Fallback Sample Clauses

Fallback. Retrieved from xxxxx://xxx.xxxxxxx.xxx/∼bodo/ssl-poodle.pdf. Xxx Xxxxx. 2012. Computer History—Citibank Direct Access and the Enhanced Telephone. Retrieved from xxxx://xxx.xxxxxx.xxx/computerhistory/?id=citibank. Mozilla. 2006. Bug 236933—Disable SSL2 and other weak ciphers. Retrieved from xxxxx://xxxxxxxx.xxxxxxx. org/show_bug.cgi?id=236933. Mozilla. 2014. Firefox—Notes (34.0). (2014). xxxxx://xxx.xxxxxxx.xxx/en-US/firefox/34.0/releasenotes/. National Institute of Standards and Technology. 2011. Vulnerability Summary for CVE-2011-3389. Retrieved from xxxx://xxx.xxx.xxxx.xxx/view/vuln/detail?vulnId=CVE-2011-3389. Nedbank. 2011. SIM Swap Scam. Retrieved from xxxx://xxx.xxxxxxx.xx.xx/website/content/Security/sim. asp. Opera Software. 2008. Opera 9.5 for Windows Changelog. Retrieved from xxxx://xxx.xxxxx.xxx/docs/change logs/windows/950/. Xxxxx Xxxxxxxxx. 2015. Banks to Allow Account Access Using Fingerprint Tech. Retrieved from xxxx://xxx. xxx.xxx/xxxx/xxxxxxxxxx-00000000. Xxxx Xxxxxxxx, Xxxxx Xxx, Xxxxx Xxxxxxxx, and Xxxxx Xxxxx. Retrieved from RFC 5746—Transport Layer Security (TLS) Renegotiation Indication Extension. (2010). xxxxx://xxxxx.xxxx.xxx/html/rfc5746. Xxxx Xxxxxx. 2009. SSL and TLS Authentication Gap Vulnerability Discovered. Retrieved from xxxxx://xxxxx xxxx.xxxxxx.xxx/xxxxx/xxxxxxxxxxxx/0000/00/00/xxx-xxx-xxx-xxxxxxxxxxxxxx-xxx-xxxxxxxxxxxxx-xxxxxxxxxx.
AutoNDA by SimpleDocs
Fallback. Under New Section 1860D-13, the Administrator, not later than September 1 of each year, beginning in 2005, would make a determination as to whether there were 2 approved bids. If not, the Administrator would enter into an annual contract with an entity to provide Part D enrollees in the area with standard coverage (including access to negotiated prices) for the following year. The Administrator could enter into only 1 contract for each such area. A single entity could be awarded contracts for more than one such area. The Administrator could not enter into such a contract if the Administrator received two or more qualified bids after exercise of the authority to reduce risk for entities. Entities would be required to meet beneficiary protection requirements.
Fallback. The New Section 1860D-3, discussed above, establishes access requirements. If access is not provided, including through a limited risk plan, the conference Present Law House Bill Senate Bill
Fallback a. Any member of Unit A or Unit B who is currently a member of one of those bargaining units shall have the total sum of their years of service in said units applicable as credit towards placement on the Unit A Seniority List described in Section 3 of this Article. b. Any individual presently employed by the Westwood Public Schools, who was formerly a member of bargaining Unit A or B and who is not now a member of those bargaining Units, shall have the sum of their years of service in both Unit A and B applicable as credit towards placement on the Unit A Seniority List described in Section 3 of this Article.
Fallback. The Extraordinary Resolutions set out in paragraphs 1, 2 and 4 above shall be conditional on satisfaction of the Conditions Precedent and the Settlement Date occurring, in each case before the Redemption Long Stop Date, and if the Conditions Precedent are not met or the Settlement Date does not occur in accordance with paragraph 1 above before the Redemption Long Stop Date, then the Extraordinary Resolutions in paragraph 1, 2 and 4 above and the Deed Poll shall be revoked upon the Redemption Long Stop Date and be of no further force and effect, and for the avoidance of doubt, the Trust Deed, the Conditions and Agency Agreement shall continue in full force and effect. In addition and in such case: a. within 7 days of the Redemption Long Stop Date, the Issuer shall pay the Accrued Interest up to 24 August 2022 by payment into the Clearing Systems (subject to blocking/freezing requirements in accordance with Sanctions); b. provided that the UK/EU/US Sanctions Approval Satisfaction Date has occurred before the Redemption Long Stop Date, the Issuer shall: i. within 7 days of the Redemption Long Stop Date, pay USD 95 million in partial redemption of the principal amount outstanding of the Bonds pro rata and at par by payment into the Clearing Systems (subject to blocking/freezing requirements in accordance with Sanctions); or ii. within 20 Business Days of the Redemption Long Stop Date, as an alternative to paragraph (b)(i) above and at the option of the relevant Beneficial Owner, apply USD 95 million to implement on market buy backs at par, provided that the Issuer shall not make an offer to a Beneficial Owner or purchase from a Beneficial Owner more than its pro rata allocation of USD 95 million and any Bonds so bought back shall immediately upon buy-back be surrendered by the Issuer for cancellation. Payments, applications, related transactions and activities under each of paragraphs (a) or (b) shall be made in a manner in compliance with Sanctions, including blocking/freezing requirements; and c. the Issuer acknowledges that the Trust Deed, the Conditions and the Agency Agreement continue to apply and, without limitation, interest continues to accrue on and from 24 August 2022 on the Bonds in accordance with those terms and that the Potential Events of Default or Events of Default arising pursuant to Condition 10(a) or 10(b) as a result of the Issuer’s failure to pay principal and interest on 31 May 2022 in connection with the exercise by certain Bondholders...
