Noise Abatement Decision Report Sample Clauses

Noise Abatement Decision Report. The project does not qualify as a Type 1 project under 23 CFR 772 and it will not cause a traffic noise impact. Consideration of noise abatement is not required. No noise/vibration studies are required. However, because residences are present on both sides of SR 87 measures to reduce construction noise, especially at night, should be considered during the PS&E phase.
Sample 1Sample 2
AutoNDA by SimpleDocs
Noise Abatement Decision Report. The Noise Abatement Decision Report (NADR; approved December 2019, revised September 2020) presents the noise abatement recommendation based on acoustical and non-acoustical feasibility factors and the relationship between noise abatement allowances and the engineering cost estimate. The NADR is based on the project-specific Noise Study Report (NSR; Xxxxxx Xxxxx, December 2019) and Noise Study Report Addendum (Xxxxxx Xxxxx, September 2020). The NSR documents the assessment of existing and future (2045) traffic noise levels at noise- sensitive receptors in the vicinity of the proposed project and identifies whether preliminary noise abatement measures are necessary for the project to comply with State and Federal noise abatement/mitigation requirements. A summary of key information used in making the preliminary noise abatement decision is found in Table 6-4, below. 3 6 No 0 No $0 $791,680 No (new) 8 Yes N/A No $0 $922,240 No 10 Yes N/A No $0 $1,052,800 No 12 Yes 4 Yes $428,000 $1,183,360 No 14 Yes 4 Yes $428,000 $1,313,920 No 16 Yes 4 Yes $428,000 $1,444,480 No 4 6 Yes N/A No $0 $1,104,366 No Trail- Township (new) 8 Yes N/A No $0 $1,415,304 No 10 Yes 1 Yes $107,000 $1,733,390 No 12 Yes 1 Yes $107,000 $2,015,736 No 14 Yes 1 Yes $107,000 $2,326,674 No 16 Yes 1 Yes $107,000 $2,601,872 No 5 Laguna Creek (new) 6 Yes N/A No $0 $1,588,744 No 8 Yes N/A No $0 $1,784,992 No 10 Yes N/A No $0 $1,981,240 No 12 Yes 6 Yes $642,000 $2,177,488 No 14 Yes 6 Yes $642,000 $2,373,736 No 16 Yes 6 Yes $642,000 $2,569,984 No 6 Southbound before Xxxxxx Avenue (replacement) 6 No 0 No $0 $993,888 No 8 No 0 No $0 $1,273,216 No 101 Yes N/A No $0 $1,526,560 No 12 Yes N/A No $0 $1,792,896 No 14 Yes 15 Yes $1,605,000 $2,068,976 No 16 Yes 15 Yes $1,605,000 $2,338,560 No 10 Muirwood/ Stonedale (replacement) 6 Yes N/A No $0 $3,351,000 No 8 Yes N/A No $0 $4,468,000 No 101 Yes N/A No $0 $5,585,000 No 12 Yes N/A No $0 $6,702,000 No 14 Yes 34 Yes $3,638,000 $7,819,000 No 16 Yes 55 Yes $5,885,000 $8,936,000 No 7A Trail (new) 6 No 0 No $0 $3,685,800 No 8 No 0 No $0 $4,914,400 No 10 No 0 No $0 $6,143,000 No 12 Yes N/A No $0 $7,371,600 No 14 Yes N/A No $0 $8,600,200 No 16 Yes 9 Yes $963,000 $9,828,800 No 13-Relocated Canterbury 6 No 0 No $0 $1,686,432 No 8 Yes N/A No $0 $2,197,472 No 101 Yes N/A No $0 $2,682,960 No 12 Yes N/A No $0 $3,142,896 No 14 Yes 42 Yes $4,494,000 $3,577,280 Yes 16 Yes 42 Yes $4,494,000 $3,986,112 Yes 14A- Relocated Ironwood 6 No 0 No $0 $1,496,400 No 8 Yes N/A No $0 $1,948,80...
