Third Party Oversight Organization. The Discharger shall cover the full costs of project oversight. Oversight costs are not considered part of the project’s direct cost. The Discharger shall use the San Francisco Estuary Partnership (SFEP) to provide third party oversight for this project and shall pay SFEP’s invoice for oversight services, which will be sent to the Discharger after the Stipulated Order becomes effective. If the Executive Officer extends the SEP Completion Date past June 30, 2021, the Discharger shall be responsible for any additional oversight costs incurred as a result of the extension. For oversight of the project, SFEP will report directly to the Regional Water Board. All reports shall be emailed to the following: Xxxxxx Xxxxxxxxxx San Francisco Estuary Partnership 000 Xxxxx Xxxxxx, Suite 700 San Francisco, CA 00000 (000) 000-0000 Xxxxxx.Xxxxxxxxxx@xxxxxxxxx.xxx Xxxxx Xxxxx Water Resources Control Engineer San Francisco Bay Regional Water Quality Control Board 0000 Xxxx Xxxxxx, 00xx Xxxxx Xxxxxxx, XX 00000 Xxxxx.Xxxxx@xxxxxxxxxxx.xx.xxx (510) 622-23 Xxxxxxx Xxxxxx State Water Resources Control Board Office of Enforcement 000 X Xxxxxx, 00xx Xxxxx Xxxxxxxxxx, XX 00000 (000) 000-0000
Third Party Oversight Organization. The District will contract with the San Francisco Estuary Partnership or other non- governmental organization, as approved by the Water Board, who is qualified to perform oversight services. All reports must be sent to the following: Xxxxxx Xxxxxx San Francisco Estuary Partnership 0000 Xxxx Xxxxxx, Xxxxx 0000 Oakland, CA 94612 (000) 000-0000 xxxxxxx@xxxxxxxxxxx.xx.xxx Basic Information
Third Party Oversight Organization. EBMUD shall cover the full costs of project oversight. Oversight costs are not considered part of the project’s direct cost. EBMUD shall use SFEP to provide third party oversight for this project and shall pay SFEP’s invoice for oversight services, which will be sent to EBMUD after the Stipulated Order becomes effective. If the Executive Officer extends the ECA Completion Date past September 30, 2020, EBMUD shall be responsible for any additional oversight costs incurred as a result of the extension. For oversight of the project, SFEP will report directly to the Regional Water Board. All reports shall be emailed to the following: Xxxxxx Xxxxxxxxxx Xxxxxxx Xxxx San Francisco Estuary Partnership Regional Water Board 000 Xxxxx Xxxxxx, Suite 000 0000 Xxxx Xxxxxx, Xxxxx 0000 San Francisco, CA 94105 Oakland, CA 94612 (000) 000-0000 (000) 000-0000
Third Party Oversight Organization. The District will contract with the San Francisco Estuary Partnership or other non-governmental organization, as approved by the Water Board, who is qualified to perform oversight services. Figure 1. Stream Maintenance Program Stream Reaches Flood Zone 3A Sonoma Valley
Third Party Oversight Organization. The City of Oakland will hire the San Francisco Estuary Partnership to perform the required third party oversight with funding from the City of Oakland.
Third Party Oversight Organization. The District will use SFEP to provide oversight for this SEP. SFEP has extensive experience overseeing SEP implementation in the San Francisco Bay Region. The District shall reimburse SFEP for oversight; such costs shall not be part of the cost of the SEP. For SEP oversight, SFEP shall report directly to the Regional Water Board. In case of a time extension of this SEP, additional oversight fees shall be paid to SFEP. All reports will be sent to the following: Xxxxxx Xxxxxxxxxx San Francisco Estuary Partnership Bay Area Metro Center 000 Xxxxx Xxxxxx, Suite 700 San Francisco, CA 94105 Xxxxxx.Xxxxxxxxxx@xxxxxxxxx.xxx (000) 000-0000 Xxxxx Xxxxx Water Resources Control Engineer San Francisco Bay Regional Water Quality Control Board 0000 Xxxx Xxxxxx, 00xx Xxxxx Xxxxxxx, XX 00000 Xxxxx.Xxxxx@xxxxxxxxxxx.xx.xxx (000) 000-0000 Xxxxxxx Xxxxxx State Water Resources Control Board Office of Enforcement 000 X Xxxxxx, 00xx Xxxxx Xxxxxxxxxx, XX Xxxxxxx.Xxxxxx@xxxxxxxxxxx.xx.xxx (000) 000-0000
Third Party Oversight Organization. None anticipated at this time. Stipulated Order R5-2021-0503 C - 1 Attachment C: Economic Benefit Calculator Economic Benefit Analysis Xxxxxxx SSO – Caltrans/City of Xxxxxxx/CCFG One Time Non-Depreciable Expenditure Compliance Action Amount Basis Date Delayed? Non-Compliance Date Compliance Date Penalty Payment Date Discount Rate Benefit of Non-Compliance Project Standby/Equipment Idling $12,660 CCI 3/1/2021 No 2/1/2021 Blank Cell 3/1/2021 7.70% 9,023 Income Tax Schedule: For Profit (Other than C-Corporation) Total Benefit $9,023 USAEPA BEN Model Version Version 2020.0.0 (June 2020) Analyst Xxxxx Xxxxx Date/Time of Analysis 1/14/2021 16:46 Assumptions: 1. Cost estimate based on two days of project standby and equipment idling due to SSO investigation and repair. Estimates include 4 field staff @ $150 per hour (assumes 8 hours per day), 1 excavator @ $750 per day, 1 backhoe @ $337 per day, 1 light stand @ $30/day, and 3 work trucks @ $100 per day.
