HIGHWAYS. Agreement relating to the construction of the inter-American highway. Exchange of notes at Washington January 30 and February 13, 1942; entered into force February 13, 1942. 56 Stat. 1842; EAS 294; 7 Xxxxxx 558; 23 UNTS 293. Amendment: February 19 and March 19, 1951 (2 UST 1840; TIAS 2318; 134 UNTS 245). LABOR Arrangement relating to workmen’s com- pensation and unemployment insurance for American citizens employed on projects in El Salvador. Exchange of notes at San Salvador September 24, 28, and 29, 1943; entered into force September 29, 1943. 7 Xxxxxx 586.
HIGHWAYS. Agreement for cooperation in the construction of the Colombia segment of the Darien Gap Highway. Signed at Washington May 6, 1971; entered into force May 6, 1971.
HIGHWAYS. Agreement providing for the construction of a military highway to Alaska. Exchange of notes at Ottawa March 17 and 18, 1942; entered into force March 18, 1942. 56 Stat. 1458; EAS 246; 6 Bevans 261; 101 UNTS 205. Agreement relating to the southern terminus of the Alaska Highway. Exchange of notes at Ot- tawa May 4 and 9, 1942; entered into force May 9, 1942. 57 Stat. 1373; EAS 380; 6 Bevans 274; 101 UNTS 215. Agreement relating to the construction of flight strips along the Alaska Highway. Exchange of notes at Ottawa August 26 and September 10, 1942; entered into force September 10, 1942. 57 Stat. 1375; EAS 381; 6 Bevans 282; 101 UNTS 221. Agreement relating to the construction of the Haines-Champagne section of the Alaska Highway. Exchange of notes at Ottawa No- vember 28 and December 7, 1942; entered into force December 7, 1942. 57 Stat. 1377; EAS 382; 6 Bevans 295; 101 UNTS 227. Agreement relating to access to the Alaska Highway. Exchange of notes at Ottawa April 10, 1943; entered into force April 10, 1943. 57 Stat. 1274; EAS 362; 6 Bevans 319; 21 UNTS 237. Agreement relating to the designation of the highway from Dawson Creek, British Colum- bia, to Fairbanks, Alaska, as the ‘‘Alaska Highway’’. Exchange of notes at Washington July 19, 1943; entered into force July 19, 1943. 57 Stat. 1023; EAS 331; 6 Bevans 324; 29 UNTS 289. Agreement relating to cooperation in recon- struction of Canadian portions of the Alaska Highway. Exchange of notes at Ottawa January 11 and February 11, 1977; entered into force February 11, 1977. 28 UST 5303; TIAS 8631; 1087 UNTS 3.
HIGHWAYS. Agreement relating to the construction of the inter-American highway. Exchange of notes at Washington April 8, 1942; entered into force April 8, 1942. 56 Stat. 1845; EAS 295; 10 Xxxxxx 424; 24 UNTS 145. Amendment: April 4 and 20, 1951 (2 UST 1848; TIAS 2320; 138 UNTS 57). Agreement relating to the construction of the Rama Road. Exchange of notes at Washington April 8 and 18, 1942; entered into force April 18, 1942. 2 UST 722; TIAS 2229; 132 UNTS 343.
