Short-Term Effectiveness, Worker Risk and Community Sample Clauses

Short-Term Effectiveness, Worker Risk and Community. Impact This difference is entirely driven by volume and therefore schedule. Again, the checks suggest Alt 2 is three times better than Alt 4, but the difference is an additional 7 months of remediation (14% longer). The text for these is identical with the exception of the three numbers; area, time, and volume. 3. Implementability This difference is entirely driven by volume and therefore schedule. Again, the checks suggest that Alt 2 is three times better than Alt 4, but the difference is an additional 56,00 CY (15% more volume). In addition, the preliminary footprints suggest that the additional area in the Alt 4 footprint tends to be around the outside of the Alt 2 footprint, suggesting that there may be some economies of scale (e.g., a few additional dredge cycles before having to relocate the dredge). There are no differences in the text for Implementability other than the volume. 265. 8.4.1 Specific 8-49 The text indicates that the alternatives are compared with each other based on their relative performance and degree of achievement of the NCP threshold criteria and primary balancing criteria. Compliance with the threshold criteria has no degree of achievement, only achievement or non-achievement, whereas there are degrees of attainment for the balancing criteria. Revise the text accordingly. 266. 8.4.2.1, Source Control Subsection Specific 8-50 This narrative should be revised to be compatible with the revised definition of source sediments. Also, the text provides the anticipated 2,3,7,8-TCDD SWAC following implementation of Alternative 5 but should also provide the anticipated total PCB SWAC. 267. 8.4.1.2, Compliance with ARARs Subsection Specific 8-50 Remove the following text of the first sentence: “, and with most chemical-specific ARARs.” No. Section General or Specific Page No. Comment 268. 8.4.2.1 Figure 8-6 Specific 8-51 Present the rates of change as half-lives computed over the entire projection period following construction for years 10 to 18 (see example below). The Mass/Mass-DW/Time or Mass/Volume/Time results presented do not allow an appropriate comparison between alternatives. For example, a 10 ppt per year change in the MNR SWAC is not nearly as significant as a 10 ppt per year change in a post remedy SWAC near 80 ppt. 269. 8.4.2.1, Source Control Subsection, Paragraph 3 Specific 8-51 After the fourth sentence add a sentence that expresses the rates at which SWACs decline for Alts 2, 3 and 4. 270. 8.4.2.1, Source Control Subsectio...
Sample 1
AutoNDA by SimpleDocs
Short-Term Effectiveness, Worker Risk and Community. Impact This difference is entirely driven by volume and therefore schedule. Again, the checks suggest Alt 2 is three times better than Alt 4, but the difference is an additional 7 months of remediation (14% longer). The text for these is identical with the exception of the three numbers; area, time, and volume.3. ImplementabilityThis difference is entirely driven by volume and therefore schedule. Again, the checks suggest that Alt 2 is three times better than Alt 4, but the difference is an additional 56,00 CY (15% more volume). In addition, the preliminary footprints suggest that the additional area in the Alt 4 footprint tends to be around the outside of the Alt 2 footprint, suggesting that there may be some economies of scale (e.g., a few additional dredge cycles before having to relocate the dredge). There are no differences in the text for Implementability other than the volume. metrics under long-term effectiveness and permanence: o For source control and recovery potential, use a 95% filled circle for Alternative 2. o For monitoring, maintenance, and ICs, use a 95% filled circle for Alternative 3 and an 85% filled circle for Alternative 4. • For reduction of toxicity, mobility, or volume through treatment, use a 50% filled circle for Alternatives 2 and 3, and a 55% filled circle for Alternative 4. • For short-term effectiveness, use a completely filled circle for Alternative 2, a 95% filled circle for Alternative 3, and a 85% filled circle for Alternative 4. Also make the following revisions for the metrics under short-term effectiveness: o For time to achieve RAOs, use a completely filled circle for Alternative 2, a 95% filled circle for Alternative 3, and a 90% filled circle for Alternative 4. o For worker risk and community impact, use a completely filled circle for Alternative 2, a 95% filled circle for Alternative 3, and a 85% filled circle for Alternative 4. o For resuspension, use a completely filled circle for each alternative. o For downstream and upstream transport, use a completely filled circle for each alternative. • For implementability, use a completely filled circle for Alternative 2, a 95% filled circle for Alternative 3, and an 85% filled circle for Alternative 4. • For cost, in addition to showing the numerical value, use a completely filled circle for Alternative 2, a 95% filled circle for Alternative 3, and a 90% filled circle for Alternative 4. General description from EPA of Table 8-7 scoring process (for general information o...
Sample 1

