Interpreters v. Total hours and cost billed for Interpreter services (including No Shows/Cancellations);
Interpreters. For out-of-court attorney/client communications, Contractor shall give preference to interpreters who are certified by the Office of the State Court Administrator (OSCA), under ORS 45.291. If no certified interpreter is available, Contractor may use a qualified interpreter, as defined in ORS 45.275(8)(b). Contractor shall ensure that all interpreters who are staff employees or who subcontract with Contractor and provide in-court interpretation comply with all certification requirements established by OSCA and the Code of Professional Responsibility for Interpreters in Oregon.
Interpreters. The Employer shall release with pay those Interpreters who are required by the State of Michigan or other regulatory Agency to attend workshops in order to maintain their certification. This shall not require the District to pay for non‐school days or fees associated with testing or certification.
Interpreters. Any party wishing an interpreter shall make all arrangements directly with the interpreter and shall assume the costs of the service.
Interpreters. The court may select, appoint, and set the rea- sonable compensation for an interpreter. The compensation must be paid from funds provided by law or by the government, as the court may direct. (As amended Feb. 28, 1966, eff. July 1, 1966; Nov. 20, 1972, eff. July 1, 1975; Apr. 29, 2002, eff. Dec. 1, 2002.) NOTES OF ADVISORY COMMITTEE ON RULES—1944 The power of the court to call its own witnesses, though rarely invoked, is recognized in the Federal courts, Young v. United States, 107 F.2d 490 (C.C.A. 5th); Xxxxxxxxx v. United States, 44 F.2d 45 (C.C.A. 7th). This rule provides a procedure whereby the court may, if it chooses, exercise this power in connection with expert witnesses. The rule is based, in part, on the Uniform Expert Testimony Act, drafted by the Commissioners on Uniform State Laws, Hand Book of the National Con- xxxxxxx of Commissioners on Uniform State La s (1937), 337; see, also, Wigmore—Evidence, 3d Ed., sec. 563; A.L.I. Code of Criminal Procedure, secs. 307–309; National Commission on Law of Observance and Enforcement— Report on Criminal Procedure, 37. Similar provisions are found in the statutes of a number of States: Wiscon- sin—Wis.Stat. (1941), sec. 357.12; Indiana—Ind.Stat.Xxx. (Xxxxx, 1933), sec. 9–1702; California—Cal.Pen.Code (Xxxxxxx, 1941), sec. 1027. NOTES OF ADVISORY COMMITTEE ON RULES—1966 AMENDMENT Subdivision (a).—The original rule is made a separate subdivision. The amendment permits the court to in- form the witness of his duties in writing since it often constitutes an unnecessary inconvenience and expense to require the witness to appear in court for such pur- pose. Subdivision (b).—This new subdivision authorizes the court to appoint and provide for the compensation of interpreters. General language is used to give discre- tion to the court to appoint interpreters in all appro- priate situations. Interpreters may be needed to inter- pret the testimony of non-English speaking witnesses or to assist non-English speaking defendants in under- standing the proceedings or in communicating with as- signed counsel. Interpreters may also be needed where a witness or a defendant is deaf. NOTES OF ADVISORY COMMITTEE ON RULES—1972 AMENDMENT Subdivision (a). This subdivision is stricken, since the subject of court-appointed expert witnesses is cov- ered in Evidence Rule 706 in detail. Subdivision (b). The provisions of subdivision (b) are retained. Although Evidence Rule 703 specifies the qualifications of interpreters and the form...
Interpreters. (i) a record showing interpreter services provided after the date of the Agreement, which includes the inmate for whom each interpreting service was provided; the date the service was provided; the reason/event for which the service was provided; and the name of the interpreter;
Interpreters. 1. Adjustments to higher salary levels for interpreters shall be made only upon the receipt of an official copy of the Educational Interpreter Certificate, which attests to the level of interpretive skills or demonstration of competencies as called for in the official job description. In the event qualified applicants cannot be found to fill an opening, persons approved by LESPA and the Board shall evaluate applicants’ general ability to interpret/translate sign to voice and voice to sign as required by the site where the vacancy exists. Salary adjustments will be made upon submission of an official copy of the Educational Interpreter Certificate or Registry of Interpreter for the Deaf Certificate or an assessment of ability as called for in the official job description. Movement to higher salary levels shall be permitted only at the beginning of each semester of the regular school year. Verification of previous work experience will be acknowledged in the initial placement on the salary schedule.
Interpreters. Employees will not be required to provide interpreter services for other employees, patient or family members. Employees may do so on voluntary basis and with permission from the supervisor.
Interpreters. An employee who has been assigned by the Employer to provide conversational language services shall receive an extra 1% of base pay while assigned to such duties. Additionally:
Interpreters. Contractor shall ensure that all interpreters who are staff employees or who subcontract with Contractor and provide in-court interpretation comply with all certification requirements established by SCA and the Code of Professional Responsibility for Interpreters in Oregon.
