HIGHWAYS. Agreement relating to the construction of the inter-American highway. Exchange of notes at Washington January 30 and February 13, 1942; entered into force February 13, 1942. 56 Stat. 1842; EAS 294; 7 Xxxxxx 558; 23 UNTS 293. Amendment: February 19 and March 19, 1951 (2 UST 1840; TIAS 2318; 134 UNTS 245). Arrangement relating to workmen’s com- pensation and unemployment insurance for American citizens employed on projects in El Salvador. Exchange of notes at San Salvador September 24, 28, and 29, 1943; entered into force September 29, 1943. 7 Xxxxxx 586.
HIGHWAYS. Agreement for cooperation in the construction of the Colombia segment of the Darien Gap Highway. Signed at Washington May 6, 1971; entered into force May 6, 1971.
HIGHWAYS. Agreement providing for the construction of a military highway to Alaska. Exchange of notes at Ottawa March 17 and 18, 1942; entered into force March 18, 1942. 56 Stat. 1458; EAS 246; 6 Bevans 261; 101 UNTS 205. Agreement relating to the southern terminus of the Alaska Highway. Exchange of notes at Ot- tawa May 4 and 9, 1942; entered into force May 9, 1942. 57 Stat. 1373; EAS 380; 6 Bevans 274; 101 UNTS 215. Agreement relating to the construction of flight strips along the Alaska Highway. Exchange of notes at Ottawa August 26 and September 10, 1942; entered into force September 10, 1942. 57 Stat. 1375; EAS 381; 6 Bevans 282; 101 UNTS 221. Agreement relating to the construction of the Haines-Champagne section of the Alaska Highway. Exchange of notes at Ottawa No- vember 28 and December 7, 1942; entered into force December 7, 1942. 57 Stat. 1377; EAS 382; 6 Bevans 295; 101 UNTS 227. Agreement relating to access to the Alaska Highway. Exchange of notes at Ottawa April 10, 1943; entered into force April 10, 1943. 57 Stat. 1274; EAS 362; 6 Bevans 319; 21 UNTS 237. Agreement relating to the designation of the highway from Dawson Creek, British Colum- bia, to Fairbanks, Alaska, as the ‘‘Alaska Highway’’. Exchange of notes at Washington July 19, 1943; entered into force July 19, 1943. 57 Stat. 1023; EAS 331; 6 Bevans 324; 29 UNTS 289. Agreement relating to cooperation in recon- struction of Canadian portions of the Alaska Highway. Exchange of notes at Ottawa January 11 and February 11, 1977; entered into force February 11, 1977. 28 UST 5303; TIAS 8631; 1087 UNTS 3.
HIGHWAYS. Agreement relating to the construction of the inter-American highway. Exchange of notes at Washington April 8, 1942; entered into force April 8, 1942. 56 Stat. 1845; EAS 295; 10 Xxxxxx 424; 24 UNTS 145. Amendment: April 4 and 20, 1951 (2 UST 1848; TIAS 2320; 138 UNTS 57). Agreement relating to the construction of the Rama Road. Exchange of notes at Washington April 8 and 18, 1942; entered into force April 18, 1942. 2 UST 722; TIAS 2229; 132 UNTS 343.
HIGHWAYS. The Developer of a Class Year XXXX Project will pay an allocated share of the cost of the System Deliverability Upgrades to any Highway needed to make the Class Year Project deliverable in accordance with these rules. The System Deliverability Upgrades on the Highway or Highways, and the Developer’s allocated share of the cost of those System Deliverability Upgrades, will be identified by the ISO, with input from the Connecting Transmission Owner and from the Affected Transmission Owner(s), in the Class Year Deliverability Study. The Transmission Owner(s) responsible for constructing a Highway System Deliverability Upgrade shall request Incremental TCCs with respect to the Highway System Deliverability Upgrade in accordance with the requirements of Section 19.2.4 of Attachment M of the ISO OATT. A Developer paying for Highway System Deliverability Upgrades will receive the right to accept any Incremental TCCs awarded by the ISO, in proportion to its contribution to the to the total cost of the Highway System Deliverability Upgrade. The ISO shall round any non-whole MW quantities to a whole number of Incremental TCCs in a manner that ensures that the sum of all individual allocations to eligible entities is equal to the total number of Incremental TCCs awarded to the Highway System Deliverability Upgrade; provided, however, that a Developer will not be entitled to receive any Incremental TCCs if the whole number value determined by the ISO for the subsequent Developer’s proportionate share is zero. If a Developer elects to accept its proportionate share of any Incremental TCCs resulting from the Highway System Deliverability Upgrade, the Developer shall be the Primary Holder of such Incremental TCCs. If a Developer declines an award of its proportionate share of any Incremental TCCs resulting from the Highway System Deliverability Upgrade, or subsequently terminates the Incremental TCCs it elected to receive in accordance with Section 19.2.4.9 of Attachment M of the ISO OATT, the declined or terminated Incremental TCCs will be deemed reserved to the extent necessary to facilitate the potential for transfers to subsequent Developers that pay for the use of Headroom pursuant to this Attachment S on a Highway System Deliverability Upgrade that has been awarded Incremental TCCs. Incremental TCCs that are declined or terminated by a Developer and not otherwise deemed reserved will be deemed permanently terminated. Incremental TCCs related to a Highway System Del...
