Reporting & Measures for Evaluating Performance Sample Clauses

Reporting & Measures for Evaluating Performance. For this Agreement, MassDEP will continue to produce regular (at least annual) status reports for the elements outlined in the Priorities and Commitment Lists covering this time period and status reports for identified Areas for Collaboration. MassDEP and EPA agree to meet as needed to discuss progress and address any areas of concern. MassDEP staff will continue to produce and submit annual work plan progress reports to EPA Region 1. MassDEP will continue to improve its reporting mechanisms, focusing on developing a jointly agreed upon set of environmental and programmatic measures, which will help xxxxxx discussions on how MassDEP and EPA Region 1 are meeting their strategic objectives and achieving measurable environmental results. MassDEP’s annual assessments will strive to summarize results, track progress on identified P&C List commitments and Areas for Collaboration, identifying areas where progress met or exceeded expectations and where the agency may have had difficulty in achieving anticipated progress on deliverables or where MassDEP may fall behind on specific strategic objectives. MassDEP and EPA will work cooperatively to improve the annual assessment progress by including specific indicators of air and water quality, as well as land resources management, in terms of outputs and outcomes.
Sample 1Sample 2Sample 3
AutoNDA by SimpleDocs
Reporting & Measures for Evaluating Performance. For this Agreement, the Department will continue to produce regular (at least annual) status reports for the elements outlined in the P&C Lists, and status reports for identified Areas for Collaboration. NHDES and EPANE agree to meet as needed to discuss progress and address any areas of concern. NHDES staff will continue to produce progress reports through the MTRS database, and will make these available to EPANE. NHDES will also utilize its web-based Environmental Dashboard to record environmental changes - See xxxx://xxx0.xxx.xxxxx.xx.xx/NHEnvironmentalDashboard/. NHDES annual assessments (also known as “End-of-Year” Progress Reports) will strive to summarize results, track progress on identified P&C List Commitments, and Areas for Collaboration, identify areas where progress met or exceeded expectations, as well as areas where there may have been difficulty in achieving projected outcomes. NHDES and EPANE agree to develop (and to continuously improve) a process for jointly evaluating and reporting progress and accomplishments that comply with 40 CFR Part 31.115.
Sample 1
Reporting & Measures for Evaluating Performance. For this Agreement, the Department of Environmental Conservation (VT DEC) will continue to produce regular (at least annual) status reports for the elements outlined in the P&C Lists, and status reports for identified Areas for Collaboration. VT DEC and EPANE agree to meet as needed to discuss progress and address any areas of concern. VT DEC’s annual assessments (also known as “End-of-Year” Progress Reports) are expected to summarize results, track progress on identified P&C List Commitments and Areas for Collaboration, identify areas where progress met or exceeded expectations, as well as areas where there may have been difficulty in achieving projected outcomes. This report is submitted by December 31st for the period ending September 30th of the prior federal fiscal year. This reporting is intended to meet the requirements under 40 CFR §35 of a joint evaluation process for state grants, including Performance Partnership Grants (PPGs) including: 1) A discussion of accomplishments as measured against work plan commitments; 2) A discussion of the cumulative effectiveness of the work performed under all work plan components; 3) A discussion of existing and potential problem areas; and 4) Suggestions for improvement, including, where feasible, schedules for making improvements. 5) Further, if needed, VT DEC and EPANE will convene a PPA meeting to discuss any issues that have arisen as part of this review process. 6) VT DEC will continue normal reporting of data to national databases such as PCS-ICIS and SDWIS, as well as required program reporting such as 305(b) and enforcement-related actions. VT DEC and EPANE agree to develop and to continuously improve a process for jointly evaluating and reporting progress and accomplishments that comply with 40 CFR §31.115.
Sample 1