Third Party Oversight Organization. To ensure completion of commitments and appropriate expenditure of funds, oversight and audit of the project will be conducted by the San Francisco Estuary Partnership (SFEP). All reports must be sent to the following: Xxxxxx Xxxxxx San Francisco Estuary Partnership 0000 Xxxx Xxxxxx, Xxxxx 0000 Oakland, CA 94612 (000) 000-0000 xxxxxxx@xxxxxxxxxxx.xx.xxx 1647276.1 ATTACHMENT C Project Name: Marine Mammal Center’s Intensive Care and Quarantine Unit - Shade Structure for Three In-Ground Pools Project Developed by: City of San Bruno Project to be Performed by: The Marine Mammal Center Contact: Xxxx Xxxxxxxx Director of Life Support and Facilities The Marine Mammal Center 0000 Xxxxxx Xxxx Xxxx Xxxxxxxxx Xxxxxxxxx, CA 94965 000 000-0000 work 000 000-0000 cell 000 000-0000 fax xxxxxxxxx@xxxx.xxx Compliance with SEP Criteria:
Third Party Oversight Organization. The SFPUC proposes to use the SFEP to provide oversight of funding for this SEP. SFEP has extensive experience overseeing SEP implementation in the San Francisco Bay Region. The SFPUC shall reimburse the SFEP for oversight; such costs shall not be part of the cost of the SEP. For oversight of the SEP, the SFEP shall report directly to the Regional Water Board. Attachment: Schematic Design and 60% Construction Document for the Visitor Interpretive Center Yosemite Slough North Park Improvements 60% Design Review Meeting 10 am to 12 pm California State Parks Xxx Xxxxx, Xxxxx Xxxxxxxxx, Xxx Xxxxxx, Xxxxxxx Xxxxxxx, Xxxxxx Xxxxxxxxx, Xxxx Xxxx, Xxxx Xxxxxxxx, Xxx Xxxx California State Parks Foundation: Xxxxxxxxx Xxxxxxxxx, Xxxxxxx Xxxxxxxx, Xxxxx Xxxxx WRA, Inc. – Lead Consultant: Xxxxxxx Xxxxxxxx, Xxxxxx Xxxxxxxxx, Xxxxxxxxx Xxxxxxxxx Xxxxxxx Partners – Architects: Xxxxxxx Xxxxxxxxx, Xxxxx Xxxxx, Xxxx Xxxxxxx
Third Party Oversight Organization. 16. San Francisco Estuary Partnership will provide third-party oversight for this project. Eastern Creekside Xxxxx Culvert Enlargement - Estimated Budget WRA Stetson Avocet Fees OtherContractor TOTAL Task 1: Characterize Site 1a Prepare DEM 4,000 4,000 1b Evaluate Soils 2,400 2,400 1c Map Jurisdictional Wetlands and Vegetation 4,300 4,300 Task 2: Develop Criteria for Xxxxx Design 2a Identify Criteria for Biological Resources 2,100 1,200 3,300 2b Identify Flooding Threshold 1,500 1,500 Task 3: Design Channels and Culvert 3a Build XXXX XXXXX Hydraulic Models 6,000 6,000 3b Design Channels Using XXXX XXXXX 3,000 3,000 3c Design Culvert Using XXXX XXXXX 2,000 2,000 3d Evaluate Benefits and Report Models Results 4,500 4,500 3e Prepare 50% Designs for Culvert and Xxxxx 19,000 19,000 3f Develop Planting and Public Access Plan 6,000 6,000 Task 4: Conduct Environmental Review and Obtain Permits 4a Evaluate Response to Climate Change 3,000 3,000 4b Prepare BA 5,000 2,000 440 7,440 4c Prepare CEQA Document (Friends & MC Parks) 5,000 2,000 2,500 9,500 4d Prepare JARPA Documents (Friends) 1,000 5,000 5,000 11,000 4e Respond to Comments 4,400 2,000 220 6,620 Design and Permitting Subtotal 30,200 54,000 1,860 7,500 93,560 Task 5: Install Larger Culvert 5a Conduct Land Surveys 2,310 2,310 5b Prepare 80% and Final Culvert Designs 12,000 12,000 5c Support Construction 14,000 14,000 5d Install Larger Culvert 116,000 116,000 5e Conduct Compliance Monitoring 1,000 1,000 Task 6: Relocate Plants 6a Prepare Bare Areas 2,500 2,500 6b Plant Salvaged Material - Task 7: Monitor and Report - 7a Conduct Photo-documentation - 7b Prepare Quarterly Reports 7c Monitor Implementation 5,000 5,000 7d Monitor Effectiveness 3,000 3,000 7e Monitor Planting - 7f Prepare Final Report - Task 8: Manage Project (Friends) Construction and Monitoring Subtotal 1,000 36,310 - - 118,500 - 155,810 TOTAL 31,200 90,310 1,860 7,500 118,500 249,370 California Regional Water Quality Control Board San Francisco Bay Region Xxxxxxx Xxxxxxxxx Secretary for Environmental Protection 0000 Xxxx Xxxxxx, Xxxxx 0000, Xxxxxxx, Xxxxxxxxxx 00000 (000) 000-0000 • Fax (000) 000-0000 xxxx://xxx.xxxxxxxxxxx.xx.xxx/sanfranciscobay Xxxxxx X. Xxxxx, Xx. Governor TO: Xxxxx Xxxxxxxx Staff Counsel Office of Enforcement State Water Resources Control Board FROM: Xxxxxxx Xxxxxxxxxx, P.E. Reviewed and Approved By: Sr. Water Resources Control Engineer NPDES Enforcement Section San Francisco Bay Regional Water Quality Control Board DATE: De...
