FINAL WRITTEN EVALUATION Sample Clauses

FINAL WRITTEN EVALUATION. 1. All observations will be consolidated into the written report on the Evaluation shall be given to the teacher/counselor, and a conference shall be held between the teacher/counselor and evaluator. 2. The evaluation shall acknowledge the performance strengths of the teacher/counselor evaluated as well as performance deficiencies, if any. The evaluator shall note all the information used to support the conclusions reached in the formal evaluation report. Such information must be accurate and supported. The evaluation report shall be signed by the evaluator. The evaluation report should then be signed (electronically “pinned”) by the teacher/counselor to verify notification to the teacher/counselor that the evaluation will be placed on file, but the signature (electronic pin) should not be construed as evidence that the teacher/counselor agrees with the contents of the evaluation report. Should the report contain improvements needed, they shall be specific, measurable and include specific assistance teacher will be given by administrator. 3. Should a teacher disagree with an Evaluation or Observation, the teacher may file a written response within ten (10) school days of receipt which shall be attached to the evaluation/observation form or the teacher may present to the evaluator additional evidence of accomplishments which will be used to update the evaluation/observation. 4. The evaluation must occur by May 1 with a written report by May 10.
Sample 1Sample 2Sample 3
AutoNDA by SimpleDocs
FINAL WRITTEN EVALUATION. 17.4.9.1 The administrator is responsible for preparing a draft evaluation using the criteria in 17.3. The draft evaluation shall reflect the information gathered throughout the process, including classroom/worksite observations, student evaluations, materials listed in 17.4.7.3, and the administrator’s assessment of the evaluatee’s performance. Documented/investigated complaints, concerns, or recommendations that have been previously shared with the employee in a timely manner, and are deemed by the administrator to have merit, may be included in the draft evaluation. Additional information from the evaluatee may be requested. 17.4.9.2 If in the judgment of the team, the work of the evaluatee is less than satisfactory, the team may recommend to the appropriate administrator: (1) reevaluation the following semester, with or without a remediation plan, (2) an administrative evaluation, or (3) other action the team considers appropriate. 17.4.9.3 Upon receiving direction from the evaluation team, the administrator shall modify the draft as necessary to create a final written evaluation. The team members shall review and sign off on the final evaluation. If a team member does not agree with the final written evaluation, within six
Sample 1
FINAL WRITTEN EVALUATION. 1. All observations will be consolidated into the written report, and shall be provided to the MBU through OhioES, and a conference shall be held between the MBU and evaluator. The MBU shall receive a draft of the final summative evaluation at least one school day prior to the final conference. 2. The evaluation shall acknowledge the performance strengths of the MBU evaluated as well as performance deficiencies, if any. The evaluator shall note all the information used to support the conclusions reached in the formal evaluation report. Such information must be accurate and supported. Should the MBU disagree with the rankings on the evaluation, additional evidence may be submitted to the evaluator of accomplishments and skills within five (5) days of the conference. The document and ratings shall be updated based upon supplemental evidence that supports the rubric. 3. MBUs evaluations shall consist of multiple factors (as described in the OTES Rubric) and will contain a Final Holistic Rating of Accomplished, Skilled, Developing, or Ineffective. 4. The evaluation report shall be signed (electronically pinned) by the evaluator and subsequently by the MBU to verify that the MBU has been notified of the results of the final written evaluation. 5. The evaluation must be completed by May 1 with a written report by May 10.
Sample 1

Related to FINAL WRITTEN EVALUATION

  • Written Evaluation The Superintendent in consultation with the Board shall review and assess the Administrator’s performance on or before February 1 of each year. The Administrator shall be formally evaluated in writing annually by the Superintendent on or before February 1 of each year. The evaluation shall include a description of the Administrator’s duties and responsibilities and the standards to which the Administrator is to perform. It shall consider the Administrator’s specific duties, responsibilities, management and competence as an Administrator; specify the Administrator’s strengths and weaknesses with supporting reasons; align with research based standards established by the Illinois State Board of Education and use data and indicators on student growth as a significant factor in rating performance. The evaluation shall also consist of a review of the Administrator’s progress toward meeting established professional, student performance and academic goals set forth in Appendix A and a review of the Administrator’s leadership and management performance relative to his current assignment. The written evaluation shall be signed by both the Superintendent and the Administrator. The Administrator may respond to the evaluation in writing and such response shall be attached to and included in the Administrator’s personnel file.

  • Final Evaluation IC must submit a final report and a project evaluation to the Arts Commission within thirty (30) days after the completion of the Services. Any and all unexpended funds from IC must be returned to City no later than sixty (60) days after the completion of the Services.

