Final Reflection Sample Clauses

Final Reflection. Not later than the forty-five (45) days before the last school day of the school year in which the evaluation takes place, the unit member shall complete and submit the Tier I Final Reflection document to the evaluator.
AutoNDA by SimpleDocs
Final Reflection. ‌ By the end of my thesis journey I can say with confidence that I learnt a lot. Looking back to last summer when I was at the very beginning of my thesis project, I can see how much self-development has been achieved. First and foremost, reviewing and analyzing the relevant literature on the field helped me to build sound knowledge on the topic. Even though I cannot state that I became a specialist on the topic, but the difference is massive. I remember moments when reading the articles, which sometimes were related to the wider topic but not the specific area of my research, I could not stop reading and even forgot to make notes because the process of learning new facts was incredibly interesting and informative. Regarding the process of building the research design, identifying the most effective research instruments and conducting the survey, all of this helped me not only in terms of enriching knowledge on the topic, but indirectly influenced in a positive way to developing leadership skills, as it involved such activities as proper organization, conversations with the research gate keeper and school psychologists. Cooperation with the school psychologists was also a crucial part of the process, which resulted even in initial bones of future studies with the plan to further adapt the research instrument and employ it among students of younger age within the school work. Overall, it is necessary to emphasize that the whole process of thesis project helped me to understand the importance of empirical, evidence-based research. Xxxxxx, X., Xxxxxxx, X., Xxxxxx, X., & Xxxx-Xxxxxxx, J. (2008). A review of the extent, nature, characteristics and effects of bullying behaviour in schools. Journal of Instructional Psychology, 35(2), 151. Xxxxxx, X. X. (2016). Types of Bullying in the Senior High Schools in Ghana. Journal of Education and Practice, 7(36), 131–138. Xxxxxx, X. (Ed.). (2012). Research methods and methodologies in education. Sage publications. Xxxx, X., & Güneri, O. Y. (2013). Bullying and victimization: Predictive role of individual, parental, and academic factors. School Psychology International, 34(6), 658-673. Xxxxxxx, X. X., Xxxx, X. X., Xxxxx, X., & Xxxxxxx, X. X. (2015). Individual and contextual factors associated with verbal bullying among Brazilian adolescents. BMC pediatrics, 15(1), 49. Baizdrakhmanova, A.K. (2015) Sovremenniye podhody k probleme izucheniya bullinga v kazakhstanskoy shkole. [Modern approaches to the problem of studying bul...
Final Reflection. Writing the thesis study on the relationship between emotional intelligence and academic achievement had been valuable and challenging experience for me. I had started exploring the notion of emotional intelligence before the enrollment to this university. However, that investigation of the topic was rather amateur. Similarly, I was passionate about the link between emotional intelligence and intelligence quotient what had become popular domain recently. Conducting the thesis study on emotional intelligence with connection to academic achievement I could reveal the significance of that relationship in the education context. Although the emotional intelligence concept has become popular, still many people do not recognize it correctly. Frequently, even specialists from unrelated spheres do not consider emotional intelligence as a broad term. Hence, employers demand from their future experts to obtain specific soft skills such as interpersonal, leadership, communication, intrapersonal which were not taught in the universities as separate or additional courses. Have conducted statistical analyses on the relationship between emotional intelligence and academic achievement I could indicate that these two variables are interconnected and interrelated with each other. Higher education institutions may use that fact to improve students’ academic achievement and learning strategies. Students of higher education institutions are future specialists in different spheres, who have to be familiar with soft skills and in particular emotional competencies. Therefore, I believe that this study will contribute to the contemporary higher education and indicate the need for further development of emotional intelligence in the academic sphere. Xxxxxxxxx-Xxxxxxxxxx, X., & Xxxxxxx, M. S. (2016). Xxxx Xxxxx'x educational theory and educational implications of Xxxxxx Xxxxxxx'x multiple intelligences theory. International Journal of Cognitive Research in Science, Engineering and Education/IJCRSEE, 4(2), 57-66. Xxxxx, M., Xxxx, X. X., Xxxx, X. X., Xxxxxx, M., & Xxxx, M. N. (2011). Relationship between Emotional Intelligence and Academic Achievement among Higher Secondary School Students. Pakistan Journal of Psychology, 42(2), 41–54. Retrieved from xxxxx://xxxxxxx.xx.xxx.xx:2358/login.aspx?direct=true&db=aph&AN=85899234&s Xxxxxxxxx, X. X., Xxx, X. X., & Xxxxxxxx, X. X. (2014). Using Mixed Methods to Study Emotional Intelligence and Teaching Competencies in Higher Education. Procedia ...

Related to Final Reflection

  • Final Report The goal of this subtask is to prepare a comprehensive Final Report that describes the original purpose, approach, results, and conclusions of the work performed under this Agreement. The CAM will review the Final Report, which will be due at least two months before the Agreement end date. When creating the Final Report Outline and the Final Report, the Recipient must use the Style Manual provided by the CAM.