Sample 1Sample 2
Noise Abatement Decision Report. Noise abatement was not warranted for this project; therefore, a separate noise abatement study was not conducted.
Sample 1Sample 2
Noise Abatement Decision Report. The Noise Study Report for this project was prepared by ICF International and approved by the Environmental Engineering Branch Chief in October, 2019. There are no sensitive receptors adjacent to the project area. Traffic noise was modelled for existing and design year conditions. Traffic noise levels are predicted to increase by a maximum of 4 decibels, which is less than the threshold of 12 decibels. Results from the NSR indicated that implementation of the interchange improvements will also not result in noise levels that approach or exceed the applicable Noise Abatement Criteria at any modeled receivers. As such, noise abatement was not considered and a Noise Abatement Decision Report is not required for this project.
Sample 1Sample 2
Noise Abatement Decision Report. This project is not a Type I project, therefore there are no impacts to noise and no requirement for a Noise Abatement Decision Report.
Sample 1Sample 2
Noise Abatement Decision Report. The project is not identified as a Type 1 project under 23 CFR 772 or the Caltrans Traffic Noise Analysis Protocol. Therefore, neither a Noise Abatement Decision Report nor a Traffic Noise Study is required. Standard construction management practices will be adequate to prevent adverse noise impacts during construction.
Sample 1Sample 2
Noise Abatement Decision Report. LSA will update the Noise Abatement Decision Report (NADR) to include noise abatement measures identified for the Design Variations. The estimated noise barrier construction cost and nonacoustical factors related to feasibility will be obtained from the project engineer (Xxxxxxx Xxxxx). The report will update the summary of NSR results, the engineer’s cost estimate for the evaluated abatement, nonacoustical factors related to feasibility, preliminary noise abatement decisions, and secondary effects of abatement (e.g., impacts on cultural resources, scenic views, agriculture, hazardous materials, and biology).
Sample 1
AutoNDA by SimpleDocs
Noise Abatement Decision Report. N/A – Temporary increase in ambient noise and from truck operations would be less than significant per Draft Environmental Impact Report (begins on pg. 14-24)
Sample 1
Noise Abatement Decision Report. Not applicable to this project as there is no change to the horizontal or vertical alignment, change to the highway capacity or prediction for an increase in traffic volume because of this project in accordance with Title 23, CFR, Part 772 of the Federal Highway Administration (FHWA) standards.
Sample 1

