PEER COACH Sample Clauses

PEER COACH. A Peer Coach is a Unit Member mutually selected to help the Evaluatee who is participating in the teacher assistance plan. A Peer Coach shall be a permanent unit member in a like or similar position. An Evaluatee must approve the Peer Coach selected to provide assistance and input from the Peer Coach shall not be used in the evaluation process.
Sample 1Sample 2Sample 3See All (10)
AutoNDA by SimpleDocs
PEER COACH. The teacher selected and directed by the PAR Panel to assist and review teachers will be assigned to the Program to work exclusively with beginning teachers and/or teachers subject to intervention.
Sample 1Sample 2Sample 3See All (9)
PEER COACH. ‌ A Peer Coach will be assigned to assist any tenured bargaining unit member who receives a Summative Rating of “Needs Improvement.” To qualify as a Peer Coach, the bargaining unit member must have received at minimum of 4 consecutive “Excellent” Summative Ratings on their own evaluations and must have completed the Evaluator Training and Certification process. The role of the Peer Coach is to assist with the implementation of the Professional Development Plan developed by the evaluator and the bargaining unit member under evaluation. Assuming the Peer Coach will work an average of one (1) additional hour per week, they will be paid a stipend equal to 36 hours at Pay Rate 4 (9.8.4). The position of Peer Coach will be posted per this Agreement.
Sample 1Sample 2See All (4)
PEER COACH. A “Peer Coach” is an experienced, exemplary Teacher/Service Provider selected by Program Administration that meets the criteria as specified in Article
Sample 1Sample 2See All (4)
PEER COACH. 22.5.1 Peer Coaches will be selected by Program Administration and approved by the PAC panel. The application process shall include signatures by the Immediate Supervisor and an Association Member (peer teacher/service provider). Once approved, Peer Coaches will remain eligible to provide service annually unless: a. If the effectiveness of the Peer Coach is found to be unsatisfactory at the annual review by either the Program Administration or by the PAC panel, then he/she may be removed from this role; b. The Peer Coach submits a written request to Program Administration and the PAC panel to withdraw from the program.
Sample 1Sample 2See All (4)
PEER COACH. 21.5.1 Coaches will be nominated by Program Administration and approved by the PAC panel. Once approved, Coaches will remain eligible to provide service annually unless: a. The effectiveness of the Coach is found to be unsatisfactory at the annual review by either the Program Administration or the PAC panel, then he/she may be removed from this role. b. The Coach submits a 30-day written request to Program Administration and the PAC panel to withdraw from the program. Upon approval he/she may withdraw as a Coach providing an acceptable replacement Coach has been found.
Sample 1Sample 2Sample 3
PEER COACH. A Peer Coach will be assigned to assist any tenured bargaining unit member who receives a Summative Ratings of “Needs Improvement.” To qualify as a Peer Coach, the bargaining unit member must have received a minimum of four (4) consecutive “Excellent” Summative Ratings on their own evaluations and must have completed the Evaluator Training and Certification process. The Peer Coach will be selected by the evaluator, teacher in need of assistance, a representative from the REA, and the Superintendent. The role of the Peer Coach is to assist with the implementation of the Professional Development Plan developed by the evaluator and the bargaining unit member under evaluation. Peer Coaches will be paid a stipend equal to $37.50 per hour, with the assumption that peer coaches will work an average of one (1) additional hour per week.
Sample 1Sample 2
AutoNDA by SimpleDocs
PEER COACH. Creekside Evaluation Model includes the idea of a peer coach to aid the reflective process. A peer coach can serve as a critical friend, co-reflector or may become a guide and mentor for effective teaching. The idea of a continuous improvement model is that it serves as a benefit for the peer coach as well. The coach recognizes that learning is a two way street and that the use of Creekside Evaluation Model will encourage “professional synergy” with his/her colleagues. The peer coach plays an important role by helping the participant to review the California Standards for the Teaching Profession (CSTP), selecting a standard on which to focus, review the professional rubric, and select and develop an essential question for further study. The peer coach may also help the Participant triangulate and display data. A peer-coach xxxx also play key roles in the examination of student work by focusing attention on the important elements of the question, and how that question can serve as a tool for revealing insights about student work and classroom instructional practice.
Sample 1

Related to PEER COACH

  • Alternative Index In the event that the Index for any Mortgage Loan, as specified in the related Mortgage Note, becomes unavailable for any reason, the Master Servicer shall select an alternative index, which in all cases shall be an index that constitutes a qualified rate on a regular interest under the REMIC Provisions, in accordance with the terms of such Mortgage Note or, if such Mortgage Note does not make provision for the selection of an alternative index in such event, the Master Servicer shall, subject to applicable law, select an alternative index based on information comparable to that used in connection with the original Index and, in either case, such alternative index shall thereafter be the Index for such Mortgage Loan.

  • Mileage Measurement Where required, the mileage measurement for LIS rate elements is determined in the same manner as the mileage measurement for V&H methodology as outlined in NECA Tariff No. 4.

  • Peer Review Dental Group, after consultation with the Joint ----------- Operations Committee, shall implement, regularly review, modify as necessary or appropriate and obtain the commitment of Providers to actively participate in peer review procedures for Providers. Dental Group shall assist Manager in the production of periodic reports describing the results of such procedures. Dental Group shall provide Manager with prompt notice of any information that raises a reasonable risk to the health and safety of Group Patients or Beneficiaries. In any event, after consultation with the Joint Operations Committee, Dental Group shall take such action as may be reasonably warranted under the facts and circumstances.

