Evaluation of Non-Tenured Faculty Sample Clauses

Evaluation of Non-Tenured Faculty. The purpose of this policy is to improve the learning process, to apprise instructional staff of their strengths, weaknesses, progress and overall status, to determine the desirability of tenure when an individual is eligible, and to provide information for use in making personnel decisions with respect to non-tenured faculty members in accordance with 110 Illinois Compiled Statutes Section 805/3B. The appropriate Vice President, or their designee, shall have the responsibility for evaluating in writing each non-tenured faculty member at leastonce during each school year that they are employed as a full-time faculty member. Following each written evaluation, the person making the evaluation will hold an individual conference with the non-tenured faculty member to discuss the results of the evaluation. The written evaluation for non-tenured faculty members whose continuous full- time employment commenced with the start of the fall semester shall be completed on or before February 1, except for extenuating circumstances. The written evaluation for non-tenured faculty members whose continuous full-time employment commenced with the start of the spring semester shall be completed on or before October 1, except for extenuating circumstances. The purpose of this timetable for evaluations is to enable the Board to decide at least sixty (60) days before the end of the school year or term, whichever is applicable, whether or not a full-time non-tenured faculty member’s appointment should be renewed. The written evaluations shall be submitted to the College President who, in turn, shall submit their recommendations to the Board. It shall be the responsibility of the Board to decide at least sixty (60) days before the end of the school year or term, whichever is applicable, whether or not a full-time non-tenured faculty member’s appointment should be renewed. If the Board decides not to renew a non-tenured faculty member for the ensuing school year or term, the Board shall give notice thereof to the faculty member not later than sixty (60) days before the end of the school year or term, whichever is applicable. The specific reasons for the non-renewal shall be confidential but shall be issued to the teacher upon request. In addition to the formal written evaluations specified above, the performance and qualifications of the faculty members may be assessed in other ways, including, but not limited to, self-evaluations, student evaluations, work habits, observance of C...
AutoNDA by SimpleDocs
Evaluation of Non-Tenured Faculty. 1. During the first three (3) years of employment, the College President shall cause an annual evaluation to be made of non- tenured faculty. This evaluation shall be performed by the non- tenured faculty member's xxxx/supervisor in accordance with procedures prescribed by the Faculty Evaluation Handbook.
Evaluation of Non-Tenured Faculty. Department Chairpersons, after consultation and input from the tenured members of the Department, will meet annually with each non-tenured faculty member to review that faculty member's professional growth. (If the Department Chairperson is not tenured, his/her evaluation will be conducted according to Article 20.3(d).) In addition, first year faculty will be evaluated at the end of their first semester of service. In every case, the Department Chairperson and the non-tenured faculty member will have a shared responsibility to insure that such an evaluation takes place. This annual meeting will include a discussion of the faculty member's professional performance, a review of his/her career plans, and where appropriate, an action plan to correct deficiencies, and to insure professional growth. At the conclusion of each meeting, the Chair will prepare a written summary. The faculty member may indicate, in writing, any differing opinions about the content of the summary statement. Such written opinion will become part of the summary statement. The statement(s) will become part of the official personnel file maintained by the Administration. The Department and faculty member will each retain a copy of the statement(s).
Evaluation of Non-Tenured Faculty. A comprehensive evaluation of all non-tenured faculty shall be conducted each year in accordance with the tenure procedure adopted by the Board of Trustees which may include the following elements:
Evaluation of Non-Tenured Faculty. Department Chairpersons, after consultation and input from the tenured members of the Department, will meet annually with each non-tenured faculty member to review that faculty member's professional growth. In addition, first year faculty will be evaluated at the end of their first quarter of service. In every case, the Department Chairperson and the non-tenured faculty member will have a shared responsibility to insure that such an evaluation takes place. This annual meeting will include a discussion of the faculty member's professional performance, a review of his/her career plans, and where appropriate, an action plan to correct deficiencies, and to insure professional growth. At the conclusion of each meeting, the Chair will prepare a written summary. The faculty member may indicate, in writing, any differing opinions about the content of the summary statement. Such written opinion will become part of the summary statement. The statement(s) will become part of the official personnel file maintained by the Administration. A copy of the statement will be given to the faculty member.