Related to Noise Abatement Decision Report

  • Project Completion Report At the completion of construction and once a Project is placed in service, the Subrecipient must submit a Project Completion Report that includes the total number of units built and leased, affordable units built and leased, DR-MHP units built and leased, an accomplishment narrative, and the tenants names, demographics and income for each DR-MHP unit.

  • Punchlist Upon completion of the Performance Tests and prior to Substantial Completion, Owner and Contractor shall inspect Subproject 3, and Contractor shall prepare a proposed Punchlist of items identified as needing to be completed or corrected as a result of such inspection. Contractor shall promptly provide the proposed Punchlist to Owner for its review, together with an estimate of the time and cost necessary to complete or correct each Punchlist item. Contractor shall add to the proposed Punchlist any Punchlist items that are identified by Owner within ten (10) Days after Owner’s receipt of the proposed Punchlist from Contractor, and Contractor shall immediately initiate measures to complete or correct, as appropriate, any item on Contractor’s proposed Punchlist (including those items identified by Owner during Owner’s review) that are not of a Punchlist nature. Notwithstanding anything to the contrary in this Agreement, Contractor and Owner are not required as a condition of Substantial Completion to agree upon and identify every Punchlist item and include it on the Punchlist, but Contractor is required to complete as a condition of Substantial Completion all Work that does not meet the definition of Punchlist as provided in Section 1.1. In the event of a dispute regarding whether a specific item of Work meets the definition of Punchlist under Section 1.1, the Parties shall resolve such dispute in accordance with Section 18.1A. Owner shall provide Contractor with access to the Work after Substantial Completion sufficient to enable Contractor to complete all Punchlist items, so long as such access does not unreasonably interfere with operation of Subproject 3 after Substantial Completion or Subproject 1 or Subproject 2 after substantial completion of Subproject 1 or Subproject 2 (as applicable) under the Stage 1 EPC Agreement and subject to any reasonable security or safety requirements of Owner. Upon Contractor’s completion or correction of any items necessary to achieve Substantial Completion, as modified by any Owner additions, such Punchlist shall govern Contractor’s performance of the Punchlist items up to Final Completion. All Work on the Punchlist shall be completed by the date required for Final Completion, as specified in Section 5.3C, or Owner may, in addition to any other rights that it may have under this Agreement, complete such Punchlist Work at the expense of Contractor. In the event Owner elects to complete such Punchlist Work, Contractor shall pay Owner, within ten (10) Days after receipt of written notice from Owner, all reasonable costs and expenses incurred by Owner in performing such Punchlist Work, or, at Owner’s sole discretion, Owner may withhold or offset amounts owed to Contractor or collect on the Letter of Credit in accordance with Section 7.8 in the amount of such costs and expenses. Any Defective Work identified after agreement between the Parties of the Punchlist shall be corrected by Contractor as a Warranty item under Article 12.

  • Construction Reports Each Constructing Entity shall issue reports to each other Construction Party on a monthly basis, and at such other times as reasonably requested, regarding the status of the construction and installation of the Interconnection Facilities. Each Construction Party shall promptly identify, and shall notify each other Construction Party of, any event that the Construction Party reasonably expects may delay completion, or may significantly increase the cost, of the Interconnection Facilities. Should a Construction Party report such an event, Transmission Provider shall, within fifteen days of such notification, convene a technical meeting of the Construction Parties to evaluate schedule alternatives.

  • Review Protocol A narrative description of how the Claims Review was conducted and what was evaluated.

  • Final Project Report Prepare a Final Project Report that addresses, to the extent feasible, comments made by the Grant Manager on the Draft Final Project Report. Submit one (1) reproducible master and an electronic copy of the final. Upload an electronic copy of the final report in pdf format to the FAAST system.

  • Drug-Free Workplace Certification As required by Executive Order No. 90-5 dated April 12, 1990, issued by the Governor of Indiana, the Company hereby covenants and agrees to make a good faith effort to provide and maintain a drug-free workplace at the Project Location. The Company will give written notice to the IEDC within ten (10) days after receiving actual notice that the Company, or an employee of the Company in the State of Indiana, has been convicted of a criminal drug violation occurring in the workplace. False certification or violation of this certification may result in sanctions including, but not limited to, suspension of payments under the Agreement, termination of the Agreement and/or debarment of contracting opportunities with the State for up to three (3) years. In addition to the provisions of the above paragraph, if the total amount set forth in the Agreement is in excess of $25,000.00, the Company agrees that it will provide a drug-free workplace by: A. Publishing and providing to all of its employees a statement notifying them that the unlawful manufacture, distribution, dispensing, possession or use of a controlled substance is prohibited in the Company’s workplace, and specifying the actions that will be taken against employees for violations of such prohibition;

  • ADB’s Review of Procurement Decisions 11. All contracts procured under international competitive bidding procedures and contracts for consulting services shall be subject to prior review by ADB, unless otherwise agreed between the Borrower and ADB and set forth in the Procurement Plan.

  • Noise Abatement Contractor shall operate, conduct, or construct without violating the City’s Noise Abatement Ordinance codified in the SDMC.

