Performance Evaluation Meeting Sample Clauses

Performance Evaluation Meeting a) The issuance of a Contract Discrepancy Report (CDR) may be cause for the scheduling of a meeting among the Contractor, Contracting Officer, and the Contracting Officer Representative. A mutual effort will be made to resolve all problems identified. The Government will prepare written minutes of the meeting. The Contractor, Contracting Officer, and the Contracting Officer Representative will sign minutes of the meeting (s). b) Should the Contractor not concur with the minutes, he will state in writing to the Contracting Officer within ten calendar days any areas he does not concur and explain the reasons for non-concurrence. The Contracting Officer will review and consider the reasons submitted for the Contractor's non-concurrence and make a decision. The Contracting Officer will notify the Contractor of the decision in writing within ten calendar days.
Sample 1
AutoNDA by SimpleDocs
Performance Evaluation Meeting. Performance evaluations shall be considered confidential. The 48 evaluator shall not belong to the classified bargaining unit. 49
Sample 1
Performance Evaluation Meeting. The contract manager shall be required to meet with the Contracting Officer and/or his/her representative on an as required basis. There should be no more than one meeting per month.
Sample 1
Performance Evaluation Meeting. The supervisor/manager will meet with the employee to discuss the performance evaluation. The employee shall sign the formal performance evaluation to acknowledge its contents and that they have met with their supervisor/manager to discuss the evaluation. The employee’s signature shall not mean that he or she endorses the contents of the evaluation. The employee may comment on the evaluation in a written statement, which will then be placed with the evaluation in the employee’s personnel file. The written statement must be submitted within ten (10) working days after the employee receives the evaluation. A request for reconsideration of the evaluation may be made utilizing steps one and two of the Grievance Procedure in Article 26. Steps three and four of Article 26’s Grievance Procedure shall not be applicable to performance evaluations. An employee does not have the right to appeal. Any employee receiving a “Not Meeting Expectations” rating will be given a time period of ninety (90) days to bring their performance up to a “Meets Expectations” level or they will be subject to further disciplinary action up to and including termination. Any merit increases awarded as part of a performance evaluation will take effect on the first pay period following January 31st, or, if applicable, the date of the completion of their probationary period. Merit Increases shall be as follows: Exceeds Expectations: 2-Step Increase Meets Expectations: 1-Step Increase Not Meeting Expectations: No Increase
Sample 1
Performance Evaluation Meeting. Performance evaluations shall be considered confidential. 46 The evaluator shall not belong to the classified bargaining unit. 48 16.02.1 Unit members will be given no less than two (2) working days of notice prior to 49 any scheduled evaluation meeting with the evaluator. 51 16.02.2 Unit members will be provided with a copy of their completed evaluation a 52 minimum of two (2) working days prior to the evaluation meeting. This 53 provides the unit member an opportunity to review the evaluation and identify 54 any areas of concern, which may then be discussed with the evaluator during 1 the performance evaluation meeting. 3 16.02.3 The unit member and evaluator shall sign one (1) copy of the performance 4 evaluation form at the end of their meeting. The unit member’s signature 5 acknowledges receipt of the evaluation. Signing the performance evaluation 6 form does not constitute the unit member’s agreement with the performance 7 evaluation. The evaluator shall provide the unit member with a copy of the 8 evaluation. 10 16.02.4 Evaluators shall forward the completed performance evaluation form to Human 11 Resources within five (5) working days of the evaluation meeting.
Sample 1
Performance Evaluation Meeting. As directed by the Contracting Officer, the Contractor may be required to meet with the Government's representative monthly during the first two months of the contract. Thereafter, meetings will be as often as necessary at the discretion of the Contracting Officer. A mutual effort will be made to resolve all problems identified. The written minutes of these meetings, prepared by the Government, shall be signed by the Contractor's representative and the Government's representative. Should the Contractor not concur with the minutes, the Contractor shall state, in writing, to the Contracting Officer any areas of disagreement within five calendar days.
Sample 1
Performance Evaluation Meeting. The Consultant shall be readily available to meet with representatives of the City of San Diego weekly during the first month of the contract and as often as necessary thereafter for the purpose of evaluating Consultant’s performance on the Contract. A mutual effort will be made to resolve any and all performance problems identified at these meetings.
Sample 1
AutoNDA by SimpleDocs

Related to Performance Evaluation Meeting

  • Performance Evaluation The Department may conduct a performance evaluation of Contractor’s Services, including Contractor’s Subcontractors. Results of any evaluation may be made available to Contractor upon request.

  • Performance Evaluations The Contractor is subject to an annual performance evaluation to be conducted by NYCDOT pursuant to the PPB Rules.

  • Annual Performance Evaluation On either a fiscal year or calendar year basis, (consistently applied from year to year), the Bank shall conduct an annual evaluation of Executive’s performance. The annual performance evaluation proceedings shall be included in the minutes of the Board meeting that next follows such annual performance review.

  • Performance Meetings During a meeting on performance, the parties will: (a) discuss the causes of a Performance Factor; (b) discuss the impact of a Performance Factor on the local health system and the risk resulting from non-performance; and (c) determine the steps to be taken to remedy or mitigate the impact of the Performance Factor (the “Performance Improvement Process”).

  • Annual Performance Review The Employee’s performance of his duties under this Agreement shall be reviewed by the Board of Directors or a committee of the Board of Directors at least annually and finalized within thirty (30) days of the receipt of the annual audited financial statements. The Board of Directors or a committee of the Board of Directors shall additionally review the base salary, bonus and benefits provided to the Employee under this Agreement and may, in their discretion, adjust the same, as outlined in Addendum B of this Agreement, provided, however, that Employee’s annual base salary shall not be less than the base salary set forth in Section 4(A) hereof.

