Methodology Model Overview Sample Clauses

Methodology Model Overview. Figure 4 gives an overview about the most abstract view on the methodology. The methodology follows one to one the abstraction level principle of the EAST-ADL language, starting from the most abstract level, the vehicle phase, to the most concrete level, the implementation phase. The methodology shows an idealized forward process oriented view only. Iterations are not illus- trated in the methodology. This is reserved to the process instantiation in a concrete project. Standards managing functional safety aspects (e.g. ISO26262) usually are structured in a pro- cess-oriented manner. On the other hand standards which describe FEV specific features often refer to a concrete work product or to a specified vehicle part. Following these strategies the safety aspects given in the tables in chapter 4 (Methodology analy- sis) and in chapter 8 (Appendix ISO26262 Requirements) are grouped according the development process. The FEV aspects described in chapter 5 (Design Methodology Checklist for FEVs) are assigned to a specific subject. To define the MAENAD EAST-ADL methodology, the ATESST2 methodology was used as a basis. The normative regulation for functional safety in the automotive domain, ISO 26262, has phases with sub-phases comprised by work products, tools and the responsible role. Both process models were compared regarding functional safety to identify needs on methodology content. The follow- ing tables show an excerpt of this analysis. ISO Part Phase Sub-phase Work Products Tools Activity Responsible LINK to Product Development Work Flow (EAST-ADL Based) EAST-ADL artifacts P a r t 2 S a f e t y m a n a g e m e n t Overall safety management Organization-specific rules and processes for functional safety Not applicable Product Liability Manager Vehicle Level Analysis Level Design Level N/A Evidence of competence Not applicable Product Liability Manager Vehicle Level Analysis Level Design Level N/A Evidence of quality management Not applicable Product Liability Manager Vehicle Level Analysis Level Design Level N/A Safety management during the concept phase and the product development Safety plan Compatible with traceability requirements, change mangement, configuration… Safety Manager Vehicle Level Analysis Level Design Level VVCase for detailed activities, SafetyCase structure for overall information structure, Requirements with Satisfy relation to Ground to detail the evidence required. Project plan (refined) Not applicable Project Manager N/A Safety case...
AutoNDA by SimpleDocs

Related to Methodology Model Overview

  • Methodology 1. The price at which the Assuming Institution sells or disposes of Qualified Financial Contracts will be deemed to be the fair market value of such contracts, if such sale or disposition occurs at prevailing market rates within a predefined timetable as agreed upon by the Assuming Institution and the Receiver. 2. In valuing all other Qualified Financial Contracts, the following principles will apply:

  • Service Providing Methodology 1.3.1 Party A and Party B agree that during the term of this Agreement, where necessary, Party B may enter into further service agreements with Party A or any other party designated by Party A, which shall provide the specific contents, manner, personnel, and fees for the specific services. 1.3.2 To fulfill this Agreement, Party A and Party B agree that during the term of this Agreement, where necessary, Party B may enter into equipment or property leases with Party A or any other party designated by Party A which shall permit Party B to use Party A’s relevant equipment or property based on the needs of the business of Party B. 1.3.3 Party B hereby grants to Party A an irrevocable and exclusive option to purchase from Party B, at Party A’s sole discretion, any or all of the assets and business of Party B, to the extent permitted under PRC law, at the lowest purchase price permitted by PRC law. The Parties shall then enter into a separate assets or business transfer agreement, specifying the terms and conditions of the transfer of the assets.

  • Financial Model The Financial Model has been prepared in good faith based on reasonable assumptions as to the estimates set forth therein and is consistent in all material respects with the provisions of the Material Contracts.

  • Program Overview Microsoft extends to eligible partners the opportunity to participate in the Program referenced above subject to these Program Terms & Conditions (“Program Terms”). Each entity participating in the Program is hereinafter referred to as a “Participant.” Participation in the Program is voluntary. The Program is governed by the Program Terms, which incorporate by reference the Microsoft Partner Network Agreement (as in effect between Microsoft and Participant, the “MPN Agreement”). Capitalized terms used but not defined in these Program Terms have the meanings assigned to them in the MPN Agreement. These Program Terms are subject to local requirements and may vary by jurisdiction, and Participant retains sole discretion to set pricing for sales of applicable products.

  • Flexible Work Schedule A flexible work schedule is any schedule that is not a regular, alternate, 9/80, or 4/10 work schedule and where the employee is not scheduled to work more than 40 hours in the "workweek" as defined in Subsections F. and H., below.

  • Claims Review Methodology ‌‌ a. C laims Review Population. A description of the Population subject‌‌ to the Quarterly Claims Review.

  • Commercial Operation Date Testing and Modifications Prior to the Commercial Operation Date, the Connecting Transmission Owner shall test the Connecting Transmission Owner’s Attachment Facilities (including required control technologies and protection systems) and System Upgrade Facilities and System Deliverability Upgrades and Developer shall test the Large Generating Facility and the Developer’s Attachment Facilities to ensure their safe and reliable operation. Similar testing may be required after initial operation. Developer and Connecting Transmission Owner shall each make any modifications to its facilities that are found to be necessary as a result of such testing. Developer shall bear the cost of all such testing and modifications. Developer shall generate test energy at the Large Generating Facility only if it has arranged for the injection of such test energy in accordance with NYISO procedures.

  • Post-Commercial Operation Date Testing and Modifications Each Party shall at its own expense perform routine inspection and testing of its facilities and equipment in accordance with Good Utility Practice as may be necessary to ensure the continued interconnection of the Large Generating Facility with the Participating TO’s Transmission System in a safe and reliable manner. Each Party shall have the right, upon advance written notice, to require reasonable additional testing of the other Party’s facilities, at the requesting Party’s expense, as may be in accordance with Good Utility Practice.

  • Milestone Schedule Please state the status and progress of each Milestone and identify any completed Milestone(s) for the previous calendar quarter.

  • Model List your model number of the product you are bidding.

Draft better contracts in just 5 minutes Get the weekly Law Insider newsletter packed with expert videos, webinars, ebooks, and more!