RATING CRITERIA. Major factors/criteria for the establishment of a reduced candidate/shortlist and selection:
RATING CRITERIA. Great Extent The student demonstrates the practice behavior 90 to 100% of the time and does so with a high degree of competence reflective of generalist/advanced generalist level social work practice. Considerable Extent The student demonstrates the practice behavior 60 to 89% of the time and does so with a good degree of competence showing strong promise as a generalist/advanced generalist level social worker. Some Extent The student demonstrates the practice behavior 30 to 59% of the time and does so with some competence that with practice will likely improve to a considerable or great extent. Little or no Extent The student demonstrates the practice behavior less than 30% of the time or with very little competence and is unlikely to improve to a considerable extent even with practice. If this is marked, the behavior should be discussed with the Faculty Liaison. Honesty and accuracy in assessment is critical for meaningful professional development. We encourage both the student and field instructor to use these ratings to accurately capture where the student is in their development.
RATING CRITERIA. (a) The Initial Holder severally represents and warrants to the Issuer and the Indenture Trustee that, on the Closing Date, the Rating Criteria are satisfied with respect to it.
(b) With respect to each Holder that becomes a party to this Agreement during the Draw Period pursuant to Section 7.03, such Holder represents and warrants to the Issuer and the Indenture Trustee that, on the date on which such Holder becomes a party to this Agreement, the Rating Criteria are satisfied with respect to such Holder.
(c) At all times during the Draw Period, each Holder must continue to satisfy the Rating Criteria. If any Holder at any time during the Draw Period fails to satisfy the Rating Criteria, such Holder (or, in the case of the Initial Holder, the Alternative Credit Provider on behalf of such Holder) shall within five Business Days thereafter deposit cash in a Holder Subaccount in an amount equal to the undrawn amount of such Holder’s Commitment. If such Holder (or, in the case of the Initial Holder, the Alternative Credit Provider) fails to fund a Holder Subaccount as described in the preceding sentence, the Issuer will have the right under Section 2.09 to replace such Holder. The Indenture Trustee shall not have any obligation to pursue any collection action or remedy against any Holder (or, in the case of the Initial Holder, the Alternative Credit Provider) of a Class A-2A Note.
(d) Any amounts on deposit in any Holder Subaccount may be invested in Eligible Investments that are available on the day following the date of acquisition thereof (collectively, the “Class A-2A Permitted Investments”) at the direction of the related Holder (or, in the case of the Initial Holder, following the provision of Alternative Credit, at the direction of the Alternative Credit Provider). Investment earnings received during each Collection Period in respect of Class A-2A Permitted Investments in a Holder’s Holder Subaccount will be paid directly to such Holder (or, in the case of the Initial Holder, following the provision of Alternative Credit, the Issuer shall direct the Indenture Trustee in writing to pay such investment earnings directly to the Alternative Credit Provider) on the Payment Date following the last day of the Draw Period, as instructed by the Servicer.
RATING CRITERIA. Major factors/criteria for the establishment of a reduced candidate/shortlist and selection: Key Staff/Project Team qualifications 20% Experience in conducting work with similar scope and complexity 15% Demonstrated experience assessing program effectiveness 20% Project understanding/approach/services required 20% Demonstrated experience conducting targeted public outreach on the specified campaign topics 25% Responses to questions concerning the RFQ, submissions, and procedures may be obtained by submitting you questions to the DOT Professional Services mailbox at XXX.Xxxxxxxxxxxx@xxxxx.xx.xx or via telephone at (000)000-0000. In order to ensure a timely response, questions must be submitted at least two (2) business days before the Expressions of Interest due date.
RATING CRITERIA. The appointed Selection Committee will consider the following criteria in evaluating responses:
RATING CRITERIA. Practice: Criteria used for performance reviews have been developed to meet the expectations of the City of Lakewood staff throughout the organization. Job specific indicators have been determined by the Police Department for personnel assigned to the various units and sections.
