Evaluations of the Work. § 3.6.2.1 The Architect shall visit the site at intervals appropriate to the stage of construction progress and quality of the portion of the Work completed, and to determine if the Work is with the Contract Documents. However, the Architect shall not be required to make exhaus inspections to check the quality or quantity of the Work. On the basis of the site visits, the Owner informed in writing of the progress and quality of the portion of the Work complete Owner (1) known deviations from the Contract Documents and from the most recent constr
§ 3.6.2.2 The Architect has the authority to reject Work that does not conform to the Contract Documents. If the Architect does not reject non-conforming work, the Architect shall demand in writing that the Contractor bring the non-conforming Work into compliance with the Contract Documents; and, if the Contractor’s efforts to do so are not begun and completed expeditiously, the Architect shall report that failure to the Owner in writing, stating: (a) the problem; (b) the reasons for the actions taken by the Architect; (c) what, if any, response has been forthcoming from
§ 3.6.2.3 The Architect shall interpret and decide matters concerning performance under, and requirements of, the Contract Documents on written request of either the Owner or Contractor. The Architect’s response to such requests shall be made in writing within any time limits agreed upon or otherwise with reasonable promptness.
§ 3.6.2.4 Interpretations and decisions of the Architect shall be consistent with the requirements indicated in or reasonably inferable from the Contract Documents and shall be in writing or in the form of Drawings. Where approved in writing by the Owner in advance, the Architect’s decisions on matters relating to aesthetic effect shall be final if consistent with the intent expressed in the Contract Documents. To the extent the Contract Documents do not permit the Owner to make final decisions on aesthetic matters, then this Section shall be deemed modified by requiring the Architect to consult the Owner before making a decision on matters relating to aesthetic effect. To the extent that the Contract Documents permit the Owner to make final decisions on aesthetic matters, this Section shall be of no effect. This Section shall control over Section 4.2.13 in the General Conditions.
§ 3.6.2.5 Unless the Owner and Contractor designate another person to serve as an Initial Decision Maker, as that term is defined in AIA Document A...
Evaluations of the Work. § 3.6.2.1 The Architect shall Engineer, as a representative of the Owner, will visit the site at intervals appropriate to the stage of construction, or as otherwise required in Section 4.2.3, to become generally familiar with familiar with, and keep the Owner informed about, the progress and quality of the portion of the Work completed, and to determine, in general, to endeavor to guard the Owner against defects and deficiencies in the Work, and to determine if the Work observed is being performed in a manner indicating that the Work, when fully completed, will be in accordance with the Contract Documents. However, the Architect Engineer shall not be required to make exhaustive or continuous on-site inspections to check the quality or quantity of the Work. On the basis of the site visits, the Architect Engineer shall keep the Owner reasonably informed about the progress and quality of the portion of the Work completed, and promptly report to the Owner (1) known deviations from the Contract Documents, (2) known deviations from the most recent construction schedule submitted by the Construction Manager, and (3) defects and deficiencies observed in the Work.
§ 3.6.2.2 The Architect has the authority to Engineer and the Owner will reject Work that does not conform to the Contract Documents. Whenever the Architect Engineer considers it necessary or advisable, the Architect the Engineer and the Owner shall have the authority to require inspection or testing of the Work in accordance with the provisions of the Contract Documents, whether or not the Work is fabricated, installed or completed. However, neither this authority of the Architect the Engineer and the Owner nor a decision made in good faith either to exercise or not to exercise such authority shall give rise to a duty or responsibility of the Architect the Engineer or the Owner to the Construction Manager, Subcontractors, suppliers, their agents or employees, or other persons or entities performing portions of the Work.
§ 3.6.2.3 The Architect shall interpret and decide matters concerning performance under, Engineer shall initially interpret matters concerning and requirements of, the Contract Documents on written request of either both the Owner or and Construction Manager. The Architect’s Engineer’s response to such requests shall be made in writing within any time limits agreed upon or otherwise with reasonable promptness. If no agreement is made concerning the time within which interpretations requir...
Evaluations of the Work. The Architect shall visit the site at intervals appropriate to the stage of construction, or as otherwise required in Section 4.2.3, to become generally familiar with the progress and quality of the portion of the Work completed, and to determine, in general, if the Work observed is being performed in a manner indicating that the Work, when fully completed, will be in accordance with the Contract Documents. However, the Architect shall not be required to make exhaustive or continuous on-site inspections to check the quality or quantity of the Work. On the basis of the site visits, the Architect shall keep the Owner reasonably informed about the progress and quality of the portion of the Work completed, and promptly report to the Owner (1) known deviations from the Contract Documents, (2) known deviations from the most recent construction schedule submitted by the Contractor, and (3) defects and deficiencies observed in the Work.