Reporting & Measures for Evaluating Performance. For this Agreement, the Department will continue to produce regular (at least annual) status reports for the elements outlined in the P&C Lists, and status reports for identified Areas for Collaboration. MEDEP and EPA agree to meet as needed to discuss progress and address any areas of concern. MEDEP staff will continue to produce progress reports, and will make these available, to EPA bi-annually. MEDEP annual assessments (also known as “End-of-Year” Progress Reports) will strive to summarize results, track progress on identified P&C List Commitments, and Areas for Collaboration, identify areas where progress met or exceeded expectations, as well as areas where there may have been difficulty in achieving projected outcomes. MEDEP will continue normal reporting of data to national databases such as PCS-ICIS, as well as required program reporting such as 305(b) and enforcement related actions. MEDEP and EPA agree to develop (and to continuously improve) a process for jointly evaluating and reporting progress and accomplishments that comply with 40 CFR Part 31.115.
Sample 1
Reporting & Measures for Evaluating Performance. For this Agreement, the Vermont Department of Environmental Conservation (VTDEC) will continue to produce regular (at least annual) status reports for the elements outlined in the P&C Lists, and status reports for identified Areas for Collaboration. VTDEC and EPA Region 1 agree to meet as needed to discuss progress and address any areas of concern. VTDEC annual assessments (also known as “End-of-Year” Progress Reports) will strive to summarize results, track progress on identified P&C List Commitments, and Areas for Collaboration, identify areas where progress met or exceeded expectations, as well as areas where there may have been difficulty in achieving projected outcomes. VTDEC and EPA Region 1 agree to develop (and to continuously improve) a process for jointly evaluating and reporting progress and accomplishments that comply with 40 CFR Part 31.115.
Sample 1
Reporting & Measures for Evaluating Performance. For this Agreement, MassDEP will continue to produce regular (at least annual) status reports for the elements outlined in the Priorities and Commitment Lists covering this time period. MassDEP and EPA agree to meet as needed to discuss progress and address any areas of concern. MassDEP staff will continue to produce and submit annual work plan progress reports to EPA New England. MassDEP will continue to improve its reporting mechanisms, focusing on developing a jointly agreed upon set of environmental and programmatic measures, which will help xxxxxx discussions on how MassDEP and EPA New England are meeting their strategic objectives and achieving measurable environmental results. MassDEP’s annual assessments will strive to summarize results, track progress on identified P&C List commitments, identifying areas where progress met or exceeded expectations and where the agency may have had difficulty in achieving anticipated progress on deliverables or where the MassDEP may fall behind on specific strategic objectives. MassDEP and EPA will work cooperatively to improve the annual assessment progress by including specific indicators of air and water quality, as well as land resources management in terms of outputs and outcomes.
Sample 1
Reporting & Measures for Evaluating Performance. For this Agreement, the Department will continue to produce regular (at least annual) status reports for the elements outlined in the P&C Lists, and status reports for identified Areas for Collaboration. RIDEM and XXXXX agree to meet as needed to discuss progress and address any areas of concern. RIDEM and EPA may agree to changes in the work plan based on new priorities or challenges that were not evident when the PPA was signed. The deliverables and target dates in the work plan are based on current staffing levels and budgets. They may be revised if circumstances change. Agreed upon updates to the work plans will be completed by the end of September in each year covered by the Performance Partnership Agreement. RIDEM annual assessments (also known as “End-of-Year” Progress Reports) will strive to summarize results, track progress on identified P&C List Commitments, and Areas for Collaboration, identify areas where progress met or exceeded expectations, as well as areas where there may have been difficulty in achieving projected outcomes. RIDEM and EPANE agree to develop (and to continuously improve) a process for jointly evaluating and reporting progress and accomplishments that comply with 40 CFR Part 31.115.
Sample 1
AutoNDA by SimpleDocs

