Title of Deliverable Sample Clauses

Title of Deliverable. Report on existing curricula, according to ECVET/learning outcomes, VET and career pathways concerning HHCPs WP related to the Deliverable: Wp2 Dissemination Level: (PU/PP/RE/CO)*: PU Nature of the Deliverable: (R/P/D/O)**: R Actual Date of Delivery to the CEC: 01/08/2016 WP responsible for the Deliverable: OMNIA WP starting month 1 WP ending month 10 Partner Contributor(s): OMNIA, SI4LIFE, LIGURIA REGION, SUPER, FNBE, GGALLERY, UVA, ARS, VE II Partner Reviewer(s): Si4LIFE *Dissemination Level: **Nature of Deliverables: PU=Public R=Report CO=Confidential, only for members of the Alliance (including Commission Services). P=Prototype PP=Restricted to external subjects in confidential mode (including Commission Services) D=Demonstrator RE=Restricted to a group specified by the Alliance (including Commission Services). O=Other 1 ABSTRACT: The Document collects the main results of Task 2.3. Within the activities of WP2, aimed at collecting and mapping background information for the design of the EU Framework in WP3, Task 2.3 is aimed at the identification of existing curricula for HHCPs in the three countries involved in the Project (Italy, Finland and Spain), with a special focus on VET courses providing specific competencies for homecare sector; for these latest courses an analysis of learning objectives will be provided, according to ECVET terminology. As introductive sections, an overview on ECVET and EQF classifications will be provided and specific paragraphs will be devoted to depict the application of these classifications in the analyzed countries. 2 KEYWORDS: EQF, ECVET, HHCP – Home Health Care Practitioners, Learning Outcomes, Curricula, Learning pathway, Learning Objectives, Career pathway, 3 LIST OF BENEFICIARIES (PP-RE)/PARTICIPANTS (PU-CO)*** Ben. No. Beneficiary Name Short Name Country 1 Si4Life – Scienza e Impresa Insieme per Migliorare la Qualità xxxxx Xxxx s.c.r.l. Si4Life Italy 2 Regione Liguria Liguria Region Italy 3 Ggallery s.r.l. GGallery Italy 4 I.T.C. “Xxxxxxxx Xxxxxxxx XX-Xxxxxxx” VE-II Italy 5 AGE-Platform AGE Belgium 6 OMNIA OMNIA Finland 7 Finnish National Board of Education FNBE Finland 8 Super SUPER Finland 9 Ayuntamiento de Valladolid AYTO Spain 10 Universidad de Valladolid UVA Spain 11 Sociedad de Geriatría y Gerontología de Castilla y Xxxx SGGCYL Spain 12 Associazione Polo Tecnico Professionale Professioni Vita Pro. Vi Hub Italy 13 Azienda Regionale Sanitaria Ligure ARS Italy 14 Royal Cornwall Hospitals Trust RCHT UK 15 United...
Sample 1
AutoNDA by SimpleDocs
Title of Deliverable. Final update of the Euro-NF vision regarding the network of the future Contractual Due Date : April, 2012 Actual Date of Completion : June, 2012 Workpackage contributing to the Deliverable : SEA 10.1 – Euro-NF Vision Lead Contractor for this Deliverable : UNI WIEN (partner 04) and BTH (partner 11) Editor{s} : Xxxx Xxxxxxxx and Xxxxxx Xxxxxxx Nature of the Deliverable : (R/P/D/O)* R Dissemination Level : (PU, PP, RE, CO)** PU *Nature: R-report, P-prototype, D-demonstrator, O-other **Dissemination: PU-public, PP-restricted to programme, RE- restricted to a group, CO-confidential Project URL: xxxx://xxx.xxxxxx.xxx With contributions from the following partners: Partner Number Partner Acronym Contributor Name Contributor e-mail address 01 GET Xxxxxx Xxxxxx xxxxxx.xxxxxx@xxxxxxx-xxxxxxxxx.xx 01 GET Xxxx-Xxxx Xxxxxxx xxxxxxxxx@xxxxxx-xxxxxxx-xxxxxxxx.xx 10 UWUERZ Xxxxx Xxxx Gia