Evaluations of the Work. 6.2.1 The Architect shall visit the site at intervals appropriate to the stage of construction (not less than one visit every other week) to become generally familiar with the progress and quality of the portion of the Work completed, and to determine, in general, if the Work observed is being performed in a manner indicating that the Work, when fully completed, will be in accordance with the Contract Documents. However, the Architect shall not be required to make exhaustive or continuous on-site inspections to check the quality or quantity of the Work. On the basis of the site visits, the Architect shall keep the Owner reasonably informed about the progress and quality of the portion of the Work completed, and promptly report to the Owner (1) known deviations from the Contract Documents, (2) known deviations from the most recent construction schedule submitted by the Contractor, and (3) defects and deficiencies observed in the Work.
6.2.2 The Architect has the authority to reject Work that does not conform to the Contract Documents. Whenever the Architect considers it necessary or advisable, the Architect shall have the authority to require inspection or testing of the Work in accordance with the provisions of the Contract Documents, whether or not the Work is fabricated, installed or completed. However, neither this authority of the Architect nor a decision made in good faith either to exercise or not to exercise such authority shall give rise to a duty or responsibility of the Architect to the Contractor, Subcontractors, suppliers, their agents or employees, or other persons or entities performing portions of the Work.
6.2.3 The Architect shall interpret and decide matters concerning performance under, and requirements of, the Contract Documents on written request of either the Owner or Contractor. The Architect’s response to such requests shall be made in writing within any time limits agreed upon or otherwise with reasonable promptness.
Evaluations of the Work. § 3.6.2.1 The Engineer shall visit the site at intervals appropriate to the stage of construction every two weeks. Each engineering discipline shall make periodic visits not less than once
§ 3.6.2.2 The Engineer has the authority to reject and shall reject Work that does not conform to the Contract Documents. Whenever the Engineer considers it necessary or advisable, the Engineer shall have the authority to require inspection or testing of the Work in accordance with the provisions of the Contract Documents, whether or not such Work is fabricated, installed or completed. However, neither this authority of the Engineer nor a decision made in good faith either to exercise or not to exercise such authority shall give rise to a duty or responsibility of the Engineer to the Construction Manager at Risk, Contractor(s), Subcontractors, material and equipment suppliers, their agents or employees or other persons or entities performing portions of the Work. In the event that Engineer determines that the Work is non-conforming, Engineer shall inform the Owner and Contractor or Construction Manager at Risk in writing within two (2) days of the determination.
§ 3.6.2.3 The Engineer shall interpret and decide matters concerning performance under, and requirements of, the Contract Documents on written request of either the Owner or Contractor. The Engineer’s response to such requests shall be made in writing within any time limits agreed upon or otherwise with reasonable promptness.
§ 3.6.2.4 Interpretations and decisions of the Engineer shall be consistent with the intent of and reasonably inferable from the Contract Documents and shall be in writing or in the form of drawings. When making such interpretations and decisions, the Engineer shall endeavor to secure faithful performance by the Owner, Contractor(s) and Construction Manager at Risk, if any, shall not show partiality to any party, and shall not be liable for results of interpretations or decisions rendered in good faith. The Engineer’s decisions on matters relating to aesthetic effect shall be final if consistent with the intent expressed in the Contract Documents.
§ 3.6.2.5 Unless the Owner and Contractor or Construction Manager at Risk designate another person to serve as an Initial Decision Maker, as that term is defined in AIA Document A201–2007, the Engineer shall render initial decisions on Claims between the Owner and Contractor or Construction Manager at Risk as provided in the Contract Documents.
Evaluations of the Work. The Architect shall visit the site at intervals appropriate to the stage of construction, or as otherwise agreed to in writingrequired in Section 4.2.3, to become generally familiar with the progress and quality of the portion of the Work completed, and to determine, in general, if the Work observed is being performed in a manner indicating that the Work, when fully completed, will be to guard the Owner against defects and deficiencies in the Work and to determine, if the Work is being performed in accordance with the Contract Documents. However, the Architect shall not be required to make exhaustive or continuous on-site inspections to check the quality or quantity of the Work. On the basis of the site visits, the Architect shall keep the Owner reasonably informed about the progress and quality of the portion of the Work completed, and promptly report to the Owner (1) known deviations from the Contract Documents, (2) known deviations from the most recent construction schedule submitted by the Contractor, and (3) defects and deficiencies observed in the Work.
Evaluations of the Work. 2.6.2.1 The Design Consultant shall visit the site at intervals appropriate to the stage of the Contractor's operations, or as otherwise agreed by the Owner and the Design Consultant, (1) to observe all reasonably apparent conditions at the site and to keep the Owner informed about the progress and quality of the portion of the Work completed, (2) to endeavor to guard the Owner against defects and deficiencies in the Work, and (3) to determine in general if the Work is being performed in a manner indicating that the Work, when fully completed, will be in accordance with the Contract Documents. However, the Design Consultant shall not be required to make exhaustive or continuous on-site inspections to check the quality or quantity of the Work. The Design Consultant shall neither have control over or charge of, nor be responsible for, the construction means, methods, techniques, sequences or procedures, or for safety precautions and programs in connection with the Work, since these are solely the Contractor's rights and responsibilities under the Contract Documents. The Design Consultant shall prepare and submit notes of its observations to the Owner within five days after each site visit. The Design Consultant shall schedule, attend and chair all job meetings, which shall be held weekly unless otherwise provided in the Contract Documents or mutually agreed by the Design Consultant, Owner and Contractor, and shall prepare and distribute minutes of each such meeting to the Owner, Contractor, Clerk of the Works if any, design consultants and others as appropriate not later than five days after the meeting. The Design Consultant shall secure the attendance at job meetings of Design Consultant's sub-design consultants and others as appropriate and as reasonably requested by the Owner.