  • Final Evaluation IC must submit a final report and a project evaluation to the Arts Commission within thirty (30) days after the completion of the Services. Any and all unexpended funds from IC must be returned to City no later than sixty (60) days after the completion of the Services.

  • Final Retention Subject to the provisions of this Work Letter, a check for the Final Retention payable jointly to Tenant and Contractor, or directly to Contractor at Landlord’s sole discretion, shall be delivered by Landlord to Tenant within thirty (30) days following the completion of construction of the Improvements, provided that (i) Tenant delivers to Landlord (a) paid invoices for all Improvements and related costs for which the Improvement Allowance is to be dispersed, (b) signed permits for all Improvements completed within the Premises, (c) properly executed unconditional mechanics lien releases in compliance with both California Civil Code Section 8134 and either Section 8136 or Section 8138 from Tenant’s contractor, subcontractors and material suppliers and any other party which has lien rights in connection with the construction of the Improvements, (ii) Landlord has determined that no substandard work exists which adversely affects the mechanical, electrical, plumbing, heating, ventilating and air conditioning, life-safety or other systems of the Building, the curtain wall of the Building, the structure or exterior appearance of the Building, or any other tenant’s use of such other tenant’s leased premises in the Building, (iii) Architect delivers to Landlord a “Certificate of Substantial Completion”, in a form reasonably acceptable to Landlord, certifying that the construction of the Improvements in the Premises has been substantially completed, (iv) Tenant delivers to Landlord a “close-out package” in both paper and electronic forms (including, as-built drawings, and final record CADD files for the associated plans, warranties and guarantees from all contractors, subcontractors and material suppliers, and an independent air balance report); and (v) a certificate of occupancy, a temporary certificate of occupancy or its equivalent is issued to Tenant for the Premises.

  • Payment Calculation District shall pay Contractor at a rate of $ per . District shall pay Contractor as described in attached Exhibit A

  • Final Accounting Upon the dissolution of the Company, a proper accounting shall be made from the date of the last previous accounting to the date of dissolution.

  • VALUATION SUPPORT AND COMPUTATION ACCOUNTING SERVICES BNY Mellon shall provide the following valuation support and computation accounting services for each Fund:  Journalize investment, capital share and income and expense activities;  Maintain individual ledgers for investment securities;  Maintain historical tax lots for each security;  Corporate action processing as more fully set forth in the SLDs;  Reconcile cash and investment balances of each Fund with the Fund’s custodian or other counterparties as applicable;  Provide a Fund’s investment adviser, as applicable, with the cash balance available for investment purposes at start-of-day and upon request, as agreed by the parties;  Calculate capital gains and losses;  Calculate daily distribution rate per share;  Determine net income;  Obtain security market quotes and currency exchange rates from pricing services approved by a Fund’s investment adviser, or if such quotes are unavailable, then obtain such prices from the Fund’s investment adviser, and in either case, calculate the market value of each Fund’s investments in accordance with the Fund's valuation policies or guidelines; provided, however, that BNY Mellon shall not under any circumstances be under a duty to independently price or value any of the Fund's investments, including securities lending related cash collateral investments (with the exception of the services provided hereunder to Funds utilized for such cash collateral investments), itself or to confirm or validate any information or valuation provided by the investment adviser or any other pricing source, nor shall BNY Mellon have any liability relating to inaccuracies or otherwise with respect to such information or valuations; notwithstanding the foregoing, BNY Mellon shall follow the established procedures and controls to identify exceptions, tolerance breaches, etc. and to research and resolve or escalate any pricing inaccuracies;  Application of the established automated price validation rules against prices received from third party vendors and review of exceptions as identified;  Calculate Net Asset Value in the manner specified in the Fund’s Offering Materials (which, for the service described herein, shall include the Fund’s Net Asset Value error policy);  Calculate Accumulated Unit Values (“AUV”) for select funds as mutually agreed upon between the parties;  Transmit or make available a copy of the daily portfolio valuation to a Fund’s investment adviser;  Calculate yields, portfolio dollar-weighted average maturity and dollar-weighted average life as applicable; and  Calculate portfolio turnover rate for inclusion in the annual and semi-annual shareholder reports.  For money market funds, obtain security market quotes and calculate the market-value Net Asset Value in accordance with the Fund’s valuation policies and guidelines at such times and frequencies as required by regulation and/or instruction from TRP.

