Mutual Accountability Sample Clauses

Mutual Accountability. The G8 members, the Government of Nigeria, and the private sector intend to review their collective performance under this document through an annual review process to be conducted jointly. These participants intend, in particular, to review progress toward jointly determined objectives on the basis of jointly determined benchmarks in contributing to the fulfillment of Nigeria's Agricultural Transformation Agenda. Agreed upon objectives include: (1) progress towards achieving wealth creation target through job creation; (2) G8 member commitments to align their agricultural investments to the Government of Nigeria’s ATA; (3) Government of Nigeria's progress in implementing its policy commitments and consulting with private-sector investors; and (4) the investment commitments of private-sector investors. The review will also take account of the shared responsibilities related to the Voluntary Guidelines and the rai.
Sample 1Sample 2
AutoNDA by SimpleDocs
Mutual Accountability. The District and External Operator will maintain open and honest communication and continue to work together through the Executive Action Team to share progress updates and take responsibility resolve any impediments to implementation.
Sample 1Sample 2
Mutual Accountability. The approach to mutual accountability affects the way that EPA and MPCA interact and is a change from EPA’s traditional approach to oversight. EPA and MPCA will agree on the appropriate level of EPA oversight of State program implementation. One primary consideration will be those program areas that are deemed to “need improvement.” However, EPA will continue to review and act on new regulations in program areas that impact State authorization or where federal statute or regulation requires EPA review and approval of State actions (e.g., water quality standards).
Sample 1
Mutual Accountability. This study will extensively approach the first three, the international rule of law, multilateralism, and collective responsibility, but it will still refer to all basic principles of international relations regulated by the UN and recently by the Rome Statute system. Sharing knowledge to develop global values in the international society is the function of public international organiza- tions and this is common either to the United Nations and the Rome Statute institutions as multilateral tools of governance. The scope is the protection of human rights, the promotion of human security, combining political con- sensus to an appropriate lawmaking process for the implementation of more democratic international regimes of complementary character. An exten- sive literature review has been performed considering both policy and legal aspects in the field of international criminal justice, and the ways new crimes would be considered for future reviews of the Rome Statute. in order to pro- pose a consolidation model between the United Nations and the Court’s regimes, the UN missions from peacekeeping to peace building, especially in the African Great Lakes Region where the Court is involved since the begin- ning of its investigative and prosecutorial activities, have been extensively examined. The intent is to promote democratic standards of interactions only achievable throughout concrete institutional reforms, which would also allow the extension of a universal jurisdiction to other serious crimes of com- mon concern and wider design of an architecture governing international threats and crimes.
Sample 1
Mutual Accountability. The approach from direct oversight to mutual accountability and joint assessment is a shift from the traditional approach. Ohio EPA and USEPA R5 will jointly assess each program element and determine the appropriate course change, as needed. USEPA R5 will review and act on new regulations in program areas that impact Ohio’s authorization or where Federal statute or regulation requires USEPA review and approval of State actions (e.g., water quality standards).
Sample 1
Mutual Accountability. [PSR, appendix 6 b (c)] Leaders agree that they will demonstrate mutual accountability by doing the following: a. Demonstrate open communication per Section 1, Part 2 of this agreement. b. File Quarterly Area Reports of their contacts with mothers to the ACL or her designee. c. File quarterly Group Treasurer’s Report to the ACL or her designee and the AFC or her designee. d. Communicate with the Area Database Administration Leader of any changes to her contact information, including but not limited to address, phone numbers and e-mail address. e. Uphold the LLLI Policies and Standing Rules. f. Uphold the Ethical Standards for Relationships among Leaders for La Leche League of Southern California/Southern Nevada (LLL So CA/NV). g. To nurture accountability and connections among Leaders:  Area Leaders will seek means of associating, making use of email, face-to-face meetings, Area Council meetings, Leader Days, Enrichment Workshops, and Area Conferences as time and resources allow.  Leaders are encouraged to share their La Leche League activities and stay in touch with each other via League Spirit, New & Notes and Area email lists.
Sample 1
Mutual Accountability. The approach from direct oversight to mutual accountability and joint assessment is a shift from the traditional approach. IDEM and USEPA R5 will jointly assess each program element and determine the appropriate course change, as needed. USEPA R5 will review and act on new regulations in program areas that impact Indiana’s authorization or where Federal statute or regulation requires USEPA review and approval of State actions (e.g., water quality standards).
Sample 1
AutoNDA by SimpleDocs
Mutual Accountability. Mutual accountability means that at each level of decision-making there are stated goals for planning, clear criteria for evaluation, mutually accepted measures of performance and easy access to appeals and reconsideration. This approach emphasizes the importance of coordinating planning, recruiting, hiring, tenure, promotion, merit, assessment and program evaluation. It is accomplished by the following: (1) that departments and colleges/University library set forth the standards and criteria on which faculty are to be evaluated and reviewed; (2) that department personnel committees and college personnel committees will serve an important advisory role such that disagreements between committees and chairs and deans must be addressed; (3) that there will be a regular career support peer review of all continuing faculty to provide a positive and systematic procedure for faculty development in the context and implementation of the department plan. This review will take place every three years. This review will consist of the member and a group of peers from the department and may include faculty members from other departments in the University at the discretion of the faculty member and department; (4) that there will be regular evaluation of department chairs by faculty, at least every two (2) years and annually by the xxxx; (5) that there will be regular evaluation of each xxxx; biannual evaluation by department chairs in conjunction with Chief Academic Officer’s evaluation and evaluation by faculty at least every three (3) years; (6) that the method of assessing the department’s progress on its plan will be created by each department and included within that plan; and (7) that department plans and department assessment plans will be an integral part of the program review process.
Sample 1

Related to Mutual Accountability

  • Accountability Actuaries and external auditors will be appointed by the Trust. Audited financial statements, and an actuarial evaluation report will be obtained for the Trust on an annual basis. The actuarial report will include projections for the Trust for a period of not less than 3 years into the future.