2.6.2.2 The Design Consultant shall report to the Owner known deviations from the Contract Documents and from the most recent construction schedule submitted by the Contractor. However, the Design Consultant shall not be responsible for the Contractor's failure to perform the Work in accordance with the requirements of the Contract Documents. The Design Consultant shall be responsible for the Design Consultant's negligent acts or omissions, but shall not have control over or charge of and shall not be responsible for acts or omissions of the Contractor, Subcontractors, or their agents or employees, or of any other persons or entities performing portions of the Work.
2.6.2.3 The Des...
Evaluations of the Work. § 3.6.2.1 The Architect, as representative of the Owner, shall visit the site weekly and at other intervals appropriate to the stage of construction, or as otherwise required in Section 4.3.3, to become generally familiar with the progress and quality of the portion of the Work completed, and to determine, in general, if the Work observed is being performed in a manner indicating that the Work, when fully completed, will be in accordance with the Contract Documents. The Architect shall require its consultants to visit the site a minimum of every other week and more frequent visits during critical portions of the work involving areas of work designed of their discipline and attend all required testing of materials or systems designed by Architect’s consultants. The Architect and/or his Consultants shall observe form work, reinforcing and related items prior to every concrete pour and shall remain in attendance to observe commencement of concrete placement operations. Provided the concrete placement operations are proceeding without incident and the Owner’s representative attending the pour specifically concurs, Architect and/or his Consultant may end their attendance at the concrete placement operations. However, the Architect shall not be required to make exhaustive or continuous on-site inspections to check the quality or quantity of the Work. On the basis of the site visits, the Architect shall keep the Owner reasonably informed about the progress and quality of the portion of the Work completed, and report to the Owner (1) known deviations from the Contract Documents and from the most recent construction schedule submitted by the Contractor, and (2) defects and deficiencies observed in the Work.
§ 3.6.2.2 The Architect has the authority to reject Work that does not conform to the Contract Documents. Whenever the Architect considers it necessary or advisable, the Architect shall have the authority to require inspection or testing of the Work in accordance with the provisions of the Contract Documents, whether or not such Work is fabricated, installed or completed. The Architect will inform the Owner prior to rejecting Work or requiring testing. However, neither this authority of the Architect nor a decision made in good faith either to exercise or not to exercise such authority shall give rise to a duty or responsibility of the Architect to the Contractor, Subcontractors, material and equipment suppliers, their agents or employees or other persons or ent...
Evaluations of the Work. 1.2.1 The CONSULTANT shall at all times have access to the work wherever it is in preparation or progress.
1.2.2 The CONSULTANT shall visit the site appropriate to the stage of construction become generally familiar with and report in writing “Site Observations Reports” to keep the CITY informed about the progress and quality of the portion of the Work completed; to guard the CITY against defects and deficiencies in the Work; and to determine in general if the Work is being performed in a manner indicating that the Work, when fully completed, will be in accordance with the Construction Documents. The CONSULTANT shall report to the CITY known deviations from the Construction Documents. CONSULTANT shall advise CITY where appropriate, to reject work that does not conform to the Construction Documents.
1.2.3 CONSULTANT shall participate in regular weekly progress meetings and attend on-site meetings every three weeks during construction. CONSULTANT shall review meeting minutes for weekly and on-site progress meetings for distribution by CITY.
Evaluations of the Work. 2.9.2.1 The Designer shall visit the site and attend construction progress meetings at intervals appropriate to the stage of construction to become generally familiar with the progress and quality of the portion of the Work completed, and to determine, in general, if the Work observed is being performed in a manner indicating that the Work, when fully completed, will be in accordance with the Construction Documents. However, the Designer shall not be required to make exhaustive or continuous on-site inspections to check the quality or quantity of the Work. On the basis of the site visits, the Designer shall keep ACPS and the City reasonably informed about the progress and quality of the portion of the Work completed, and report to ACPS and/or the City (1) known deviations from the Construction Documents and from the most recent construction schedule, and (2) defects and deficiencies observed in the Work.
2.9.2.2 The Designer, while under contract to ACPS and the City, shall, after notification to ACPS and/or the City, have the authority to reject Work that does not conform to the Construction Documents. Whenever the Designer considers it necessary or advisable, the Designer shall have the authority to require inspection or testing of the Work by a certified third party firm in accordance with the provisions of the Construction Documents, whether or not such Work is fabricated, installed or completed. However, neither this authority of the Designer nor a decision made in good faith either to exercise or not to exercise such authority shall give rise to a duty or responsibility of the Designer to the Contractor, or its subcontractors, material and equipment suppliers, their agents or employees or other persons or entities performing portions of the Work.
