate in evaluations involving new and/or existing Third Party products and services.
4. Upon reasonable request, provide corporate reports, summaries, or results of its evaluation and testing of Third Party products and services.
5. Benchmark new types of Equipment and Software (including testing of various configurations and combinations of Equipment and Software) that may be considered for deployment within DIR’s and/or DIR Customers’ environments.
6. Determine interoperability and performance measures for specific configurations of Equipment and/or Software, including unit testing, systems integration testing, connectivity testing, load testing, and Applications integration testing.
7. Identify, support, and coordinate as necessary with other DIR’s and DIR Customers’ IT functions and Third Party Vendors, any specific Equipment, Software, and/or telecommunications required for interoperability and performance testing.
8. Perform evaluation and testing in any or all of the following environments prior to deployment:
8.1. A Service Provider laboratory environment, which is set up to simulate DIR’s and DIR Customers’ current or potential environment. Leverage Service Provider own laboratories, testing results, and reports in order to minimize the cost of testing to DIR.
8.2. A DIR and DIR Customer test environment, which may be a laboratory, a test domain, or a test pilot implementation.
9. Provide a complete test plan for DIR’s and DIR Customers’ approval prior to testing as set out in the Evaluation and Testing section of the Service Management Manual.
10. Report test findings and recommendations to DIR.
11. Establish criteria that will be used to support the evaluation, technology selection, testing, and so forth for DIR’s review and approval.
12. Upon DIR request, contract with a Third Party to conduct or to review the test findings and recommendations.
Evaluation and Testing. Prior to installing a new Major Release or Minor Release, CSC shall evaluate and test such release to verify that it shall perform in accordance with this Agreement and the Sears Standards and that it shall not violate clauses (i) – (iv) of Section 5.2(c) (Sears Approval – Cost, Adverse Impact). The evaluation and testing performed by CSC in accordance with the OPM shall be at least consistent with the reasonable and accepted industry norms applicable to the performance of such Services and shall be at least as rigorous and comprehensive as the evaluation and testing usually performed by highly qualified service providers under such circumstances.
Evaluation and Testing. Prior to installing a new Major Release or Minor Release, Supplier shall evaluate and test such release to verify that it will perform in accordance with this Agreement and the Triad Standards and Strategic Plans and that it will not (i) increase Triad’s total cost of receiving the Services; (ii) have an adverse impact or require changes as described in Section 9.6 (c) or (iii) violate or be inconsistent with Triad Standards, Strategic Plans, Technology Plan or applicable Laws. The evaluation and testing performed by Supplier shall be at least consistent with the reasonable and accepted industry norms applicable to the performance of such Services and shall be at least as rigorous and comprehensive as the evaluation and testing usually performed by highly qualified service providers under such circumstances.
Evaluation and Testing. Prior to installing a new Major Release or Minor Release, Supplier shall evaluate and test such Release to verify that it will perform in accordance with this Agreement and the Hercules Standards and Strategic Plans and that it will not (i) increase Hercules' total cost of receiving the Services; (ii) have an adverse impact or require changes as described in Section 9.6(c); or (iii) violate or be inconsistent with Hercules Standards, Strategic Plans, the Technology and Business Process Plan or applicable Laws. The evaluation and testing performed by Supplier shall be at least consistent with the reasonable and accepted industry norms applicable to the performance of such Services and shall be at least as rigorous and comprehensive as the evaluation and testing usually performed by highly qualified service providers under such circumstances.