Justice. To be fair in the treatment of all clients; to provide appropriate services to all.
Justice. In any location where there are two (2) or more permanently assigned bargaining unit employees, such employees shall be entitled to have one (1) Xxxxxxx per fifty (50) such employees or portion thereof. The Agency shall make an effort to arrange investigatory meetings so that a worksite Xxxxxxx is available to attend.
Justice. In any location where there are two (2) or more permanently assigned bargaining unit employees, such employees will be entitled to have one (1) Xxxxxxx per fifty (50) such employees or portion thereof. The Agency will make an effort to arrange investigatory meetings so that a worksite Xxxxxxx is available to attend. If no Xxxxxxx is available for employee representation at the employee’s worksite, the employee will select a Xxxxxxx from the next closest worksite (as determined by road miles). At the employee’s request, the Agency will provide the employee a list of all Stewards at the next closest worksite. A Xxxxxxx may also not be considered “available” if the Xxxxxxx or employee reasonably determines that a conflict of interest between the Xxxxxxx and employees exists, which would interfere with the Xxxxxxx’x capacity to act in the best interests of the employee.
Justice. XxXxxx ―had difficulty in finding a justification for clemency in any of these cases.‖ He nevertheless significantly reduced the sentences of all seven petitioners
Justice. To be fair in the treatment of all clients; to provide appropriate services to all. Nonmaleficence: To do no harm to others. Veracity: To be honest and truthful.
Justice. With regard to justice, it has been agreed to establish a Special Jurisdiction for Peace (Jurisdicción Especial para la Paz).
Justice. As a prior action the authorities will propose and subsequently implement a three years strategic plan for the improvement of the functioning of the judicial system. The plan should encompass key actions aimed at enhancing judicial efficiency, speeding up judicial proceedings and addressing shortcomings in the functioning of courts such as, but not limited to, collecting information on the situation of the courts, computerization, developing alternative means for dispute resolution, such as mediation, rationalizing the cost of litigation and improving in court functioning and court management. The authorities will take all the necessary steps to ensure the full transition to the new provisions of the Code of Civil Procedure (CCP) which became effective as of 1 January 2016, in particular by adopting (key deliverable) the Presidential Decrees required by Article 1 (Ninth Article) of Law 4335/2015 which will provide for the implementation the following provisions of the revised CCP: Articles 954(4)(c), 955 (2)(b), 965(5)(i), 973(1)(c) and (3)(d) and 995(4)(b) on the electronic publication and advertising of auctions on a dedicated website, by May 2016; Articles 993(2)(c) on the determination of the value of the property seized on the basis of its market value and Article 995(1)(d) on the first offer price for the auction. The Presidential Decree will notably set out the method for the determination of the market value of the seized property, the entity responsible for determining the value and any other relevant details, and will provide that the first offer price for the auction will be the market value of the seized property as determined at the time of the seizure, by June 2016. By September 2016, the authorities will adopt the Presidential Decree under Article 1 (Ninth Article) § 16 of Law 4335/2015, to regulate all relevant details and requirements allowing to implement electronic auctions. The operational implementation of electronic auctions will occur in December 2016. The authorities, in order to implement the provisions of Article 1 (Ninth Article) of Law 4335/2015 concerning the implementation of Article 237(4)(e) and (f) and (6)(b) and (c) of the CCP, regarding the registration of cases in the e-docket will provide for a draft Presidential Decree by June 2016, a roadmap for the implementation of the registration of cases in the e-docket by September 2016, and adopt, as a Key deliverable, the Presidential Decree by December 2016 ; The authorities,...