AutoNDA by SimpleDocs
Fallback. In the event that a catastrophic problem is encountered at the Hot Cut, the transition approach employed by ACS allows for a controlled fallback to Symetra original systems at RDC. As part of developing the cutover plan and script, ACS also develops a fallback plan based on potential “showstoppers” that are pre-identified by ACS and Symetra. The following paragraphs highlight key aspects of ACS’ fallback approach. ACS works with Symetra to develop an Acceptance Test that is executed at the final Hot Cut. The Acceptance Test checks the validity of the “just-moved” systems to ensure that all business-critical functions are working properly prior to making a “go” decision and starting production processing at ACS. If a major problem surfaces, ACS, along with its supporting vendors, works to resolve the problem within the pre-designated outage window. If the issue cannot be resolved to the satisfaction of Symetra, the fallback plan is implemented. Since the original systems have not been dismantled, the fallback plan is to point the network back to the original systems and restart the production applications. This is done with little or no loss of data. Regarding the tape library, ACS works with Symetra prior to the Hot Cut to identify if there are any critical master tapes that need to be copied by Safeco prior to the cutover. In the event that fallback is required, the copies will remain at the original data center and will be used until the tape library can be returned. If problems are encountered after production processing is started in the new processing environment, ACS, with its supporting vendors and Symetra, works to resolve the issues and move forward on the systems at ACS. Following a “go” decision based on successful testing and approval, the implemented solution is put into production. During post implementation there is a defined “critical care” period where all activities associated with the implemented solution are closely monitored and issues or incidents are addressed by the transition team. Once this “critical care” period is over, incident management will be addressed by the defined operational support organization. • Complete turnover from the TMO to the SBU Management team. • Obtain customer concurrence that deliverables associated with this effort have been met • Obtain customer approval to close project • Complete administrative project close activities
Fallback solutions for CZ-SK or SK-HU or HU-RO border in case of Decoupling as described in Annex 3 are subject to separate agreements concluded between relevant Parties.
Fallback procedure for data exchange 1. In case of a failure at the site of the Allocation Platform of the standard processes for data exchange via the Auction Tool as described in these Allocation Rules, the Allocation Platform may inform Registered Participants that a fallback procedure for data exchange may be used as follows: (a) by the applicable deadlines unless otherwise announced by the Allocation Platform the Registered Participant shall request the Allocation Platform by electronic means as specified by the Allocation Platform on its website to enter the relevant data into the Auction Tool by using this fallback procedure for data exchange; (b) with the request the Registered Participant shall provide to the Allocation Platform in the format specified in the Information System Rules the relevant data to be entered in the Auction Tool; (c) the Allocation Platform shall enter the submitted data into the Auction Tool; (d) the Allocation Platform may set in Information System Rules an identification process for the Registered Participant at the moment when the Registered Participant submits the relevant operational or commercial data and requests the Allocation Platform to enter this data into the Auction Tool on its behalf by means of the fallback procedure. If the Registered Participant or the person authorized by the Registered Participant for this purpose does not clearly identify itself, the Allocation Platform shall be entitled not to perform the data entry; (e) the Registered Participant shall provide the Allocation Platform with a telephone number, which can be used in case of a necessary communication; (f) once the Allocation Platform has entered the provided data into the Auction Tool on behalf of the Registered Participant, the Allocation Platform shall inform, without undue delay, the Registered Participant by telephone and/or via email of the entry; and (g) the Allocation Platform shall under no circumstances be held responsible if it fails to reach the Registered Participant through the means of communication above. 2. In case of application of the fallback procedure for data exchange, all necessary information which is made available via the Auction Tool during the standard processes may be distributed to the Registered Participants by the Allocation Platform, by electronic means as specified by the Allocation Platform on its website or where appropriate published on the website of the Allocation Platform.
Draft better contracts in just 5 minutes Get the weekly Law Insider newsletter packed with expert videos, webinars, ebooks, and more!