Related to Reporting & Measures for Evaluating Performance

  • EVALUATING PERFORMANCE 7.1 The Performance Plan (Annexure A) to this Agreement sets out: 7.1.1 the standards and procedures for evaluating the Employee’s perfor- xxxxx; and 7.1.2 the intervals for the evaluation of the Employee’s performance. 7.2 Despite the establishment of agreed intervals for evaluation, the Employer may in addition review the Employee’s performance at any stage while the contract of employment remains in force. 7.3 Personal growth and development needs identified during any performance review discussion must be documented in a Personal Development Plan as well as the actions agreed to and implementation must take place within set time frames. 7.4 The Employee’s performance will measured in terms of contributions to the goals and strategies set out in the Employer’s IDP. 7.5 The annual performance appraisal will involve: 7.5.1. Assessment of the achievement of results as outlined in the perfor- xxxxx plan: (a) Each KPA should be assessed according to the extent to which the specified standards or performance indicators have been met and with due regard to ad hoc tasks that had to be performed under the KPA. (b) An indicative rating on the five-point scale should be provided for each KPA. (c) The applicable assessment rating calculator (refer to paragraph 7.5.3. below) must then be used to add the scores and calculate a final KPA score.

  • Benchmarks for Measuring Accessibility For the purposes of this Agreement, the accessibility of online content and functionality will be measured according to the W3C’s Web Content Accessibility Guidelines (WCAG) 2.0 Level AA and the Web Accessibility Initiative Accessible Rich Internet Applications Suite (WAI-ARIA) 1.0 for web content, which are incorporated by reference.

  • Covenants of Performance Measurement No interference. Registry Operator shall not interfere with measurement Probes, including any form of preferential treatment of the requests for the monitored services. Registry Operator shall respond to the measurement tests described in this Specification as it would to any other request from an Internet user (for DNS and RDDS) or registrar (for EPP). ICANN testing registrar. Registry Operator agrees that ICANN will have a testing registrar used for purposes of measuring the SLRs described above. Registry Operator agrees to not provide any differentiated treatment for the testing registrar other than no billing of the transactions. ICANN shall not use the registrar for registering domain names (or other registry objects) for itself or others, except for the purposes of verifying contractual compliance with the conditions described in this Agreement. PUBLIC INTEREST COMMITMENTS Registry Operator will use only ICANN accredited registrars that are party to the Registrar Accreditation Agreement approved by the ICANN Board of Directors on 27 June 2013 in registering domain names. A list of such registrars shall be maintained by ICANN on ICANN’s website. (Intentionally omitted. Registry Operator has not included commitments, statements of intent or business plans provided for in its application to ICANN for the TLD.) Registry Operator agrees to perform the following specific public interest commitments, which commitments shall be enforceable by ICANN and through the Public Interest Commitment Dispute Resolution Process established by ICANN (posted at xxxx://xxx.xxxxx.xxx/en/resources/registries/picdrp), which may be revised in immaterial respects by ICANN from time to time (the “PICDRP”). Registry Operator shall comply with the PICDRP. Registry Operator agrees to implement and adhere to any remedies ICANN imposes (which may include any reasonable remedy, including for the avoidance of doubt, the termination of the Registry Agreement pursuant to Section 4.3(e) of the Agreement) following a determination by any PICDRP panel and to be bound by any such determination. Registry Operator will include a provision in its Registry-Registrar Agreement that requires Registrars to include in their Registration Agreements a provision prohibiting Registered Name Holders from distributing malware, abusively operating botnets, phishing, piracy, trademark or copyright infringement, fraudulent or deceptive practices, counterfeiting or otherwise engaging in activity contrary to applicable law, and providing (consistent with applicable law and any related procedures) consequences for such activities including suspension of the domain name. Registry Operator will periodically conduct a technical analysis to assess whether domains in the TLD are being used to perpetrate security threats, such as pharming, phishing, malware, and botnets. Registry Operator will maintain statistical reports on the number of security threats identified and the actions taken as a result of the periodic security checks. Registry Operator will maintain these reports for the term of the Agreement unless a shorter period is required by law or approved by ICANN, and will provide them to ICANN upon request. Registry Operator will operate the TLD in a transparent manner consistent with general principles of openness and non-discrimination by establishing, publishing and adhering to clear registration policies.

  • Performance Evaluations The Contractor is subject to an annual performance evaluation to be conducted by NYCDOT pursuant to the PPB Rules.

  • Ongoing Performance Measures The Department intends to use performance-reporting tools in order to measure the performance of Contractor(s). These tools will include the Contractor Performance Survey (Exhibit H), to be completed by Customers on a quarterly basis. Such measures will allow the Department to better track Vendor performance through the term of the Contract(s) and ensure that Contractor(s) consistently provide quality services to the State and its Customers. The Department reserves the right to modify the Contractor Performance Survey document and introduce additional performance-reporting tools as they are developed, including online tools (e.g. tools within MFMP or on the Department's website).

  • SCHEDULE FOR PERFORMANCE REVIEWS 7.1 The performance of the Employee in relation to his performance agreement shall be reviewed for the following quarters with the understanding that the reviews in the first and the third quarter may be verbal if performance is satisfactory:

  • Metrics Institutional Metrics System-Wide Metrics

  • Annual Performance Evaluation On either a fiscal year or calendar year basis, (consistently applied from year to year), the Bank shall conduct an annual evaluation of Executive’s performance. The annual performance evaluation proceedings shall be included in the minutes of the Board meeting that next follows such annual performance review.

  • Performance Reporting The State of California is required to submit the following financial reports to FEMA:

  • Performance Measure Grantee will adhere to the performance measures requirements documented in

Draft better contracts in just 5 minutes Get the weekly Law Insider newsletter packed with expert videos, webinars, ebooks, and more!