RATING CRITERIA. Item 1 should be rated as a Strength if either of the following applies: Item 1 should be rated as an Area Needing Improvement if the following applies: Item 1 should be rated as Not Applicable if the response to the question of applicability is No.
Item 1 Rating (select one): Instructions: SAFETY OUTCOME 2: CHILDREN ARE SAFELY MAINTAINED IN THEIR HOMES WHENEVER POSSIBLE AND APPROPRIATE. Item 2: Services to Family to Protect Child(ren) in the Home and Prevent Removal or Re-Entry Into Xxxxxx Care Purpose of Assessment: To determine whether, during the period under review, the agency made concerted efforts to provide services to the family to prevent children’s entry into xxxxxx care or re-entry after a reunification. Item 2 Applicable Cases: In the list of criteria below, check Yes for any that apply and No for any that do not apply. A case is applicable for an assessment of this item if it meets at least one of the following criteria: Is this case applicable?
A. For the period under review, did the agency make concerted efforts to provide or arrange for appropriate services for the family to protect the children and prevent their entry into xxxxxx care or re-entry into xxxxxx care after a reunification? (Be sure to assess the entire period under review.) Yes No If No, explain circumstances in the narrative field below. 12 Child and Family Services Reviews Onsite Review Instrument • “Appropriate services,” for the purposes of Item 2, are those that are provided to, or arranged for, the family with the explicit goal of ensuring the child’s safety. Examples include: (1) if there are safety issues in the home due to environmental hazards, homemaking services could be an appropriate safety-related service; (2) if there are safety concerns related to the parent’s ability to manage specific child needs or child behaviors, intensive in-home services could be an appropriate safety-related service; (3) child care services could be a safety-related service in cases where the child was being cared for in an unsafe setting or by an inappropriate caregiver; and (4) if there are safety concerns related to parental substance abuse, substance abuse treatment could be an appropriate safety-related service. In most cases a child’s need for mental health services, education-related services, or services to address health issues, would not be considered relevant to the child’s safety if the child remained in the home. The agency’s efforts to meet those service needs are as...
RATING CRITERIA. This item should be rated as a Strength if either of the following applies: This item should be rated as an Area Needing Improvement if either of the following applies: Item 2 should be rated as Not Applicable if the response to the question of applicability is No. Item 2 Rating (select one): SAFETY OUTCOME 2: CHILDREN ARE SAFELY MAINTAINED IN THEIR HOMES WHENEVER POSSIBLE AND APPROPRIATE. Item 3: Risk and Safety Assessment and Management Purpose of Assessment: To determine whether, during the period under review, the agency made concerted efforts to assess and address the risk and safety concerns relating to the child(ren) in their own homes or while in xxxxxx care.
RATING CRITERIA. Item 5 should be rated as a Strength if any one of the following criteria apply: Item 5 should be rated as an Area Needing Improvement if any of the following apply: Item 5 should be rated as Not Applicable if the response to the question of applicability is No. Item 5 Rating (select one): PERMANENCY OUTCOME 1: CHILDREN HAVE PERMANENCY AND STABILITY IN THEIR LIVING SITUATIONS. Item 6: Achieving Reunification, Guardianship, Adoption, or Other Planned Permanent Living Arrangement Purpose of Assessment: To determine whether concerted efforts were made, or are being made, during the period under review to achieve reunification, guardianship, adoption, or other planned permanent living arrangement.
RATING CRITERIA. Major factors/criteria for the establishment of a reduced candidate/shortlist and selection are listed below with the weight assigned by percent for each element to be evaluated in the submitted proposals: Key Staff/Project Team qualifications 15% Firm resources/capability to accomplish proposed work on schedule (to include subconsultants, if applicable) 15% Understanding of Delaware Roadways/Approach/Ability to provide services required 10% Firm’s prior experience in providing litter collection services and administrative experience related to litter collection, and experience with other Sponsor-A-Highway or Adopt-A- Highway programs 50% Completeness of submissions to include clarity, readability, and presentation of material 10%