xxxxxxx@xxxxxxxxxx.xxx-xxxxxxxxx.xx 11 BTH Xxxxxx Xxxxxxx xxxxxx.xxxxxxx@xxx.xx 13 AUEB-RC Xxxxxx Xxxxxxx xxxxxxx@xxxx.xx 30 INESC-ID Xxxxxxx Xxxxxx xxxxxxx.xxxxxx@xxxxx-xx.xx 34 AU Xxxxxxxx Xxxxxxxxxxxx xxxxxxxx@xxx.xx.xx FOREWORD: The so-called Euro-NF vision is the result of a long-term continuous brainstorming initiated during the former project Euro-NGI (a Network of Excellence supported by the European Commission through FP6 between 2003 and 2012). An initial document [1] was produced in May 2006, and then regularly discussed and updated until the release of the First Update [2] in July 2009, followed by a Second Update [3] in December 2010, focusing on architectural issues and (r-)evolutionary approaches. The present document can be seen as a snapshot of the evolution of our views on how to extrapolate and anticipate future networking technologies and challenges, rather than providing a detailed and technically exhaustive vision. Thus, it has to be considered as complementary to its predecessors and is labelled with a version date. Moreover, being extendable and adaptive to trends, which cannot currently be foreseen, is a major feature of the Euro-NF vision and reflects also the Euro-NF ability to address emerging networking issues in a very timely manner. On this background, merely examples of future technological focus areas are provided. [1] Euro-NGI Network of Excellence, FP6 Project N° 507613, Deliverable N° D.WP.SEA.10.1.1, “A View on Future Communications”, May 2006, available at: xxxx://xxxxxxx.xxxx.xx/p_en_Publicat_ngiview_366.html [2] Euro-NF Network of Excellence, FP7 Gr...
Sample 1
Title of Deliverable. Impact Assessment of DOREMI output on Health care system of EU27 WP related to the Deliverable: WP7 Dissemination Level: (PU/PP/RE/CO)*: PU Nature of the Deliverable: (R/P/D/O)**: R Contractual Date of Delivery to the CEC: 31/10/2016 Actual Date of Delivery to the CEC: 31/10/2016 WP responsible for the Deliverable: UOC Author(s): Xxxxx Xxxxx (UOC), Xxxxxxx Xxxxxxxxxxxx (UOC), Xxxxxxxxx Xxxxxx (UOC), Xxxxxxxxx Xxxxxxxx- Xxxxxxxxxx (UOC) Contributor(s): All Partners Reviewer(s): - *Dissemination Level: PU=Public PP=Restricted to other program participants (including Commission Services) RE=Restricted to a group specified by the consortium (including Commission Services). CO=Confidential, only for members of the consortium (including Commission Services). **Nature of Deliverables: R=Report P=Prototype D=Demonstrator O=Other oremi Abstract This deliverable performs an Impact Assessment of the potential impact of DOREMI on EU health systems, applying an extrapolation accounting framework model. It examines DOREMI expected benefits in the form of savings in hospitalisation costs and reduced mortality. It also constructs a break-even indicator to compare expected benefits from DOREMI with its costs.
Sample 1
Title of Deliverable. Web-­‐based environment design of joint curricula for collaborative WP related to the Deliverable: 3 Dissemination Level: (PU/PP/RE/CO)*: PU Nature of the Deliverable: (R/P/D/O)**: R Actual Date of Delivery to the CEC: 31/01/2017 PARTNER responsible for the Deliverable: UVA WP starting month 7 WP ending month 34 Partner Contributor(s): Si4Life, OMNIA, UVA Partner Reviewer(s): *Dissemination Level: PU=Public CO=Confidential, only for members of the Alliance (including Commission Services). PP=Restricted to external subjects in confidential mode (including Commission Services) RE=Restricted to a group specified by the Alliance (including