Fallback. Retrieved from xxxxx://xxx.xxxxxxx.xxx/∼bodo/ssl-poodle.pdf. Xxx Xxxxx. 2012. Computer History—Citibank Direct Access and the Enhanced Telephone. Retrieved from xxxx://xxx.xxxxxx.xxx/computerhistory/?id=citibank. Mozilla. 2006. Bug 236933—Disable SSL2 and other weak ciphers. Retrieved from xxxxx://xxxxxxxx.xxxxxxx. org/show_bug.cgi?id=236933. Mozilla. 2014. Firefox—Notes (34.0). (2014). xxxxx://xxx.xxxxxxx.xxx/en-US/firefox/34.0/releasenotes/. National Institute of Standards and Technology. 2011. Vulnerability Summary for CVE-2011-3389. Retrieved from xxxx://xxx.xxx.xxxx.xxx/view/vuln/detail?vulnId=CVE-2011-3389. Nedbank. 2011. SIM Swap Scam. Retrieved from xxxx://xxx.xxxxxxx.xx.xx/website/content/Security/sim. asp. Opera Software. 2008. Opera 9.5 for Windows Changelog. Retrieved from xxxx://xxx.xxxxx.xxx/docs/change logs/windows/950/. Xxxxx Xxxxxxxxx. 2015. Banks to Allow Account Access Using Fingerprint Tech. Retrieved from xxxx://xxx. xxx.xxx/xxxx/xxxxxxxxxx-00000000. Xxxx Xxxxxxxx, Xxxxx Xxx, Xxxxx Xxxxxxxx, and Xxxxx Xxxxx. Retrieved from RFC 5746—Transport Layer Security (TLS) Renegotiation Indication Extension. (2010). xxxxx://xxxxx.xxxx.xxx/html/rfc5746. Xxxx Xxxxxx. 2009. SSL and TLS Authentication Gap Vulnerability Discovered. Retrieved from xxxxx://xxxxx xxxx.xxxxxx.xxx/xxxxx/xxxxxxxxxxxx/0000/00/00/xxx-xxx-xxx-xxxxxxxxxxxxxx-xxx-xxxxxxxxxxxxx-xxxxxxxxxx.
Fallback. No provision House Xxxx
Fallback. No provision Senate Xxxx
Fallback. Under New Section 1860D-13, the Administrator, not later than September 1 of each year, beginning in 2005, would make a determination as to whether there were 2 approved bids. If not, the Administrator would enter into an annual contract with an entity to provide Part D enrollees in the area with standard coverage (including access to negotiated prices) for the following year. The Administrator could enter into only 1 contract for each such area. A single entity could be awarded contracts for more than one such area. The Administrator could not enter into such a contract if the Administrator received two or more qualified bids after exercise of the authority to reduce risk for entities. Entities would be required to meet beneficiary protection requirements. Beneficiary premiums for a fallback plan would be set at the premium amount that would apply if the plan premium equaled the national weighted average premium for the area, as adjusted for geographic differences in drug prices. The Administrator would establish a methodology for making this calculation, which could take into account geographic differences in utilization and the results of the ongoing study on spending and utilization required under the Act. The contract with the plan would provide for payments to the plans for the negotiated costs of covered drugs and payment of prescription management fees tied to performance management fees established by the Administrator. Performance requirements established by the Administrator would include the following; 1) the entity contained costs to taxpayers and to beneficiaries; 2) the entity provided quality clinical care; and 3) the entity provided quality services. The fallback plan would not be permitted to engage in any marketing or branding of the contract. Entities that submitted bids to be a qualified risk-bearing entity could not submit a bid to be a fallback plan.
