Public Hearing Process Sample Clauses

Public Hearing Process. During the public circulation of the Tier II Draft EIR/EIS, a public hearing was held on January 19, 2011, at Ocean View Hills Elementary in Otay Mesa. No oral or written comments were received at the meeting. During the public review, 28 comment letters were received from individuals and agencies. These public and agency comment letters have formal responses included in the Final Environmental Document.
AutoNDA by SimpleDocs
Public Hearing Process. The APG team will be available to support the public hearing and adoption process with the Bend City Council and Deschutes County Board of Commissioners as a contingency task. Public hearing support could include, but is not limited to, preparation and/or presentation of public hearing materials, written or oral response to public testimony, support with staff reports, refinement of final adoption findings, etc. Deliverables:
Public Hearing Process. The applicant’s response to Council’s December 12, 2018 motion results in three changes to the plans advertised and considered at the December 12, 2018 public hearing and the original public hearing in 2014: • the proposed wetland buffer has been increased from 20 meters (65.6 feet.) to 23.5 meters (77.1 feet.) • the proposed commercial building footprint has been reduced by 74.6 square meters (802 square feet); and • 5 parking spaces on the property have been eliminated. Material changes to the development proposal after the public hearing have been identified as being significant enough to necessitate an additional public hearing to ensure the community has adequate opportunity to comment on the merits of the application in context of the proposed changes. The original public hearing was held on June 4, 2014. Three written submissions were provided and two members of the community spoke at the hearing. One of the written submissions was in support of the proposal and two were in opposition. One of the opposing submissions was based on environmental Case 21847: Amending Development Agreement PID 00000000, Xxxxxxxx Xx., Xxxxxxxx Community Council Report - 4 - December 11, 2019 impacts and one was primarily for competitive business reasons. Both speakers spoke generally in favour of the application but noted concerns about risks to water quality. See Attachment E for minutes of that public hearing and copies of the written submissions. One community member spoke at the subsequent public hearing on December 12, 2018 raising similar questions with respect to water quality and adequacy of the 20 meter buffer. No additional public input was received. The changes submitted by the applicant are in direct response to the only issues raised by community members throughout the course of the application. Staff advise these alterations are minor and represent a reduction in development intensity. None of these changes represent fundamental alterations to the proposal previously approved and they are unlikely to generate additional community impacts.
Public Hearing Process. An in-person public meeting was held on November 28, 2023 at the City of West Sacramento Community Center and on December 13, 2023 at the City of Xxxxx Library and during the circulation of the draft project report and draft environmental document (DPR/DED). During the public meeting Caltrans staff highlighted the project scope, schedule, cost, environmental document, and other pertinent information. The public meetings had good participation from several local residents and local officials and Caltrans was able to inform the public and solicit comments on the DED. The Public Information Office disseminated the live Public Meeting notifications through social media, newspaper advertisement, and press release. An on-line Notice of Preparation (NOP) meeting was held on August 25, 2021, to discuss the proposed project scope of work and alternatives.‌‌ Caltrans conducted three open houses or Community Workshops during the Project Initiation Document (PID) phase on June 6, 2018, Xxxxx Senior Center; June 14, 2018, West Sacramento City Hall; June 21, 2018, Sacramento City Hall). During the PA&ED phase, Xxxxxxxx conducted an open house in the City of Xxxxx Public Library in November 2019 and West Sacramento City Hall in February 2020. In all meetings, Caltrans received and responded to written public comments. The proposed project has been presented to the Yolo Transportation District (Yolo TD), Xxxxx Bike Coalition, Yolo County Steering committee, and other various commissions and authorities for their input. The comments received have been considered, and some have been incorporated into the preliminary project plans.
Public Hearing Process. H. The CONSULTANT shall assist with the public involvement process. The CONSULTANT shall provide the following services as required for requesting certification of the public involvement process for a LPA project:
Public Hearing Process. Upon conclusion of the Purchase and Sale Agreement, the subject property along with staff report will be presented to the Board of Directors of the Housing Successor or the Successor Agency for Public Hearing and subsequent approval. Furthermore, all non-housing properties shall be submitted to the Oversight Board of the Successor Agency for approval in accordance with the Dissolution Act (AB 1484). The staff report recommending approval of the PSA shall include timeframes for concluding all negotiations leading to consummation of Purchase and Sale Agreement (PSA).

Related to Public Hearing Process

  • Public Hearing If the Grantee fails to respond to the Violation Notice received from the Grantor, or if the default is not remedied within the cure period set forth above, the Board shall schedule a public hearing if it intends to continue its investigation into the default. The Grantor shall provide the Grantee at least twenty (20) days prior written notice of such hearing, which specifies the time, place and purpose of such hearing, notice of which shall be published by the Clerk of the Grantor in a newspaper of general circulation within the Grantor in accordance with subsection 15.8 hereof. At the hearing, the Board shall give the Grantee an opportunity to state its position on the matter, present evidence and question witnesses, after which it shall determine whether or not the Franchise shall be revoked. The public hearing shall be on the record and a written transcript shall be made available to the Grantee within ten (10) business days. The decision of the Board shall be made in writing and shall be delivered to the Grantee. The Grantee may appeal such determination to an appropriate court, which shall have the power to review the decision of the Board de novo. The Grantee may continue to operate the Cable System until all legal appeals procedures have been exhausted.

  • Bidding Process 3.1. Bidding shall generally commence based on the sequence of the lot being shown on the PAH Website. However the Auctioneer has the right to vary the sequence without having to give prior notice to the intended bidders.

  • Public Health Public Health activities and reporting to the extent permitted by Applicable Law.

Draft better contracts in just 5 minutes Get the weekly Law Insider newsletter packed with expert videos, webinars, ebooks, and more!