Noise Study Report Sample Clauses

Noise Study Report. The Noise Study Report (NSR) for this project was prepared by Xxxxx Xxxx on June 18, 2020 and approved by Xxxxx Xxxxxxx on June 18, 2020. The purpose of this NSR is to evaluate noise impacts and abatement, if necessary, under the requirements of Title 23, Part 772, of the Code of Federal Regulations (CFR), Procedures for Abatement of Highway Traffic Noise, related to the SR 70 Binney Junction Roadway Rehabilitation and Complete Streets Project. According to 23 CFR 772.3, all highway projects developed in conformance with this regulation are deemed to be in conformance with FHWA noise standards. Compliance with 23 CFR 772 provides compliance with the noise impact assessment requirements of NEPA. Future traffic noise levels under design-year build conditions are predicted to approach or exceed the noise abatement criteria (NAC) at outdoor areas of frequent human use associated with Activity Category B and Activity Category C land uses in the project area. As such, traffic noise impacts are predicted to occur due to operation of this project, and noise abatement was considered for four areas where noise impacts were predicted to occur under future build conditions. These four areas include: • Ellis Lake Park • B Street/Lakeside Court – Three Residential Area • B Street/18th Street – Marysville High School and Youth Center • Cemetery Road – Marysville Cemetery At residential land uses where noise levels were predicted to approach or exceed the NAC for Activity Category B land use, noise barriers were not found to be feasible due to driveway and sidewalk access requirements along B Street. At locations associated with the cemetery, two parks, Marysville High School, and the youth center where noise levels at outdoor areas were predicted to approach or exceed the NAC for Activity Category C land use, the areas that would be affected were not considered or assumed to be areas of frequent outdoor use. Because of these factors, noise abatement was not evaluated further. No adverse noise impacts from construction are anticipated. Construction would be conducted in accordance with Caltrans provisions in Section 14-8.02, Noise Control, of the 2018 Standard Specifications and applicable local noise standards. Furthermore, implementing the measures specified in Chapter 8, “Construction Noise,” would minimize temporary noise impacts from construction. See Attachment J, Noise Study Report, for more information. The Railroad Noise and Vibration Technical Report for this pr...
Sample 1Sample 2See All (4)
AutoNDA by SimpleDocs
Noise Study Report. TAHA will prepare a Noise Study consistent with the Caltrans Traffic Noise Analysis Protocol (April 2020). This process will begin with the preparation of a Work Plan to be approved by Caltrans. The Work Plan will identify traffic data, sensitive receptors (e.g., residences), noise monitoring locations, and methodology. The scope includes a series of short-term 20-minute measurements and up to two long- term 24-hour measurements. Construction noise will be assessed based on maximum equipment levels and frequency of occurrence near sensitive receptors. The noise levels will consider construction phase, engine type (diesel or gasoline), horsepower, load factor, and percentage of time in use. The construction section will discuss Caltrans Standard Specifications and local noise regulations. If necessary, avoidance and/or mitigation measures will be included to minimize or eliminate adverse construction noise impacts. Changes in operational noise levels will be assessed using Traffic Noise Model (TNM). The baseline noise condition will be estimated using traffic counts and speed information obtained during monitoring activities. No Build and Build Alternatives will be modeled using traffic conditions that generate the highest noise levels, vehicle mix, speed, and roadway configuration. The roadway configuration will be precisely based on engineering drawings. Noise abatement measures (soundwalls) will be evaluated based on benefits to receptors, acoustical feasibility, and reasonableness allowances. The Work Plan will set the framework for the analysis and minimize the potential for complications. XXXX will use the Work Plan to coordinate extensively with Caltrans staff to discuss and quickly resolve complications. As part of this task, XXXX will prepare a Draft Noise Abatement Decision Report (NADR) using information from the Noise Study Report, other relevant environmental studies, and design considerations. The NADR will include: • Noise abatement reasonableness allowances presented in the Noise Study Report. • Acoustical feasibility of noise abatement presented in the Noise Study Report. • Locations and dimensions of evaluated noise barriers. • Approved cost estimates of acoustically feasible noise abatement. • Non-acoustical feasibility issues of proposed noise abatement based on the best available design information available. • Effects of abatement, including effects on cultural resources, scenic views, hazardous materials, biological resources, and oth...
Sample 1
Noise Study Report. A Noise Study Report (NSR) will be updated to address the trips associated with the movement of import material from the mandatory borrow site.
Sample 1
Noise Study Report. CONSULTANT will address issues related to the traffic noise impact for use in the Environmental Document. A Noise Study Report (NSR) will be updated to analyze two
Sample 1
Noise Study Report. LSA will re-conduct noise level measurements to calibrate the FHWA’s Traffic Noise Model (TNM) Version 2.5 and update the NSR to evaluate the Design Variations to identify traffic noise impacts and abatement measures using the FHWA’s TNM Version 2.5. Noise abatement measures (noise barriers) designed to reduce long-term traffic noise impacts by 5 A-weighted decibels (dBA) or more, as required to be feasible, will be evaluated. The total reasonable allowance will be recalculated using the most recent cost allowance for each noise barrier. The remaining Caltrans review comments on the Draft NSR may need to be addressed. ⮚ Noise level measurements will be re-conducted to calibration the FHWA TNM version 2.5.
Sample 1

Related to Noise Study Report

  • Protocol The attached Protocol shall be an integral part of this Agreement.

  • Study Population Infants who underwent creation of an enterostomy receiving postoperative care and awaiting enterostomy closure: to be assessed for eligibility: n = 201 to be assigned to the study: n = 106 to be analysed: n = 106 Duration of intervention per patient of the intervention group: minimum 21 days/3 weeksuntil patient's weight >2000g, averaged 6 weeks between enterostomy creation and enterostomy closure Follow-up per patient: 3 months, 6 months and 12 months following enterostomy closure (12- month follow-up only applicable for patients that are recruited early enough to complete this follow-up within the 48 months of overall study duration).

  • Progress Reporting 5. The IP will submit to UNICEF narrative progress reports against the planned activities contained in the Programme Document, using the PDPR. Unless otherwise agreed between the Parties in writing, these reports will be submitted at the end of every Quarter. The final report will be submitted no later than thirty (30) calendar days after the end the Programme and will be provided together with the FACE form.

  • Clinical Studies The animal and other preclinical studies and clinical trials conducted by the Company or on behalf of the Company were, and, if still pending are, to the Company’s knowledge, being conducted in all material respects in compliance with all Applicable Laws and in accordance with experimental protocols, procedures and controls generally used by qualified experts in the preclinical study and clinical trials of new drugs and biologics as applied to comparable products to those being developed by the Company; the descriptions of the results of such preclinical studies and clinical trials contained in the Registration Statement and the Prospectus are accurate and complete in all material respects, and, except as set forth in the Registration Statement and the Prospectus, the Company has no knowledge of any other clinical trials or preclinical studies, the results of which reasonably call into question the clinical trial or preclinical study results described or referred to in the Registration Statement and the Prospectus when viewed in the context in which such results are described; and the Company has not received any written notices or correspondence from the FDA, the EMA, or any other domestic or foreign governmental agency requiring the termination, suspension or modification of any preclinical studies or clinical trials conducted by or on behalf of the Company that are described in the Registration Statement and the Prospectus or the results of which are referred to in the Registration Statement and the Prospectus.

Draft better contracts in just 5 minutes Get the weekly Law Insider newsletter packed with expert videos, webinars, ebooks, and more!