  • Billing and Payment Procedures and Final Accounting 6.1.1 The Connecting Transmission Owner shall xxxx the Interconnection Customer for the design, engineering, construction, and procurement costs of Interconnection Facilities and Upgrades contemplated by this Agreement on a monthly basis, or as otherwise agreed by those Parties. The Interconnection Customer shall pay all invoice amounts within 30 calendar days after receipt of the invoice. 6.1.2 Within three months of completing the construction and installation of the Connecting Transmission Owner’s Interconnection Facilities and/or Upgrades described in the Attachments to this Agreement, the Connecting Transmission Owner shall provide the Interconnection Customer with a final accounting report of any difference between (1) the Interconnection Customer’s cost responsibility for the actual cost of such facilities or Upgrades, and (2) the Interconnection Customer’s previous aggregate payments to the Connecting Transmission Owner for such facilities or Upgrades. If the Interconnection Customer’s cost responsibility exceeds its previous aggregate payments, the Connecting Transmission Owner shall invoice the Interconnection Customer for the amount due and the Interconnection Customer shall make payment to the Connecting Transmission Owner within 30 calendar days. If the Interconnection Customer’s previous aggregate payments exceed its cost responsibility under this Agreement, the Connecting Transmission Owner shall refund to the Interconnection Customer an amount equal to the difference within 30 calendar days of the final accounting report. 6.1.3 If the Interconnection Customer disputes an amount to be paid, the Interconnection Customer shall pay the disputed amount to the Connecting Transmission Owner or into an interest bearing escrow account, pending resolution of the dispute in accordance with Article 10 of this Agreement. To the extent the dispute is resolved in the Interconnection Customer’s favor, that portion of the disputed amount will be credited or returned to the Interconnection Customer with interest at rates applicable to refunds under the Commission’s regulations. To the extent the dispute is resolved in the Connecting Transmission Owner’s favor, that portion of any escrowed funds and interest will be released to the Connecting Transmission Owner.

  • CERTIFICATION OF INDEPENDENT PRICE DETERMINATION By submission of this bid, the Bidder certifies, and in the case of a joint bid each party thereto certifies as to its own organization, that in connection with this procurement: A. The prices in this bid have been arrived at independently, without consultation, collusion, communication, or agreement for the purpose of restricting competition, as to any matter relating to such prices with any other bidder or with any competitor. B. Unless otherwise required by law, the prices which have been quoted in this bid have not been knowingly disclosed by the Bidder and will not knowingly be disclosed by the Bidder prior to opening, directly or indirectly to any other Bidder or to any competitor; and, C. No attempt has been made or shall be made by the Bidder to induce any other person or bidder to submit or not to submit a bid for the purpose of restricting competition.

  • Classification Review Grand Valley State University and APSS shall jointly determine the review assessment survey instrument to be used at Grand Valley State University. The parties shall maintain a Joint Review Committee, composed of three members appointed by the Human Resources Office and three members appointed by the Alliance. Bargaining unit members questioning the assigned classification of their position may do so by using the following procedure: A. Meet with the Employment Manager in the Human Resources Office to discuss the review process, changes in their job responsibilities, duties and any other process questions they may have. B. PSS member will fill out the assessment survey and email to the Employment Manager along with any other documentation that supports the request. The survey instrument will be jointly administered/reviewed by the Assessment Team (consisting of the Employment Manager and an Alliance member of the Joint Review Committee). A meeting with the PSS is scheduled for a verbal review of the documentation and to answer any questions the Assessment Team may have. The supervisor or appointing officer is encouraged to attend. If the Assessment Team believes a job site visit is warranted as a result of the survey information, they will schedule a time for a joint visit. C. The completed survey instrument shall be coded. The survey results, as determined by the Assessment Team, shall be shared with the survey participant. D. After receiving the survey results, the survey participant, if they so choose shall have the opportunity to meet with the Joint Review Committee for additional input and appeal. Any additional information shall be reviewed by the Committee, and where the Committee feels it is necessary, the survey will be recoded, in a manner mutually agreeable. E. The Joint Review Committee shall then deliberate as to the merit of the upgrade requested by the participant. If the Committee is not able to reach a consensus, the University will decide on the classification. The Alliance may appeal that decision through the arbitration procedure of the collective bargaining agreement. Professional Support Staff members may engage in the review process no more than once per year. Supervisors questioning the assigned classification of a staff member’s position shall provide supporting rationale, complete an assessment survey instrument and discuss with Manager of Employment. The Manager of Employment shall notify an Alliance Representative that a Supervisor is reviewing a staff member’s classification. The review and outcome shall be completed within 45 working days unless the Alliance Representative and Manager of Employment mutually agreed to an extension. The Alliance will be provided with the scored instrument and any supporting rationale.

  • Final Audit Report Contractor shall promptly submit to the State a copy of any final audit report of an audit performed on Contractor’s records that relates to or affects this Contract or the Work, whether the audit is conducted by Contractor or a third party.

Draft better contracts in just 5 minutes Get the weekly Law Insider newsletter packed with expert videos, webinars, ebooks, and more!