Related to Short-Term Effectiveness, Worker Risk and Community

  • SHORT-TERM ILLNESS AND INJURY AND LONG-TERM DISABILITY Employees shall be entitled to coverage for short term illness and injury and long term disability in accordance with agreed upon regulations which will be subject to review and revision during the period of this Agreement by negotiations between the Parties and included as Appendix A to this Agreement.

  • SHORT TERM SICKNESS PLAN 37.1 A full time employee who is unable to attend to his or her duties due to sickness or injury is entitled, in each calendar year, to leave of absence,

  • Occupational Safety and Health Acts Contractor(s) who perform any work under this contract shall fully comply with the provisions of the Federal Occupational Safety and Health Act of 1970 and any amendments thereto and regulations pursuant to the act. Any Contractor who fails to do so may be terminated for cause as set forth below.

  • Extended Health Benefit Plan (a) All regular and probationary employees after three (3) months employment will be covered by a one hundred percent (100%) Extended Health Benefit Plan with the standard $100.00 deductible. The City will pay eighty percent (80%) of the costs and the twenty percent (20%) deduction for employees shall be made through payroll deductions. The extended health lifetime maximum will be $1,000,000.

  • Occupational Health and Safety Act The Employer, the Union and the employees agree to be bound by the provisions of the Occupational Health and Safety Act, S.N.S. 1996, c.7.

  • COMPLIANCE WITH OCCUPATIONAL SAFETY AND HEALTH By submission of a bid in response to this solicitation, the Bidder certifies that all material, equipment, etc., contained in their bid meets all OSHA requirements. Bidder further certifies that if they are the awarded Contractor, and the material, equipment, etc., delivered is subsequently found to be deficient in any OSHA requirements in effect on date of delivery, all costs necessary to bring the material, equipment, etc., into compliance with the aforementioned requirements shall be borne by the Contractor.

  • OCCUPATIONAL SAFETY AND HEALTH The parties desire to deal with safety and health complaints, and to attempt to correct any health or safety violations, internally. Accordingly, neither the Association nor an employee may file a complaint alleging a health or safety violation with the Ohio Department of Industrial Relations pursuant to R.C. §4167.10 until the following process has been completely exhausted:

  • Drug Free Workplace Act The Contractor will assure a drug-free workplace in accordance with 45 CFR Part 76.

  • Short Term Layoff In the event of short term layoffs (a layoff of less than thirteen (13) weeks) the Employer will determine the shift(s) and classification(s) in which the layoffs will occur. The parties can agree to alternative methods of reduction of hours if time permits.

  • SECTION 109 OF THE HOUSING AND COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT ACT OF 1974 The Contractor shall comply with the provisions of Section 109 of the Housing and Community Development Act of 1974. No person in the United States shall on the grounds of race, color, national origin, or sex be excluded from participation in, be denied the benefits of, or be subjected to discrimination under any program or activity funded in whole or in part with funds made available under this title. Section 109 further provides that discrimination on the basis of age under the Age Discrimination Act of 1975 or with respect to an otherwise qualified handicapped individual as provided in Section 504 of the Rehabilitation Act of 1973, as amended, is prohibited.

Time is Money Join Law Insider Premium to draft better contracts faster.