Methodology Model Overview Sample Clauses

Methodology Model Overview. Figure 4 gives an overview about the most abstract view on the methodology. The methodology follows one to one the abstraction level principle of the EAST-ADL language, starting from the most abstract level, the vehicle phase, to the most concrete level, the implementation phase. The methodology shows an idealized forward process oriented view only. Iterations are not illus- trated in the methodology. This is reserved to the process instantiation in a concrete project. Figure 4 – Top level of the MAENAD methodology Figure 5 – Analysis Phase of the MAENAD methodology Figure 6 – Analysis Phase of the MAENAD methodology Figure 7 – Implementation Phase of the MAENAD methodology Standards managing functional safety aspects (e.g. ISO26262) usually are structured in a pro- cess-oriented manner. On the other hand standards which describe FEV specific features often refer to a concrete work product or to a specified vehicle part. Following these strategies the safety aspects given in the tables in chapter 4 (Methodology analy- sis) and in chapter 8 (Appendix ISO26262 Requirements) are grouped according the development process. The FEV aspects described in chapter 5 (Design Methodology Checklist for FEVs) are assigned to a specific subject. 4 Methodology analysis and Refinement for Safety and Electrical Vehicle Design To define the MAENAD EAST-ADL methodology, the ATESST2 methodology was used as a basis. The normative regulation for functional safety in the automotive domain, ISO 26262, has phases with sub-phases comprised by work products, tools and the responsible role. Both process models were compared regarding functional safety to identify needs on methodology content. The follow- ing tables show an excerpt of this analysis. ISO Part Phase Sub-phase Work Products Tools Activity Responsible LINK to Product Development Work Flow (EAST-ADL Based) EAST-ADL artifacts P a r t 2 S a f e t y m a n a g e m e n t Overall safety management Organization-specific rules and processes for functional safety Not applicable Product Liability Manager Vehicle Level Analysis Level Design Level N/A Evidence of competence Not applicable Product Liability Manager Vehicle Level Analysis Level Design Level N/A Evidence of quality management Not applicable Product Liability Manager Vehicle Level Analysis Level Design Level N/A Safety management during the concept phase and the product development Safety plan Compatible with traceability requirements, change mangement, configuration… Safe...
AutoNDA by SimpleDocs

Related to Methodology Model Overview

  • Methodology 1. The price at which the Assuming Institution sells or disposes of Qualified Financial Contracts will be deemed to be the fair market value of such contracts, if such sale or disposition occurs at prevailing market rates within a predefined timetable as agreed upon by the Assuming Institution and the Receiver.

  • Calculation methodology No adjustment in the Conversion Price need be made unless the adjustment would require an increase or decrease of at least 1% in the Conversion Price then in effect, provided that any adjustment that would otherwise be required to be made shall be carried forward and taken into account in any subsequent adjustment. Except as stated in this Article VI, the Conversion Rate will not be adjusted for the issuance of Common Stock or any securities convertible into or exchangeable for Common Stock or carrying the right to purchase any of the foregoing. Any adjustments that are made shall be carried forward and taken into account in any subsequent adjustment. All calculations under Article V and Section 6.06 hereof and this Section 6.07 shall be made to the nearest cent or to the nearest 1/10,000th of a share, as the case may be.

  • Technical Standards Applicable to a Wind Generating Plant i. Low Voltage Ride-Through (LVRT) Capability A wind generating plant shall be able to remain online during voltage disturbances up to the time periods and associated voltage levels set forth in the standard below. The LVRT standard provides for a transition period standard and a post-transition period standard.

  • Financial Model 37.1 Unless otherwise agreed between the parties, any amendments to the Financial Model shall reflect, be consistent with and be made only in accordance with the provisions of this Agreement, and shall in all cases be subject to the prior written approval of the Authority (such approval not to be unreasonably withheld or delayed). In the event that the parties fail to agree any proposed amendments to the Financial Model, the matter shall be referred for resolution in accordance with Schedule Part 20 (Dispute Resolution Procedure).