  • Level Five i. If the grievant is not satisfied with the disposition of the grievance at Level Four, the Association may submit the grievance to advisory arbitration not later than fifteen (15) school days after receipt of the decision by the Board. ii. Within ten (10) school days after such submission for arbitration, the Board and the Association shall attempt to agree upon a mutually acceptable arbitrator. If the parties are unable to agree upon an arbitrator, either shall request the Public Employment Relations Commission to appoint an arbitrator. iii. The arbitrator shall confer with the representative of the Board and of the Association and shall proceed with a hearing and submit a written report in the shortest possible time setting forth his findings of fact, reasoning and conclusions on the issues submitted. The arbitrator shall be without power or authority to make any decision, which requires the commission of an act prohibited by law or which is violative of the terms of the Agreement. The decision of the arbitrator shall be advisory only to the Board and the Association. iv. The costs for the services of the arbitrator, including per diem expenses and actual necessary travel, subsistence expenses and the cost of the hearing room shall be borne equally by the Board and the Association. Any other expenses incurred shall be paid by the party incurring same. v. If time is lost by any teacher due to arbitration proceedings necessitating the retention of a substitute, the Board of Education will pay only the cost of the substitute; the time lost by the teacher must either be without pay or charged to personal time; however, if the arbitrator subpoenas a teacher to attend the arbitration proceedings as a witness, this teacher shall not suffer loss of pay. vi. Notwithstanding the above, the parties agree that in not more than one (1) arbitration per contract year (non-cumulative) may be submitted to an arbitrator, whose decision shall be final and binding upon both parties. The Association shall have the right to designate which arbitration shall be so binding, provided such designation is made and communicated in writing prior to the commencement of the arbitration in question. The Association's choice shall be limited to a grievance which must have reached Level Two of the grievance procedure in any contract year governed by the agreement. vii. Notwithstanding the above, the parties agree that any dispute which involves a disagreement as to whether the health insurance benefits provided employees herein are equal to or better than the health insurance benefits heretofore provided employees through the New Jersey Public and School Employees Health Benefits Plan may be submitted to an arbitrator whose decision shall be final and binding on both parties.

  • Staffing Levels To the extent legislative appropriations and PIN authorizations allow, safe staffing levels will be maintained in all institutions where employees have patient, client, inmate or student care responsibilities. In July of each year, the Secretary or Deputy Secretary of each agency will, upon request, meet with the Union, to hear the employees’ views regarding staffing levels. In August of each year, the Secretary or Deputy Secretary of Budget and Management will, upon request, meet with the Union to hear the employees’ views regarding the Governor’s budget request.

  • Power Factor Design Criteria Developer shall design the Large Generating Facility to maintain an effective power delivery at demonstrated maximum net capability at the Point of Interconnection at a power factor within the range established by the Connecting Transmission Owner on a comparable basis, until NYISO has established different requirements that apply to all generators in the New York Control Area on a comparable basis. The Developer shall design and maintain the plant auxiliary systems to operate safely throughout the entire real and reactive power design range. The Connecting Transmission Owner shall not unreasonably restrict or condition the reactive power production or absorption of the Large Generating Facility in accordance with Good Utility Practice.

  • Market Capitalization At the time the Registration Statement was or will be originally declared effective, and at the time the Company’s most recent Annual Report on Form 10-K was filed with the Commission, the Company met or will meet the then applicable requirements for the use of Form S-3 under the Securities Act, including, but not limited to, General Instruction I.B.1

  • Measuring EPP parameters Every 5 minutes, EPP probes will select one “IP address” of the EPP servers of the TLD being monitored and make an “EPP test”; every time they should alternate between the 3 different types of commands and between the commands inside each category. If an “EPP test” result is undefined/unanswered, the EPP service will be considered as unavailable from that probe until it is time to make a new test.

  • Long Term Cost Evaluation Criterion # 4 READ CAREFULLY and see in the RFP document under "Proposal Scoring and Evaluation". Points will be assigned to this criterion based on your answer to this Attribute. Points are awarded if you agree not i ncrease your catalog prices (as defined herein) more than X% annually over the previous year for years two and thr ee and potentially year four, unless an exigent circumstance exists in the marketplace and the excess price increase which exceeds X% annually is supported by documentation provided by you and your suppliers and shared with TIP S, if requested. If you agree NOT to increase prices more than 5%, except when justified by supporting documentati on, you are awarded 10 points; if 6% to 14%, except when justified by supporting documentation, you receive 1 to 9 points incrementally. Price increases 14% or greater, except when justified by supporting documentation, receive 0 points. increases will be 5% or less annually per question Required Confidentiality Claim Form This completed form is required by TIPS. By submitting a response to this solicitation you agree to download from th e “Attachments” section, complete according to the instructions on the form, then uploading the completed form, wit h any confidential attachments, if applicable, to the “Response Attachments” section titled “Confidentiality Form” in order to provide to TIPS the completed form titled, “CONFIDENTIALITY CLAIM FORM”. By completing this process, you provide us with the information we require to comply with the open record laws of the State of Texas as they ma y apply to your proposal submission. If you do not provide the form with your proposal, an award will not be made if your proposal is qualified for an award, until TIPS has an accurate, completed form from you. Read the form carefully before completing and if you have any questions, email Xxxx Xxxxxx at TIPS at xxxx.xxxxxx@t xxx-xxx.xxx

  • Falls Far Below Target  Upon further review following a preliminary Pending rating, the Commission identifies significant financial risk and has concerns about financial viability such that heightened monitoring and/or intervention are necessary. 2.

Draft better contracts in just 5 minutes Get the weekly Law Insider newsletter packed with expert videos, webinars, ebooks, and more!