  • Service Accountability Agreements The HSP acknowledges that if the LHIN and the HSP enter into negotiations for a subsequent service accountability agreement, subsequent funding may be interrupted if the next service accountability agreement is not executed on or before the expiration date of this Agreement.

  • Health Care Accountability Ordinance If Administrative Code Chapter 12Q applies to this contract, Contractor shall comply with the requirements of Chapter 12Q. For each Covered Employee, Contractor shall provide the appropriate health benefit set forth in Section 12Q.3 of the HCAO. If Contractor chooses to offer the health plan option, such health plan shall meet the minimum standards set forth by the San Francisco Health Commission. Information about and the text of the Chapter 12Q, as well as the Health Commission’s minimum standards, is available on the web at xxxx://xxxxx.xxx/olse/hcao. Contractor is subject to the enforcement and penalty provisions in Chapter 12Q. Any Subcontract entered into by Contractor shall require any Subcontractor with 20 or more employees to comply with the requirements of the HCAO and shall contain contractual obligations substantially the same as those set forth in this Section.

  • A Service Accountability Agreement This Agreement is a service accountability agreement for the purposes of the Enabling Legislation.

  • Federal Funding Accountability and Transparency Act (FFATA Subrecipient shall comply with the requirements of 2 CFR part 25 Universal Identifier and System for Award Management (XXX). Subrecipient must have an active registration in XXX, xxxxx://xxx.xxx.gov/XXX/ in accordance with 2 CFR part 25, appendix A, and must have a Data Universal Numbering System (DUNS) number xxxxx://xxxxxx.xxx.xxx/webform/ Subrecipient must also comply with provisions of the Federal Funding Accountability and Transparency Act, which includes requirements on executive compensation, 2 CFR part 170 Reporting Subaward and Executive Compensation Information.

  • Wall Street Transparency and Accountability Act In connection with Section 739 of the Wall Street Transparency and Accountability Act of 2010 (“WSTAA”), the parties hereby agree that neither the enactment of WSTAA or any regulation under the WSTAA, nor any requirement under WSTAA or an amendment made by WSTAA, shall limit or otherwise impair either party’s otherwise applicable rights to terminate, renegotiate, modify, amend or supplement this Confirmation or the Agreement, as applicable, arising from a termination event, force majeure, illegality, increased costs, regulatory change or similar event under this Confirmation, the Equity Definitions incorporated herein, or the Agreement (including, but not limited to, rights arising from Change in Law, Hedging Disruption, Increased Cost of Hedging, an Excess Ownership Position, or Illegality (as defined in the Agreement)).

  • Wall Street Transparency and Accountability Act of 2010 The parties hereby agree that none of (i) Section 739 of the WSTAA, (ii) any similar legal certainty provision included in any legislation enacted, or rule or regulation promulgated, on or after the Trade Date, (iii) the enactment of the WSTAA or any regulation under the WSTAA, (iv) any requirement under the WSTAA or (v) any amendment made by the WSTAA shall limit or otherwise impair either party’s right to terminate, renegotiate, modify, amend or supplement this Confirmation or the Agreement, as applicable, arising from a termination event, force majeure, illegality, increased cost, regulatory change or similar event under this Confirmation, the Equity Definitions or the Agreement (including, but not limited to, any right arising from any Acceleration Event).

  • Portability (a) Employees are able to maintain their participation in the scheme should they transfer their employment between Catholic schools or to the Catholic Education Office. (b) The employee is obliged to notify the principal prior to appointment of their participation in the Deferred Salary Scheme and the date that leave is due to be taken. (c) Participation in the Deferred Salary Scheme shall not impede an application for employment in a Catholic school.

  • Health Insurance Portability and Accountability Act Grantee certifies that it is in compliance with the Health Insurance Portability and Accountability Act of 1996 (HIPAA), Public Law Xx. 000-000, 00 XXX Parts 160, 162 and 164, and the Social Security Act, 42 USC 1320d-2 through 1320d-7, in that it may not use or disclose protected health information other than as permitted or required by law and agrees to use appropriate safeguards to prevent use or disclosure of the protected health information. Grantee shall maintain, for a minimum of six (6) years, all protected health information.

  • Portability of Sick Leave 1. The employer will accept up to sixty (60) accumulated sick leave days from other school districts in British Columbia, for employees hired to or on exchange in the district. 2. An employee hired to or on exchange in the district shall accumulate and utilize sick leave credit according to the provisions of the Collective Agreement as it applies in that district.

Draft better contracts in just 5 minutes Get the weekly Law Insider newsletter packed with expert videos, webinars, ebooks, and more!