  • Program Overview A. Goals of the Choice Neighborhoods Program. The Choice Neighborhoods Program employs a comprehensive approach to neighborhood transformation. The program transforms neighborhoods of concentrated poverty into mixed-income neighborhoods of long-term viability by revitalizing severely distressed public and/or assisted housing; improving access to economic opportunities; and investing and leveraging investments in well-functioning services, effective schools and education programs, public assets, public transportation, and improved access to jobs. Choice Neighborhoods ensures that current residents benefit from this transformation by preserving affordable housing in the neighborhood or providing the choice to move to affordable housing in another neighborhood of opportunity. The purpose of this grant is to implement a Transformation Plan that has been developed through a local planning process and furthers the goals of the Choice Neighborhoods Program. The core goals of Choice Neighborhoods are:

  • Claims Review Methodology a. C laims Review Population. A description of the Population subject to the Quarterly Claims Review.‌

  • DATA FOR CALCULATIONS The initial calculations for any payments owing under this Agreement shall be based upon the valuations placed upon the Qualified Property by the Appraisal District in its annual certified appraisal roll submitted to the District pursuant to § 26.01 of the TEXAS TAX CODE in or about July of each year of this Agreement. The certified appraisal roll data shall form the basis from which any and all amounts due under this Agreement are calculated, and the data utilized by the Consultant will be adjusted as necessary to reflect any subsequent adjustments by the Appraisal District to the District’s appraisal roll. Any estimates used by the Consultant to make calculations as required by this Agreement shall be based on the best and most current information available. The Consultant shall from time to time adjust the data utilized to reflect actual amounts, subsequent adjustments by the Appraisal District to the District’s certified appraisal roll, or any other relevant changes to material items such as student counts or tax collections.

  • Construction Progress Schedule; Overall Project Schedule The Contractor shall submit for review by the Design Professional and approval by the Owner a Construction Progress Schedule based upon the Design Professional’s Preliminary Design and Construction Schedule and prepared using a CPM (Critical Path Method) process within sixty days after the Effective Date of the Contract, utilizing a full-featured software package in a form satisfactory to the Design Professional and Owner, showing the dates for commencement and completion of the Work required by the Contract Documents, including coordination of mechanical, plumbing, and electrical disciplines, as well as coordination of the various subdivisions of the Work within the Contract. Milestones must be clearly indicated and sequentially organized to identify the critical path of the Project. The Construction Schedule will be developed to represent the CSI specification divisions. It shall have the minimum number of activities required to adequately represent to the Owner the complete scope of Work and define the Project’s (and each Phase’s if phased) critical path and associated activities. The format of the Construction Progress Schedule will have dependencies indicated on a monthly grid identifying milestone dates such as construction start, phase construction, structural top out, dry-in, rough-in completion, metal stud and drywall completion, equipment installation, systems operational, inspections for Material Completion and Occupancy Date, and Final Completion Date. The Contractor shall submit, along with the Construction Progress Schedule, the Submittal Schedule for approval by the Design Professional, correlating the associated approval dates for the documents with the Construction Progress Schedule. Upon recommendation by the Design Professional and approval by the Owner, the Construction Progress Schedule shall become the Overall Project Schedule, which shall be utilized by the Design Professional, Owner and Contractor. The Contractor must provide the Design Professional and the Owner with monthly updates of the Overall Project Schedule indicating completed activities and any changes in sequencing or activity durations, including approved change orders. See also Article 3.3.5.

  • Cost for Service and Charge Methodology – POS to The NWSA Service Area and Department (Acct if appropriate) Service Item (from list above) Method of Charges1 Basis for Charge Hourly Rate, Fixed Percentage or Formula 2021 Budgeted Amount2 Commission Office Dept #1200 3.a Fixed Based upon agreed amount of $250,000 per year. $250,000

  • OGS Centralized Contract Modifications OGS, an Authorized User, or the Contractor may suggest modifications to the Centralized Contract or its Appendices. Except as specifically provided herein, modifications to the terms and conditions set forth herein may only be made with mutual written agreement of the Parties. Modifications may take the form of an update or an amendment. “

Draft better contracts in just 5 minutes Get the weekly Law Insider newsletter packed with expert videos, webinars, ebooks, and more!