Commission Services). **Nature of Deliverables: R=Report P=Prototype D=Demonstrator O=Other 1 ABSTRACT: This report provides the description of the web-­‐based solution for supporting the collaborative creation of instructional designs for flexible and pedagogically sound VET pathways. The proposed web-­‐based solution will be used for the definition of the three planned CARESS national pilots based on a first release of the developed EU Framework for VET in the field of homecare. This report will provide a technical description of the learning design environment that provides the basis for the developed web-­‐based solution. It will also describe a set of guidelines for using the CARESS Framework in instructional design processes. Finally, the report will detail how those guidelines will be incorporated in the learning design environment in the form of instructional templates specific for the VET health homecare domain.
Sample 1
Title of Deliverable. Dissemination activities report WP related to the Deliverable: WP7 Dissemination Level: (PU/PP/RE/CO)*: PU Nature of the Deliverable: (R/P/D/O)**: R Contractual Date of Delivery to the CEC: 30/04/2015 Actual Date of Delivery to the CEC: 11/05/2015 Author(s): Xxxxxxxx Xxxxx, Xxxxxxx Xxxxxx (CNR-­‐IFC) Xxxxxx Xxxxx, Xxxxxx Xxxxxxxx (AGE), Xxxxxxxxx Xxxxxxxx-­‐Xxxxxxxxxx (UOC), Contributor(s): All Partners Reviewer(s): ICT / Specific Targeted Research Projects (STReP) FP7-611650 DELIVERABLE D7.6 Title
Sample 1
Title of Deliverable. Definition of HHCPs training needs in terms of learning outcomes to be achieved according to XXXXX WP related to the Deliverable: WP2 Dissemination Level: (PU/PP/RE/CO)*: PU Nature of the Deliverable: (R/P/D/O)**: R Actual Date of Delivery to the CEC: 12/09/2016 WP responsible for the Deliverable: OMNIA WP starting month: M1 WP ending month: M10 Partner Contributor(s): OMNIA, SI4LIFE, UVA, Regione Liguria, VE-II GGallery, SGGCYL, FNBE, SuPer, Xxx.Xx. Hub, ARS Partner Reviewer(s): SI4LIFE *Dissemination Level: **Nature of Deliverables: PU=Public R=Report CO=Confidential, only for members of the Alliance (including Commission Services). P=Prototype PP=Restricted to external subjects in confidential mode (including Commission Services) D=Demonstrator RE=Restricted to a group specified by the Alliance (including Commission Services). O=Other The European Commission support for the production of this publication does not constitute an endorsement of the contents which reflects the views only of the authors, and the Commission cannot be held responsible for any use which may be made of the information contained therein.
Sample 1
Title of Deliverable. DOREMI Portal WP related to the Deliverable: WP7 Dissemination Level: (PU/PP/RE/CO)*: PU Nature of the Deliverable: (R/P/D/O)**: R Contractual Date of Delivery to the CEC: 31/07/2014 Actual Date of Delivery to the CEC: 18/08/2014 WP responsible for the Deliverable: UOC Author(s): Xxxxxxxxx Xxxxxxxx-Xxxxxxxxxx (UOC), Xxxxxxxx Xxxxx, Xxxxxx Xxxxxxx (CNR-IFC) Contributor(s): Xxxxxxxx Xxxxx (CNR-IFC), Xxxxxx Xxxxx (AGE) Reviewer(s): Xxxxxxx Xxxxxx (CNR-IFC) *Dissemination Level: PU=Public PP=Restricted to other program participants (including Commission Services) RE=Restricted to a group specified by the consortium (including Commission Services). CO=Confidential, only for members of the consortium (including Commission Services). **Nature of Deliverables: R=Report P=Prototype D=Demonstrator O=Other Abstract
Sample 1
AutoNDA by SimpleDocs