  • Performance Review Where a performance review of an employee’s performance is carried out, the employee shall be given sufficient opportunity after the interview to read and review the performance review. Provision shall be made on the performance review form for an employee to sign it. The form shall provide for the employee’s signature in two (2) places, one (1) indicating that the employee has read and accepts the performance review, and the other indicating that the employee disagrees with the performance review. The employee shall sign in only one (1) of the places provided. No employee may initiate a grievance regarding the contents of a performance review unless the signature indicates disagreement. An employee shall, upon request, receive a copy of this performance review at the time of signing. An employee’s performance review shall not be changed after an employee has signed it, without the knowledge of the employee, and any such changes shall be subject to the grievance procedure of this Agreement. The employee may respond, in writing, to the performance review. Such response will be attached to the performance review.

  • Performance Metrics The “Performance Metrics” for the Performance Period are: (i) the JD Power Residential National Large Segment Survey for investor-owned utilities; (ii) the System Average Interruption Frequency Index (Major Events Excluded) (“XXXXX”); (iii) Arizona Public Service Company’s customer to employee improvement ratio; (iv) the OSHA rate (All Incident Injury Rate); (v) nuclear capacity factor; and (vi) coal capacity factor. (1) With respect to the Performance Metric described in clause (i) of this Subsection 6(a), the JD Power Residential National Large Segment Survey will provide data on an annual basis reflecting the Company’s percentile ranking, relative to other participating companies. (2) With respect to the Performance Metric described in clause (ii) of this Subsection 6(a), the Edison Electric Institute (“EEI”) will provide data on an annual basis regarding the XXXXX result of the participating companies; the Company will calculate its XXXXX result for the year in question and determine its percentile ranking based on the information provided by EEI. (3) With respect to the Performance Metric described in clause (iii) of this Subsection 6(a), SNL, an independent third party data system, will provide data on an annual basis regarding the customer and employee counts; the Company will use its customer and employee counts for the year in question and determine its percentile ranking based on the information provided by SNL. Only those companies whose customers and employees were included in the data provided by SNL in each of the years of the Performance Period will be considered. (4) With respect to the Performance Metric described in clause (iv) of this Subsection 6(a), EEI will provide data on an annual basis regarding the OSHA rate of the participating companies; the Company will calculate its OSHA rate for the year in question and determine its percentile ranking based on the information provided by EEI. (5) With respect to the Performance Metric described in clause (v) of this Subsection 6(a), SNL will provide data on an annual basis regarding the nuclear capacity factors of the participating nuclear plants; the Company will calculate its nuclear capacity factor for the year in question and determine its percentile ranking based on the information provided by SNL. Only those plants that were included in the data provided by SNL in each of the years of the Performance Period will be considered. (6) With respect to the Performance Metric described in clause (vi) of this Subsection 6(a), SNL will provide data on an annual basis regarding the coal capacity factors of the participating coal plants; the Company will calculate its coal capacity factor for the year in question and determine its percentile ranking based on the information provided by SNL. Only those plants that were included in the data provided by SNL in each of the years of the Performance Period will be considered. (7) The Company’s percentile ranking during the Performance Period for each Performance Metric will be the average of the Company’s percentile ranking for each Performance Metric during each of the three years of the Performance Period (each, an “Average Performance Metric”); provided, however, that if the third year of a Performance Metric is not calculable by December 15 of the following year, the Performance Metric shall consist of the three most recent years for which such Performance Metric is calculable. The Company’s “Average Performance,” for purposes of determining any Base Grant adjustments pursuant to Subsection 5(b) above will be the average of the Average Performance Metrics. If only quartile, rather than percentile, rankings are available for a particular Performance Metric, the Average Performance Metric for any such Performance Metric shall be expressed as a percentile. For example, if the Performance Metric was in the top quartile for two Performance Periods and in the lowest quartile in the other Performance Period, the average of these quartiles would be 3 (the average of 4, 4, and 1) and the Average Performance Metric would be the 75th percentile (3 /4). The calculations in this Subsection 6(a)(7) will be verified by the Company’s internal auditors. (8) If either EEI or SNL discontinues providing the data specified above, the Committee shall select a data source that, in the Committee’s judgment, will provide data most comparable to the data provided by EEI or SNL, as the case may be. If the JD Power Residential National Large Segment Survey for investor-owned utilities (or a successor JD Power survey) is not available during each of the years of the Performance Period, the Performance Metric associated with the JD Power Residential Survey (Subsection 6(a)(1)) will be disregarded and not included in the Company’s Average Performance for purposes of determining any Base Grant adjustments pursuant to Subsection 5(b).

  • POST AWARD MEETING Within ten (10) days after receipt of notification of award of bid, Contractor shall meet with the County’s representative(s) to discuss job procedures and scheduling.

  • Performance Measurement The Uniform Guidance requires completion of OMB-approved standard information collection forms (the PPR). The form focuses on outcomes, as related to the Federal Award Performance Goals that awarding Federal agencies are required to detail in the Awards.

  • Performance Reviews The Employee will be provided with a written performance appraisal at least once per year and said appraisal will be reviewed at which time all aspects of the assessment can be fully discussed.

Draft better contracts in just 5 minutes Get the weekly Law Insider newsletter packed with expert videos, webinars, ebooks, and more!