HIGHWAYS. The Developer of a Class Year XXXX Project will pay an allocated share of the cost of the System Deliverability Upgrades to any Highway needed to make the Class Year Project deliverable in accordance with these rules. The System Deliverability Upgrades on the Highway or Highways, and the Developer’s allocated share of the cost of those System Deliverability Upgrades, will be identified by the ISO, with input from the Connecting Transmission Owner and from the Affected Transmission Owner(s), in the Class Year Deliverability Study. The Transmission Owner(s) responsible for constructing a Highway System Deliverability Upgrade shall request Incremental TCCs with respect to the Highway System Deliverability Upgrade in accordance with the requirements of Section 19.2.4 of Attachment M of the ISO OATT. A Developer paying for Highway System Deliverability Upgrades will receive the right to accept any Incremental TCCs awarded by the ISO, in proportion to its contribution to the to the total cost of the Highway System Deliverability Upgrade. The ISO shall round any non-whole MW quantities to a whole number of Incremental TCCs in a manner that ensures that the sum of all individual allocations to eligible entities is equal to the total number of Incremental TCCs awarded to the Highway System Deliverability Upgrade; provided, however, that a Developer will not be entitled to receive any Incremental TCCs if the whole number value determined by the ISO for the subsequent Developer’s proportionate share is zero. If a Developer elects to accept its proportionate share of any Incremental TCCs resulting from the Highway System Deliverability Upgrade, the Developer shall be the Primary Holder of such Incremental TCCs. If a Developer declines an award of its proportionate share of any Incremental TCCs resulting from the Highway System Deliverability Upgrade, or subsequently terminates the Incremental TCCs it elected to receive in accordance with Section 19.2.4.9 of Attachment M of the ISO OATT, the declined or terminated Incremental TCCs will be deemed reserved to the extent necessary to facilitate the potential for transfers to subsequent Developers that pay for the use of Headroom pursuant to this Attachment S on a Highway System Deliverability Upgrade that has been awarded Incremental TCCs. Incremental TCCs that are declined or terminated by a Developer and not otherwise deemed reserved will be deemed permanently terminated. Incremental TCCs related to a Highway System Del...
HIGHWAYS. 1.9 The applicant agrees to contribute towards improvements to the local highway network and/ or encouraging the use of sustainable modes of transport where appropriate, necessary and directly related to the impacts of the proposed development. This will be subject to discussions with the Local Highway Authority through the course of the planning application.
HIGHWAYS. Design Services Contract (2023-0420) between MDOT and Fishbeck, Xxxxxxxx, Xxxx and Xxxxx, Inc., will provide for design services to be performed for a bridge replacement on M-43 over the Red Cedar River in Meridian Township, Ingham County (CS 33082 – JN 211428PE- S). The work items will include performing design surveys; performing hydraulic surveys; performing structure soils investigations; preparing required plans, typical cross- sections, details, and specifications; computing and verifying all plan quantities; and preparing staging plans and special provisions for maintaining traffic during construction. The contract will be in effect from the date of award through December 6, 2024. The contract amount will be $665,943.27. Source of Funds: 100% State Restricted Trunkline Funds.
HIGHWAYS. Design Services Contract (2023-0435) between MDOT and Orchard, Xxxxx & XxXxxxxxx, Inc., will provide for design services to be performed for a non-motorized trail along the north side of M-22 (West Harbor Highway) from South Bohemian Road (County Road 669) to the West Traverse Lake Road south junction, then north along the west side of West Traverse Lake Road to the National Park Service property, then east and north to Good Harbor Trail, in Leelanau County. The work items will include analyzing geotechnical soil boring data; preparing required plans, typical cross-sections, details, and specifications; computing and verifying all plan quantities; and preparing staging plans and special provisions for maintaining traffic during construction. The contract will be in effect from the date of award through March 23, 2025. The contract amount will not exceed $659,954.91. Source of Funds: 100% Federal Highway Administrative Funds.
HIGHWAYS. INFORMATIVES The Local Planning Authority recommends that developers of housing estates should enter into formal agreement with the Highway Authority under Section 38 of the Highways Act 1980 relating to the construction and subsequent adoption of Estate Roads. The works within the public highway will be required to be designed and constructed in accordance with the County Council's specification. The applicant will also be required to enter into a legal agreement under the provisions of Section 278 of the Highways Act 1980 relating to the construction and subsequent adoption of the highway improvements . Amongst other things the Agreement will cover the specification of the highway works, safety audit procedures, construction and supervision and inspection of the works, bonding arrangements, indemnity of the County Council regarding noise insulation and land compensation claims, commuted sums, and changes to the existing street lighting and signing. Public Transport have requested a Real Time Passenger Information screen to be installed in the library. The county may consider a CIL contribution for this service.
HIGHWAYS. 1. Both the County and TekSavvy acknowledge and agree that County Road 2 and County Road 39 and the associated rights-of-way are the only Highways authorized for use by TekSavvy and its agents and/or contractors, for the Installation.