Related to Title of Deliverable

  • Rejection of Deliverables The Department reserves the right to reject deliverables, as outlined in the Grant Work Plan, as incomplete, inadequate, or unacceptable due, in whole or in part, to Xxxxxxx’s lack of satisfactory performance under the terms of this Agreement. The Grantee’s efforts to correct the rejected deliverables will be at Xxxxxxx’s sole expense. Failure to fulfill the applicable technical requirements or complete all tasks or activities in accordance with the Grant Work Plan will result in rejection of the deliverable and the associated invoice. Payment for the rejected deliverable will not be issued unless the rejected deliverable is made acceptable to Department in accordance with the Agreement requirements. The Department, at its option, may allow additional time within which Grantee may remedy the objections noted by Department. The Grantee’s failure to make adequate or acceptable deliverables after a reasonable opportunity to do so shall constitute an event of default.

  • SCOPE OF DELIVERY Seller agrees to accept deliveries of natural gas belonging to Buyer at Seller's delivery point from the upstream pipeline located near Columbia, South Carolina, and to transport Buyer's gas and redeliver to Buyer. Service provided hereunder is in lieu of natural gas provided from Seller's system supply to satisfy Buyer's fuel requirements in Priority-of-Service Category 3C. Xxxxx agrees that the transportation service is provided on an interruptible basis. Interruptions of transportation service shall be at the sole discretion of Seller or whenever service is interrupted by any upstream pipeline.

  • Description of Deliverables The Contractor shall Perform as set forth in Exhibit A.

  • Acceptance of Deliverables The State’s Project Manager shall be responsible for the sign-off acceptance of all Deliverables required and performed/submitted pursuant to this Agreement. Upon successful completion of a Deliverable, Contractor shall provide the State’s Project Manager with a completed Acceptance and Signoff Form (Exhibit E). The State’s Project Manager will apply the standards established in Exhibit D and the acceptance criteria set forth in subparagraph B of this article, as appropriate, to determine the acceptability of the Deliverable provided by Contractor. If the State’s Project Manager rejects the Deliverable, the parties agree to any dispute(s) resulting from such rejection(s) will be resolved as set forth in this article. Acceptance Criteria for Deliverables (“Criteria”) provided by Contractor pursuant to this Agreement include: Timeliness: The Work was provided on time; according to schedule; Completeness: The Deliverable contained all of the, Data, Materials, and features required by the Agreement; and Technical accuracy: The Deliverable complied with the standards of this Agreement, or, if this Agreement lacks a standard for provision of the Work, the currently generally accepted industry standard. Contractor shall provide the Deliverable to the State, in accordance with direction from the Project Manager and as provided for in Exhibit D. The State shall accept the Deliverable, provided that Contractor has delivered the Deliverable in accordance with the Criteria. The State’s Project Manager shall assign the Acceptance and Signoff Form to notify Contractor of the Deliverable’s acceptability. If the State rejects the Deliverable provided, the State’s Project Manager shall submit to Contractor’s Project Manager a written rejection describing in detail the failure of the Deliverable as measured against the Criteria. If the State rejects the Deliverable, then Contractor shall have a period of ten (10) Business Days from receipt of the Notice of rejection to correct the stated failure(s) to conform to the Criteria.

  • Time of Delivery Any notice delivered personally or by fax during normal business hours at an address specified above shall be deemed to be received the same Business Day, and any notice sent by mail or otherwise will be deemed to be received on the following Business Day. Any Party shall be entitled to change its address for notice to an address elsewhere in Alberta by notice in writing to the other Parties.

  • OWNERSHIP AND USE OF DELIVERABLES The City shall own all rights, titles, and interests throughout the world in and to the deliverables.

  • Closing Deliverables (a) At the Closing, Seller shall deliver to Buyer the following:

  • WARRANTY – DELIVERABLES The Contractor warrants and represents that all deliverables sold the City under the Contract shall be free from defects in design, workmanship or manufacture, and conform in all material respects to the specifications, drawings, and descriptions in the Solicitation, to any samples furnished by the Contractor, to the terms, covenants and conditions of the Contract, and to all applicable State, Federal or local laws, rules, and regulations, and industry codes and standards. Unless otherwise stated in the Solicitation, the deliverables shall be new or recycled merchandise, and not used or reconditioned.

  • Terms of Delivery The Terms of Delivery are contained in the General Conditions of Contract (GCC) and Special Conditions of Contract.

  • Ownership of Deliverables Unless otherwise agreed in this Agreement, Contractor hereby assigns to the JBE ownership of all Deliverables, any partially-completed Deliverables, and related work product or materials. Contractor agrees not to assert any rights at common law, or in equity, or establish a copyright claim in any of these materials. Contractor shall not publish or reproduce any Deliverable in whole or part, in any manner or form, or authorize others to do so, without the written consent of the JBE.

Time is Money Join Law Insider Premium to draft better contracts faster.