Related to Evaluation of Non-Tenured Faculty

  • Evaluation of Contractor Performance of the Contractor under this Agreement will be evaluated. The evaluation shall be prepared on Contract/Contractor Evaluation Sheet (STD 4), and maintained in the Agreement file. For consultant agreements, a copy of the evaluation will be sent to the Department of General Services, Office of Legal Services, if it is negative and over $5,000.

  • VISIBILITY OF FUNDING FROM THE OFFICIAL DEVELOPMENT ASSISTANCE Unless the SAIDC requests or agrees otherwise, any communication or publication made by the Final Beneficiary that relates to the action, including at conferences, seminars or in any information or promotional materials (such as brochures, leaflets, posters, presentations in electronic form, etc.), including tangible assets acquired from the project must: (a) indicate that the action has received funding from the Official Development Assistance, SlovakAid and (b) display the SlovakAid logo. When displayed in association with another logo, the SlovakAid logo must have appropriate prominence. The obligation to display the SlovakAid logo does not confer on the Final Beneficiary a right of exclusive use. The Final Beneficiary may not appropriate the SlovakAid logo or any similar trademark or logo, either by registration or by any other means. For the purposes of the first, second and third subparagraphs and under the conditions specified therein, the Final Beneficiary may use the SlovakAid logo without first obtaining permission from the SAIDC.

  • Evaluation of Teaching 1. All reports on a teacher shall be in writing.

  • EVALUATION OF TEACHERS 1. All reports on the work of a teacher shall be in writing.

  • Evaluation and Comparison of Tenders 2.24.1 The Procuring entity will evaluate and compare the tenders which have been determined to be substantially responsive, pursuant to paragraph 2.22

  • Evaluation of Tenders 33.1 The Procuring Entity shall use the criteria and methodologies listed in this ITT and Section III, Evaluation and Qualification criteria. No other evaluation criteria or methodologies shall be permitted. By applying the criteria and methodologies, the Procuring Entity shall determine the Lowest Evaluated Tender. This is the Tender of the Tenderer that meets the qualification criteria and whose Tender has been determined to be:

  • Evaluation of Students Acknowledging the District’s adopted grading system, the teacher shall maintain the right and responsibility to determine grades and other evaluation of a student. No grade or evaluation shall be changed except by the teacher with the approval of the building administrator.

  • CERTIFICATION OF NONSEGREGATED FACILITIES (Applicable to construction contracts exceeding $10,000) The Contractor certifies that it does not maintain or provide for its establishments, and that it does not permit employees to perform their services at any location, under its control, where segregated facilities are maintained. It certifies further that it will not maintain or provide for employees any segregated facilities at any of its establishments, and it will not permit employees to perform their services at any location under its control where segregated facilities are maintained. The Contractor agrees that a breach of this certification is a violation of the equal opportunity clause of this contract. As used in this certification, the term “segregated facilities” means any waiting rooms, work areas, rest rooms and wash rooms, restaurants and other eating areas, time clocks, locker rooms, and other storage or dressing areas, parking lots, drinking fountains, recreation or entertainment areas, transportation and housing facilities provided for employees which are segregated by explicit directive or are, in fact, segregated on the basis of race, color, religion, or national origin because of habit, local custom, or any other reason. The Contractor further agrees that (except where it has obtained for specific time periods) it will obtain identical certification from proposed subcontractors prior to the award of subcontracts exceeding $10,000 which are not exempt from the provisions of the equal opportunity clause; that it will retain such certifications in its files; and that it will forward the preceding notice to such proposed subcontractors (except where proposed subcontractors have submitted identical certifications for specific time periods).

  • DEVELOPMENT OR ASSISTANCE IN DEVELOPMENT OF SPECIFICATIONS REQUIREMENTS/ STATEMENTS OF WORK Firms and/or individuals that assisted in the development or drafting of the specifications, requirements, statements of work, or solicitation documents contained herein are excluded from competing for this solicitation. This shall not be applicable to firms and/or individuals providing responses to a publicly posted Request for Information (RFI) associated with a solicitation.

  • MANAGEMENT OF EVALUATION OUTCOMES 12.1 The evaluation of the Employee’s performance will form the basis for rewarding outstanding performance or correcting unacceptable performance.

Time is Money Join Law Insider Premium to draft better contracts faster.