XXXXXXX XXXXXXXXXXXX. Xxxxxx Xxxxxx
XXXXXXX XXXXXXXXXXXX. The Chargor shall
XXXXXXX XXXXXXXXXXXX. Xxxxx Xxxxxx United States
XXXXXXX XXXXXXXXXXXX. For the Republic of Bosnia and Herzegovina The Federation of Bosnia and Herzegovina, on behalf of its constituent peoples and citizens, approves the Constitution of Bosnia and Herzegovina at Annex 4 to the General Framework Agreement.
XXXXXXX XXXXXXXXXXXX. Xxxxxxx Xxxxxxxxxxxx" xxall mean any contribution to the capital of the Company in cash or property by a Member whenever made, including without limitation any payments made by a Member in satisfaction of any obligation of the Company.
XXXXXXX XXXXXXXXXXXX. Xxx Xxxxxx xxxxx xxx xx xxx Company on or before the Effective Date a Capital Contribution of $1,000.
XXXXXXX XXXXXXXXXXXX. In the context of the Gold Monetization Scheme of 2015 that aims at monetizing the household and temple gold in India, the paper explores the implications of this economic policy in understanding the cultural as well as legal meanings of temple gold. It does so by mapping the controversy and legal battle over the control of the Sree Xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx xxxxxx’x astounding gold possessions and a close reading of the judgments. The root of the controversy in the case emerged from the dispute over the wealth housed in the six xxxxxxxx of the temple’s basement. Who did this wealth belong to: the idol Sree Padmanabhaswamy or the royal family as his servants (xxxxx)? Since the world’s largest temple gold and gems collection was brought to the public eye in 2009 through a public interest litigation (PIL); the royal family, the State and the temple trust have been embroiled in the struggle for possession and control over this temple gold. Briefly outlining the history of how this temple gold was amassed and controlled, the paper traces the critical debates around the question of who is the rightful owner and manager of temple gold? This issue has emerged and changed since the High Court judgment in 2011. The authors ask and answer the question: What is the implication for cultural policy when precious material goods are defined as religious or non-religious cultural heritage? This question takes on another dimension when the cultural goods in question are estimated anywhere between 22 billion to one trillion dollars (and counting). This complex question of gold possession is characterized by the tussle between state control, temple trusts and the royal family’s hereditary historical right over the wealth as the servants of the deity. The paper maps the critical public and legal discourse to comment on (a) the question of religious rights on material possession (b) its implications for cultural policy and (c) temple gold and its monetization in a post-colonial democracy. This paper shows how notions of religious duty, kingship, and kinship emerged as clinching evidence in managing and accessing this sacred wealth and its redesignation. The case makes one rethink the question of management of temple gold and its secular-sacred status in India.
XXXXXXX XXXXXXXXXXXX. 0. Xxxxxx Xxxxxx
1.1 Neither the Certificates, the Guarantee nor the Dematerialised Certificates Guarantee (in the case of Dematerialised Certificates) have been or will be registered under the Securities Act, and the Certificates may not at any time be offered or sold within the United States or to, or for the account or benefit of, U.S. persons except in accordance with Regulation S or pursuant to an exemption from the registration requirements of the Securities Act. Each Dealer represents and agrees that it will not offer, sell or deliver any Certificates (a) as part of its distribution at any time or (b) otherwise until 40 days after the completion of the distribution, as determined and certified by the relevant Dealer or, in the case of an issue of Certificates on a syndicated basis, the relevant Lead Manager, of all Certificates of the Tranche of which such Certificates are a part, within the United States or to, or for the account or benefit of, U.S. persons. Each Dealer who has purchased Certificates of a Tranche hereunder (or in the case of a sale of a Tranche of Certificates issued to or through more than one Dealer, each of such Dealers as to the Certificates of such Tranche purchased by or through it or, in the case of a syndicated issue, the relevant Lead Manager) shall determine and certify to the Principal Paying Agent or (in the case of Dematerialised Certificates) the Italian Paying Agent and the Guarantor the completion of the distribution of the Certificates of such Tranche. On the basis of such notification or notifications, the Principal Paying Agent or (in the case of Dematerialised Certificates) the Italian Paying Agent or the Guarantor has agreed to notify such Dealer/Lead Manager of the end of the distribution compliance period with respect to such Tranche. Each Dealer also agrees that, at or prior to confirmation of sale of Certificates (other than a sale pursuant to Rule 144A), it will have sent to each distributor, dealer or person receiving a selling concession, fee or other remuneration that purchases Certificates from it during the distribution compliance period a confirmation or notice to substantially the following effect: "The Securities covered hereby have not been registered under the US Securities Act of 1933, as amended (the "Securities Act"), and may not be offered or sold within the United States or to, or for the account or benefit of, U.S. persons (i) as part of their distribution at any time or (ii) otherwise unti...
XXXXXXX XXXXXXXXXXXX. Xxx xxxxxxxxxxxxxx pertinent to this Contract shall be made in writing and shall be deemed effective upon receipt for personal delivery, or on the Business Day following the date of sending by facsimile and on the third Business Day following the date of sending by international courier service. In addition, invoices and Project status reports may be delivered via email to the Customers Program Managers.
XXXXXXX XXXXXXXXXXXX. By: Xxx Xxxxx AVP, Global Capital Excellence and Engineering Leader and Authorized Representative STATE OF IOWA ) ) ss COUNTY OF LINN ) On this day of , 2019, before me the undersigned, a Notary Public in and for said County, in said State, personally appeared Xxx Xxxxx, to me personally known, who, being by me duly sworn, did say that he is the AVP of Xxxxxxx, Xxxxxxxxxxxx and that said instrument was signed on behalf of said corporation; and acknowledged said instrument to be the free act and deed of said corporation by it voluntarily executed. Notary Public in and for State of Iowa My Commission Expires: Parcel A, Plat of Survey No. 2275 as recorded in Book 10133 Page 156 of the Linn County, Iowa Recorder on June 22, 2018. Lots 2 and 3, “Auditor’s Plat No. 212, Linn County, Iowa”, lying Northerly of the right-of-way of the Chicago and Northwestern Railway and Southerly of the Public Highway, subject to public highway. Lot 1 of “Auditor’s Plat No. 212, Linn County, Iowa”, lying Northeasterly of the Northerly line of the Chicago & Northwestern Railroad Company’s right of way, subject to the public highway. This Agreement is an environmental covenant executed pursuant to Chapter 455I of the Code of Iowa, as amended. THIS AGREEMENT FOR COVENANTS AND RESTRICTIONS (the “Agreement”), made on or as of December 17th, 2019, is executed by the XXXXXXX, XXXXXXXXXXXX (the "Grantor") in favor of the City of Cedar Rapids, Iowa, (the "Holder").