  • Tenant Improvement Plans Any work proposed by Tenant (the “Tenant Improvements”) shall be subject to Landlord’s reasonable prior approval and shall be subject to the other terms and conditions of this Exhibit C; provided that it will be reasonable for Landlord to withhold its approval or consent (as and when applicable under this Exhibit C) if Landlord’s Mortgagee has not consented to the matter that is the subject of such approval or consent. All architectural, engineering and other design fees shall be paid by Tenant. Tenant shall use its architect, engineers and other design professionals, all of whom shall comply with any applicable licensing or governmental requirements of the City of Seattle and the State of Washington; Tenant’s architect shall be approved by Landlord (“Tenant’s Architect”), which approval shall not be unreasonably withheld, conditioned or delayed. Landlord shall also be entitled to receive a copy of the agreement between Tenant and Tenant’s Architect (the “Architect Agreement”). Tenant shall cause Tenant’s Architect to prepare a draft space plan (the “Space Plan”) for the Tenant Improvements and shall submit the proposed Space Plan to Landlord for the latter’s approval (not to be unreasonably withheld) in a time period to allow Tenant to timely complete its Tenant Improvements under this Lease. Landlord shall deliver to Tenant any written objections, questions or comments of Landlord with regard to the Space Plan within ten (10) business days of receipt; Landlord’s consent thereto shall be deemed given if not denied in writing within said ten (10) business day period. If Landlord denies its approval, it shall specify the reasons for doing so in detail. Tenant shall cause the Space Plan to be revised to address such written comments and shall resubmit said Space Plan to Landlord for approval. Such process shall continue until Landlord has approved the Space Plan. Tenant’s Architect shall then prepare working drawings and specifications for the Tenant Improvements, including architectural, structural, plumbing, mechanical, electrical, and fire protection drawings as required, suitable for permit application (the “Working Drawings”) and shall submit the proposed Working Drawings to Landlord for the latter’s approval in a time period to allow Tenant to timely complete its Tenant Improvements under this Lease. The Space Plan and Working Drawings shall be subject to Landlord’s approval, which Landlord agrees shall not be unreasonably withheld, conditioned, or delayed. Landlord shall not be deemed to have acted unreasonably if it withholds its approval thereof because, in Landlord’s reasonable opinion, the work, as described in any such item: (i) is likely to adversely affect Building Systems, the structure of the Building or the safety of the Building and/or their occupants; (ii) might impair Landlord’s ability to furnish services to Tenant or other tenants in the Building; (iii) would materially increase the cost of operating the Building; (iv) would violate any governmental laws, rules or ordinances (or interpretations thereof); (v) contains or uses hazardous or toxic materials or substances; (vi) would negatively affect the appearance of the Building; (vii) is reasonably likely to adversely affect another tenant’s premises; or (viii) is prohibited by any ground lease affecting the Building or any mortgage, trust deed or other instrument encumbering the Building. Landlord shall deliver to Tenant any written objections, questions or comments of Landlord with regard to the Working Drawings, within ten (10) business days of Landlord’s receipt of the Working Drawings; Landlord’s consent thereto shall be deemed given if not denied in writing within said ten (10) business day period. If Landlord denies its approval, it shall specify the reasons for doing so in detail. Tenant shall cause the Working Drawings to be revised to address such written comments and shall resubmit said Working Drawings to Landlord for approval. Landlord may, when approving the Tenant Improvement Plans, elect to require Tenant to remove any Non-Standard Improvements which are made to the Premises. If Landlord so elects, Tenant shall, at its own cost, restore the Premises to the condition designated by Landlord in its election, before the last day of the Term. Such process shall continue until both parties have approved the Working Drawings. Landlord’s approval of the Space Plan and/or the Working Drawings shall not be deemed any representation or warranty that the same comply with applicable codes.

  • Problem Statement School bus fleets are aging, and our communities have poor air quality. Replacing school buses with zero emission school buses will address both of these issues.

Draft better contracts in just 5 minutes Get the weekly Law Insider newsletter packed with expert videos, webinars, ebooks, and more!