Fallback. The New Section 1860D-3, discussed above, establishes access requirements. If access is not provided, including through a limited risk plan, the conference agreement establishes a fallback process. The Secretary is required to establish a separate process for the solicitation of bids from eligible fallback entities for the offering in all fallback service areas in or more PDP regions of a fallback prescription drug plan during the contract period. A single fallback entity may not offer all fallback plans throughout the United States. Except as otherwise provided, the general provision relating to approval or disapproval of bids under New Section 1860D-11(e) applies with respect to fallback plans. The Secretary can only approve one fallback plan for all fallback service areas in any PDP region for a contract period. Competitive contracting provisions apply. The Secretary shall approve fallback plans so that if there are any fallback service areas in the region for the year, they are offered at the same time as prescription dug plans would otherwise be offered. The fallback entity could not submit a bid for a prescription drug plan for any region for the first year of a contract period. A fallback service area is an area within a PDP region in which, after applying the provisions relating to limited risk plans, the access requirements will not be met. Fallback prescription drug plans are permitted to offer only standard prescription drug coverage, pass on negotiated discounts and meet such other requirements specified by the Secretary. The fallback plan would not be permitted to engage in any marketing or branding of the contract. Under a fallback contract, the Secretary would pay actual costs of Part D covered drugs taking into account negotiated price concessions. Payment would also be made for prescription management fees tied to performance management requirements, established by the Secretary. Performance requirements established by the Secretary would include the following; 1) the entity contained costs to the Medicare Prescription Drug Account and to beneficiaries; 2) the entity provided quality clinical care, including reduction in adverse drug interactions; and 3) the entity provided timely and accurate delivery of services, including pharmacy and beneficiary support services; and 4) efficient and effective benefit administration and claims adjudication services. Beneficiary premiums under fallback plans would be uniform and equal to 26 percent of t...
Fallback a. Any member of Unit A or Unit B who is currently a member of one of those bargaining units shall have the total sum of their years of service in said units applicable as credit towards placement on the Unit A Seniority List described in Section 3 of this Article.
Fallback. In the event that a catastrophic problem is encountered at the Hot Cut, the transition approach employed by ACS allows for a controlled fallback to Symetra original systems at RDC. As part of developing the cutover plan and script, ACS also develops a fallback plan based on potential “showstoppers” that are pre-identified by ACS and Symetra. The following paragraphs highlight key aspects of ACS’ fallback approach. ACS works with Symetra to develop an Acceptance Test that is executed at the final Hot Cut. The Acceptance Test checks the validity of the “just-moved” systems to ensure that all business-critical functions are working Confidential Information Symetra Transition Program properly prior to making a “go” decision and starting production processing at ACS. If a major problem surfaces, ACS, along with its supporting vendors, works to resolve the problem within the pre-designated outage window. If the issue cannot be resolved to the satisfaction of Symetra, the fallback plan is implemented. Since the original systems have not been dismantled, the fallback plan is to point the network back to the original systems and restart the production applications. This is done with little or no loss of data. Regarding the tape library, ACS works with Symetra prior to the Hot Cut to identify if there are any critical master tapes that need to be copied by Safeco prior to the cutover. In the event that fallback is required, the copies will remain at the original data center and will be used until the tape library can be returned. If problems are encountered after production processing is started in the new processing environment, ACS, with its supporting vendors and Symetra, works to resolve the issues and move forward on the systems at ACS. Following a “go” decision based on successful testing and approval, the implemented solution is put into production. During post implementation there is a defined “critical care” period where all activities associated with the implemented solution are closely monitored and issues or incidents are addressed by the transition team. Once this “critical care” period is over, incident management will be addressed by the defined operational support organization. Close • Complete turnover from the TMO to the SBU Management team. • Obtain customer concurrence that deliverables associated with this effort have been met • Obtain customer approval to close project • Complete administrative project close activities
Fallback. The Extraordinary Resolutions set out in paragraphs 1, 2 and 4 above shall be conditional on satisfaction of the Conditions Precedent and the Settlement Date occurring, in each case before the Redemption Long Stop Date, and if the Conditions Precedent are not met or the Settlement Date does not occur in accordance with paragraph 1 above before the Redemption Long Stop Date, then the Extraordinary Resolutions in paragraph 1, 2 and 4 above and the Deed Poll shall be revoked upon the Redemption Long Stop Date and be of no further force and effect, and for the avoidance of doubt, the Trust Deed, the Conditions and Agency Agreement shall continue in full force and effect. In addition and in such case:
Fallback. Actions to revert software implemented changes that failed and therefore it is requiring going back to the original state.
Fallback. Fallback procedures shall be defined and implemented. This includes defining procedures and roles and responsibilities for aborting/cancelling and recovering from unsuccessful changes and unforeseen events.