Justice. The criminal justice system (and relevant elements of the civil justice system) will continue to be responsible for meeting the needs of people with disability in line with the National Disability Strategy and existing legal obligations, including making reasonable adjustments in accordance with the Disability Discrimination Act 1992 (CTH), through: a. ensuring its systems, supports and buildings are accessible for people with disability including appropriate communication and engagement mechanisms, adjustments to the physical environment, accessible legal assistance services and appropriate fee waivers; b. general programs for the wider population, including programs to prevent offending and minimise risks of offending and reoffending and the diversion of young people and adults from the criminal justice system; and c. the management of community corrections, including corrections-related supervision for offenders on community based orders. 2. Other parties and systems will be responsible for supports for people subject to a custodial sentence or other custodial order imposed by a court or remanded in custody. This includes where a court has ordered a person reside in a prison, or other facility accommodating people on custodial orders such as youth detention and training facilities, secure mental health facilities or secure facilities for people with disability. These parties are responsible for meeting the day-to-day care and support needs of people with disability in these custodial settings, including supervision, personal care and general supports which are also required by the general custodial population, and also general supports to enable skill development and living skills and promote the effective transition of people with disability out of custodial settings, in line with supports offered to other people in custodial settings. 3. The health system, mental health system and other parties will be responsible for operating secure mental health facilities which are primarily treatment focused.
Justice. In any society, holding people accountable for breaking the law is a fundamental responsibility of government. Doing so consistently and even-handedly reinforces belief in the integrity of government and reassures citizens that their society is safe, fair, and just. Major efforts have been undertaken to reform the criminal justice system, including the devolution of justice functions from Westminster and the establishment of the Police Service of Northern Ireland (PSNI). These and other reforms constitute real progress. At the time of the Belfast/Good Friday Agreement in 1998, however, there remained thousands of cases relating to the conflict that were unsolved or had been resolved by justice mechanisms that did not elicit full faith from all of society. New institutions were therefore created to address these particular incidents. The Historical Enquiries Team (HET), a unit reporting to the Chief Constable of the PSNI, is tasked specifically with reviewing the files of the more than 3,000 deaths that occurred between 1968 and 1998. Its mission is to uncover, where possible, information requested by the families of the deceased and, for unsolved murders, to determine if any evidence was missed that should be reinvestigated by the police. It has completed around 1,900 reviews to date, with approximately 600 cases, involving some 800 deaths, yet to be reviewed. The Police Ombudsman of Northern Ireland (PONI) serves as an independent and impartial investigator of complaints against the police. It is empowered to investigate ‘grave and exceptional’ historical offenses suspected to have been committed by police officers. Coroner’s inquests work through a process consistent with Article 2 of the European Convention on Human Rights to ascertain the circumstances of all suspicious deaths. Dozens of cases relating to the conflict are pending; some of them have never been investigated, while others are new inquests ordered by the Attorney General in light of fresh evidence. Coroner’s inquests have been broadened substantially in recent years, especially for inquests involving the state, in response to rulings from the European Court of Human Rights regarding their adherence to Article 2 procedural requirements. A fourth vehicle for addressing historical events, public inquiries, remains a discretionary tool for the governments of the United Kingdom and Ireland. All four institutions have conducted enormously difficult and politically sensitive investigative work in...
Justice. The authorities have adopted on 22 July 2015 the new Code of Civil Procedure, which will become effective as of 1 January 2016. The authorities will implement the revised Code of Civil Procedure, in accordance with the requirements set out in the transitional provisions of Article 1 (Ninth Article) of Law 4335/2015 and the roadmap for the implementation of the revised Code of Civil Procedure to be finalized by September 2015. The authorities will rationalise and introduce a selective increase of court fees, as well as increase transparency in this regard (October 2015). The authorities will propose measures to ensure access to justice by vulnerable persons (December 2015). The authorities will propose measures to reduce the backlog of cases in administrative courts by September 2015 and in civil courts by October 2015; they will agree on an action plan with European institutions including technical assistance on e-justice, mediation and judicial statistics (October 2015). The authorities will propose by November 2015 and subsequently implement a three years strategic plan for the improvement of the functioning of the justice system. The plan should encompass key actions aimed at enhancing judicial efficiency, speeding up judicial proceedings and addressing shortcomings in the functioning of courts such as, but not limited to, collecting information on the situation of the courts, computerization, developing alternative means for dispute resolution, such as mediation, rationalizing the cost of litigation and improving in court functioning and court management.