HIGHWAYS. INFORMATIVES The Local Planning Authority recommends that developers of housing estates should enter into formal agreement with the Highway Authority under Section 38 of the Highways Act 1980 relating to the construction and subsequent adoption of Estate Roads. The works within the public highway will be required to be designed and constructed in accordance with the County Council's specification. The applicant will also be required to enter into a legal agreement under the provisions of Section 278 of the Highways Act 1980 relating to the construction and subsequent adoption of the highway improvements . Amongst other things the Agreement will cover the specification of the highway works, safety audit procedures, construction and supervision and inspection of the works, bonding arrangements, indemnity of the County Council regarding noise insulation and land compensation claims, commuted sums, and changes to the existing street lighting and signing. Public Transport have requested a Real Time Passenger Information screen to be installed in the library. The county may consider a CIL contribution for this service.
HIGHWAYS. Design Services
HIGHWAYS. The applicant agrees to contribute towards improvements to the local highway network and/ or encouraging the use of sustainable modes of transport where appropriate, necessary and directly related to the impacts of the proposed development. This will be subject to discussions with the Local Highway Authority through the course of the planning application.
HIGHWAYS. 8.1 Both the County and NFTC acknowledge and agree that only those Highways specified on any Permit issued to NFTC for its Work, or such further Highways of the County as the County may expressly agree following the issuance of the applicable Permit, are the only Highways authorized for use by NFTC and its agents and/or contractors, for the Works and the Installation.
8.2 If and to the extent NFTC wishes, after commencement of the Works pursuant to a Permit, to alter the specific placement of the Installation set out in the Approved Plans, NFTC shall request and obtain the prior written approval of the County Engineer prior to altering the Works contained in the Approved Plan, by way of an amendment of the existing Permit or the issuing of a new Permit.
8.3 In the event it becomes necessary, during the construction of the Installation, for NFTC to transport goods by way of oversized loads on any County Highway(s), NFTC shall obtain all of the necessary permits from the County to do so, including posting any security required pursuant to such permits, and to comply with any reasonable conditions that may be required or imposed by the County at that time. Provision of such approvals shall be subject to the timelines specified in Section 7.
8.4 NFTC hereby agrees to comply with the provisions of relevant By- laws of the County with respect to weight restrictions on the Highways, unless and until it receives the express written permission of the County Engineer to be exempted from the weight restrictions, with such permission and terms of such permission at the sole and absolute discretion of the County Engineer.
HIGHWAYS. 8.1 Both the County and TELUS acknowledge and agree that only those Highways specified on any Permit issued to TELUS for its Work, or such further Highways of the County as the County may expressly agree following the issuance of the applicable Permit, are the only Highways authorized for use by TELUS and its agents and/or contractors, for the Works and the Installation.
8.2 If and to the extent TELUS wishes, after commencement of the Works pursuant to a Permit, to alter the specific placement of the Installation set out in the Approved Plans, TELUS shall request and obtain the prior written approval of the County Engineer prior to altering the Works contained in the Approved Plan, by way of an amendment of the existing Permit or the issuing of a new Permit.
8.3 In the event it becomes necessary, during the construction of the Installation, for TELUS to transport goods by way of oversized loads on any County Highway(s), TELUS shall obtain all of the necessary permits from the County to do so, including posting any security required pursuant to such permits, and to comply with any reasonable conditions that may be required or imposed by the County at that time. Provision of such approvals shall be subject to the timelines specified in Section 7.
8.4 TELUS hereby agrees to comply with the provisions of relevant By- laws of the County with respect to weight restrictions on the Highways, unless and until it receives the express written permission of the County Engineer to be exempted from the weight restrictions, with such permission and terms of such permission at the sole and absolute discretion of the County Engineer.