  • Independent Evaluation Buyer is experienced and knowledgeable in the oil and gas business. Buyer has been advised by and has relied solely on its own expertise and legal, tax, accounting, marketing, land, engineering, environmental and other professional counsel concerning this transaction, the Subject Property and value thereof.

  • TECHNICAL EVALUATION (a) Detailed technical evaluation shall be carried out by Purchase Committee pursuant to conditions in the tender document to determine the substantial responsiveness of each tender. For this clause, the substantially responsive bid is one that conforms to all the eligibility and terms and condition of the tender without any material deviation. The Institute’s determination of bid’s responsiveness is to be based on the contents of the bid itself without recourse to extrinsic evidence. The Institute shall evaluate the technical bids also to determine whether they are complete, whether required sureties have been furnished, whether the documents have been properly signed and whether the bids are in order. (b) The technical evaluation committee may call the responsive bidders for discussion or presentation to facilitate and assess their understanding of the scope of work and its execution. However, the committee shall have sole discretion to call for discussion / presentation. (c) Financial bids of only those bidders who qualify the technical criteria will be opened provided all other requirements are fulfilled. (d) AIIMS Jodhpur shall have right to accept or reject any or all tenders without assigning any reasons thereof.

  • Annual Evaluation The Partnership will be evaluated on an annual basis through the use of the Strategic Partnership Annual Evaluation Format as specified in Appendix C of OSHA Instruction CSP 00-00-000, OSHA Strategic Partnership Program for Worker Safety and Health. The Choate Team will be responsible for gathering required participant data to evaluate and track the overall results and success of the Partnership. This data will be shared with OSHA. OSHA will be responsible for writing and submitting the annual evaluation.

  • Formal Evaluation All formal evaluations of personnel shall be conducted openly and with full knowledge of the employee concerned by an administrator or supervisor of the District.

  • Program Evaluation The School District and the College will develop a plan for the evaluation of the Dual Credit program to be completed each year. The evaluation will include, but is not limited to, disaggregated attendance and retention rates, GPA of high-school-credit-only courses and college courses, satisfactory progress in college courses, state assessment results, SAT/ACT, as applicable, TSIA readiness by grade level, and adequate progress toward the college-readiness of the students in the program. The School District commits to collecting longitudinal data as specified by the College, and making data and performance outcomes available to the College upon request. HB 1638 and SACSCOC require the collection of data points to be longitudinally captured by the School District, in collaboration with the College, will include, at minimum: student enrollment, GPA, retention, persistence, completion, transfer and scholarships. School District will provide parent contact and demographic information to the College upon request for targeted marketing of degree completion or workforce development information to parents of Students. School District agrees to obtain valid FERPA releases drafted to support the supply of such data if deemed required by counsel to either School District or the College. The College conducts and reports regular and ongoing evaluations of the Dual Credit program effectiveness and uses the results for continuous improvement.

  • JOC EVALUATION If any materials being utilized for a project cannot be found in the RS Means Price Book, this question is what is the markup percentage on those materials? When answering this question please insert the number that represents your percentage of proposed markup. Example: if you are proposing a 30 percent markup, please insert the number "30". Remember that this is a ceiling markup. You may markup a lesser percentage to the TIPS Member customer when pricing the project, but not a greater percentage. EXAMPLE: You need special materials that are not in the RS Means Unit Price Book for a project. You would buy the materials and xxxx them up to the TIPS Member customer by the percentage you propose in this question. If the materials cost you, the contractor, $100 and you proposed a markup on this question for the material of 30 percent, then you would charge the TIPS Member customer $130 for the materials. TIPS/ESC Region 8 is required by Texas Government Code § 791 to be compensated for its work and thus, failure to agree shall render your response void and it will not be considered. Vendor agrees to remit to TIPS the required administration fee or, if resellers are named, guarantee the fee remittance by or for the reseller named by the vendor?

  • Annual Evaluations The purpose of the annual evaluation is to assess and communicate the nature and extent of an employee's performance of assigned duties consistent with the criteria specified below in this Policy. Except for those employees who have received notice of non-reappointment pursuant to the BOT- UFF Policy on Non- reappointment, every employee shall be evaluated at least once annually. Personnel decisions shall take such annual evaluations into account, provided that such decisions need not be based solely on written faculty performance evaluations.

  • Self-Evaluation Each regular faculty member shall provide a self-evaluation. It shall address, among other items, the faculty member's fulfillment of professional responsibilities as referenced in Section 18.2.3 and an assessment of his or her own performance. The faculty member will share the self-evaluation with the Faculty Evaluation Committee and the first-level manager or designee. The self-evaluation will become part of the evaluation report.

Draft better contracts in just 5 minutes Get the weekly Law Insider newsletter packed with expert videos, webinars, ebooks, and more!